Hamas Security Leaders Find Shelter in Beirut’s Southern Suburbs

A firefighter cleans the site of the attack in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)
A firefighter cleans the site of the attack in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)
TT

Hamas Security Leaders Find Shelter in Beirut’s Southern Suburbs

A firefighter cleans the site of the attack in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)
A firefighter cleans the site of the attack in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)

After the killing of Hamas deputy leader Saleh al-Arouri, concerns arise over the wisdom of placing Hamas offices in residential areas in Beirut’s southern suburbs, which puts residents at risk, especially considering explicit Israeli threats to pursue them globally.

The reality is that Hamas’ security and military presence in Lebanon has grown since the Syrian crisis and the fallout with the Syrian regime.

Hamas political leaders are now scattered between Doha and Türkiye, while security and military elements are concentrated in Lebanon, particularly in Sidon and mainly some camps in the southern suburbs of Beirut – a Hezbollah stronghold considered a safe haven for them.

However, what applies to Hamas doesn't necessarily apply to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement, which hasn't left Damascus.

Nevertheless, the presence of its leaders in Lebanon remains limited, falling within the framework of coordination among resistance axis groups.

According to observers, military-involved leaders requiring direct coordination with Iran are in Lebanon, including figures from both Hamas and the PIJ.

On the other hand, leaders in Qatar and Türkiye play political and non-military roles.

These observers consider the southern suburbs of Beirut as the optimal location for these leaders.

However, Israel’s assassination of al-Arouri sent a message implying that rules of engagement followed with Lebanon’s Hezbollah do not include Hamas leaders.

Palestinian researcher Hisham Dabsi explained to Asharq Al-Awsat that the political leaders of Hamas in Lebanon are limited to those responsible for the Lebanese arena, such as Ahmed Abdul Hadi, Ali Barka, Ayman Shana'a, and Rafat Mara.

However, prominent leaders like Osama Hamdan, al-Arouri, Khalil Al-Hayya, Ismail Haniyeh, and others are based in Doha.

Dabsi emphasized their essential media role in Lebanon due to restrictions preventing such activities from other countries.

Even Osama Hamdan holds press conferences related to Gaza in Beirut, while Haniyeh sends recorded videos.

In contrast, Dabsi notes that unlike Hamas, the PIJ has been and still is under the protection of the Syrian regime and its leaders, safeguarded by Syrian security forces and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

Sources familiar with the Palestinian file in Lebanon do not expect the assassination of al-Arouri to impact the presence and concentration of Hamas’ security and military leadership in Lebanon and Beirut’s suburbs.

Armed Palestinian and Lebanese groups, alongside Hezbollah, have been conducting attacks from the southern Lebanese border since Oct. 7 in support of Gaza fighters.

 



US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
TT

US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)

Recent statements by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on his willingness to meet Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to normalize relations between the two countries have sparked mixed reactions.
While the Syrian opposition sees the possibility of such a meeting despite the challenges, Damascus views the statements as a political maneuver by the Turks. Meanwhile, the United States has tied the normalization process to achieving a political solution in Syria based on UN Security Council Resolution 2254, issued in 2015.
Turkish media reported on Thursday that a US administration official, who was not named, confirmed that Washington is against normalizing relations with the Syrian regime under Assad. He emphasized that Washington cannot accept normalizing ties with Damascus without progress toward a political solution that ends the conflicts in Syria.
Meanwhile, the head of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces, Hadi al-Bahra, stated that a meeting between Assad and Erdogan is possible despite the obstacles. In a statement to Reuters on Thursday, Bahra said the meeting is feasible, even though Ankara is fully aware that the Assad regime cannot currently meet its demands and understands the regime’s limitations.
Bahra pointed out that the UN-led political process remains frozen and that he had briefed US and Western officials on the latest developments in the Syrian file. On Saturday, Bahra participated in a consultative meeting in Ankara with the Syrian Negotiation Commission, along with a high-level delegation from the US State Department, during which they exchanged views on the political solution and the need to establish binding mechanisms for implementing international resolutions related to the Syrian issue.
On the other side, Assad’s special advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, dismissed Erdogan’s announcement that Ankara is awaiting a response from Damascus regarding his meeting with Assad for normalization as another political maneuver with ulterior motives.
Shaaban, speaking during a lecture at the Omani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was reported by Turkish media on Thursday, stated that any rapprochement between the two countries is contingent on its withdrawal of forces from Syrian territory.