Jomaili to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bin Laden Met with Iraqi Agents through Turabi’s Mediation

Salem al-Jomaili speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat.
Salem al-Jomaili speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat.
TT

Jomaili to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bin Laden Met with Iraqi Agents through Turabi’s Mediation

Salem al-Jomaili speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat.
Salem al-Jomaili speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraq came out “victorious” and exhausted after its long war with Iran. Saddam Hussein rejoiced because he lived long enough to see Khomeini reluctantly agree to a ceasefire without achieving his dream of toppling the Baath regime in Baghdad.

The general impression was that the regime would now be preoccupied with treating its wounds and paying back its massive debts. No one predicted that Saddam would make the suicidal move of invading Kuwait.

Tensions with Kuwait were no secret. They first emerged when Emir Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmad refused to sign a security agreement with Baghdad. However, the majority of observers never expected the crisis to lead to a full-blown invasion.

The unexpected took place in August 1990. In the early hours of August 2, the defense minister and chief of staff were summoned to the general command headquarters and informed that Republican Guards had infiltrated Kuwait overnight. Salem al-Jomaili, director of the US branch of the intelligence agency, heard the news of the invasion over the radio.

It was rumored at the time that only three people knew of the planned date of the invasion. They were Saddam, his son-in-law Hussein Kamel and relative Ali Hassan al-Majid.

Iraqi intelligence found itself confronted with a new reality. In an interview to Asharq Al-Awsat, al-Jomaili described the invasion as “the major mistake that broke the regime” and led to it being besieged, effectively destroying its economy and society and halting all development and growth. It also exposed the regime to various threats and dangers.

Iraq became an isolated island that was being choked by international resolutions, sanctions and damning condemnations. The American forces dealt Iraqi troops devastating losses and the Iraqi opposition found itself presented with opportunities they had never dreamed of.

Years later, the invasion of Kuwait would give the United States, under President George W. Bush, the excuse to invade Iraq in 2003. Washington used several excuses to justify its own invasion, such as Saddam’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction and his regime’s so-called ties to al-Qaeda. Al-Jomaili said Iran played a significant role in promoting fabricated claims against the regime.

There has long been speculation over whether Saddam’s regime had contacts with al-Qaeda.

Al-Jomaili was actually the Iraqi official who - through Syrian mediation - sent the first oral message from Iraq to al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who was living in Sudan at the time.

The first attempt at communication failed. Hassan Al-Turabi, leader of Sudan’s National Islamic Front and “godfather” of Omar al-Bashir's regime, then successfully intervened as a mediator that led to bin Laden agreeing to meeting with chief of Iraqi intelligence, Farouk Hijazi. Hijazi was executed in wake of the 2003 invasion.

Al-Jomaili recalled that Iraq and Saudi Arabia had reached a security agreement whereby both sides would refrain from meddling in each other’s affairs and from carrying out espionage and security activity on their territories. Relations were good, he added, but the agreement effectively collapsed with the invasion of Kuwait.

Information began to pour in that Saudi Arabia was in contact with the Iraqi opposition. “We sent an open letter to the president requesting that the security agreement with Saudi Arabia be annulled, but he refused,” added al-Jomaili. “He later requested that we send him a monthly report about the issue. He later concluded that Saudi Arabia had started to support regime change in Iraq.”

The president then ordered that all efforts be dedicated to undermining the American military presence in the region, continued al-Jomaili. When the president makes such an order, all concerned agencies do whatever they can to carry it out.

“At the time, I was director of the Syria branch of the intelligence agency. We enjoyed good ties with the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria that was led by Adnan Aqla,” he continued. Iraq sought to arrange a meeting with bin Laden, who had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Al-Jomaili met with a Muslim Brotherhood official in Baghdad seeking to convey a message to bin Laden that he and Iraq have a shared goal: getting the American troops out of the Arabian Peninsula and the region and that they can cooperate to this end.

The official delivered the message to the al-Qaeda leader, who refused to cooperate with Iraq, saying its regime was the reason why the American troops were deployed in the region in the first place. Bin Laden was adamant: there would be no meeting with his representatives or any cooperation with him.

This was during the early 1990s. Hijazi received a similar response from bin Laden when he sought contact with him through another channel.

“I later found out that Hijazi had traveled to Khartoum where he met with bin Laden through mediation by Turabi who was reportedly at the meeting,” al-Jomaili told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Hijazi came back empty-handed to Baghdad and al-Qaeda and the regime never ended up cooperating with al-Qaeda. George W. Bush was likely aware of this, but he refrained from mentioning it when he justified the US invasion of Iraq.



Israel Calls Countries Condemning New West Bank Settlements ‘Morally Wrong’

Newly constructed buildings are pictured in the Israeli settlement of Givat Zeev near the Palestinian city of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank on October 24, 2025. (AFP)
Newly constructed buildings are pictured in the Israeli settlement of Givat Zeev near the Palestinian city of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank on October 24, 2025. (AFP)
TT

Israel Calls Countries Condemning New West Bank Settlements ‘Morally Wrong’

Newly constructed buildings are pictured in the Israeli settlement of Givat Zeev near the Palestinian city of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank on October 24, 2025. (AFP)
Newly constructed buildings are pictured in the Israeli settlement of Givat Zeev near the Palestinian city of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank on October 24, 2025. (AFP)

Israel reacted furiously on Thursday to a condemnation by 14 countries including France and Britain of its approval of new settlements in the occupied West Bank, calling the criticism discriminatory against Jews.

"Foreign governments will not restrict the right of Jews to live in the Land of Israel, and any such call is morally wrong and discriminatory against Jews," Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said.

"The cabinet decision to establish 11 new settlements and to formalize eight additional settlements is intended, among other things, to help address the security threats Israel is facing."

On Sunday, Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced that authorities had greenlit the settlements, saying the move was aimed at preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Fourteen countries, including Britain, France, Germany, Spain and Canada, then issued a statement urging Israel to reverse its decision, "as well as the expansion of settlements".

Such unilateral actions, they said, "violate international law", and risk undermining a fragile ceasefire in Gaza in force since October 10.

They also reaffirmed their "unwavering commitment to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the two-state solution... where two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, live side-by-side in peace and security".

Israel has occupied the West Bank following the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

Excluding east Jerusalem, which was occupied and annexed by Israel in 1967, more than 500,000 Israelis live in the West Bank, along with about three million Palestinian residents.

Earlier this month, the United Nations said the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, all of which are illegal under international law, had reached its highest level since at least 2017.


Iraq Criminalizes Volunteering in Russia-Ukraine War

A photo circulated on social media shows a 24-year-old Iraqi who traveled to Russia to join its armed forces. (AFP)
A photo circulated on social media shows a 24-year-old Iraqi who traveled to Russia to join its armed forces. (AFP)
TT

Iraq Criminalizes Volunteering in Russia-Ukraine War

A photo circulated on social media shows a 24-year-old Iraqi who traveled to Russia to join its armed forces. (AFP)
A photo circulated on social media shows a 24-year-old Iraqi who traveled to Russia to join its armed forces. (AFP)

The Iraqi judiciary warned on Wednesday that people involved in the war between Russia and Ukraine will face jail as it attempts to crack down on the recruitment of Iraqis joining the conflict.

Faiq Zidan, the head of Iraq's Supreme Judicial Council, received on Wednesday National Security Advisor Qasim Al-Araji and members of a committee tasked with combating the recruitment of Iraqis.

Zaidan stressed that Iraq criminalizes any Iraqi who joins the armed forces of another nation without the approval of the government.

The judiciary does not have a fixed prison term for anyone accused of the crime, but a court in Najaf last week sentenced to life an Iraqi accused of human trafficking.

He was convicted of belonging to an international criminal gang that recruits Iraqis to fight for Russia in its war against Ukraine.

In November, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani ordered the formation of a committee, headed by Araji, to crack down on the recruitment of Iraqis to fight for the Russian and Ukrainian militaries.

Iraq does not have official figures detailing how many of its citizens have joined the war. Media reports said some 50,000 Iraqis have joined Russian ranks, while unofficial figures put the number at around 5,000, with 3,000 fighting for Russia and 2,000 for Ukraine.

The debate over the recruitment played out over the media between the Russian and Ukrainian ambassadors to Iraq.

Ukrainian Ambassador Ivan Dovhanych accused Russia of recruiting Iraqis. Last week, the Ukrainian government sent a letter to the Iraqi government about the recruitment.

It hailed Baghdad’s criminalization of such activity. The letter also revealed that Ukrainian authorities had arrested an Iraqi who was fighting for Russia.

Ukraine has denied that it has recruited Iraqis to join the conflict, but reports indicate otherwise.

Meanwhile, Russian Ambassador to Baghdad Elbrus Kutrashev acknowledged that Iraqi fighters had joined the Russian army.

Speaking to the media, he declined to give exact figures, but dismissed claims that they reached 50,000 or even 5,000, saying instead they number no more than a few hundred.

He confirmed that Iraqis had joined the Russian army and “that some four to five had lost their lives”.

He revealed that the Russian embassy in Baghdad had granted visas to Russia to the families of the deceased on humanitarian grounds.

Russian law allows any foreign national residing in Russia and who speaks Russian to join its army with a salary of around 2,500 to 3,000 dollars.

There have been mounting calls in Iraq for the authorities to crack down on human trafficking gangs.

Would-be recruits are often lured by the monthly salary and the possibility of gaining the Russian or Ukrainian nationality.

Critics of the authorities have said Iraqi youths are lured to join foreign wars given the lack of job opportunities in Iraq.


Somalia's Capital Votes in First Step toward Restoring Universal Suffrage

Members of the Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP) campaign in the streets as they share their political aims with voters in Mogadishu, Somalia, 22 December 2025. EPA/SAID YUSUF WARSAME
Members of the Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP) campaign in the streets as they share their political aims with voters in Mogadishu, Somalia, 22 December 2025. EPA/SAID YUSUF WARSAME
TT

Somalia's Capital Votes in First Step toward Restoring Universal Suffrage

Members of the Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP) campaign in the streets as they share their political aims with voters in Mogadishu, Somalia, 22 December 2025. EPA/SAID YUSUF WARSAME
Members of the Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP) campaign in the streets as they share their political aims with voters in Mogadishu, Somalia, 22 December 2025. EPA/SAID YUSUF WARSAME

Residents of Somalia's capital Mogadishu will vote on Thursday in municipal elections meant to pave the way for the East African country's first direct national polls in more than half a century.

With the exception of votes in the semi-autonomous region of Puntland and the breakaway region of Somaliland, Somalia last held direct elections in 1969, months before military general, Mohamed Siad Barre, took power in a coup, Reuters said.

After years of civil ‌war that ‌followed Barre's fall in 1991, indirect elections ‌were ⁠introduced in ‌2004. The idea was to promote consensus among rival clans in the face of an armed insurgency, although some Somalis say politicians prefer indirect elections because they create opportunities for corruption.

Under the system, clan representatives elect lawmakers, who then choose the president. The president, in turn, has been responsible for appointing Mogadishu's mayor.

The vote in Mogadishu, a ⁠city of some 3 million people where security conditions have improved in recent years ‌despite continuing attacks by al Qaeda-linked al ‍Shabaab militants, is seen as ‍a test run for direct elections at the national level.

Around ‍1,605 candidates are running on Thursday for 390 posts in Mogadishu's district councils, said Abdishakur Abib Hayir, a member of the National Electoral Commission. Council members will then choose a mayor.

"It shows Somalia is standing on its feet and moving forward," Hayir told Reuters. "After the local election, elections can and will take place in ⁠the entire country."

A 2024 law restored universal suffrage ahead of federal elections expected next year. However, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud reached a deal in August with some opposition leaders stipulating that while lawmakers would be directly elected in 2026, the president would still be chosen by parliament.

Opposition parties have argued the rapid introduction of a new electoral system would benefit Mohamud's re-election prospects.

They also question whether the country is safe enough for mass voting given al Shabaab's control over vast areas of the countryside and regular strikes ‌on major population centers.