Advanced US Radar and Special Israeli Unit to Hunt Hamas Leader, Sinwar

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)
Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)
TT

Advanced US Radar and Special Israeli Unit to Hunt Hamas Leader, Sinwar

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)
Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)

By Mark Mazzetti, Ronen Bergman, Julian E. Barnes and Adam Goldman

 

In January, Israeli and American officials thought they had caught a break in the hunt for one of the world’s most wanted men.
Israeli commandos raided an elaborate tunnel complex in the southern Gaza Strip on Jan. 31 based on intelligence that Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader, was hiding there, according to American and Israeli officials.
He had been, it turned out. But Sinwar had left the bunker beneath the city of Khan Younis just days earlier, leaving behind documents and stacks of Israeli shekels totaling about $1 million. The hunt went on, with a dearth of hard evidence on his whereabouts.
Since the Oct. 7 attacks in Israel that he planned and directed, Sinwar has been something of a ghost: never appearing in public, rarely releasing messages for his followers and giving up few clues about where he might be.
He is by far Hamas’s most important figure, and his success in evading capture or death has denied Israel the ability to make a foundational claim: that it has won the war and eradicated Hamas in a conflict that has decimated the group’s ranks but also destroyed the Gaza Strip and killed tens of thousands of civilians.
American and Israeli officials said Sinwar abandoned electronic communications long ago, and he has so far avoided a sophisticated intelligence dragnet. He is believed to stay in touch with the organization he leads through a network of human couriers. How that system works remains a mystery.
It is a playbook used by Hamas leaders in the past, and by other leaders like Osama bin Laden. And yet Sinwar’s situation is more complex, and even more frustrating to American and Israeli officials.
Unlike bin Laden in his last years, Sinwar is actively managing a military campaign. Diplomats involved in ceasefire negotiations in Doha, Qatar, say that Hamas representatives insist they need Sinwar’s input before they make major decisions in the talks. As the most respected Hamas leader, he is the only person who can ensure that whatever is decided in Doha is implemented in Gaza.
Interviews with more than two dozen officials in Israel and the United States reveal that both countries have poured vast resources into trying to find Sinwar.
Officials have set up a special unit inside the headquarters of Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence service, and American spy agencies have been tasked with intercepting Sinwar’s communications. The United States has also provided ground-penetrating radar to Israel to help in the hunt for him and other Hamas commanders.
Killing or capturing Sinwar would undoubtedly have a dramatic impact on the war. American officials believe it would offer Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel a way to claim a significant military victory and potentially make him more willing to end military operations in Gaza.
But it is less clear what effect Sinwar’s death would have on negotiations for the release of hostages seized on Oct. 7. Removing him might make his successors far less willing to make a deal with Israel.
Communicating with Sinwar has become more difficult, said Israeli, Qatari, Egyptian and American officials. He used to respond to messages within days, but the officials said that it has taken much longer to get a response from him in recent months, and that some of his deputies at times have been his proxies in those discussions.
Sinwar, who is 61, was declared the group’s top political leader in early August, days after Ismail Haniyeh, the previous political chief, was killed in an Israeli assassination plot in Tehran.
But, in reality, Sinwar has long been considered Hamas’s de facto leader, even if the group’s political operatives based in Doha held the official leadership titles.
The pressure on the Hamas leader has made it far more difficult for him to communicate with military commanders and direct day-to-day operations, although American officials said that he still has the ability to dictate the group’s broad strategy.
It was weeks after the Oct. 7 attacks, which killed at least 1,200 people, when a special committee of senior Israeli intelligence and military officials approved a kill list of top Hamas commanders and political officials. Many of the men on the list, including Haniyeh, have been killed in the months since.
With each assassination, the Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, has put an “X” over a name on the diagram of the Hamas leadership he keeps on his wall.
But Sinwar, the most important of all, remains at large.
Life Underground
Before the war, Sinwar was a towering presence in Gaza.
He gave interviews, presided over military exercises and even made a televised appearance to present an award to a show depicting a Hamas attack on Israel — an eerie precursor to Oct. 7.
During the first weeks of the war, Israeli intelligence and military officials believe that Sinwar was living in a warren of tunnels beneath Gaza City, the largest city in the strip and one of the first targeted by Israeli military forces.
During one early raid on a tunnel in Gaza City, Israeli soldiers found a video — filmed days earlier — of Sinwar in the midst of moving his family to a different hiding spot under the city. Israeli intelligence officials believe that Sinwar kept his family with him for at least the first six months of the war.
Back then, Sinwar still used cellular and satellite phones — made possible by cell networks in the tunnels — and from time to time spoke to Hamas officials in Doha. American and Israeli spy agencies were able to monitor some of those calls but were not able to pinpoint his location.
As Gaza ran low on fuel, Gallant pushed for new shipments to Gaza to power generators needed to keep the cell networks running so that the Israeli eavesdropping could continue — over the objections of ultra right members of the Israeli government who wanted the fuel shipments cut off to punish the residents of Gaza.
During this period, the spy agencies gained glimpses of his life underground, including his voracious consumption of Israeli news media and his insistence on watching the 8pm news on Israeli TV.
In November, a freed Israeli hostage described how Sinwar had addressed a large number of Israeli captives not long after the Oct. 7 attacks. Speaking in Hebrew, which he learned during his years in an Israeli prison, Sinwar told them that they were safe where they were, and that no harm would come to them, according to the hostage’s account.
Israeli officials said that all Hamas operatives hiding underground, even Sinwar, must occasionally come out of the tunnels for health reasons. But the tunnel network is so vast and complex — and Hamas fighters have such good intelligence about the whereabouts of Israeli troops — that Sinwar can sometimes come above ground without being discovered.
Sinwar eventually moved south to Khan Younis, the city where he was born, Israeli and American officials believe, and probably occasionally traveled from there to the city of Rafah through a stretch of tunnel.
By the time the Khan Younis bunker was raided on Jan. 31, Sinwar had fled, Israeli officials said.
He stayed one step ahead of his pursuers, who sometimes made boastful comments about how close they were to finding him.
In late December, as Israeli military units began excavating tunnels in one area of the city, Gallant bragged to reporters that Sinwar “hears the bulldozers of the Israeli army above him, and he will meet the barrels of our guns soon.”
It appears Sinwar fled the Khan Younis bunker in some haste, leaving the many piles of Israeli shekels behind.
Shared Interests
Almost immediately after the Oct. 7 attacks, Israeli military intelligence and Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic security service, established a cell inside Shin Bet headquarters with the singular mission of finding Sinwar.
The CIA also set up a task force, and the Pentagon dispatched special operations troops to Israel to advise the Israel forces on the looming war in Gaza.
The United States, which considers Hamas a terrorist organization, and Israel established channels to share information about the location of Sinwar and other top Hamas commanders, and the hostages.
“We’ve devoted considerable effort and resources to the Israelis for the hunt for the top leadership, particularly Sinwar,” said Jake Sullivan, the White House national security adviser. “We’ve had people in Israel sitting in the room with the Israelis working this problem set. And obviously we have a lot of experience hunting high-value targets.”
In particular, the Americans have deployed ground-penetrating radar to help map the hundreds of miles of tunnels they believe are under Gaza, with new imagery combined with Israeli intelligence gathered from captured Hamas fighters and troves of documents to build out a more complete picture of the tunnel network.
One senior Israeli official said American intelligence support had been “priceless.”
The Israelis and Americans have a mutual interest in locating Hamas commanders and the dozens of hostages, including Americans, who remain in Gaza.
But one person familiar with the intelligence-sharing arrangement, who discussed it on the condition of anonymity, describes it as often “very lopsided” — with the Americans sharing more than the Israelis give in return. At times, the person said, the Americans provide information about Hamas leaders in the hopes that the Israelis will direct some of their own intelligence resources toward finding the American hostages.
Rise to the Top
During the 1980s, in the years after he was recruited by Hamas’s founder, Sheik Ahmed Yassin, Sinwar’s influence in the group grew steadily.
He took over as the head of Hamas’s internal security unit, a group charged with finding and punishing Palestinians suspected of collaborating with Israeli authorities as well as anyone who commits blasphemy.
He spent years in an Israeli prison but was released in October 2011 along with more than 1,000 other prisoners as part of an exchange for Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier captured by Hamas.
In 2017, Sinwar was named Hamas’s leader in Gaza.
While he has had an outsized impact on decision-making within Hamas, Sinwar has shaped his positions in close coordination with a group of Hamas political and military leaders in Gaza, according to analysts who have studied Hamas.
The circle of confidants has included Marwan Issa, a Hamas military commander killed in March; Rawhi Mushtaha, a member of Hamas’s political office in Gaza; Izzeldin al-Haddad, a senior commander in the military wing; Mohammed Sinwar, Sinwar’s brother and a top official in the military wing; and Muhammad Deif, the leader of the military wing, according to Ibrahim al-Madhoun, an Istanbul-based expert who maintains a close relationship with Hamas.
But Sinwar’s network of advisers has been steadily shrinking: Some top Hamas commanders have been killed, some captured, and others were outside of Gaza when the war began and have not been able to return since.
Deif was the most senior adviser to Sinwar, but was less disciplined than his boss. He came above ground far more regularly, allowing Western intelligence agencies to pinpoint his whereabouts.
It was on one of those occasions, Israeli officials say, when he was killed in an airstrike.

 

The New York Times



RSF to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Won’t Allow Division of Sudan

Omar Hamdan (third right) during a meeting with Saudi Arabia and the African Union’s representatives at the Geneva talks. (X platform)
Omar Hamdan (third right) during a meeting with Saudi Arabia and the African Union’s representatives at the Geneva talks. (X platform)
TT

RSF to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Won’t Allow Division of Sudan

Omar Hamdan (third right) during a meeting with Saudi Arabia and the African Union’s representatives at the Geneva talks. (X platform)
Omar Hamdan (third right) during a meeting with Saudi Arabia and the African Union’s representatives at the Geneva talks. (X platform)

The Geneva peace talks to end the war in Sudan failed to achieve any progress to end the hostilities on the ground between the army and Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

Head of the RSF’s negotiations team at the talks Omar Hamdan told Asharq Al-Awsat his forces were hoping to reach an agreement that would end the fighting.

The absence of the army at the talks, however, prevented an agreement from being reached and the opportunity was wasted, he added.

He called on the international community to pressure the army to dispatch a negotiations team to any future peace talks.

Failure to hold negotiations will keep the door open for the military option, Hamdan warned.

He also stressed that the RSF rejects attempts to divide Sudan. It has already been divided, which led to the birth of South Sudan after 38 years of war.

Sudan lost a third of its size, a fifth of its population and 70 percent of its oil and natural resources as a result of the division, he remarked.

“The voice of the Sudanese army has been usurped and its decision-making power lies in the hands of the Islamist movement, which has chosen to forge ahead with the war until the very end,” he warned.

Geneva talks

Returning to the Geneva talks, Hamdan said they did not meet expectations, but they were still a step forward because the international community has become more united and serious about ending the war in Sudan.

He stressed that the talks did make one major achievement, which was secure the delivery of humanitarian aid through two routes that are held by the RSF.

The so-called “Port Sudan government has prevented international organizations from delivering aid,” he added.

Ultimately, the talks in Geneva were “beneficial” and RSF commander Mohammed Hamdan Daglo will issue firm orders against harming civilians, Hamdan said.

He did not rule out the possibility of holding another round of negotiations and the mediators and partners in Geneva confirmed that they will work towards that.

“On our end, negotiations are a matter of principle as repeatedly stipulated by the RSF commander since the beginning of the war. We will be the first to meet the call to hold negotiations to end the suffering of our people. This is a strategic issue for us, not a tactic,” he stressed.

Army no-show

He dismissed the excuses the army presented to justify its absence from the talks and its dispatch of a government delegation instead.

He noted that all previous rounds of negotiations, which have been held Jeddah and Manama and others, have been held between the RSF and army.

“So their reasons for not attending the Geneva talks were not logical,” noted Hamdan.

Negotiations on ending the hostilities and implementing previous agreements demand the presence of the military, he declared.

“The only reason we can think of to explain their absence is that the Islamist movement had usurped their decision-making and prevented them from attending,” he added.

“We are fully aware that the movement has chosen war to the very end and the army has no voice in the matter,” he went on to say.

On army commander Abdel Fattah’s remarks that the military will fight for a hundred years, Hamdan said: “The Islamist movement is in control of the army, but the international community has the means to exert pressure.”

“With the necessary pressure, it can force the Islamist movement, its army and all of its followers to choose peace,” he continued.

Famine is happening in Sudan and the world cannot just idly stand by and watch this humanitarian catastrophe unfold, he said. “So strong international pressure is needed to make them opt for peace and end the war,” he urged.

Asharq Al-Awsat noted that international pressure failed in making ousted President Omar al-Bashir change his stances, so why should it succeed now?

Hamdan acknowledged the situation with Bashir, adding however that the “times are different now. Sudan used to be controlled by one party, which used to find international support, so it remained unyielding in its positions.”

“The Port Sudan gang now only holds less than 30 percent of Sudanese territories. We are in control of several sectors. They are weak and won’t be able to hold out for long. I believe they will be forced to negotiate,” he added.

Accusations against the RSF

On accusations that the RSF is deployed in people’s homes and the army’s demand that they withdraw before returning to negotiations, Hamdan said the war has taken place in cities and villages, not outer space, so major losses were going to be inevitable, especially with the army having had set up bases inside neighborhoods.

“The war forced millions of people to flee their homes. Is it possible that our forces were present at all of these homes?” he asked.

“What they really want is for us to leave the areas under our control,” he added. They want the RSF to withdraw from Gezira state. “We will not quit regions we controlled through force without reaching a final agreement. Their talk about leaving the people’s home is only meant to incite them.”

Military option

On the possible scenarios should the negotiations fail, Hamdan said that would leave Sudan with two options. Either the international community applies pressure to make the army attend the talks to end the war, “or we will continue to liberate the remaining territories and rid Sudan of the Islamist movement and remnants of the National Congress.”

“The RSF can decide the war in its favor,” he warned. “But this is the costliest scenario and we don’t want to go down that path.”

“We sense the hell the Sudanese people are enduring. But if Burhan and his group insist on fighting, then we will rid the Sudanese people of them militarily,” he went on to say, citing similar experiences in Rwanda.

“That scenario is very possible” in Sudan, he stated.

Parallel government

On the other escalation options at the RSF’s disposal, Hamdan said: “They are many, but the RSF commander hasn’t chosen one yet.”

On whether a parallel government is one of those options, he replied: “The RSF supports Sudan’s unity and we will not allow any division. We boast governments and civil administrations in regions under our control because of the urgent need to offer services to the people.”

“The decision to form a government in parallel to the one in Port Sudan is up to the RSF command,” he said. “But all options are on the table and we will not allow the division of Sudan.”

“Sudan must remain united. We are affected by a cancer called the Islamist movement and it must be eradicated,” he stressed.

Commenting on accusations that the RSF has failed in running regions under its control, Hamdan blamed the suffering on “the Port Sudan gang that has cut off internet and water from all of our regions in Khartoum, Omdurman and Gezira.”

“In return, we have been exerting massive efforts through civil administrations to allow them to carry out their roles. We will do everything we can and we will work with the international community to deliver humanitarian aid to our regions,” he went on to say.

RSF ‘violations’

Asked about accusations that the RSF had struck civilian areas in Omdurman, el-Fasher and Karrari, he said: “We have never hit civilian regions, but we have targeted military positions.”

He explained the military had deployed in civilian neighborhoods in Karrari, Wadi Seidna and al-Kadroo. In el-Fasher, he said mercenary groups led by Arcua Minnawi and Gibril Ibrahim were present in hospitals and had deployed snipers on mosque rooftops.

“We had previously suggested that armed forces withdraw from el-Fasher and that neutral armed groups remain, but the military refused,” Hamdan added.

Joining the RSF

Asked why he abandoned the army and joined the RSF, he explained that he joined the latter eight years ago and that he was recruited by the military itself.

On why he is siding with the RSF, he revealed: “This is the second army to wage a war against its own people.” He said the Myanmar army had been waging war against its people for 60 years.

“The military has been used to bring the Sudanese people to their knees. Some very bad parties have exploited the army to impose their will in killing the people,” he noted.

“So, I am in favor of the army permanently exiting politics and for the armed forces to return to their main duties of protecting the nation and civilians, not protecting ruling regimes,” he stated.