Council of Arab Media Ministers in Rabat Discusses Anti-terrorism Strategies

The Arab ministers of information in Rabat. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The Arab ministers of information in Rabat. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Council of Arab Media Ministers in Rabat Discusses Anti-terrorism Strategies

The Arab ministers of information in Rabat. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The Arab ministers of information in Rabat. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Saudi Minister of Media Salman Al-Dosari said that the 53rd session of the Council of Arab Media Ministers held in the Moroccan capital, Rabat, would address highly significant issues namely sketching an anti-terrorism Arab media strategy.

Al-Dosari underscored Wednesday the need for a joint Arab mechanism to address online content that deviates from religious, and moral values, urging the development of effective mechanisms to deal with such online platforms.

He highlighted the Kingdom’s support for unity among Arabs, saying it hosted the 32nd Session of the Arab League Summit amid challenges in the Arab world and it resulted in issuing the Jeddah Declaration that stressed joint Arab work.

Moroccan Minister of Youth, Culture, and Communication Mohamed Mehdi Bensaid, who was chairing Wednesday’s session, said that Morocco under the leadership of King Mohammed VI exerts efforts to defend the legitimate rights of the Palestinians and the Islamic and Arab identity of Jerusalem.

Bensaid noted that Morocco is involved in joint Arab work, specifically in media.

The developments in media technology and communication are considered the “greatest challenge to the sector” in terms of the capability to go along with these developments and face international media competition.

The minister further highlighted the challenge of legal regulations in the Arab world which fail to go along with the technological developments witnessed in the media industry.

Chairman of the Supreme Council for Media Regulation (SCMR) Karam Gabr indicated that the Palestinian cause is at the forefront of the issues discussed during the meetings, alongside the continuation of the Arab media strategy, the plan of Arab media mobilization abroad, particularly with regard to the promotion of the Arab image and the role of the media in the fight against terrorism, and the Arab media map of sustainable development.

Gabr remarked that fighting terrorism and extremism in the media is equally important to fighting them militarily, calling for endorsing a clear media strategy against misleading information and rumors.

The SCMR chairman mentioned proposals to establish the Arab Institute for Peace Press, highlighting that it would reinforce the Arab League’s role in achieving peace in Arab communities and between Arab countries and the world.

Assistant Secretary-General and Head of the Media and Communications Sector of the League of Arab States Ambassador Ahmed Rashid Khattabi announced updating the joint anti-terrorism Arab media strategy and putting its executive plan in cooperation with Naif Arab University for Security Sciences.

In his speech, Khattabi stated that the Arab League General Secretariat attaches great importance to the Palestinian cause and defends the legal, historical, and spiritual situation of Jerusalem.

Khattabi affirmed that the Council’s desire to adopt the rules of procedure of the Arab Committee for Electronic Media and the classification by age group of electronic uses aims to protect children from unsafe practices that incite violence, extremism, and hatred, expressing his wish to see the Rabat session a beginning of the development of a clear common vision in terms of interaction with the largest digital companies.

Palestinian Minister of Information Nabil Abu Rudeineh stated that Israel is committing criminal acts in Jerusalem and Palestine, noting that the Palestinian Authority commits to international legitimacy and the Arab peace initiative.

In this context, he called for forming an international mechanism to disclose the Israeli forgery and attempts to Judaize Jerusalem.

Abu Rudeineh termed the situation as “dangerous” and requires Arab media support because Western public opinion has fallen victim to the Israeli fake media.

Moreover, the Arab information ministers hailed the efforts of King Mohammed VI in backing the Palestinian cause. The Council of Arab Information Ministers approved several resolutions on the Palestinian cause and Arab media situation.



Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)

Israel’s insistence that France can not be a member of the international committee that will monitor a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon is due to a series of French practices that have disturbed Israel recently, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed.
These practices are most notably attributed to the French judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, who has joined other judges to unanimously issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the sources revealed.
“The Israeli government is following with concern the French role at The Hague,” they said, noting that veteran French lawyer Gilles Devers led a team of 300 international lawyers of various nationalities who volunteered to accuse Israel of “committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
According to the Israeli Maariv newspaper, Israeli officials believe that Devers, who signed the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Galant, would not have dared to do so without having received a green light from French President Emmanuel Macron.
Israeli sources also mentioned other reasons for Israel’s anger at France, such as the government’s decision to bar Israeli firms from exhibiting at the Euronaval arms show near Paris earlier this month.
French officials have repeatedly said that Paris is committed to Israel's security and point out that its military helped defend Israel after Iranian attacks in April and earlier this month.
Paris has so far also refused to recognize the Palestinian state. But the Israeli government is not satisfied. It wants France to follow the United States and blindly support its war in Gaza and Lebanon.
Tel Aviv also feels incredibly confident that France should be punished, and therefore, decided that Paris could not participate in the Lebanese ceasefire agreement, knowing that the Israeli government itself has traveled to Paris several times begging for its intervention, especially during the war on Lebanon.
Meanwhile, an air of optimism has emerged in Israel around the chances for an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon following negotiations led by US envoy Amos Hochstein.
But any optimism relies on Netanyahu’s final decision. The PM is still conducting talks with his friends and allies of the far right who reject the ceasefire agreement and instead, demand that Lebanese citizens not be allowed to return to their villages on the border with Israel. They also request that a security belt be turned into a permanently depopulated and mined zone.
Hochstein Talks
Meanwhile, political sources in Israel claim that what is holding up a ceasefire deal so far is Lebanon. According to Israel's Channel 12, Hochstein expressed a “firm stance” during his talks with the Lebanese side. The envoy delivered clear terms that were passed on to Hezbollah, which the channel said “led to significant progress” in the talks.
Israeli officials said that Tel Aviv is moving towards a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon with Hezbollah in the coming days.
The channel said that during his late visit to Tel Aviv, coming from Beirut after talks with Speaker Nabih Barri, Hochstein said, “I placed before them (Lebanese officials) a final warning, and it seems to have been effective.”
Iran Obstacle
Despite the “positive atmosphere,” informed diplomatic sources pointed to a major obstacle: Iran.
Channel 12 quoted the sources as saying that Lebanon has not yet received the final approval required from Iran, which has significant influence over Hezbollah.

According to the draft proposal, the Lebanese Army must be redeployed to the south and carry out a comprehensive operation to remove weapons from villages. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will “supervise and monitor the implementation of the operation.”
Channel 12 said Israel believes that such details could still derail the agreement. It also said that Hezbollah could violate the truce.
“In such cases, Israel would have to conduct military operations inside the Lebanese territory,” the channel reported, adding that “one of the unsettled issues is related to the committee that will oversee the implementation of the agreement between Israel and Lebanon.”
The sources said Tel Aviv “insists that France is not part of the agreement, nor part of the committee that will oversee its implementation.”