Growing US Role in Gaza Raises Israeli Alarm 

US soldiers listen to Vice President JD Vance as he delivers remarks at the Civilian Military Coordination Center in southern Israel on Friday. (EPA)
US soldiers listen to Vice President JD Vance as he delivers remarks at the Civilian Military Coordination Center in southern Israel on Friday. (EPA)
TT

Growing US Role in Gaza Raises Israeli Alarm 

US soldiers listen to Vice President JD Vance as he delivers remarks at the Civilian Military Coordination Center in southern Israel on Friday. (EPA)
US soldiers listen to Vice President JD Vance as he delivers remarks at the Civilian Military Coordination Center in southern Israel on Friday. (EPA)

Growing US involvement in the Gaza Strip is stirring growing concern in Israel, where security sources have voiced alarm over Washington’s reported plan to build a large military base in the enclave, a move they say signals “an unprecedented insistence on intervening in Gaza, and in the Israeli and Palestinian conflict.”

According to the sources cited by the Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth, the plan “reshapes the map of influence after Israel did everything it could since the 1967 war to limit international intervention in the Palestinian territories.”

Until recently, US military presence in Israel was extremely limited. After the ceasefire agreement was signed, the United States sent about 200 troops to Israel. They are currently operating from an American command center in Kiryat Gat in southern Israel.

The United States also deployed a THAAD missile defense battery during the Israel-Iran war in June to help intercept Iranian missiles.

Yedioth said the planned base forms part of US measures that have already reduced Israel’s freedom of action inside the enclave, particularly with regard to allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, which Israel had used as a pressure tool on Hamas.

Israeli sources said the US command center in Kiryat Gat is expected to assume full control over the distribution of humanitarian aid, leaving Israel only a marginal role in coordinating government activity in the territories.

Michael Milstein, a Hamas expert at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University, told The Guardian that the military coordination center in Kiryat Gat will be responsible for most of the activity in Gaza, and Israel’s status as the main player in the enclave will change.

All of this has fed rising accusations in Israel against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since the ceasefire brokered by Washington.

Critics argue the Americans have taken the initiative in Gaza out of Israel’s hands.

Netanyahu has been forced to defend himself and his relationship with the United States repeatedly in recent weeks, following Israeli claims that Washington has entrenched its dominance over Israel through a political airlift of senior officials, a military headquarters in the south monitoring Gaza minute by minute, and American drones operating over the enclave.

They say the Americans have prevented Netanyahu and his government from taking action against Hamas or carrying out attacks or even imposing sanctions, have intervened in the search for bodies, brought in foreign teams despite initial Israeli objections, want Hamas members extracted alive from Rafah, and are effectively deciding the nature of the next phase, who will govern the enclave, and who will participate in any international force.

Many Israelis, including politicians, writers, and analysts, say the United States has taken the initiative in the Gaza Strip and is now openly determining Israeli security and political affairs in a way that has turned Israel into a de facto American “protectorate.”

Israeli commentators have written about “Bibi’s guardianship,” “a single deciding party,” the internationalization of the conflict, and “tight American supervision.”

These sentiments intensified with a report about US plans to build a 500-million-dollar military base near the Gaza border to support the ceasefire.

Yedioth Ahronoth reported Tuesday, citing Israeli officials, that the planned US base along the Gaza boundary would host several thousand troops tasked with maintaining the ceasefire.

In recent weeks, US officials have raised the proposal in discussions with the Israeli government and the Israeli army and have begun surveying potential sites around Gaza.

After the ceasefire agreement was signed in the Egyptian city of Sharm el-Sheikh in October, about 200 American troops were deployed in Israel from the central US military coordination center in Kiryat Gat, although Washington stressed it would not send soldiers into the enclave.



Israel Says Military Operation Against Hezbollah 'Still Not Complete'

A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
TT

Israel Says Military Operation Against Hezbollah 'Still Not Complete'

A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki

Israel's defense minister said on Friday that the campaign against Hezbollah was not yet complete, just hours after a 10-day ceasefire came into force in Lebanon.

He also warned that if the fighting resumed, displaced residents returning to the country's war-torn south would have to evacuate again.

"The ground maneuver into Lebanon and the strikes on Hezbollah have achieved many gains, but they are still not complete," Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a broadcast statement.

There remained areas of the south that had not yet been cleared of Hezbollah militants, which would have to happen one way or another, he added.

"The area between the security zone and the Litani (River) line, which is currently under our control, has not yet been cleared of terrorists and weapons," Katz warned.

"This will have to be carried out either through diplomatic means or by continued IDF activity once the ceasefire ends."

As the truce took effect at midnight (2100 GMT), thousands of displaced Lebanese civilians began heading south, hoping to return to their homes.

But Katz said a fresh bout of fighting could force them to leave again.

"If the fighting resumes, those residents who return to the security zone will have to be evacuated to allow completion of the mission," AFP quoted him as saying.

According to details of the truce released by the US State Department, Israel reserves the right to continue targeting Hezbollah to prevent "planned, imminent, or ongoing attacks".

Israel, whose troops are occupying parts of southern Lebanon, has also said it will maintain a 10-kilometer (six-mile) security zone it has established along the border.

"The security zone has been cleared of militants and weapons, is empty of residents, and will continue to be cleared of terrorist infrastructure, including the destruction of homes in front-line villages that have effectively become terrorist outposts," Katz said.

The details of the truce also stipulate that Lebanon "with international support... will take meaningful steps to prevent Hezbollah" from undertaking any attacks against Israeli targets.


Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
TT

Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 

Beirut MPs representing most of Lebanon’s political parties met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free,” following recent security incidents and Israeli strikes.

The conference brought together most factions, except MPs from Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya.

Despite political divisions, participants struck a unified rhetoric, calling for all weapons to be placed exclusively under state control and for a stronger presence of official institutions, chiefly the Lebanese Army, across the capital to ensure stability and restore public confidence in security.

MP Fouad Makhzoumi said Beirut “deserves to be protected together” and would remain “a city that embraces everyone,” describing the “Black Wednesday” as a serious warning of the risks still facing the capital.

He called for the army to deploy across all neighborhoods, for checkpoints to be reinforced and for effective security oversight, stressing that state-building requires a monopoly on arms “without exception.”

He further stressed all necessary measures should be taken to restore order, “up to declaring general mobilization if needed.”

For his part, MP Ghassan Hasbani of the Lebanese Forces said the meeting reflected a national stance tied to the responsibility of representing Beirut’s residents. He voiced support for state efforts to assert full authority, confiscate illegal weapons and treat any armed activity outside state control as a direct threat to the capital’s security and stability.

Kataeb Party lawmaker Nadim Gemayel noted that Lebanon should no longer be used as a bargaining chip by external actors, calling for firm implementation of government decisions and for the army to deploy across the country, starting with Beirut, to protect citizens and reinforce sovereignty.

Similarly, MP Ibrahim Mneimneh said Hezbollah had dragged Lebanon into a conflict unrelated to it, exposing the country to heavy losses, while Beirut and other regions paid the price in security and stability. He stressed that the current phase required restoring state authority and ensuring its exclusive control over arms.

MP Waddah Sadeq said the Lebanese “have the right to loyalty to Lebanon alone,” urging support for what he described as “historic” government decisions. He called for unity under a state based on institutions and the rule of law, and for security forces to fully carry out their duties.

MP Nicolas Sehnaoui of the Free Patriotic Movement highlighted the need for an inclusive national approach to rebuild trust in the state, stressing that limiting arms to the army and legitimate forces remains essential, while avoiding exclusionary rhetoric.

Lawmaker Edgar Traboulsi said Beirut, despite wars and crises, “does not die,” but needs unity and solidarity free from division and incitement.

MP Faisal Sayegh of the Progressive Socialist Party stated that Beirut’s security is inseparable from Lebanon’s, calling for adherence to sovereignty and independence and implementation of the Taif Agreement and relevant government decisions.


Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat

Beirut MPs representing most of Lebanon’s political parties met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free,” following recent security incidents and Israeli strikes.

The conference brought together most factions, except MPs from Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya.

Despite political divisions, participants struck a unified rhetoric, calling for all weapons to be placed exclusively under state control and for a stronger presence of official institutions, chiefly the Lebanese Army, across the capital to ensure stability and restore public confidence in security.

MP Fouad Makhzoumi said Beirut “deserves to be protected together” and would remain “a city that embraces everyone,” describing the “Black Wednesday” as a serious warning of the risks still facing the capital.

He called for the army to deploy across all neighborhoods, for checkpoints to be reinforced and for effective security oversight, stressing that state-building requires a monopoly on arms “without exception.”

He further stressed all necessary measures should be taken to restore order, “up to declaring general mobilization if needed.”

For his part, MP Ghassan Hasbani of the Lebanese Forces said the meeting reflected a national stance tied to the responsibility of representing Beirut’s residents. He voiced support for state efforts to assert full authority, confiscate illegal weapons and treat any armed activity outside state control as a direct threat to the capital’s security and stability.

Kataeb Party lawmaker Nadim Gemayel noted that Lebanon should no longer be used as a bargaining chip by external actors, calling for firm implementation of government decisions and for the army to deploy across the country, starting with Beirut, to protect citizens and reinforce sovereignty.

Similarly, MP Ibrahim Mneimneh said Hezbollah had dragged Lebanon into a conflict unrelated to it, exposing the country to heavy losses, while Beirut and other regions paid the price in security and stability. He stressed that the current phase required restoring state authority and ensuring its exclusive control over arms.

MP Waddah Sadeq said the Lebanese “have the right to loyalty to Lebanon alone,” urging support for what he described as “historic” government decisions. He called for unity under a state based on institutions and the rule of law, and for security forces to fully carry out their duties.

MP Nicolas Sehnaoui of the Free Patriotic Movement highlighted the need for an inclusive national approach to rebuild trust in the state, stressing that limiting arms to the army and legitimate forces remains essential, while avoiding exclusionary rhetoric.

Lawmaker Edgar Traboulsi said Beirut, despite wars and crises, “does not die,” but needs unity and solidarity free from division and incitement.

MP Faisal Sayegh of the Progressive Socialist Party stated that Beirut’s security is inseparable from Lebanon’s, calling for adherence to sovereignty and independence and implementation of the Taif Agreement and relevant government decisions.