Israeli Police Prevent Catholic Leaders from Celebrating Palm Sunday Mass at Jerusalem Church

 Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, sits inside the Church of All Nations on the day of a prayer service to mark Palm Sunday in Jerusalem on March 29, 2026, following the cancellation of the traditional Palm Sunday procession from the Mount of Olives amid restrictions on gathering in large groups and the US-Israeli war on Iran. (AFP)
Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, sits inside the Church of All Nations on the day of a prayer service to mark Palm Sunday in Jerusalem on March 29, 2026, following the cancellation of the traditional Palm Sunday procession from the Mount of Olives amid restrictions on gathering in large groups and the US-Israeli war on Iran. (AFP)
TT

Israeli Police Prevent Catholic Leaders from Celebrating Palm Sunday Mass at Jerusalem Church

 Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, sits inside the Church of All Nations on the day of a prayer service to mark Palm Sunday in Jerusalem on March 29, 2026, following the cancellation of the traditional Palm Sunday procession from the Mount of Olives amid restrictions on gathering in large groups and the US-Israeli war on Iran. (AFP)
Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, sits inside the Church of All Nations on the day of a prayer service to mark Palm Sunday in Jerusalem on March 29, 2026, following the cancellation of the traditional Palm Sunday procession from the Mount of Olives amid restrictions on gathering in large groups and the US-Israeli war on Iran. (AFP)

The Israeli police prevented Catholic leaders from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre to celebrate Mass on the Christian holiday of Palm Sunday for the first time in centuries, the Latin Patriarchate said Sunday.

Jerusalem's major holy sites are closed because of the ongoing Iran war, including the church, as the city has come under frequent fire from Iranian missiles.

The Catholic Church called the police decision “a manifestly unreasonable and grossly disproportionate measure.” It prevented two of the church’s top religious leaders, including Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa and the head of the Custos in the Holy Land, from celebrating Palm Sunday at the place where Christians believe Jesus was crucified.

Palm Sunday commemorates Jesus’ triumphant entry into Jerusalem and launches the Holy Week commemorations for Christians who follow the Latin calendar, which culminates in Easter next Sunday.

The Israeli police said it had notified the Catholic Church on Saturday that no Mass could take place on Palm Sunday because of safety considerations, the lack of access for emergency vehicles in narrow alleys of the Old City and lack of adequate shelter.

However, the Latin Patriarchate said the Church of the Holy Sepulchre has been hosting Masses that aren't open to the public since the Iran war began on Feb. 28, and it was unclear why Sunday’s Mass and access by the two priests was any different.

“It’s a very, very sacred day for Christians and in our opinion there was no justification for such a decision or such an action,” said Farid Jubran, the spokesperson for the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem.

Jubran said that the church had requested permission from the police for a few religious leaders to enter the church for a private Mass on Sunday — not one that was open to the public. The Patriarchate said that the decision impeded freedom of worship and the status quo in Jerusalem.

The traditional Palm Sunday procession normally sees tens of thousands of Christians from around the world walk from the Mount of Olives down the narrow, hilly streets toward the Old City, waving palm fronds and singing.

The Patriarchate canceled the traditional processional last week because of safety concerns, and has held Masses limited to fewer than 50 worshippers in compliance with the Israeli military’s guidelines for civilians.

Pizzaballa celebrated Mass in the nearby St. Savior’s Monastery, a soaring marble church which is located next to an underground music school that the Israeli military has deemed a safe shelter space. Later on Sunday, Pizzaballa held a prayer for peace at the Dominus Flevit Shrine on the Mount of Olives, but kept his homily concentrated on Jesus and didn't mention the morning’s incident.

Pope Leo XIV, at the end of Palm Sunday Mass in St. Peter’s Square, prayed for all Christians in the Middle East who he said were living through an “atrocious” conflict. He said that “in many cases, they cannot live fully the rites of these holy days,” though he didn’t elaborate.

The Vatican spokesman didn’t immediately respond when asked to comment on the Jerusalem incident.

Italy formally protested the incident to Israeli authorities. Premier Giorgia Meloni said that the police action “constitutes an offense not only against believers but against every community that recognizes religious freedom.”

“The Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem is a sacred site of Christianity, and as such must be preserved and protected for the celebration of sacred rites,” Meloni said. “Preventing the Patriarch of Jerusalem and the Custos of the Holy Land from entering, especially on a solemnity central to the faith such as Palm Sunday, constitutes an offense not only against believers but against every community that recognizes religious freedom.”

Meloni’s conservative government tried to keep a balanced position with Israel during the war in Gaza, supporting Israel’s right to defense but condemning the toll on Palestinians.

The Italian leader has also said that Italy won't participate in the Iran war, while affirming that Tehran can't be allowed to possess nuclear weapons.

Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani instructed Italy’s ambassador to Israel to convey the protest “and to reaffirm Italy’s commitment to protecting religious freedom at all times and under all circumstances.”

In addition, Tajani summoned the Israeli ambassador to Italy for talks on Monday at the Italian Foreign Ministry to seek clarification about the decision.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday evening that there was no “malicious intent” and that the cardinal was prevented from accessing the church because of safety concerns, but that Israel would try to partially open the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in the coming days.

“Given the holiness of the week leading up to Easter for the world’s Christians, Israel’s security arms are putting together a plan to enable church leaders to worship at the holy site in the coming days,” Netanyahu wrote on X.

The Western Wall, the holiest site where Jews can pray, is also mostly closed because of safety issues, but authorities are letting up to 50 people at a time pray in an enclosed area adjacent to the plaza.

Smaller churches, synagogues, and mosques are open in Jerusalem’s Old City if they are located within a certain distance of a bomb shelter deemed acceptable by Israel’s military and, if gatherings are kept under 50 people.



Iraq’s Badr Organization Demands Reopening of Border Crossings with Iran

The Shalamcheh border crossing with Iran in Basra, southern Iraq. (AFP)
The Shalamcheh border crossing with Iran in Basra, southern Iraq. (AFP)
TT

Iraq’s Badr Organization Demands Reopening of Border Crossings with Iran

The Shalamcheh border crossing with Iran in Basra, southern Iraq. (AFP)
The Shalamcheh border crossing with Iran in Basra, southern Iraq. (AFP)

Iraq’s Iran-aligned Badr Organization, led by Hadi al-Amiri, expressed anger on Sunday over remarks by Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein concerning the closure of land border crossings with Iran.

The closure of the al-Sheeb crossing in the southern province of Maysan continues to draw opposition from Tehran-aligned groups and businesses whose livelihoods depend on cross-border trade. The dispute also involves networks that exploit weak oversight and security procedures to smuggle prohibited goods.

Truck drivers have staged repeated protests demanding the reopening of the crossing.

The controversy resurfaced after Hussein told Al Jazeera that the US had formally asked Iraq to close all its border crossings with Iran except two.

Some political sources believe the request may have been conveyed during Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s meeting with US envoy Tom Barrack last week, or during an earlier telephone conversation between al-Zaidi and President Donald Trump.

According to the prime minister’s media office, the call addressed the importance of coordination and consultation between Baghdad and Washington on current challenges and efforts to support regional stability.

Al-Zaidi reaffirmed Iraq’s position on respecting state sovereignty and preventing its territory from being used to launch attacks against neighboring countries.

Iraqi authorities closed the al-Sheeb crossing on October 21, citing the need to review security arrangements and procedures, as well as inadequate technical infrastructure and surveillance equipment requiring upgrades.

The decision drew criticism from parties and groups allied with or close to Iran, which portrayed it as compliance with US pressure and the economic blockade imposed on Tehran.

An official at Iraq’s Border Ports Authority confirmed to Asharq Al-Awsat that four of the five crossings with Iran remained open, with al-Sheeb the only one still closed.

Security sources, however, suggested that the shutdown was linked to sensitive security concerns, particularly reports that the crossing had served as a route for carrying out missile attacks against Saudi Arabia on October 10.

Badr rejects US demands

In a statement, the Badr Organization said it had followed recent developments, particularly Hussein’s disclosure of American requests and what it described as dictates to close border crossings with Iran.

The Badr parliamentary bloc categorically rejected those demands, insisting on Iraq’s national sovereignty.

“What the minister’s remarks contradict the previous technical justifications and exposes agendas targeting our resistance-minded south and interfering in sovereign decision-making,” the bloc declared.

The statement referred to the government’s earlier explanations for closing the crossing.

Badr maintained that Iraq was a fully sovereign state and that its people and national political forces would not stand idly by in the face of any violation of sovereignty or submission to foreign agendas harmful to the country’s interests.

The Iran-aligned organization also denounced what it called policies of economic blockade and the starvation of populations, underscoring the longstanding ties between Baghdad and Tehran.

“Iraqi-Iranian relations are deep-rooted, forged through the blood shed for liberation and in confronting terrorism,” it stated.

“We categorically reject Iraq becoming a tool in a campaign to besiege the Muslim Iranian people. Participation in such efforts would betray our fraternal commitments and squander the sacrifices of the martyrs.”

Badr argued that the continued closure of major border crossings, particularly al-Sheeb, had inflicted significant economic hardship on residents and disrupted livelihoods.

The organization urged the government to uphold Iraq’s declared policy of staying out of regional conflicts and avoid being drawn into “hegemonic policies” and “illegal wars” that fuel regional tensions.

It demanded the immediate reopening of border crossings, insisting that the interests of Iraqi citizens and national sovereignty take precedence over foreign pressure.


Syrian Foreign Ministry Appointments Mark a Break with Diplomatic Tradition

President Ahmad al-Sharaa with Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani and Interior Minister Anas Khattab last February (SANA). 
President Ahmad al-Sharaa with Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani and Interior Minister Anas Khattab last February (SANA). 
TT

Syrian Foreign Ministry Appointments Mark a Break with Diplomatic Tradition

President Ahmad al-Sharaa with Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani and Interior Minister Anas Khattab last February (SANA). 
President Ahmad al-Sharaa with Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani and Interior Minister Anas Khattab last February (SANA). 

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa has appointed three young deputy foreign ministers as part of efforts to restructure state institutions, breaking with a longstanding tradition of reserving senior diplomatic posts for seasoned officials.

The appointments come as many diplomats who defected from the former regime are still awaiting the resolution of their employment status.

The changes have sparked debate in political circles in Damascus over appointments to senior positions in key ministries, amid unconfirmed reports of a possible cabinet reshuffle involving sensitive portfolios and the reassignment of prominent officials.

Wael Alwan, a researcher and executive director of the Jusoor Center for Studies, told Asharq Al-Awsat that there was speculation about Interior Minister Anas Khattab taking over as head of National Security, with Maj. Gen. Abdul Qader al-Tahhan potentially succeeding him.

“There is similar talk concerning the Defense Ministry, but no precise information is available so far,” Alwan said.

He added that he had no knowledge of reports suggesting Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani might be moved to another position.

An Unprecedented Move

On Saturday, al-Sharaa issued three presidential decrees, numbered 205, 206 and 207 of 2026, appointing deputy foreign ministers responsible for consular affairs, international cooperation and executive affairs, respectively.

The appointment of three deputies simultaneously is unprecedented in Syria’s diplomatic history and signals a departure from an administrative structure that has prevailed for decades.

Traditionally, the Foreign Ministry has had two permanent assistant ministers overseeing diplomatic, political and administrative affairs, alongside a deputy foreign minister.

A third assistant was occasionally appointed under exceptional circumstances, while specialized responsibilities were sometimes assigned to advisers. The two-assistant structure, however, remained the norm.

Alwan described the latest appointments as a restructuring of the ministry.

“The country’s new administration is not bound by established practices. It is completely separate from the previous system of government,” he explained.

Ordinarily, senior officials would be selected through institutional promotion, established career paths or extensive diplomatic experience, he noted.

“In a transitional government, however, things are different. Trust, in the sense of loyalty, takes precedence over competence,” Alwan said, attributing the controversial approach largely to security considerations.

Asked whether experienced diplomats who defected from the former regime could be brought back into senior positions, he acknowledged that this was possible but not essential.

Priority, he stressed, would go to trust and alignment with the current administration’s approach.

Young Appointees with Limited Experience

The three newly appointed officials were born between 1988 and 1996 and have backgrounds in public policy, law, international cooperation and administration.

Muhammad Yaqub al-Omar, born in Idlib in 1993, was appointed deputy foreign minister for consular affairs.

According to local media, he holds a master’s degree in public policy from the University of Idlib, a bachelor’s degree in political science from Al-Shamal University, and a degree in agricultural engineering from the University of Idlib.

Qutaiba Ali Kadish, born in Damascus in 1988, was named deputy foreign minister for international cooperation.

A law graduate of Damascus University, Kadish previously headed the Foreign Ministry’s international cooperation and protocol departments.

He also served as deputy minister of development and humanitarian affairs in the Syrian Salvation Government and directed its humanitarian and development projects department.

Obadah Khaled Diab, born in Damascus in 1996, was appointed deputy foreign minister for executive affairs.

He holds an executive master’s degree in development policies from the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva and a bachelor’s degree in foreign service, specializing in international economics, from Georgetown University.

According to the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA), Diab previously headed the foreign minister’s office and directed the ministry’s strategic planning office.

His professional background also includes work as an information management and labor market research expert at Qatar’s Ministry of Labor and as a data specialist at the Center for Humanitarian Data of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

Despite the Foreign Ministry’s decision to reinstate diplomats who defected from the former regime, and the appointment of several to head diplomatic missions in regional and international capitals, many cases remain unresolved.

A substantial number are still awaiting the settlement of their employment status and the completion of administrative reviews.

Peace Adviser Appointment Sparks Debate

The presidential appointments came alongside a separate decision by Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani to name broadcaster Muzna Mamdouh al-Atrash, a native of Sweida, as an adviser for peace affairs.

Some viewed the appointment as a potential boost to national reconciliation efforts, particularly those concerning Sweida.

Others criticized the creation of what they described as a vaguely defined position covering “peace affairs.”

Critics also cited al-Atrash’s previous political positions, noting that she had supported former President Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian army’s actions during her work at state television.


Lebanon Rushes to Avert Security Vacuum as UNIFIL Mandate Nears End

UNIFIL's mission expires on December 31. (UNIFIL)
UNIFIL's mission expires on December 31. (UNIFIL)
TT

Lebanon Rushes to Avert Security Vacuum as UNIFIL Mandate Nears End

UNIFIL's mission expires on December 31. (UNIFIL)
UNIFIL's mission expires on December 31. (UNIFIL)

Lebanon is intensifying diplomatic efforts ahead of the expiration of the UN peacekeeping mission’s mandate in South Lebanon at the end of the year, fearing a security vacuum that could undermine its internationally recognized southern border, deprive it of independent documentation of Israeli violations and isolate residents of Christian villages in the Bint Jbeil district.

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) announced that its mandate would expire on December 31, under UN Security Council Resolution 2790, after which it would begin a phased withdrawal.

Diplomatic sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the full withdrawal would take several months, with peacekeepers leaving their positions gradually rather than evacuating all three operational sectors - western, central and eastern - simultaneously. The aim is to avoid leaving entire areas without an international presence.

Lebanon’s concerns are compounded by Israel’s continued occupation of parts of the South following its advance deeper into Lebanese territory between March and June 2026 during the latest war with Hezbollah.

During that period, the Lebanese Army gradually withdrew from dozens of positions south of the Litani River, redeploying to unoccupied areas north of the virtual Yellow Line imposed by Israel that remain within UNIFIL’s area of operations.

Border markers and international monitoring

Security sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the consequences of UNIFIL’s departure would extend beyond the immediate security situation. A principal concern is the potential loss of border markers that UNIFIL and the Lebanese Army have worked to establish since the Blue Line was identified in 2000.

The sources warned that the absence of international observers could encourage Israel to intensify violations of Lebanon’s internationally recognized border, which Israel accepted under the 1949 Armistice Agreement.

UN peacekeepers are currently the only international witnesses in occupied areas, they explained, where Lebanese state institutions, including the army and security forces, are absent amid widespread displacement and destruction.

“The only witness today in the occupied area is the United Nations force,” the sources said, describing UNIFIL as a credible international witness and a longstanding source of support for Lebanon.

Its presence allows Israeli actions and attacks to be independently documented and recorded at the United Nations, preserving an international account of the conflict that Lebanon fears losing.

“Amid Israeli claims, international accounts and documentation cannot be called into question,” the sources stressed.

They also recalled UNIFIL’s role since 2006 in assisting the Lebanese Army’s deployment south of the Litani River and supporting legitimate state institutions.

According to the sources, the mission has fulfilled its obligations under Security Council Resolution 1701, with 45 countries contributing to those efforts over the past two decades.

Christian villages face growing isolation

The sources warned that withdrawing UNIFIL without replacing it with another UN mission or internationally backed force would leave Lebanon “at the mercy of the Israeli hyena,” alone in confronting Israel.

The repercussions would be particularly severe for hundreds of families who have remained in occupied areas, including residents of the three Christian villages of Rmeish, Debel and Ain Ebel in Bint Jbeil district.

Residents currently rely on UNIFIL escorts when traveling through occupied areas toward the Lebanese interior. Beyond those areas, they continue under the protection of both UN peacekeepers and the Lebanese Army until reaching territory north of the Litani River. Without UNIFIL, they would have to navigate Israeli security procedures on their own.

The sources revealed that Israel had rejected a Lebanese proposal to establish a safe corridor allowing residents to travel freely to and from their villages under Lebanese security escort.

The proposed route would have passed through Tebnine toward Beit Yahoun and Ain Ebel, providing access to communities surrounded by Israeli-occupied territory.

Lebanon also fears losing what remains of the international framework governing security arrangements in the south.

The trilateral talks between Lebanon and Israel under UN auspices in Naqoura were discontinued, followed by the termination of a five-party mechanism that included France and the United States, was chaired by a US general and convened at UN headquarters in Naqoura.

Lebanese concerns now extend to the possibility that the United States, as guarantor, could declare its mission complete, leaving Beirut to deal directly with Israel - an arrangement the Lebanese government rejects. Lebanon and Israel are technically in a state of war and have no diplomatic ties.

UNIFIL currently maintains some 36 permanent military positions south of the Litani River. Security sources fear Israeli forces could occupy some of these sites or destroy others following the peacekeepers’ departure.

The mission also conducts hundreds of patrols daily. Before the 2024 war, it carried out as many as 410 patrols a day across its area of operations.

In its statement, UNIFIL stressed that peacekeepers from 45 countries would continue their regular activities throughout South Lebanon until the mandate expires.

These include monitoring and reporting developments, liaising with the parties, supporting the Lebanese Army and facilitating humanitarian operations.

Diplomatic push for an alternative

Lebanese diplomatic efforts to secure an alternative international presence are continuing ahead of UNIFIL’s departure.

President Joseph Aoun has repeatedly warned of the dangers of a security vacuum and welcomed the deployment of any international force capable of helping maintain stability in the south.

On Friday, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri reaffirmed Lebanon’s position during a meeting with EU Ambassador Sandra De Waele.

He stressed that Resolution 1701 remains the legal guarantee of Lebanon’s right to recover all its territory up to its internationally recognized borders, while UNIFIL provides the operational framework for implementing the resolution in full.

Lebanon has proposed expanding the mandate of certain UN observers, but Israel rejected the suggestion.