Malki: Palestinian Authority Will Rule Gaza After War

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki speaking at the Third Antalya Diplomatic Forum (AP)
Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki speaking at the Third Antalya Diplomatic Forum (AP)
TT

Malki: Palestinian Authority Will Rule Gaza After War

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki speaking at the Third Antalya Diplomatic Forum (AP)
Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki speaking at the Third Antalya Diplomatic Forum (AP)

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki expressed hope on Saturday for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip before the Holy month of Ramadan and he criticized Western countries for not regarding Palestinians as human beings.
Speaking at a press conference on the sidelines of the Third Antalya Diplomatic Forum held in south Türkiye, Malki said it was important to announce a ceasefire before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
“It is important not only because Ramadan is a holy month, but also because the number of innocent Palestinians killed and injured is increasing by the day,” he said, adding that if “we are serious about saving lives, we have to act quickly."
Regarding who will govern Gaza after the war, Malki affirmed, “Us, the Palestinian Authority. That's for sure. No doubt about it.”
Commenting on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statements about the future of governance in Gaza, he said, “Who cares about Netanyahu? Netanyahu is an occupier (and) has no political or legal weight to say so.”
“He is saying it solely to undermine the discussion, but he has no political or legal weight,” Malki added.
“His statement has no significance, and I ignored them... so please ignore them the way that I ignored them,” he said.
Regarding Western countries' stance on events in Gaza, the FM said these countries do not regard Palestinians as human beings, possibly because they do not value Palestinian lives.
Palestinians’ lives may be less important than those of others, he noted.
Malki added that Israel has tried to “dehumanize Palestinians since day one” to have a simple way to kill them, affirming that it appears that the West is still living in the era of colonialism, as evidenced by their behavior and actions.
Unfortunately, he said, “they are unable to rid themselves of their ugly past. As a result, “they judge us precisely from that perspective.”
The FM then expressed sadness over considering Palestinians' killings, as well as the destruction of hospitals, shelters, schools, churches, and mosques as normal.
Malki also praised the achievements made at the Moscow meetings, held last Thursday in the presence of representatives of Palestinian factions, most notably Fatah, Hamas, and the Islamic Jihad.
He said the meeting was capable of solving the basic problem faced by the Palestinians in previous talks. “All participants agreed that the PLO is the body that represents all the Palestinian people,” he added, pointing out that the coming period will witness more internal Palestinian dialogues on elections.
“The conditions are now fit for reaching an internal agreement, and we feel responsibility from everyone,” the FM noted.
Meanwhile, the Gaza Contact Group panel formed during the Riyadh Arab-Islamic Summit held a meeting on the sidelines of the Antalya Forum, with the participation of Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, Egyptian FM Sameh Shourky, and Al-Maliki.
In his opening remarks at the panel, Fidan asserted that Israel's actions constitute war crimes, destabilizing the international order.
“Now we are taking this problem into our own hands. We are really taking this job with a regional responsibility. In fact, as a result of this kind of thinking, the Gaza Contact Group was commissioned at the joint OIC-Arab League Summit and is working to take responsibility for the ongoing war in Palestine”, Fidan said.
He added that the Contact Group is continuously pressuring countries supporting Israel and its attacks, aiming to increase humanitarian aid and cease-fire support from a few Western countries.
He also pointed out that the "yes" vote in the UN sessions on the humanitarian cease-fire in Gaza increased from 121 votes in October to 153 after that.
Fidan opposed the hegemony narrative, stating that the current war does not provide security for Israel, emphasizing Palestinians' need for security and self-defense.
He noted that there is another obstacle, saying international calls for a cease-fire and calls for a two-state solution have no impact on Israel.
“It is important to go to the 1967 borders. Only then will the people of Israel truly achieve sustainable security,” the FM said, underlining that Israel will not be safe unless it declares that it does not want to acquire the Palestinian territories.
The Turkish diplomat also noted that Egypt has always been at the heart of the Gaza issue and its role in international humanitarian assistance has been admirable.
For his part, Shoukry emphasized the need for a permanent solution to Israel's Gaza attacks, stating that they have caused “severe instability and insecurity in the region.”
He noted that there were difficulties in the passage of aid from Rafah due to Israeli attacks; they tried to keep the crossing open from the first stage.
Shoukry also noted that Cairo was working to convince the Israeli government to provide support to the Gazans.
“Our efforts have always been blocked. There have been manipulative and restrictive studies, especially related to the amount of aid that can be distributed. There is a very heavy pressure on our brothers in Gaza,” he noted.
Meanwhile, Oncu Keceli, the Turkish Foreign Ministry's spokesperson said that Israeli officials will be brought to justice "sooner or later" for their crimes in the besieged Palestinian enclave of Gaza.
“We are closely following the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice,” Keceli said in a statement on his X account.
Responding to accusations published by Israeli Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz concerning a meeting between Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan and the head of the Hamas Movement, Ismail Haniyeh, Keceli said, “We are convinced that sooner or later all members of the Israeli government will be brought to justice for the crimes they are committing in Gaza.”



Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
TT

Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman

Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces, said the process of merging the SDF with Syrian government forces “may take some time,” despite expressing confidence in the eventual success of the agreement.

His remarks came after earlier comments in which he acknowledged differences with Damascus over the concept of “decentralization.”

Speaking at a tribal conference in the northeastern city of Hasakah on Tuesday, Abdi said the issue of integration would not be resolved quickly, but stressed that the agreement remains on track.

He said the deal reached last month stipulates that three Syrian army brigades will be created out of the SDF.

Abdi added that all SDF military units have withdrawn to their barracks in an effort to preserve stability and continue implementing the announced integration agreement with the Syrian state.

He also emphasized the need for armed forces to withdraw from the vicinity of the city of Ayn al-Arab (Kobani), to be replaced by security forces tasked with maintaining order.


Israeli Far-Right Minister to Push for ‘Migration’ of West Bank, Gaza Palestinians 

A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israeli Far-Right Minister to Push for ‘Migration’ of West Bank, Gaza Palestinians 

A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)

Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said he would pursue a policy of "encouraging the migration" of Palestinians from the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israeli media reported Wednesday.

"We will eliminate the idea of an Arab terror state," said Smotrich, speaking at an event organized by his Religious Zionism Party late on Tuesday.

"We will finally, formally, and in practical terms nullify the cursed Oslo Accords and embark on a path toward sovereignty, while encouraging emigration from both Gaza and Judea and Samaria.

"There is no other long-term solution," added Smotrich, who himself lives in a settlement in the West Bank.

Since last week, Israel has approved a series of measures backed by far-right ministers to tighten control over the West Bank, including in areas administered by the Palestinian Authority under the Oslo Accords, in place since the 1990s.

The measures include a process to register land in the West Bank as "state property" and facilitate direct purchases of land by Jewish Israelis.

The measures have triggered widespread international outrage.

On Tuesday, the UN missions of 85 countries condemned the measures, which critics say amount to de facto annexation of the Palestinian territory.

"We strongly condemn unilateral Israeli decisions and measures aimed at expanding Israel's unlawful presence in the West Bank," they said in a statement.

"Such decisions are contrary to Israel's obligations under international law and must be immediately reversed.

"We underline in this regard our strong opposition to any form of annexation."

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday called on Israel to reverse its land registration policy, calling it "destabilizing" and "unlawful".

The West Bank would form the largest part of any future Palestinian state. Many on Israel's religious right view it as Israeli land.

Israeli NGOs have also raised the alarm over a settlement plan signed by the government which they say would mark the first expansion of Jerusalem's borders into the occupied West Bank since 1967.

The planned development, announced by Israel's Ministry of Construction and Housing, is formally a westward expansion of the Geva Binyamin, or Adam, settlement situated northeast of Jerusalem in the West Bank.

The current Israeli government has fast-tracked settlement expansion, approving a record 52 settlements in 2025.

Excluding Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, more than 500,000 Israelis live in West Bank settlements and outposts, which are illegal under international law.


Maliki Can Withdraw as Candidacy as Iraq PM the Easy or Hard Way

Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
TT

Maliki Can Withdraw as Candidacy as Iraq PM the Easy or Hard Way

Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)

Iraqi Former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki declined at the last minute to attend a meeting of the pro-Iran Coordination Framework on Monday night that was aimed at settling the crisis over his nomination as prime minister.

Instead of declaring that he was pulling out as candidate, as had been expected, Maliki informed his close circle that he is “following through with his nomination to the end,” trusted sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraq has come under intense pressure from the US to withdraw the nomination. In January, President Donald Trump warned Baghdad against picking Maliki as its PM, saying the United States would no longer help the country.

“Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos. That should not be allowed to happen again. Because of his insane policies and ideologies, if elected, the United States of America will no longer help Iraq,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Maliki also dismissed as “extortion and intimidation” talks of renewed US sanctions on Iraq, added the sources.

However, circles within the Coordination Framework have started to “despair” with the impasse over naming a new prime minister and are weighing the possibility of taking “difficult” choices, they revealed. Maliki has become a prisoner of his own nomination.

The Sunni Progress Party (Takadum) had voiced its reservations over Maliki’s nomination before Trump made his position clear and which has since weighed heavily on Iraq.

‘Indefinitely’

Maliki’s decision to skip the Framework’s meeting on Monday forced the coalition to postpone it “indefinitely”, exposing more differences inside the alliance that have been festering for months. The dispute over the post of prime minister is threatening to evolve into one that threatens the unity of the coalition itself.

Several sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Maliki had sent the Framework a written message on Monday night informing them that he will not attend the meeting because “he was aware that discussions will seek to pressure him to withdraw his candidacy.”

Maliki was the one to call for the meeting to convene in the first place, they revealed.

Reports have been rife in Iraq that Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish political leaderships have all received warnings that the US would take measure against Iraq if Maliki continued to insist on his nomination.

Former Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told Dijlah TV that “Shiite parties” had received two new American messages reiterating the rejection of Maliki’s nomination.

Necessary choice

Maliki and the Framework are now at an impasse, with the latter hoping the former PM would take it upon himself to withdraw his candidacy in what a leading Shiite figure said would help protect the unity of the coalition.

Leading members of the coalition were hoping to give Maliki enough time to decide himself to withdraw, but as time stretches on, the coalition may take matters into its own hands and take “necessary” choices, said the figure.

Other sources revealed, however, that Maliki refuses to voluntarily withdraw from the race believing that this is a responsibility that should be shouldered by the Framework. This has effectively left the alliance with complex and limited choices to end the crisis.

Sources close to Maliki said he has made light of US threats to impose sanctions, saying that if they were to happen, Iraq will emerge on the other side stronger, citing other countries that came out stronger after enduring years of pressure.

Moreover, he is banking on an American change in position, saying mediators have volunteered to “polish his image before Trump and his team.” Members of Maliki’s State of Law coalition declined to comment on this information.

Sources inside the Framework said the coalition may “ultimately withdraw Maliki’s nomination if he becomes too much of a burden on an already weary alliance.”

Doing so may cost them a strong ally in Maliki and force the Framework to yield to Washington’s will, said the Shiite figure. “Maliki may come off as stubborn and strong, but he is wasting his realistic options at this critical political juncture,” it added.

The Framework is divided between a team that is banking on waiting to see how the US-Iran tensions will play out to resolve the crisis and on Maliki voluntarily withdrawing his nomination. The other team is calling for the coalition to resolve the crisis through an internal vote.

Leading Shiite figures told Asharq Al-Awsat that opponents of Maliki’s nomination in the coalition have no choice but to apply internal pressure inside the Framework, which is on the verge of collapse.