Largest Iraq Bloc Seeks a Prime Minister Who Avoids Becoming a ‘Leader’

Iraqis gather at a Baghdad cafe to watch final election results, November 17, 2025 (AFP)
Iraqis gather at a Baghdad cafe to watch final election results, November 17, 2025 (AFP)
TT

Largest Iraq Bloc Seeks a Prime Minister Who Avoids Becoming a ‘Leader’

Iraqis gather at a Baghdad cafe to watch final election results, November 17, 2025 (AFP)
Iraqis gather at a Baghdad cafe to watch final election results, November 17, 2025 (AFP)

Iraq’s Coordination Framework has reached what insiders describe as almost final criteria for choosing the next prime minister, the most important of which is that the nominee must not be focused on building a partisan model that would position him to join the alliance as a leader.

While the final candidate is expected to serve as a chief executive at the head of the new cabinet, the victorious Shiite parties in the general election are expected to assume responsibility for decisions related to the weapons held by armed factions and the economic crisis.

One week after the November 11, 2025 vote, twelve leaders of Shiite parties within the Coordination Framework signed a declaration naming themselves the largest bloc, qualifying them to nominate a prime minister.

The presence of outgoing Prime Minister Mohammed al-Sudani at the signing drew attention after internal disagreements about his desire to stay on for a second term.

Al-Sudani’s Reconstruction and Development Coalition won 45 seats, not enough to break with the Framework consensus and form a government under his leadership. Shiite parties collectively secured about 187 seats in the sixth parliament, which has 329 seats.

Long and shortlists

Asharq Al-Awsat has learned that key Shiite forces, led by the State of Law Coalition and Asaib Ahl al-Haq, have been intensively reviewing a wide range of names for the country’s top executive post.

They recently converged on the idea of forming a government headed by a figure who would implement a package of decisions for which the coalition leaders would assume responsibility, particularly on security, relations with the United States, and addressing the economic situation.

Sources said senior figures in the Coordination Framework have temporarily halted their review of candidate lists in order to assess the political formula that will define the premiership in the coming period.

They added that outgoing Prime Minister al-Sudani has made the shortlist, although under different conditions.

Nouri al-Maliki, the former prime minister, strongly opposes allowing al-Sudani to return for a second term, although a few factions in the coalition would not object if the new criteria for the post are applied.

Parties inside the Coordination Framework have leaked multiple long and shortlists of possible candidates. In Iraq, such leaks are typically used to test public reactions to certain figures, eliminate others from contention, or obscure the identities of contenders who have not yet entered the race.

Asharq Al-Awsat has also learned that the Framework stopped leaking names in the past two days after public confusion escalated.

It has decided instead to focus on the requirements of the post. The sources said al-Sudani remains on a shortlist, although they declined to discuss his chances.

The Coordination Framework has experienced sharp divisions both before and after the elections over how to handle al-Sudani’s ambitions. Meanwhile, some leaders within the ruling coalition have come to view the premiership as a factory for producing political leaders.

More leaders at the table

A senior Shiite figure in the Coordination Framework told Asharq Al-Awsat that coalition leaders have lately expressed anger and frustration at the growing number of people seated at the table with the right to vote on major decisions as leaders in their own right.

The Shitte coalition has decided to form two leadership committees to discuss the next phase, develop a unified vision for governing the state, and interview prime ministerial candidates based on professional criteria, according to a statement issued on November 17.

Sources said political discussions among the winning Shiite parties are now centered on finding a prime minister who will never feel anxious about his political future and will not be preoccupied with building a partisan legacy while in office, in any circumstance or at any point in his term.

Three senior Shiite leaders in the Coordination Framework have agreed on the need for what they described as a chief executive with strong powers who enjoys full support, but who is not a political leader.

They added that the new prime minister would represent all forces in the new coalition, which would oversee decision making and assume responsibility for it.

The senior Shiite figure said the final nominee will represent all Shiite factions in the Framework in order to prevent defiance and to give him the strength the post requires in administrative terms.

The sources said the Coordination Framework is trying to make maximum use of what it views as the best electoral cycle Shiite parties have experienced in years, marked by the absence of the Sadrist Movement and a large haul of parliament seats.

But internal and external pressures are imposing a strict agenda on the next government.

According to discussions within the Coordination Framework, the new government is expected to take decisions on armed groups that still retain their weapons, as well as factions that won seats but are under United States sanctions.

The senior Shiite figure said that if the Framework secures its preferred nominee for prime minister, it will strongly support him on this file.



8 Arab and Islamic Countries Deeply Concerned About Deteriorating Humanitarian Situation in Gaza

Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

8 Arab and Islamic Countries Deeply Concerned About Deteriorating Humanitarian Situation in Gaza

Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

The foreign ministers of eight Arab and Islamic countries, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Qatar urged on Friday the international community to pressure Israel to lift constraints on the distribution of aid in the Gaza Strip.

In a joint statement the eight countries “expressed their deepest concern regarding the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, which has been exacerbated by severe, harsh, and unstable weather conditions, including heavy rainfall and storms, and compounded by the continued lack of sufficient humanitarian access, acute shortages of essential life-saving supplies, and the slow pace of the entry of essential materials required for the rehabilitation of basic services and the establishment of temporary housing.”

They "urged the international community to pressure Israel, as the occupying power, to immediately lift the constraints on the entry and distribution of essential supplies" to Gaza.

The statement also called for the immediate delivery of humanitarian aid in the Palestinian enclave through the UN and its agencies, the rehabilitation of infrastructure and hospitals, and the opening of the Rafah Crossing in both directions as stipulated in US President Donald Trump’s Comprehensive Plan.

The Rafah border crossing was set to be reopened under the ceasefire in effect in Gaza since October, but has so far remained closed.

Friday’s statement “commended the tireless efforts of all United Nations organizations and agencies, especially UNRWA, as well as humanitarian international NGOs, in continuing to assist Palestinian civilians and deliver humanitarian assistance under extremely difficult and complex circumstances.”

The eight countries “demanded that Israel ensure the UN and international NGOs are able to operate in Gaza and the West Bank in a sustained, predictable, and unrestricted manner, given their integral role in the humanitarian response in the Strip.”

“Any attempt to impede their ability to operate is unacceptable,” they added.


MSF Calls Israeli Ban a 'Grave Blow' to Gaza Aid

Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

MSF Calls Israeli Ban a 'Grave Blow' to Gaza Aid

Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Nanaa Abu Jari cooks outside her tent after it was flooded by rainwater in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

International charity Doctors Without Borders Friday condemned a "grave blow to humanitarian aid" after Israel revoked the status it needs to operate in Gaza for refusing to share Palestinian staff lists.

Israel on Thursday confirmed it had banned access to the Gaza Strip to 37 foreign humanitarian organizations for refusing to share lists of their Palestinian employees.

Doctors Without Borders (MSF), which has 1,200 staff members in the Palestinian territories, the majority of them in Gaza, said in a statement that "denying medical assistance to civilians is unacceptable under any circumstances".

The medical organization argued that it had "legitimate concerns" over new Israeli requirements for foreign NGO registration, specifically the disclosing of personal information about Palestinian staff.

According to AFP, it pointed to the fact that 15 MSF staff had been "killed by Israeli forces", and that access to any given territory should not be conditional on staff list disclosure.

"Demanding staff lists as a condition for access to territory is an outrageous overreach," the charity said.

MSF also denounced "the absence of any clarity about how such sensitive data will be used, stored, or shared", charging that Israeli forces "have killed and wounded hundreds of thousands of civilians" in Gaza during the course of the war.

It also charged that Israel had "manufactured shortages of basic necessities by blocking and delaying the entry of essential goods, including medical supplies".

Israel controls and regulates all entry points into Gaza, which is surrounded by a wall that began to be built in 2005.

Felipe Ribero, MSF head of mission in the Palestinian territories, told AFP that all of its operations were still ongoing in Gaza.

"We are supposed to leave under 60 days, but we don't know whether it will be three or 60 days" before Israeli authorities force MSF to leave, he said.

Prominent humanitarian organizations hit by the Israeli ban include the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), World Vision International and Oxfam, according to an Israeli ministry list.

The ban, which came into effect on December 31, 2025 at midnight, has triggered widespread international condemnation.

Israel says the new regulation aims to prevent bodies it accuses of supporting terrorism from operating in the Palestinian territories.

MSF says it currently supports one in five hospital beds in Gaza and assists one in three mothers in the territory, and urged the Israeli authorities to meet to discuss the ban.


Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: National Shield Forces Control Al-Khasha Camp

National Shield forces are seen in Hadhramaut. Photo: National Shield forces
National Shield forces are seen in Hadhramaut. Photo: National Shield forces
TT

Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: National Shield Forces Control Al-Khasha Camp

National Shield forces are seen in Hadhramaut. Photo: National Shield forces
National Shield forces are seen in Hadhramaut. Photo: National Shield forces

Sources confirmed that the National Shield forces, led by the Governor of Hadhramaut in Yemen, have taken control of the “37th Strategic Brigade Camp” in the Al-Khasha area.

Field sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the National Shield forces tightened their grip on Al-Khasha camp after clashes with the Southern Transitional Council (STC) forces, which subsequently retreated.

The sources added that National Shield forces continue to secure and completely clear the areas adjacent to the camp.

According to military sources in Hadhramaut, STC forces “had positioned themselves in areas on the outskirts of the camp early on, fearing airstrikes.”

“These forces were dealt with,” and efforts are underway to secure the area, the sources said.

They confirmed that National Shield forces will continue advancing toward Seiyun to liberate the remaining camps and areas.

Those forces, “with support from brothers in the Kingdom (Saudi Arabia), are proceeding according to clear plans to secure all military camps in the governorates of Hadhramaut and Al-Mahrah.”

The forces “are now present in some areas on the outskirts of Seiyun.”

The sources did not confirm reports about the withdrawal of STC forces from the First Military Region in Seiyun.

“Some STC forces are stationed at Seiyun Hospital and the Republican Palace, while the rest of the locations have been completely evacuated and their forces have withdrawn toward Al-Qatn," they added.