Sudan: Legal Experts Urge ICC to Dispatch Team to Probe War Crimes in Darfur

International Criminal Court (ICC) Persecutor Karim Khan (AFP)
International Criminal Court (ICC) Persecutor Karim Khan (AFP)
TT

Sudan: Legal Experts Urge ICC to Dispatch Team to Probe War Crimes in Darfur

International Criminal Court (ICC) Persecutor Karim Khan (AFP)
International Criminal Court (ICC) Persecutor Karim Khan (AFP)

The ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan urged civil society organizations to provide any evidence and material to aid an urgent investigation into allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sudan’s Darfur region.
“We’re asking national authority counterparts, State parties and non-State parties alike, to share any evidence... in relation to these profound allegations of international crimes that are increasingly emerging and cannot be ignored,” Khan said following an attack on the South Hospital in al-Fasher, the capital city of North Darfur province on Sunday.
In a statement on X, Khan said he was “particularly concerned by the ethnically motivated nature” of attacks on civilian populations, especially in the western Darfur region, asking people to provide evidence so the ICC could investigate further.
Legal expert Hatem Elias told Asharq Al-Awsat on Wednesday that “the Darfur file being investigated by the ICC is still open based on Security Council resolutions and previous court investigations that led to the charges against former President Omar al-Bashir, and a number of his aides.”
Elias said that previous Security Council resolutions granting the ICC the power to prosecute crimes against humanity “enabled the court to collect strong evidence confirming that crimes against humanity were committed in Darfur.”
For his part, legal expert and human rights activist El Moez Hadra told Asharq Al-Awsat that Khan’s appeal reveal that the ICC is interested to investigate the fresh attacks on al-Fasher and at the same time, continue to respect the 2005 Security Council resolution that referred the situation in Darfur to the ICC Prosecutor for investigations into allegations of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
“The ICC is currently questioning old and new suspects,” he said.
But the legal expert appealed to the ICC Prosecutor to form an international commission of inquiry that visits Sudan and provides its own evidence rather than just urge organizations to offer information.
Khan, as a public prosecutor, has the right to form an ICC commission tasked to collect factual evidence rather than ask for information from activists and human rights defenders, who are at risk and are being killed and detained by both warring sides in Sudan, Hadra affirmed.
He based his request on the well-known Security Council “Cassese Commission” that investigated war crimes in Darfur. The commission was led by the Italian Antonio Cassese and Egyptian Mohammed Fayek, who visited Darfur and wrote their own report on the situation in the country, the expert explained.
Hadra said Khan’s appeal for organizations to provide the court with evidence is “useless.”
“It’s not going to help the court because evidence is lost over time and witnesses are moving to other places... It is important to send an ICC field team that has international protection,” Hadra said, adding that Sudanese teams and lawyers are getting killed while investigating war crimes in the country.

 



International Coalition to End Mission in Iraq, Keep Going in Syria

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)
TT

International Coalition to End Mission in Iraq, Keep Going in Syria

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)

A US-led coalition's military mission in Iraq will end by September 2025 and there will be a transition to bilateral security partnerships, the United States and Iraq said in a joint statement on Friday.

The US has approximately 2,500 troops in Iraq and 900 in neighboring Syria as part of the coalition formed in 2014 to combat ISIS as it rampaged through the two countries.

The joint statement provided few details, including how many US troops would leave Iraq and from which bases.

The announcement was a product of nine months of negotiations.

An Iraqi official said the coalition will maintain its mission in Syria.

Not a withdrawal

In a briefing with reporters on Friday, a senior US official said that the move was not a withdrawal and declined to say if any troops would even be leaving Iraq.

"I just want to foot stomp the fact that this is not a withdrawal. This is a transition. It's a transition from a coalition military mission to an expanded US-Iraqi bilateral security relationship," the official said according to Reuters.

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani initiated talks with Washington in January on the change. He has said that, while he appreciates their help, US troops have become a magnet for instability, frequently targeted and responding with strikes often not coordinated with the Iraqi government.

Reuters has reported that the agreement would see hundreds of troops leave by September 2025, with the remainder departing by the end of 2026.

Under the plan, all coalition forces would leave the Ain al-Asad airbase in western Anbar province and significantly reduce their presence in Baghdad by September 2025.

US and other coalition troops are expected to remain in Erbil. Other nations, including Germany, France, Spain, and Italy, contribute hundreds of troops to the coalition.

The drawdown will mark a notable shift in Washington's military posture in the Middle East.

While primarily focused on countering ISIS, US officials acknowledge the US presence also serves as a strategic position against Iranian influence.

This position has grown more important as Israel and Iran escalate their regional confrontation, with US forces in Iraq shooting down rockets and drones fired towards Israel in recent months, according to US officials.

Sudani win

Sudani aide Hussein Allawi told Asharq Al-Awsat that the mission will completely end its mission in Iraq in 2026 and focus its operations in Syria.

The coalition, which helped Iraqi armed forces liberate provinces that terrorist groups had seized ten years ago, is no longer needed, he added.

The agreement will likely present a political win for Sudani as he balances Iraq's position as an ally of both Washington and Tehran.

An Iraqi political source told Asharq Al-Awsat is a victory for Sudani, who had for months insisted on the withdrawal despite Washington’s reservations and pressure from Iraqi armed factions that wanted to “violently” drive them out of the country.

Sudani put the finishing touches to the deal during his recent visit to New York where he attended the United Nations General Assembly, he revealed.

The announcement of the end of the mission is a political win at a very critical moment in the Middle East, he added.

However, a Shiite politician said the forces that are opposed to the American troop deployment are “wary of the vagueness of the announcement.”

The position of the armed forces will become clear at the appropriate time as they await the details of the plan to come to light and its implementation on the ground, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraqi circles have completely lost faith in the Americans, who at first may agree to Iraq’s request for them to leave, but may then place obstacles to renege on the deal, he went on to say.

The pro-Iran Kataib Hezbollah faction called on Sudani against rushing to announce the pullout of the forces.

In a statement, it said the timing of the announcement was “not right given the American’s involvement in the mass killing of children, women and innocents and the operations of betrayal in Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen and Syria.”