Lebanon Worried about Possible Security Unrest Along Syria Border 

Lebanese soldiers during the battles in Jroud Arsal in 2017. (Army Command)
Lebanese soldiers during the battles in Jroud Arsal in 2017. (Army Command)
TT

Lebanon Worried about Possible Security Unrest Along Syria Border 

Lebanese soldiers during the battles in Jroud Arsal in 2017. (Army Command)
Lebanese soldiers during the battles in Jroud Arsal in 2017. (Army Command)

Tensions have been high along the Lebanese-Syrian border amid reports of forces being amassed in both countries.

Stoking the tensions were Lebanese media circulating a document from the Army Command that spoke of extremists gathering along the Syrian side of the border.

Dated August 10, the document said the extremists were planning on kidnapping Lebanese soldiers in the Bekaa and North to later swap them for Islamists held in Lebanese jails.

Security sources confirmed to Asharq Al-Awsat the authenticity of the document.

The document also showed that army units and military intelligence were requested to take extra precautions and bolster security, especially at night, and to report any suspicious activity on either side of the border.

At the same time the document was released, rumors emerged that the Lebanese air forces had breached Syrian skies to detect suspicious movement, sparking tensions with Syria.

The Army Command was quick to dismiss the claims, saying they were “baseless” and that “military units were monitoring the situation at the border and taking the necessary measures to secure and protect them.”

“Coordination is ongoing with the Syrian authorities to follow up on any development,” it stressed in a statement.

It called against circulating false news and to only resort to official military statements to obtain accurate information.

Hezbollah benefits

Lebanon’s former Internal Security Forces chief MP Ashraf Rifi also dismissed claims about security threats from Syria, saying that Hezbollah would gain the most from such rumors to justify holding on to its weapons.

The Lebanese government had earlier this month agreed to the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon in an attempt to impose state monopoly over weapons.

Rifi told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hezbollah is “adopting Israeli claims that Syria wants to annex parts of Lebanon in return for Syria abandoning the Golan Heights to Israel.”

“Hezbollah has an interest in supporting claims about threats from the east to strike fears in Christians and other segments of society and convince them that it should maintain its weapons arsenal so that it can confront the imminent danger from Syria,” he explained.

“The new Syrian regime has been very clear; it has openly said that it recognizes Lebanon as an independent state and that it was ready to demarcate the border and secure it to prevent any breach that threatens Lebanon and its people,” Rifi stressed.

Alert level raised

Lebanese military units and security forces deployed along the border have raised their alert level, especially in wake of the violence that erupted in Syria’s predominantly Druze southern province of Sweida in recent months.

Calls had been made in Lebanon to send fighters to support the various rival parties there.

A Lebanese security source acknowledged the tensions along the border, but said they have been exaggerated.

It told Asharq Al-Awsat that the army is on alert and deploying patrols to prevent any breach from either side of the border.

Contacts are ongoing on a daily basis between the neighbors to tackle any development, it stressed.

The Syrian side of the border has also been on alert since the ouster of Bashar al-Assad's regime in December and the announcement that dozens of its members had fled to Lebanon.

Syria’s new rulers have accused Hezbollah of sheltering them in Lebanon and being involved in the Syria coastal clashes earlier this year that pit remnants of the regime against the new authorities in a failed coup attempt.

Lebanese former minister Wiam Wahhab also declared the establishment of a military unit that was ready to go to Sweida to fight. Concerns have been high in Lebanon that the violence there could spread to its own territories, forcing Hezbollah and clans in the Bekaa to go on alert.

The security source acknowledged that military and security units were deployed along the border with Syria, including fighters from the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group and official security forces.

Rallying Shiites

Clashes had erupted on the Lebanese-Syrian border in late June leaving casualties and injuries from both sides. Fighters from the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham managed to enter the town of Hosh al-Sayyed in the Lebanese Bekaa and expel Hezbollah fighters there. The army soon intervened and forced the Syrians out.

Residents of border areas fear a repeat of the violence amid unconfirmed reports that groups loyal to Maher al-Assad, Bashar’s brother, were working in coordination with Hezbollah to spark a confrontation with the Syrian army.

Security and military expert Khalil al-Helo said: “At the moment, the conditions on the ground indicate that Syria has no intention of opening a front with Lebanon.”

“The Syrian state is too preoccupied with its own internal affairs and in preventing tensions from erupting, such as the unrest in Sweida,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“It is focused on reconstruction and attracting investments, especially after the US lifted its sanctions and Saudi investors became involved in Syria,” he added.

Hezbollah has warned of “an impending danger from Syria in an attempt to rally its Shiite supporters and respond to internal and external pressure for it to disarm,” he said.

The Iran-backed party will use the alleged foreign danger “as an excuse to maintain its weapons so that it can use them against the threat from Syria,” he went on to say.

However, all studies and circumstances on the ground do not back up claims of this threat or that the situation on the border was ready to explode, Helo said.

“The escalation only benefits Hezbollah, and it is using it to rally support for keeping its weapons,” he remarked.



Did Hamas Threaten Israel with Another October 7 Attack?

Palestinians fill plastic bottles with water at a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip, Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Palestinians fill plastic bottles with water at a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip, Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

Did Hamas Threaten Israel with Another October 7 Attack?

Palestinians fill plastic bottles with water at a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip, Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Palestinians fill plastic bottles with water at a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip, Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

Israeli newspapers have repeatedly reported a similar account claiming that Hamas warned Israel it would carry out another attack on the scale of October 7, 2023, and that the warning was conveyed through UN Middle East envoy Ramiz Alakbarov during his visit to the Gaza Strip last week, when he allegedly met senior Hamas leaders.

The Israeli newspapers, particularly Yedioth Ahronoth, based their reports on information circulated by Israel's Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), which reportedly sent an urgent warning to the country's political and military leadership.

The alleged threat was linked to Israeli military operations in Gaza, where the army continues to occupy more than half the territory a year after the ceasefire was announced.

Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem denied in a brief statement distributed to journalists in Gaza that the movement had threatened to carry out another attack similar to October 7.

He reaffirmed Hamas's commitment to the ceasefire agreement and called on mediators to intervene to stop Israeli violations against Palestinians and ensure the agreement's implementation.

Qassem also warned against accepting Israeli allegations and exploiting them for electoral purposes.

He did not address reports that the UN official had met Hamas leaders.

Asharq Al-Awsat sought further comment from the Hamas spokesperson, but he did not respond to the correspondent's questions.

Late Thursday evening, Hamas issued an official statement denying that it had threatened any attacks, without confirming or denying whether a meeting with the UN official had taken place.

The published itinerary for Alakbarov's two-day visit to the Gaza Strip on October 11 and 12 made no reference to meetings with Hamas officials.

According to the schedule posted on the United Nations website, his visit focused on assessing humanitarian conditions at several locations, including displacement centers, affected families, winter preparedness efforts and female-headed households.

The itinerary also listed a meeting with humanitarian partners at a UNRWA facility in Gaza City to discuss humanitarian responses and gaps in assistance.

An official from Alakbarov's office told Asharq Al-Awsat that the UN envoy had not met any Hamas officials during his latest visit.

However, Asharq Al-Awsat learned from a local UN employee that Alakbarov visited Al-Shifa Medical Complex on Sunday, October 11, and met hospital and health officials to assess conditions at medical facilities.

That visit was not mentioned in the published itinerary, and Alakbarov's office neither confirmed nor denied it.

The local official also said the UN delegation came under Israeli shellfire while visiting the Zarqa area northeast of Gaza City, near the Yellow Line.

No injuries were reported, and the delegation quickly left the area.

Asharq Al-Awsat attempted to contact Mohammed Abu Salmiya, director of Al-Shifa Medical Complex, but he did not answer the calls. Officials from Gaza's Government Media Office were also unreachable.

UN officials routinely visit hospitals, displacement centers and other facilities to assess humanitarian conditions. Many have made such visits without meeting Hamas officials, particularly amid the precarious security situation and continuing pursuit and assassination of Hamas members in Gaza.

Observers believe the Israeli account is primarily motivated by electoral considerations, particularly amid repeated statements by Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz, about alleged Hamas plans to carry out attacks similar to October 7.

Both officials have emphasized that Israel would respond forcefully to any such attack, in statements seen as attempts to influence the elections. Similar warnings have also been made concerning Iran and Hezbollah.

However, Israeli security sources told Haaretz that, contrary to claims made by Netanyahu and Katz in recent days, security agencies had not detected intensive efforts by any party to launch attacks against Israel with the aim of influencing the elections.

Israeli military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, meanwhile, limited his remarks to affirming that the armed forces were prepared to deal with any attempts at external interference in the elections.

He said the military would undertake defensive and offensive operations should any such scenario materialize.


Far-right Israeli Minister Orders Buildings Demolished in West Bank after Attack

File: Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
File: Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
TT

Far-right Israeli Minister Orders Buildings Demolished in West Bank after Attack

File: Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
File: Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)

Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said he had ordered the demolition of buildings near a shooting attack in the occupied West Bank that wounded at least five people on Friday.

"Following the attack, I have ordered the immediate demolition of a wide row of illegal Arab structures adjacent to the attack site," he said. "The order will be carried out within the next hour and will take place throughout the afternoon hours."


International Meeting Rules Out Military Solution to Sudan War

A view of the consultative meeting on coordinating peace initiatives and efforts in Sudan on October 21, 2026 (Saudi Foreign Ministry). 
A view of the consultative meeting on coordinating peace initiatives and efforts in Sudan on October 21, 2026 (Saudi Foreign Ministry). 
TT

International Meeting Rules Out Military Solution to Sudan War

A view of the consultative meeting on coordinating peace initiatives and efforts in Sudan on October 21, 2026 (Saudi Foreign Ministry). 
A view of the consultative meeting on coordinating peace initiatives and efforts in Sudan on October 21, 2026 (Saudi Foreign Ministry). 

International representatives meeting in Geneva have declared that there is no military solution to Sudan’s war, calling for an urgent humanitarian truce, an end to foreign interference and renewed efforts toward a political settlement.

The appeal came at the close of UN-organized Sixth Consultative Meeting on Enhancing Coordination of Peace Initiatives and Efforts in Sudan where the army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have been fighting since April 2023.

In a final statement, participants warned that civilians were paying a devastating price for the warring parties’ pursuit of battlefield gains. They urged both sides to de-escalate and engage seriously in negotiations that could lead to a permanent ceasefire.

The sixth consultative meeting, which concluded Wednesday evening, was co-chaired by Swiss State Secretary for Foreign Affairs Alexandre Fasel and UN Secretary-General’s Personal Envoy for Sudan Pekka Haavisto.

Representatives of 22 countries attended, including the United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Britain, France, China, Russia and Sudan’s neighbors, alongside regional and international organizations such as the African Union, European Union and Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD).

Confidence-building measures

Haavisto outlined UN efforts to introduce confidence-building measures that both warring parties might accept, including exchanges of prisoners of war and detainees, both military and civilian, and arrangements to allow students to sit examinations.

“We think that there are issues that should unite actually both parties of the conflict,” he said, describing such initiatives as modest first steps compared with the devastation caused by the war.

The meeting stressed that a humanitarian truce must pave the way for a lasting ceasefire, with de-escalation efforts bringing tangible improvements on the ground.

After three and a half years of fighting, participants dismissed the pursuit of military gains as a solution, warning that civilians were bearing the devastating cost of continued hostilities.

They called for full compliance with international humanitarian law and the protection of civilian facilities, particularly infrastructure essential to basic services.

States and other actors were urged to stop fueling the conflict by supplying mercenaries, military equipment, drones or financing.

Such support, the statement warned, would cause further casualties and increase the risk of Sudan’s fragmentation. It did not identify any countries or organizations responsible for providing assistance to the warring parties.

Participants reaffirmed their commitment to Sudan’s sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity, as well as the preservation of state institutions.

They rejected the creation of parallel governments, institutions or governing structures and called for concrete measures to prevent any steps that could undermine the country’s unity.

Push for an inclusive political settlement

The Geneva talks emphasized that lasting peace would require a credible, inclusive Sudanese political process reflecting the aspirations of the population.

Such negotiations should allow meaningful participation by political and civilian groups, including women and young people, and lead to an agreed transition toward sustainable peace and democratic governance.

Participants backed mediation efforts by the Quad — the United States, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt — and the Quintet, comprising the African Union, European Union, IGAD, Arab League and United Nations.

They stressed that any political process must be transparent, credible, and free from coercion.

The meeting also expressed grave concern over continuing hostilities, reports of atrocities and the increasing use of drones.

Millions of Sudanese face severe food shortages, while restrictions on humanitarian access and adverse weather conditions have heightened the threat of famine.

The conflict’s humanitarian, social and economic repercussions are also being felt across neighboring countries, raising fears of violence spreading beyond Sudan’s borders with potentially catastrophic consequences.

Regional and international coordination

The Geneva consultations follow earlier meetings in Cairo, Djibouti, Nouakchott and Brussels, the most recent held in the Egyptian capital on January 14.

The initiative seeks to bring regional and international diplomatic efforts into closer alignment as Sudan’s humanitarian catastrophe deepens.

Aid organizations estimate that more than 200,000 people have been killed and over 13 million displaced since the war began, leaving the country at the center of the world’s largest hunger and displacement crisis.

Participants also reaffirmed their commitment to the principles adopted at the ministerial conference on Sudan in Berlin last April and the spirit of the May 2023 Jeddah Declaration, under which the army and RSF pledged to protect civilians and facilitate humanitarian access.