Why Did the US Delegation Exclude Lebanon’s Shiite Officials?

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam meets US Treasury delegation in Beirut on Monday (Lebanese Government Presidency)
Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam meets US Treasury delegation in Beirut on Monday (Lebanese Government Presidency)
TT

Why Did the US Delegation Exclude Lebanon’s Shiite Officials?

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam meets US Treasury delegation in Beirut on Monday (Lebanese Government Presidency)
Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam meets US Treasury delegation in Beirut on Monday (Lebanese Government Presidency)

Political observers in Lebanon have taken note of the US Treasury delegation’s decision to exclude Shiite officials from its meetings in Beirut earlier this week.

The exclusion came even though some of the Shiite officials are directly involved, by virtue of their positions, in implementing Washington’s demands that Lebanon curb Hezbollah’s financing channels and enforce the state’s monopoly on arms through legislation and executive measures.

US delegation meets top Lebanese officials

The American delegation, led by Deputy Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Counterterrorism Sebastian Gorka, included Undersecretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI) John Hurley and White House National Security Council counterterrorism specialist Rudolph Atallah.

During their visit to Beirut, they met President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Justice Minister Adel Nassar, Interior Minister Ahmad Hajjar, and Central Bank Governor Karim Souaid.

The delegation also met Kataeb Party leader and lawmaker Sami Gemayel, and attended a dinner hosted by MP Fouad Makhzoumi with a group of parliamentarians.

However, the delegation notably excluded Shiite officials. It did not meet Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri — the country’s second-highest official, a key Hezbollah ally and the group’s long-time interlocutor with foreign delegations — nor Finance Minister Yassin Jaber.

No Shiite figures were present at any of the official meetings, including First Vice Governor of the Central Bank Wassim Mansouri, who was absent from the session held with Governor Souaid.

‘No boycott,’ says Shiite bloc

Sources familiar with the visit’s schedule said most meetings were held privately between the delegation and Lebanese officials, including Central Bank Governor Souaid, who met the visitors alone without the presence of senior banking oversight officials, in what they described as an effort to downplay any sectarian undertones.

Sources from the Shiite political alliance known as the “duo” — Hezbollah and the Amal Movement — also dismissed the idea of a boycott. “The delegation met with officials relevant to its mission,” one source told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“The claim of a boycott is inaccurate, as the delegation met Finance Minister Yassin Jaber during the dinner hosted by MP Makhzoumi, which was also attended by another Shiite MP. That confirms there was no boycott.”

Symbolism and political messages

Yet, political analysts say the exclusion carried symbolic weight, noting that the delegation did not seek an appointment with Speaker Berri as visiting US officials typically do, nor did it request a meeting with the finance minister at his office.

That, according to some Lebanese officials following the visit, suggested a political message — one directed at Iran, Hezbollah’s main backer.

“The exclusion signals that the Americans are deliberately avoiding all Shiite officials, regardless of political affiliation,” one ministerial source told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“This was met with a quick response from Iran through Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem, who on the same day rejected any new negotiations with Israel and refused to discuss surrendering weapons north of the Litani River, saying the agreement applies only to the south.”

Lebanon as a messaging arena

According to the same sources, the issue is “not about boycotting the Shiites, but rather that Lebanon has become a stage for message exchanges — with Washington sending signals and Tehran responding through Hezbollah.”

The sources said this dynamic is not new: “The United States has long sought to push Iran out of Lebanon and force it to relinquish its influence here. Lebanese officials first heard this stance during Donald Trump’s first presidential term in 2017, when the White House insisted Iran must come to the table to discuss its regional role. Ten years later, the message is the same: Washington wants Iran’s hand lifted off Lebanon.”

US-Berri contacts persist

Since the last decade, when pressure mounted on Iran and Hezbollah, Washington has drawn a line between Lebanese Shiites as citizens and Hezbollah as an organization.

US sanctions have targeted individuals it views as part of Hezbollah’s financial or military apparatus, while communication channels with Lebanese officials remained open — particularly through Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee.

Speaker Berri himself has sent parliamentary delegations to Washington since 2015 for meetings with members of Congress, maintaining an official dialogue that continues to this day.

Finance Minister Yassin Jaber has also made at least two visits to Washington since joining the cabinet, most recently last month, when he met representatives of the US Treasury Department. In Beirut, he has received multiple American, IMF, and World Bank delegations.

According to parliamentary sources who attended Makhzoumi’s dinner, Jaber delivered a 10-minute briefing to the US delegation outlining the government’s and parliament’s measures to “stabilize the monetary economy, tighten customs controls at airports, seaports, and land borders with Syria, and enhance supervision of money transfer companies.”

He also stressed that “executive reforms are progressing,” while the political aspects of implementation “remain under discussion with the president.”



Hamas to Asharq Al-Awsat: Gaza Arms Are Light, Pose No Threat to Israel

Hamas fighters in Gaza (Reuters)
Hamas fighters in Gaza (Reuters)
TT

Hamas to Asharq Al-Awsat: Gaza Arms Are Light, Pose No Threat to Israel

Hamas fighters in Gaza (Reuters)
Hamas fighters in Gaza (Reuters)

Senior sources in Hamas have played down what they described as an Israeli “scare tactic” over the group’s weapons, rejecting Israeli demands to disarm as a condition for moving to the second phase of a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

The sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hamas possesses only light weapons in Gaza that have no real impact and pose no genuine threat to Israel, and are barely sufficient to confront Israeli forces. They said such arms could not be used to carry out large-scale attacks, such as the Oct. 7, 2023, assault.

They said fighters from armed factions mainly have Kalashnikov and M16 rifles and similar light weapons, along with a very limited number of anti-armor rounds and improvised explosive devices, most of them individual and small in size.

The sources added that the group has lost almost all of its rockets, mortars and similar weapons after the vast majority were used during two years of fighting, while Israeli forces destroyed stockpiles they uncovered.

The sources said Israel was using the weapons issue to avoid complying with the ceasefire agreement and moving to the second phase, in order to preserve long-term strategic security goals, including keeping its forces inside Gaza, particularly east of the so-called yellow line designated as a withdrawal line in the first phase.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview with Fox News that there were currently 20,000 Hamas fighters in Gaza armed with Kalashnikov rifles and holding around 60,000 weapons. He said they also used them against civilians in Gaza who opposed their rule.

Disarmament means taking all their weapons and getting rid of them, and dismantling hundreds of kilometers of terror tunnels, Netanyahu said, adding that Hamas refused to do so.

According to Israel’s Channel 13, Netanyahu conveyed those figures to US President Donald Trump, who was said to be shocked by the numbers and stressed the need to dismantle the entire arsenal before any next steps.

Commenting on Netanyahu’s remarks, the Hamas sources said he was trying to influence US thinking on the second phase by making various claims, including about light weapons, in an effort to broaden the concept of disarmament in Gaza and force the resistance to hand over everything it has, even personal arms.

They said Israel’s insistence on stripping Palestinian factions of all weapons aimed to turn Gaza into a pacified area, raising a white flag and stripping it of the means of resilience and resistance that have long defined the enclave under occupation.

“Netanyahu will achieve nothing of the sort,” the sources said. “As he failed before, he and many Israeli leaders will fail again.”

Asked whether that meant Hamas rejected disarmament, the sources said discussions were ongoing with mediators and that a number of ideas were still being developed toward an agreement on weapons within the framework of a broad Palestinian national consensus.

On what remains of Hamas’ tunnel network, the sources said the issue was also under discussion and negotiation, adding that the movement was not seeking to obstruct the transition to the second phase or any of its provisions, but not at the expense of core Palestinian principles.

Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth reported on Friday that Israeli military chief of staff Eyal Zamir expressed doubts in a security discussion held before Netanyahu’s trip to the United States about the ability of an international stabilization force to disarm Hamas.

Zamir said Israeli forces were operationally ready to carry out the task themselves through another military operation in Gaza, a view Netanyahu reportedly shares as the US administration seeks to exhaust all options for such a step.

The report came as Israel continues to discover more tunnels in Gaza despite the end of the two-year war. One discovery surprised officials due to its proximity to the border with the Kissufim area, east of central Gaza.

Yedioth Ahronoth said the tunnel was about 800 meters from the settlements, within the buffer zone between Gaza and Israel that Israel intends to keep under its control in any future scenario.

The Israeli army has opened an investigation into when it was dug and why it was not detected earlier, given the presence of permanent Israeli military sites on both sides of the border. The tunnel was exposed after heavy rainfall, the paper said.


Led by Al-Khanbashi, National Shield Forces Deploy in Yemen’s Hadhramaut to Retake Camps

Hadhramaut Governor Salem al-Khanbashi (Saba News Agency)
Hadhramaut Governor Salem al-Khanbashi (Saba News Agency)
TT

Led by Al-Khanbashi, National Shield Forces Deploy in Yemen’s Hadhramaut to Retake Camps

Hadhramaut Governor Salem al-Khanbashi (Saba News Agency)
Hadhramaut Governor Salem al-Khanbashi (Saba News Agency)

Eastern Yemen’s Hadhramaut province entered a critical phase on Friday as government-backed National Shield forces began deploying against an insurgency by the Southern Transitional Council (STC), seeking to regain control of military camps and restore the state’s grip over security and military institutions under the leadership of Governor Salem al-Khanbashi.

Field sources said National Shield forces advanced toward the al-Khasha area in Wadi Seiyun, where units affiliated with the STC are stationed.

The forces encountered ambushes and armed clashes during their advance, prompting direct intervention by aircraft from the Arab Coalition backing Yemen’s internationally recognized government.

The sources said National Shield forces succeeded in the early hours in seizing the headquarters of the 37th Strategic Brigade Camp in al-Khasha, while continuing their advance to tighten control over Seiyun, the largest city in Wadi Hadhramaut and home to the First Military Region command, ahead of moving toward other valley cities still under Transitional Council influence.

As ground operations unfolded, Arab Coalition spokesperson Brig. Gen. Turki al-Maliki stated that Saudi Arabia’s Royal Naval Forces had completed their deployment in the Arabian Sea, a move aimed at conducting inspection operations and combating smuggling.

The developments followed a decision by Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council Chairman, Rashad al-Alimi, to appoint al-Khanbashi as the overall commander of the National Shield forces in the province, granting him full military, security, and administrative authority to restore security and order.

The decision stated that the mandate would end once its causes cease or upon the issuance of a subsequent presidential decision revoking the authorization. The last clause confirmed the decision would take effect from the date of issuance and publication in the official gazette and military bulletins.

The decision is widely seen as a decisive sovereign step reflecting al-Alimi’s approach to unifying military and security command in Hadhramaut and reinforcing state authority in one of Yemen’s most strategically and economically important provinces.

Observers said the decision provides legal and political cover for the “handover of camps” operation, placing it within a clear institutional framework and away from factional conflict, a point the governor emphasized in his address.

Saudi ambassador blames al-Zubaidi

Leaders of the Southern Transitional Council rejected handing over the camps or avoiding confrontation, with several figures calling for general mobilization. Field assessments indicate their forces’ capabilities have declined and may collapse, potentially forcing their withdrawal from Hadhramaut and al-Mahra by force.

In a clear Saudi stance, Saudi Ambassador to Yemen Mohammed Al-Jaber held the Transitional Council and its leader, Aidrous al-Zubaidi, directly responsible for the escalation, stating that the exploitation of the southern cause for personal gain had harmed it and stripped it of many of its political achievements.

In a series of posts on X, Al-Jaber stated that Saudi Arabia has supported and continues to support the southern cause as a just issue with historical and social dimensions, emphasizing that a genuine solution can only be achieved through political dialogue that meets the aspirations of all southern governorates.

He said al-Zubaidi had taken dangerous unilateral decisions, most notably leading a military attack on Hadhramaut and al-Mahra, resulting in security breakdowns, the intimidation of civilians, and the killing and wounding of Hadhramaut residents.

Al-Jaber stated that the Kingdom had exerted intensive efforts in recent weeks to persuade the STC to end the escalation and hand over the camps to National Shield forces, but faced continued rejection and intransigence.

This included refusing to issue clearance for a Saudi aircraft carrying an official delegation on Jan. 1, 2026, and shutting down air traffic at Aden airport, which he described as irresponsible behavior that harms Yemenis and undermines de-escalation efforts.

A peaceful operation

Al-Khanbashi confirmed the launch of the “camp handover” operation, stating that it is a peaceful and organized process targeting only military sites, without harming any political or social component, and without affecting civilians or their interests.

He stressed that the operation was not a declaration of war or a push for escalation, but a preventive measure aimed at neutralizing weapons and stopping chaos, thereby preventing the use of camps to threaten Hadhramaut’s security and protecting the province from dangerous scenarios.

Al-Khanbashi said Hadhramaut is going through a sensitive phase that requires courageous and responsible decisions.

He noted that local authorities, backed by the state and Saudi Arabia, had made significant efforts to open dialogue channels, but faced deliberate obstruction and systematic preparations to create chaos that could spiral out of control.

He stated that the operation is limited in scope, clear in its objectives, and guided by constitutional and national responsibilities to protect citizens’ lives and preserve civil peace.

Calls for calm and accountability

The governor called on Hadhramaut’s tribal leaders, elders, and social figures to play their national role during this critical phase and help shield society from being drawn into chaos or polarization, stating that Hadhramaut has always been and will remain a land of peace, wisdom, and statehood.

Al-Khanbashi held the United Arab Emirates responsible for what he described as chaos and looting targeting weapons and ammunition facilities at Riyan airport, due to their failure to hand the site over to local authorities upon withdrawal.

He rejected any attempt by forces or entities from outside the province to exploit the developments.

Al-Khanbashi stated that protecting Hadhramaut is a collective responsibility, warning that anyone attempting to undermine security or engage in looting will be held legally and judicially accountable.

He stressed that the state will remain aligned with citizens, peace, and the future.


8 Arab and Islamic Countries Deeply Concerned About Deteriorating Humanitarian Situation in Gaza

Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

8 Arab and Islamic Countries Deeply Concerned About Deteriorating Humanitarian Situation in Gaza

Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

The foreign ministers of eight Arab and Islamic countries, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Qatar urged on Friday the international community to pressure Israel to lift constraints on the distribution of aid in the Gaza Strip.

In a joint statement the eight countries “expressed their deepest concern regarding the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, which has been exacerbated by severe, harsh, and unstable weather conditions, including heavy rainfall and storms, and compounded by the continued lack of sufficient humanitarian access, acute shortages of essential life-saving supplies, and the slow pace of the entry of essential materials required for the rehabilitation of basic services and the establishment of temporary housing.”

They "urged the international community to pressure Israel, as the occupying power, to immediately lift the constraints on the entry and distribution of essential supplies" to Gaza.

The statement also called for the immediate delivery of humanitarian aid in the Palestinian enclave through the UN and its agencies, the rehabilitation of infrastructure and hospitals, and the opening of the Rafah Crossing in both directions as stipulated in US President Donald Trump’s Comprehensive Plan.

The Rafah border crossing was set to be reopened under the ceasefire in effect in Gaza since October, but has so far remained closed.

Friday’s statement “commended the tireless efforts of all United Nations organizations and agencies, especially UNRWA, as well as humanitarian international NGOs, in continuing to assist Palestinian civilians and deliver humanitarian assistance under extremely difficult and complex circumstances.”

The eight countries “demanded that Israel ensure the UN and international NGOs are able to operate in Gaza and the West Bank in a sustained, predictable, and unrestricted manner, given their integral role in the humanitarian response in the Strip.”

“Any attempt to impede their ability to operate is unacceptable,” they added.