Sudan’s Burhan Warns Islamist Group Over Call to Fight with Iran

Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)
Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)
TT

Sudan’s Burhan Warns Islamist Group Over Call to Fight with Iran

Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)
Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)

Head of Sudan’s Transitional Sovereignty Council and army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan warned that the military would confront an Islamist group wearing army uniforms after it called on fighters it described as “mujahideen” to join Iran if it faced a ground invasion by the United States or Israel.

Burhan said the Sudanese Armed Forces would not allow any party to speak in its name or exploit its identity to pursue political or ideological goals.

He signaled that strict measures could be taken, warning to back down and return to what he called “the right path”.

His remarks echoed a statement issued Tuesday by the official spokesperson of the Sudanese army, which said the armed forces would take legal action against groups linked to the Islamist movement.

The group had declared during a communal Ramadan iftar that it was ready to defend Iran if it faced a ground invasion by the United States or Israel, sparking wide debate in political and media circles.

Burhan: We stand with Gulf states

Speaking Wednesday evening after a joint iftar with military leaders, Burhan described the war in the Middle East as “sad for us,” adding that the Sudanese people know the harshness of war after suffering from it for years.

“No Sudanese would encourage the outbreak of war or call for it,” he said, urging all those carrying weapons to lay them down and work to halt the cycle of violence.

Burhan also expressed solidarity with the Gulf Arab states, saying they had supported Sudan over the years.

“Our brothers in the Gulf have extended many helping hands to Sudan and played great roles in supporting it. We stand with them in full solidarity,” he said.

He stressed that Sudan rejects any violation of the sovereignty of the Gulf states and said Sudan does not wish to see their peoples placed in painful situations or subjected to infringements on their sovereignty, adding that Sudan’s solidarity with them is “complete and unwavering.”

Burhan warned what he called “our brothers who are making noise inside Sudan,” without naming them, saying: “We will not allow any group to speak in the name of the armed forces or the Sudanese state on matters that do not concern them.”

“Everyone should open their eyes carefully, and if they do not... we will open them for them and then close them,” he said, adding that the authorities would not accept exploiting the space of freedom against Sudan and its people.

He vowed to stand against them and against anyone who supports or encourages aggression anywhere in the world. “We are a peaceful state and seek peace. Therefore, in clear terms, we warn anyone against making statements that harm the state,” he added.

Islamist commander calls for supporting Iran

Burhan’s reaction came after Naji Abdullah, one of the leaders of Islamist jihadist fighters, said in a speech to members of the al-Baraa bin Malik Brigade, in the presence of militia leader al-Misbah Talha, that the group backed Iran.

“We support Iran, and I say this on behalf of all the mujahideen in Sudan: if a ground war begins between the Americans and the Iranians, open the way for us to participate in it,” he said.

The al-Baraa bin Malik group was one of the shadow battalions during the rule of the Islamist movement under former president Omar al-Bashir. After the outbreak of war between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces, it joined the army in the fighting.

Abdullah’s remarks align with the stance of Sudan’s Islamist movement, historically aligned with Iran, while the army’s position reflects Sudan’s current regional relations.

Divisions among Islamists

Islamists fighting alongside the army appeared divided over the issue. Some criticized the army’s position on the Middle East conflict, describing it as “weak,” while others appeared to accept it tactically, even as they condemned measures taken against Abdullah.

Separately, Ali Karti, secretary-general of the Islamic Movement in Sudan, condemned what he described as the targeting of Arab and Islamic countries and attempts to “stir discord and fragment the unity of the nation.”

In a statement, he said the challenges facing the Muslim world were not isolated incidents but part of a broader project aimed at weakening it and undermining its unity.

Karti condemned attacks on Arab and Islamic countries and violations of their sovereignty, describing the war as aggression by Israel and those backing it against “resistance forces” in the region, with the aim of “breaking the will of the nation and weakening its ability to defend itself.”

He said the movement’s current focus is on defending Sudan and its people against what he called “forces of evil,” adding that its leadership and members remain committed to that approach and that any statements contradicting it do not represent the movement.



Pilot Zones: Netanyahu Rejects Simultaneous Israeli Withdrawal, Lebanese Army Deployment

An Israeli flag hangs on a damaged building in southern Lebanon as seen from northern Israel, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)
An Israeli flag hangs on a damaged building in southern Lebanon as seen from northern Israel, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)
TT

Pilot Zones: Netanyahu Rejects Simultaneous Israeli Withdrawal, Lebanese Army Deployment

An Israeli flag hangs on a damaged building in southern Lebanon as seen from northern Israel, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)
An Israeli flag hangs on a damaged building in southern Lebanon as seen from northern Israel, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

Implementation of the “pilot zones” in southern Lebanon under the Framework Agreement remains stalled by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to allow the Lebanese army to deploy simultaneously with an Israeli troop withdrawal, a move intended to prevent a security vacuum.

The issue has become a top US priority as Washington presses Netanyahu to facilitate the Lebanese army’s deployment ahead of the sixth round of US-mediated Lebanese-Israeli talks, scheduled for July 15-16 in Rome.

The negotiations are expected to discuss the formation of joint committees, including a coordination committee headed by US General Joseph Clearfield, to oversee the Lebanese army’s deployment in the areas covered by the agreement and coordinate field operations to ensure smooth implementation.

The talks are also expected to consider expanding the pilot zones beyond southern towns already under Lebanese state control to include, in phases, towns that remain under Israeli occupation. The proposed committee would intervene immediately to address any operational problems that could disrupt the deployment.

A ministerial source told Asharq Al-Awsat that a recent meeting between the Lebanese army command and the US monitoring team overseeing the deployment ended with an understanding that Lebanese forces should deploy simultaneously with an Israeli withdrawal. The plan would extend beyond areas already under state control to include occupied towns.

According to the source, the main obstacle remains Netanyahu himself, who opposes both the concept of pilot zones and the gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from occupied Lebanese towns.

The source said US Secretary of State Marco Rubio intervened during the fourth and fifth negotiating rounds to pressure the Israeli delegation into making the pilot zones a main clause because they would pave the way for the Lebanese army’s deployment up to the international border.

The source argued that Netanyahu’s position is shaped by domestic politics as he prepares for parliamentary elections and therefore opposes any explicit commitment in the Framework Agreement requiring an Israeli withdrawal.

Instead, Netanyahu insists that the Lebanese army first deploy only in towns outside the occupied areas to test its ability to establish full control and prevent any armed Hezbollah presence before considering subsequent phases.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, however, continues to insist on simultaneous deployment and withdrawal, the source underlined, adding that his position has received backing from the US monitoring team following a meeting with Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM).

The source added that Aoun reiterated the same position during talks with US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa, who expressed understanding for Lebanon’s insistence on simultaneity and did not object to amending certain provisions of the Framework Agreement, describing it as a negotiating roadmap rather than a final accord.

In practical terms, the source said, any amendments would facilitate implementation on the ground with US support. Lebanese and American preparations for the deployment plan are complete, pending Netanyahu’s approval of simultaneous implementation.

Issa is said to view the planned July 21 meeting in Washington between US President Donald Trump and Aoun as an opportunity to gauge whether the US administration is prepared to back Lebanon with concrete action rather than rhetoric.

The source said Washington’s military pressure on Iran serves two objectives: compelling Tehran to honor its commitments under its memorandum of understanding with the US and ending its interference in Lebanon by encouraging Hezbollah to facilitate implementation of the Framework Agreement, now viewed as the only viable path after the military option collapsed.

According to the source, Trump remains committed to supporting Lebanon, while Washington continues to pressure Iran to curb the Revolutionary Guard’s role in Lebanese affairs and remove obstacles to implementing the agreement, seen as the only route toward an Israeli withdrawal.


Top UN Official Accuses Hamas of Gaza Aid Obstruction

Displaced Palestinians collect water from the Ita charitable water station, amid ongoing water shortages and limited access to water sources, in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, 13 July 2026. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD
Displaced Palestinians collect water from the Ita charitable water station, amid ongoing water shortages and limited access to water sources, in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, 13 July 2026. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD
TT

Top UN Official Accuses Hamas of Gaza Aid Obstruction

Displaced Palestinians collect water from the Ita charitable water station, amid ongoing water shortages and limited access to water sources, in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, 13 July 2026. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD
Displaced Palestinians collect water from the Ita charitable water station, amid ongoing water shortages and limited access to water sources, in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, 13 July 2026. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD

A senior UN official on Monday accused Hamas of interfering with humanitarian deliveries in Gaza and intimidating aid workers, warning that the group's actions were making relief operations increasingly dangerous.

Hamas continues to control parts of Gaza, even after Israeli forces expanded their presence across more than 60 percent of the territory.

In a statement, UN Deputy Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, Ramiz Alakbarov, said he "strongly" condemns the obstruction of humanitarian operations by Gaza's de facto authorities, referring to Hamas.

Hamas's actions "endangered humanitarian personnel, intimidated workers delivering life-saving food assistance and disrupted life-saving humanitarian operations", AFP quoted him as saying.

Armed men linked to Hamas allegedly on Saturday forced their way into a food distribution point in Jabalia, in the northern Gaza Strip, the UN statement said.

Militants "also entered a WFP (World Food Program) warehouse and reportedly assaulted two truck drivers who were delivering humanitarian supplies", it added.

Alakbarov said "these incidents are not isolated" and "reflect an increasingly dangerous pattern of intimidation, violence and obstruction, including smuggling attempts, targeting and abusing humanitarian operations".

He warned that such actions were hampering the delivery of life-saving assistance at a time when civilians across Gaza faced severe hardships.

A ceasefire was reached in Gaza between Israel and Hamas in October following two years of war, which was sparked by the Palestinian militants' unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.

The second phase of the ceasefire, which was to involve Hamas' disarmament and a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, has been stalled for months.

Israeli forces have expanded their presence in recent months, taking control of more than 60 percent of the territory.

Hamas still exerts control over the remaining area, but last week announced it was dissolving its 15-member body that had governed the strip for nearly two decades.


Jordan Says it Shot Down 4 Missiles Launched by Iran

The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo
The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo
TT

Jordan Says it Shot Down 4 Missiles Launched by Iran

The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo
The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo

The Jordanian military said on Monday it had shot down four Iranian missiles over the country, which Tehran said were intended as retaliation for US strikes.

"At dawn today, air defense systems intercepted and shot down four missiles that had entered Jordanian airspace from Iranian territory," an official source from the Jordanian General Staff said

There were no reports of injuries or damage to property.