Macron Maintains Contacts to Stop Israeli War on Lebanon

The French president intensifies his contacts for an immediate ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel. (AFP)
The French president intensifies his contacts for an immediate ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel. (AFP)
TT

Macron Maintains Contacts to Stop Israeli War on Lebanon

The French president intensifies his contacts for an immediate ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel. (AFP)
The French president intensifies his contacts for an immediate ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel. (AFP)

French President Emmanuel Macron continues his efforts to halt the Israeli war on Lebanon, also stressing the need to stop supplying weapons to Israel.
Macron’s communications, as part of his call for an international conference to support Lebanon announced over a week ago, involve a wide range of Arab leaders, France’s European partners, the US, and Israel. The Lebanese issue was also discussed at the summit of the European-Mediterranean countries held in the Cypriot city of Paphos.
So far, Paris has not backed away from the French-American initiative calling for a temporary halt to military operations between Israel and Hezbollah, allowing room to discuss the activation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 and arrange security measures along the borders while seeking to find solutions to the border disputes between Lebanon and Israel.
Macron has strongly reacted to the targeting of UN peacekeeping forces (UNIFIL), stating that France “will not allow this to happen again.” In addition to a joint statement by France, Spain, and Italy on the security of UNIFIL, in which attacks on the forces were described as trampling on international humanitarian law and UN Security Council resolutions, Paris also signed a statement by the Group of Forty. This group includes 36 countries with troops operating under UNIFIL, along with six other supporting nations.
The statement emphasized the need to “respect the presence of UNIFIL, which means ensuring the safety and security of its personnel at all times”. It also expressed support for UNIFIL’s role, especially in the current critical phase, given the escalation in the region.
Macron and Berri
As part of intensive contacts, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot visited Beirut before embarking on a second regional tour that took him to several Arab capitals and Israel, without returning to Lebanon. Sources in Paris indicated that the reason for excluding Beirut was the resistance Barrot encountered in Israel regarding the possibility of achieving a ceasefire on the Lebanese front.
Macron also called Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri on Saturday. The latter received an extended 40-minute call from US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
Paris sees Berri as playing a “key role” today, given that he is “officially” tasked by Hezbollah with handling the political aspect and is considered the channel capable of delivering direct messages to the party’s leadership and influencing it. This comes especially after the issuance of the tripartite statement calling for a ceasefire and the acceptance of implementing UN Resolution 1701, which effectively means Hezbollah abandoning its “support front” and separating the war in Gaza from the conflict in Lebanon.
Given the importance of the Macron-Berri conversation, which provided the French president with a clear picture of what Hezbollah is willing to accept and reject, the Élysée Palace issued a detailed statement summarizing the call and outlining the key messages Macron aimed to convey to Lebanon and other parties involved.
Three Key Messages
The first message expressed “concern over the intensification of Israeli strikes on Lebanon and their tragic impact on civilians.” Naturally, Macron expressed “solidarity with the Lebanese people during this ordeal” and reaffirmed France’s commitment to “ensuring Lebanon’s safety, sovereignty, and security in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1701.”
The presidential statement practically conveyed that neither Hezbollah nor Israel had respected the letter or spirit of the international resolution, and that UN peacekeeping forces had been unable to fulfill their mission as mandated by the Security Council, with the same applying to the Lebanese army.
Macron reiterated France’s commitment to two things: first, keeping the French contingent of 700 troops stationed in southern Lebanon as part of UNIFIL.
The second message urged Lebanese parties to work for the “unity and stability of the country during this critical phase,” calling for a consensus on a political agenda that includes “the election of a president who guarantees national unity.” Macron stressed that France “will always stand by those who choose this path, and will continue to mobilize the international quintet (comprised of France, the US, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Qatar).
Macron had previously appointed former Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian as his personal envoy to Lebanon. However, Le Drian’s mediation efforts, along with the meetings of the quintet and his communications, have not yielded any results due to internal complications and external influences.
Macron’s main attempt in the Lebanese file now is the international conference scheduled for Oct. 24 in Paris.
The third message conveyed that Paris “remains steadfast in its efforts to organize the international conference to support the Lebanese people and Lebanon’s sovereignty.” The Élysée statement clarified that the conference “will provide an opportunity to mobilize the international community to respond to the humanitarian needs of the Lebanese people and offer support to the Lebanese armed forces and internal security forces, whose role will be crucial for the country’s stability.”
As for the ceasefire, Paris is not the key actor. In an unusually frank statement, French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu acknowledged France’s inability to influence Israel’s decisions. In a radio interview last week, Lecornu said: “Israel does not respond to American demands and requests, so how can France influence it?”

 



Eight Killed in Israeli Strike on Lebanon’s Tyre

Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in the southern city of Tyre on June 9, 2026. (AFP)
Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in the southern city of Tyre on June 9, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Eight Killed in Israeli Strike on Lebanon’s Tyre

Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in the southern city of Tyre on June 9, 2026. (AFP)
Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in the southern city of Tyre on June 9, 2026. (AFP)

Israel struck the historic port city of Tyre in southern Lebanon on Tuesday, killing at least eight people, in an escalation that adds strain to efforts to broker a peace deal to end the wider Middle East war.

On Monday, Israel and Iran halted direct attacks on each other after an appeal by US President Donald Trump, but Tehran warned it would resume hostilities if Israel continued to attack its ally Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The raids were the deadliest on Tyre since fighting erupted in Lebanon in early March, when Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel in support of Tehran after Israel and the United States began their war against Iran.

Israel had issued an evacuation order for the city earlier on Tuesday.

Residents fled and civil defense teams transported elderly residents into temporary shelters, state media reported.

The eight victims were killed in a ‌single strike on ‌the city's eastern edge, Lebanon's health ministry said.

A video verified by Reuters showed debris strewn ‌across ⁠a road at the ⁠site of the attack.

Israel's refusal to end its campaign in Lebanon, as Iran demands, has hindered Trump's efforts to extend a tenuous ceasefire in the wider US-Israeli war with Iran into a durable settlement.

US and Israeli officials said Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had spoken on Monday.

In an interview with Axios, Trump said he had warned the Israeli leader not to return to war with Iran: "I said, 'Bibi, you better be careful, or you will be on your own very soon.'"

Tehran has long said any peace deal with the US depends in part on an end to fighting in Lebanon, which Israel invaded in March in pursuit of Hezbollah fighters who had fired across the border.

In northern Israel on Tuesday, Israeli troops operating in the Ramim Ridge area close to Lebanon's border killed one person in an incident in which they returned fire, the military said.

Israel has never halted its Lebanon campaign, which has killed thousands of people, saying the conflict should be treated separately from any US-Iranian ceasefire. Hezbollah has also continued its attacks.


First War Crimes Complaint Against Sudan’s RSF Filed in Kenya

 Lawyers Antonio Mulvay, left, and Willis Otieno, center, who are part of the legal team filing a law suit against Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on behalf of Sudanese torture victims, speak to the media in Nairobi, Tuesday June 9, 2026. (AP)
Lawyers Antonio Mulvay, left, and Willis Otieno, center, who are part of the legal team filing a law suit against Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on behalf of Sudanese torture victims, speak to the media in Nairobi, Tuesday June 9, 2026. (AP)
TT

First War Crimes Complaint Against Sudan’s RSF Filed in Kenya

 Lawyers Antonio Mulvay, left, and Willis Otieno, center, who are part of the legal team filing a law suit against Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on behalf of Sudanese torture victims, speak to the media in Nairobi, Tuesday June 9, 2026. (AP)
Lawyers Antonio Mulvay, left, and Willis Otieno, center, who are part of the legal team filing a law suit against Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on behalf of Sudanese torture victims, speak to the media in Nairobi, Tuesday June 9, 2026. (AP)

Victims of alleged atrocities linked to the war in Sudan on Tuesday asked prosecutors in Kenya to investigate allegations of torture and sexual violence by members of a notorious paramilitary group.

It is the first attempt to prosecute members of the Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, the paramilitary group fighting against the Sudanese military for over three years, outside Sudan.

The group, which has been accused by rights organizations of committing atrocities amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity, has ties with Kenya’s government, while Kenyan President William Ruto has previously hosted RSF leader Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo for talks that he said were aimed at advancing peace efforts in Sudan, a move that sparked diplomatic tensions.

The complaint filed by the Switzerland-based global legal organization Legal Action Worldwide details torture and sexual violence committed by RSF members at various locations in and around Khartoum between April 2023 and March 2025 when the Sudanese capital was controlled by the paramilitaries.

The 12 victims are urging Kenya’s Director of Public Prosecutions to approve charges against 10 members of the RSF, some of whom are believed to be residing in Kenya.

The Associated Press has contacted the RSF for a comment.

According to this latest complaint, the victims were held in inhumane conditions, with little or no food, limited access to water, and inadequate sanitation facilities. They allege that they were beaten, burned, suffocated, subjected to electric shocks, and sexually abused, including through rape. Some were reportedly forced to transport dead bodies from detention facilities.

Legal Action Worldwide founder Antonia Mulvey said Kenya should consider prosecuting the alleged crimes under the country’s International Crimes Act of 2008.

“For Kenya, despite the sensitivity of the matter, it is an opportunity to lead in the fight against impunity. Authorities can now demonstrate the strength of the country’s investigative, prosecutorial, and judicial institutions in addressing the most serious international crimes, regardless of where they are committed,” she said.

The RSF has been at war with the Sudanese military since April 2023, when tensions between the two sides erupted into open conflict in Khartoum and other parts of the country.

The group emerged from the notorious Janjaweed militias, which were accused of widespread atrocities in the early 2000s against communities identifying as East or Central African in Sudan’s western Darfur region.

The RSF has been accused by human rights organizations and the United Nations of committing atrocities during the conflict that may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, particularly in Darfur, where the group maintains a strong presence.

Mulvey argued that the victims are unlikely to obtain justice in Sudan because the country’s justice system is currently “inaccessible, unavailable, and ineffective.”

She said the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction is limited to Darfur and does not extend to crimes committed in or around Khartoum.

Willis Otieno, a lawyer in Kenya who filed the complaint locally, said there was information suggesting that some of the persons of interest have links to Kenya and that the country possesses the legal framework necessary to investigate and prosecute such crimes.

Otieno described Kenya’s Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions as competent, adding: “We have faith that the office will act. For now, let’s treat them with that goodwill.”

The RSF has in the past been accused of mass killing, gang rape, and ethnicity-motivated crimes, most recently in October during an assault on the Darfur city of el-Fashir, in which over 6,000 people were killed in three days. UN-commissioned experts have described the offensive as bearing the “hallmarks of genocide.”

In one of its last decisions, the Biden administration accused the group of genocide and imposed sanctions of its commanders, including Dagalo.

The war killed at least 59,000 people over the course of three years, according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, a US-based war tracking group which said the toll was almost certainly undercut given the difficulties in reporting.

The conflict has created the world’s largest humanitarian crisis, with about 34 million people — almost two out of every three Sudanese — need assistance, according to the UN.


Rival Palestinian Factions Discuss Gaza Disarmament

A Palestinian woman stands amid debris at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, on June 7, 2026. (AFP)
A Palestinian woman stands amid debris at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, on June 7, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Rival Palestinian Factions Discuss Gaza Disarmament

A Palestinian woman stands amid debris at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, on June 7, 2026. (AFP)
A Palestinian woman stands amid debris at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, on June 7, 2026. (AFP)

Members of Palestinian factions including Hamas agreed in principle for Gaza's armed groups to hand over parts of their arsenals to a yet-to-be-created, ad hoc Palestinian entity during talks in Cairo, Palestinian sources told AFP on Tuesday.

Such a proposal has almost no chance of being accepted by Israel, which demands a complete demilitarization of the Gaza Strip, starting with Palestinian movement Hamas.

Several of those who attended the Cairo talks that began on Saturday expressed hope the proposal would break a months-long deadlock on negotiations over Gaza's future.

The talks are being attended by most major factions, including Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad, but not the Fatah party that dominates the Palestinian Authority.

On Tuesday, the factions discussed the details of the weapons handover to a new entity with representation from various Palestinian political currents, according to a source close to negotiations.

They rejected the idea of a full disarmament, as demanded by Israel, several sources who asked for anonymity said.

"Egypt and the mediators are working to formulate a new, acceptable formula that takes into account the factions' agreement," one of the participants told AFP.

Another Palestinian taking part in the talks told AFP that Egyptian and Qatari mediators welcomed this approach.

"Hamas is linking the weapons question to a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and to Gaza's reconstruction," one Palestinian political official said.

Senior Hamas official Taher al-Nunu told AFP that recent days had brought "significant progress", adding that the factions aimed to implement US President Donald Trump's peace plan for Gaza.

Israeli strikes have continued at an almost daily pace despite the ceasefire announced in October 2025 after two years of war, under Trump's phased peace plan.

Hamas and Israel blame each other for the current impasse, each accusing the other almost daily of violating the ceasefire.

Hamas accuses Israel of failing to honor its commitments, particularly on allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, while Israel insists on the complete disarmament of the movement before any further implementation of the plan.

Hamas has repeatedly stated that it is not opposed to handing over some of its arsenal, but only as part of a Palestinian political process.

Former Hamas chief Khaled Meshaal also suggested a weapons "freeze" or "storage", which Israel rejected.