عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Arab World

Lebanon, Israel Near First Round of Negotiations

An Israeli artillery unit deployed at an undisclosed location at the Israeli border with Lebanon shells targets in Lebanon, 14 March 2026. (EPA)
An Israeli artillery unit deployed at an undisclosed location at the Israeli border with Lebanon shells targets in Lebanon, 14 March 2026. (EPA)
TT
TT

Lebanon, Israel Near First Round of Negotiations

An Israeli artillery unit deployed at an undisclosed location at the Israeli border with Lebanon shells targets in Lebanon, 14 March 2026. (EPA)
An Israeli artillery unit deployed at an undisclosed location at the Israeli border with Lebanon shells targets in Lebanon, 14 March 2026. (EPA)

Lebanon and Israel have taken a step forward towards holding a first meeting to negotiate an end to the war on Lebanon.

An agreement has yet to be reached on the necessary arrangements, even as United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said from Beirut on Saturday that the “diplomatic avenues” were available to end the war.

Ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that an agreement has been reached to hold a meeting between Lebanon and Israel, but the location and date have not been set.

France and Cyprus have both offered to host the talks.

The sources revealed that parliament Speaker Nabih Berri has not yet decided whether to send a Shiite representative to the meeting or not.

The negotiations team does not yet have a Shiite representative.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Berri tied his agreement to negotiations and President Joseph Aoun’s initiative to end the war with two conditions: the ceasefire and the return of the displaced.

He refused to go into further details “ahead of time”.

Berri refuses to take part in direct negotiations between Lebanon and Israel and has demanded a ceasefire be implemented before taking any other step to resolve the conflict.

Sources have quoted him as saying that he is still committed to the Mechanism committee and UN Security Council resolution 1701 to end the war.

‘Only diplomacy’

Guterres urged on Saturday the international community to support Lebanon.

Lebanon was dragged into the Middle East war last week when Hezbollah attacked Israel in response to the killing of Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei in US-Israeli strikes, and the Tehran-backed group's leader has said the fighters were ready for a long confrontation with Israel.

On Saturday, Israel kept up strikes on Lebanon as Hezbollah claimed attacks against northern Israel and Beirut said the death toll in the country since March 2 had climbed to 826, including 106 children.

US news site Axios reported on Saturday that Israel was planning a major ground invasion of Lebanon "aiming to seize the entire area south of the Litani River", citing US and Israeli officials.

The area, covering hundreds of square miles, is already subject to Israeli evacuation warnings.

Israel has already sent some ground forces into Lebanon and late on Saturday Hezbollah said it was engaged in ongoing "direct clashes" with Israeli forces in Khiam.

Guterres, however, insisted "there is no military solution, only diplomacy" and dialogue.

The UN chief arrived in Beirut on Friday for what he called a solidarity visit and launched a $325 million humanitarian appeal to support Lebanon as it responds to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people amid sweeping Israeli army evacuation orders.

Guterres urged the international community to "step up your engagement, empower the Lebanese state" and support the army, which has committed to disarming Hezbollah.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said on Saturday that Ankara feared Israel could commit "genocide" in Lebanon and called for the international community to intervene.

Turkey has been fiercely critical of Israel since the start of the Gaza war.

Paramedics

The health ministry said 31 paramedics had been killed this month, after the bodies of additional health workers were found following an overnight strike that authorities said hit a healthcare center in Burj Qalawiya in the country's south, killing doctors, paramedics and nurses.

The Hezbollah-affiliated Islamic Health Committee said the center was one of its facilities, pledging such attacks would not deter it from "performing our humanitarian duty".

The Israeli military accused Hezbollah of using ambulances militarily, and its spokesman Avichay Adraee warned that Israel would act "in accordance with international law against any military activity" by any Hezbollah use of medical facilities or ambulances.

Lebanon's health ministry accused Israel of repeatedly "targeting ambulance crews while they were performing rescue duties".

The Israeli army said that it had struck Hezbollah operatives on Friday "who were bringing rockets into a weapons depot" in Majedel, near Burj Qalawiya.

It also said it had struck "approximately 110 Hezbollah command centers" since the regional conflict broke out.

On Saturday, a strike hit an apartment building in a northern Beirut suburb that had been targeted a day earlier.

An AFP correspondent in the Nabaa-Burj Hammoud area saw rescue workers at the scene and damage including a hole in a building, outside Hezbollah's strongholds in the capital's southern suburbs.

The health ministry said the strike killed one person in Burj Hammoud, a densely populated, mixed area known for its large Armenian-Lebanese community.

'No safety'

Levon Ghazalian, 42, who lives in the building next door, said "it's the first time this happens" in the area, which was spared in the previous conflict between Israel and Hezbollah in 2024.

"All the neighbors are afraid," he told AFP.

Hanadi Hachem, 50, who was in her pyjamas, said "there's no safety anymore... you never know where a strike will come from".

She said she and some family members were sleeping in their car out of fear.

French President Emmanuel Macron said the Lebanese government was ready to engage in "direct talks" with Israel and offered to host negotiations in Paris, warning that "everything must be done to prevent Lebanon from descending into chaos".

The French foreign ministry later denied there was a French plan to end the war, saying it had only offered to facilitate talks, after Axios reported that Paris had drawn up a proposal involving Lebanon formally recognizing Israel.

Most Viewed

 
 
Arab World

Iraq: Fuel Crisis Exacerbates the Country’s Problems, Citizens’ Burdens

A scene of congestion at a gas station in Baghdad (Iraqi News Agency)
A scene of congestion at a gas station in Baghdad (Iraqi News Agency)
TT
TT

Iraq: Fuel Crisis Exacerbates the Country’s Problems, Citizens’ Burdens

A scene of congestion at a gas station in Baghdad (Iraqi News Agency)
A scene of congestion at a gas station in Baghdad (Iraqi News Agency)

Many Iraqi provinces, including the capital Baghdad, are facing a severe fuel shortage, forcing motorists in some cases to wait for hours to get gasoline. This is placing additional burdens on citizens who are already dealing with deteriorating public services, fewer hours of available electricity, and delays in the payment of pensions and salaries for public-sector employees.

Despite repeated government promises to overcome the fuel crisis, long lines of vehicles can frequently be seen at gas stations across Baghdad, Kirkuk, Babil, Basra, and most provinces of the Kurdistan Region. This is further deepening public distrust in government statements.

According to observers, the current fuel crisis "is one of the consequences of the war and the ongoing state of tension between Washington and Tehran, and its negative repercussions for Iraq since the war began on February 28."

At the same time, successive Iraqi governments face intense public criticism for failing to build enough oil refineries to meet domestic demand in a country that sits on vast oil reserves.

"Deliberate Manipulation"?

While many experts link the fuel crisis to the negative effects of the US-Iran war, particularly following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the disruption of most of Iraq's oil exports and foreign imports, sources close to Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi's government do not rule out "deliberate manipulation" within the Oil Ministry that is worsening the crisis.

They link this alleged manipulation to groups that were recently affected by arrests targeting senior ministry officials on charges of stealing billions of dinars and dollars. Those arrested include former Deputy Oil Minister for Refining Affairs Adnan al-Jumaili, Deputy Oil Minister for Distribution Affairs Ali Maaraj al-Bahadli, Director General of the Oil Products Distribution Company Hussein Talib Abboud, and other figures.

In contrast, the Oil Ministry attributes the current fuel crisis to several factors, including increased demand and higher daily domestic gasoline consumption, technical failures that forced some production units at local refineries to shut down, and delays in the arrival of imported fuel shipments because of security tensions at ports and along regional transportation routes.

Despite the lines of cars at filling stations in more than one province, Oil Minister Basim Mohammed al-Abadi insists that petroleum products are available. During a meeting attended by senior ministry officials, he said that "the temporary shortage of gasoline is being addressed" and that additional gasoline shipments would arrive soon, helping to stabilize supplies and meet citizens' needs.

He added that "gasoline consumption averages around 33 million liters per day and rises to around 38 million liters when citizens become concerned."

He said his ministry "continues to closely monitor supply and distribution flows and is taking the necessary measures to secure petroleum products and strengthen stability in the domestic market."

Regarding the country's current oil exports following the near-total disruption caused by the US-Israeli-Iranian war, Minister al-Abadi said that "crude oil exports were around 250,000 barrels per day when the government took office, while current crude oil production has exceeded 3 million barrels per day."

In a subsequent statement, the Oil Ministry explained that "the congestion at fuel stations is caused by a negative gap between production and consumption." It said the ministry had relied on imported shipments delivered through maritime entry points to make up the shortfall, but regional events and the ongoing conflict have created logistical difficulties for tanker movements, delaying their arrival or docking at Iraqi ports.

No Plans to Export

The Iraqi Oil Ministry on Saturday denied reports circulated by some media outlets and news agencies that it planned to export gasoline, stressing that its immediate priority is to achieve self-sufficiency.

The ministry said in a statement that "the future shift toward exporting certain petroleum products depends on completing expansion work at other refineries," which it is pursuing as part of its strategic plans to transform Iraq from an importer into an exporter.

The statement noted that Iraq currently exports fuel oil and naphtha, in addition to previous shipments of jet fuel and sulfur.

Arab World

Houthi Escalation Backfires in Taiz, on Yemen’s Western Coast

Yemeni government forces launch counteroffensive in Taiz, Hodeidah — military media
Yemeni government forces launch counteroffensive in Taiz, Hodeidah — military media
TT
TT

Houthi Escalation Backfires in Taiz, on Yemen’s Western Coast

Yemeni government forces launch counteroffensive in Taiz, Hodeidah — military media
Yemeni government forces launch counteroffensive in Taiz, Hodeidah — military media

A large-scale Houthi ground offensive launched on Thursday across Yemen’s western coast, southern Hodeidah, and western Taiz was faltering on Saturday as government forces counterattacked on several fronts, backed by intensified air strikes and efforts to cut the group’s supply lines.

In the most significant battlefield development on Saturday morning, national resistance forces, backed by units from the Giants Brigades, launched a counterattack south of al-Jarrahi district in Hodeidah province.

National resistance drones simultaneously struck Houthi reinforcements in the area, according to its military media office.

The operation came as government forces advanced from Hays towards al-Jarrahi in southeastern Hodeidah, seeking to regain the initiative on one of the fronts where the Houthis had carried out major attacks in recent days.

Military sources said the group had suffered heavy losses in personnel and equipment during the fighting.

In southeastern Taiz, government forces made further gains on the Hayfan front and seized al-Wathra hill and Saeed Taha hill in the al-Mafalis area, as well as the Dheiban, al-Khudaira and al-Najdain hills, according to a military source.

The recaptured positions are militarily significant because they overlook al-Khazja market and Houthi supply routes towards fronts in northwestern Lahj and southern Taiz, the source said. The source added that the group had suffered losses in personnel and equipment and that some of its fighters had fled their positions.

Counteroffensive

In western Taiz, government forces recaptured al-Khazan hill in Jabal Habashi district on Friday after fierce clashes with the Houthis, as fighting intensified on the Maqbanah and al-Kadaha fronts and government reinforcements arrived.

The rapidly unfolding developments on these fronts indicate that the initiative is gradually shifting from the Houthis to government forces after three days of fighting in which the group sought to break through in southern Hodeidah and western Taiz, particularly in Jabal Habashi.

On the Saqam front, the national resistance’s military media office said on Saturday that Second Division forces were inflicting heavy losses on the Houthis in the al-Muharraq mountains.

The national resistance’s naval forces said they destroyed two Houthi explosive-laden boats that had attempted to target the al-Fajra area south of al-Khokha and the port of Mokha.

Military sources also said a Houthi infiltration attempt from the eastern entrance to Taiz city had been thwarted and several members of the group killed, while fighting continued in various sectors of the front.

At the same time, Houthi shelling struck the Hayjat al-Abd road linking Taiz and Aden, killing four civilians and wounding nine others, according to local and medical sources. The attack also caused property damage at the site.

The incidents reflect the widening scope of the Houthi escalation to include roads and civilian areas alongside the group’s ground operations on the front lines.

Air strikes enter the battle

For the first time, the Yemeni army said it had used combat aircraft to strike Houthi positions on the Taiz and Hodeidah fronts, marking a notable development in the course of the current fighting.

The armed forces’ media center said on Friday evening that combat aircraft had carried out more than 15 strikes on Houthi positions, gatherings and vehicles on the western coast fronts in Taiz and Hodeidah provinces, as artillery fire and ground clashes continued.

Military sources said Yemeni aircraft continued to strike Houthi positions in Taiz and Hodeidah, targeting supply lines and weapons depots. Houthi positions in the city of al-Hazm in al-Jawf province were also hit by air strikes, according to military sources.

Field sources said the Houthis had suffered heavy losses during three days of fighting, with hundreds of the group’s fighters killed or wounded. Hospitals under Houthi control in Hodeidah were facing mounting pressure as casualties arrived from the battlefronts, they said.

The group transferred another group of fighters killed or wounded in the clashes to hospitals in al-Jarrahi and Zabid, according to local media sources, indicating the scale of its losses during the offensive and subsequent efforts to repel the counterattacks.

The Houthis, meanwhile, continued to send reinforcements to the battle zones to hold positions they had initially advanced to and contain the government forces’ counteroffensive.

Protecting Bab al-Mandab

As the fighting widened, Rashad al-Alimi, chairman of Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council, and other council members monitored developments in the military operations and contacted military and field commanders to review the course of the battles, readiness levels, and operational and logistical needs, according to a statement from the office of the supreme commander of the armed forces.

Al-Alimi warned on Friday evening of the consequences of the Houthi escalation, holding the group responsible for the resulting humanitarian impact, including the displacement of hundreds of families from areas affected by the fighting.

He said government forces would not allow what he described as Iran’s objective of controlling the Bab al-Mandab Strait to be achieved, adding that any advance towards those areas would severely drain the Houthis.

The Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation called on international organizations and donors to intervene urgently to help displaced and affected families in Taiz and Hodeidah.

It warned of growing needs for shelter, food, medicine, water and medical services, and called for field hospitals to be established to receive the wounded.

Mokha and its port were hit by a series of Houthi ballistic missile and drone attacks last August, in an escalation that struck civilian facilities and sites, disrupted port traffic, and put its facilities out of service.

Government forces responded with military operations and strikes targeting the group’s movements and offensive capabilities.

Arab World

Iraq’s Coordination Framework, Armed Factions Hit Deadlock in Talks

Iraqi police manage a queue of vehicles outside a fuel station in Baghdad, Sept. 5, 2026. (AFP)
Iraqi police manage a queue of vehicles outside a fuel station in Baghdad, Sept. 5, 2026. (AFP)
TT
TT

Iraq’s Coordination Framework, Armed Factions Hit Deadlock in Talks

Iraqi police manage a queue of vehicles outside a fuel station in Baghdad, Sept. 5, 2026. (AFP)
Iraqi police manage a queue of vehicles outside a fuel station in Baghdad, Sept. 5, 2026. (AFP)

Iraq’s Shiite Coordination Framework has hit a deadlock with armed factions refusing to surrender their weapons as the Sept. 30 deadline for the final US withdrawal approaches, casting a shadow over government plans to celebrate the date as “Sovereignty Day.”

A three-member committee formed by the Framework has so far failed to secure a breakthrough with the factions, which reject demands to hand over their arsenals by the withdrawal date.

Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s government had initially hoped Sept. 30 would mark both the departure of US forces and the transfer of factional weapons to government control. But negotiations between the Framework and the armed groups now appear to have reached an impasse.

According to the latest position expressed by the armed factions, articulated by Harakat al-Nujaba, as well as statements by former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and Badr Organization leader Hadi al-Amiri, there is no final or fixed deadline for handing over, restricting, disarming or freezing weapons held outside state control.

Several armed groups, foremost among them Kataib Hezbollah and Harakat al-Nujaba, have previously rejected demands to surrender their arsenals, saying they would not abide by any timetable because their weapons are ideological and not confined within national borders.

Ali al-Asadi, head of Harakat al-Nujaba’s Political Council, said the movement remained committed to its right to safeguard what he called the “sanctity” of the resistance’s weapons in the face of regional risks and threats.

In a post on X on Friday, Asadi said he had concluded a visit to leading figures in the Coordination Framework’s political process, during which he reaffirmed the movement’s position on the importance of “preserving the Popular Mobilization Forces as a national body that cannot be compromised.”

He also stressed the need to preserve the “resistance” and the “sanctity of its weapons” in light of what he described as the “real and serious risks and threats” facing Iraq and the wider region.

Asadi also reiterated Nujaba’s policy of not participating in the political process, saying: “This approach is what keeps us alongside our people, experiencing what they experience, carrying their concerns and working to fulfill their demands.”

“This responsibility will remain on our shoulders until comprehensive change is achieved, ensuring sovereignty, security and prosperity, freeing our economy from American domination and stabilizing the domestic situation,” he said.

The Iraqi government, for its part, says through Sabah al-Numan, spokesperson for the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, that “no force in the world and no regional circumstances can break a state whose people, in all their components and communities, rally around its institutions.”

In a briefing, Numan warned of what he called “a flood of alarmism led by platforms financed with suspicious funds to peddle fear and exploit Iraqis’ emotions as the Sept. 30 deadline approaches.”

“The military and security establishment, which stood firm through the darkest and most difficult circumstances and sacrificed its most precious blood to protect this land, fully understands the scale of the challenges and is working around the clock in the field, away from the clamor of political posturing,” Numan said.

“The next phase requires wisdom, steadfastness and solidarity,” he added.

Asked about efforts to bring weapons under state control and the armed factions’ demands regarding the announced timetable for surrendering them, military and strategic expert Mukhlad Hazem told Asharq Al-Awsat that political blocs often made ill-considered statements that did not reflect what they were actually thinking behind closed doors.

“Everyone knows that their options are limited and that they could lose these gains, spoils, prestige and power at any moment,” Hazem said.

“Everyone agrees that the issue of bringing weapons under state control must be resolved because it is no longer a matter of domestic will alone, but also of external will. It is a trade-off between remaining in power and heading into the unknown,” he added.

Hazem said some politicians addressed their supporters merely to provide political cover while trying to appease the factions.

“The reality has been imposed not only on Iraq, but also on Syria, Lebanon and Yemen: No weapons can remain outside the authority of the state, and armed groups cannot be allowed to control decisions of war and peace,” he said.

“Everyone now has few options left in this regard. A decision on bringing weapons under state control has been made conclusively and finally.”

Maliki and Amiri

The three-member committee formed by the Coordination Framework — comprising former prime ministers Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and Nouri al-Maliki, as well as Badr Organization leader Hadi al-Amiri — is continuing negotiations with armed factions that refuse to surrender their weapons.

However, recent statements by al-Maliki and al-Amiri have raised questions among political groups and the Iraqi public about the timetable agreed upon for bringing all weapons under state control.

Al-Maliki said there would be “no disarmament of the factions,” but rather a process to regulate their weapons. He gave no timeframe for doing so, which some sources said meant the process would be postponed until after the US withdrawal.

Al-Amiri went further, saying in a speech that the armed factions would remain in place. He said they had protected the political system by confronting what he called the “October sedition,” a reference to the mass uprising that erupted in 2019 and was violently suppressed.

Academic and political activist Faris Harram told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the first striking aspect of al-Amiri’s statement is that it is consistent with allegations made in several Western reports during the October protest movement that armed factions in Iraq were responsible for killing demonstrators.”

“Some reports at the time named leaders alleged to have been involved in liquidations, assassinations and the unjustified attacks carried out against the young participants in the October uprising,” Harram said.

“Such consistency should immediately draw the attention of Iraq’s public prosecutor,” he added. “I ask: Where has the public prosecutor’s office been in monitoring such statements since 2003? To this day, the public prosecution service has not fulfilled its role in pursuing cases that require judicial intervention.”

Harram said an investigation should have been opened into the statements about the factions’ role in suppressing the October protest movement, given their connection to reports that both the Iraqi government and the armed factions had denied at the time.

“We are therefore facing a connection that must be kept in mind,” he said.

“Al-Amiri must explain what he meant by the statement, which can be understood as saying that the factions were responsible” for suppressing the protests, Harram added.

He said this was also connected to remarks by then-Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi, who said the killings of demonstrators had been carried out by a “third party.”

“Unfortunately, we have grown accustomed in Iraq to everything passing without investigation as part of a broader pattern of impunity,” Harram said.