British Ambassador to Baghdad: Iranian Interference is Extensive, Illegitimate

British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)
British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)
TT

British Ambassador to Baghdad: Iranian Interference is Extensive, Illegitimate

British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)
British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)

British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq sharply criticized Iran-backed armed factions, accusing them of operating through intimidation and extortion in a mafia-like manner. He also revealed that one such group had taken control of a contract originally awarded to a British company operating in Iraq.

Siddiq’s connection to Iraq dates back to the aftermath of the 2003 US-led invasion, when he served as a political affairs official with the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad. During that time, he was involved in rebuilding Iraqi institutions and participated in the constitutional drafting process.

He later returned to Baghdad as Britain’s deputy ambassador between 2010 and 2011, during the drawdown of US forces. In 2025, he was appointed British ambassador to Iraq, with a focus on political and economic cooperation and regional stability.

British Company Loses Contract

In a televised interview aired Monday evening, Siddiq said an armed faction had pressured authorities and ultimately taken over a project from a British company holding a government services contract. He added that the Iraqi government’s silence over the incident had enabled armed groups to tighten their grip on the country’s economy.

The ambassador did not identify the British company involved. However, several major British firms have operated in Iraq in recent years, particularly in security and aviation services linked to Baghdad International Airport.

British security company G4S was responsible for airport protection and security services from 2010 until its contract expired in late 2022.

In December 2020, Tehran’s prosecutor accused G4S of involvement in the killing of Qassem Soleimani, the former commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force. Iranian authorities claimed the company had provided the US military in Iraq with information regarding the arrival time of the aircraft carrying Soleimani to Baghdad in January of that year.

Distinguishing the PMF from Armed Factions

The British diplomat sought to distinguish between the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) as a formal state institution and certain affiliated factions that, according to him, have not fully complied with directives issued by the PMF leadership and Iraq’s commander-in-chief.

He referred in particular to recent months, during which hundreds of rocket attacks targeted Iraqi, Gulf, and American sites.

Speaking about his discussions with PMF chairman Falih al-Fayadh, Siddiq said he told him the organization faced serious internal problems requiring reform and accountability. According to the ambassador, al-Fayadh agreed on the need to distance the PMF from armed factions operating within it.

There are rising concerns in Iraq that the PMF’s official structure effectively provides cover for factions engaged in violent activities under the umbrella of the so-called “Axis of Resistance.”

Siddiq said the United Kingdom has no objection to dealing with the PMF as a legitimate security institution, provided it remains fully under government control. He added that London would be willing to support reforms within the organization if requested, drawing on Britain’s experience in Northern Ireland.

At the same time, the ambassador argued that the original justification for maintaining the PMF in its current form had largely vanished following the defeat of ISIS. He questioned why international coalition forces that fought alongside the PMF against terrorism are now being portrayed as occupation forces, describing such claims as illogical.

He stressed that decisions concerning war and peace should remain exclusively in the hands of legitimate state institutions, emphasizing that only Iraq’s elected government has the authority to manage such matters.

“No Relations with Armed Factions”

During the interview, Siddiq repeatedly criticized armed factions and rejected describing them as the “Iraqi resistance.” He questioned whom these groups were resisting, who controlled the territories where they operated, and why they continued to exist.

Regarding the participation of militia-linked groups in government, Siddiq said Britain does not engage with what he described as “militia parties.” However, he noted that London respects Iraq’s political decisions regarding government formation and could reconsider its position in the future if those groups abandon their weapons and transition fully into political activity.

The ambassador also criticized what he described as extensive and illegitimate Iranian interference in Iraqi affairs. He called on the new government, led by Ali al-Zaidi, to strengthen state sovereignty and ensure that all weapons remain under state control.

Siddiq said Iran exerts significant influence over Iraqi affairs and accused Tehran of failing to respect Iraq’s sovereignty, describing the interference as both inappropriate and unlawful. He expressed hope that Iraq’s new government would address the issue.



Egypt Banks on Domestic Defense Manufacturing to Curb Military Spending

A military vehicle manufactured in Egypt. (Egyptian Ministry of Military Production)
A military vehicle manufactured in Egypt. (Egyptian Ministry of Military Production)
TT

Egypt Banks on Domestic Defense Manufacturing to Curb Military Spending

A military vehicle manufactured in Egypt. (Egyptian Ministry of Military Production)
A military vehicle manufactured in Egypt. (Egyptian Ministry of Military Production)

Egypt is increasingly relying on domestic defense manufacturing to curb military spending, expanding local production of armored vehicles, drones and air defense systems while continuing to diversify its foreign arms suppliers and pursue joint-production partnerships with other countries.

The strategy comes as the country posted the lowest military spending among Arab states last year, with defense expenditure accounting for 0.61% of gross domestic product, according to figures released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Military experts told Asharq Al-Awsat that local arms production helps ease pressure on foreign-currency reserves required for imports while ensuring a more secure supply chain. They explained that modern warfare is characterized by the heavy consumption of weapons and ammunition, making uninterrupted access to military supplies a strategic necessity.

Egypt’s armed forces have pursued a comprehensive modernization program in recent years, including diversifying sources of weaponry and forging partnerships with major defense-producing countries, according to Egypt’s State Information Service.

The government is also pushing to expand reliance on locally manufactured defense products.

Minister of State for Military Production Salah Mostafa Gomblat said the current phase focuses on localizing advanced industrial technologies to improve production efficiency and enhance the competitiveness of Egyptian-made products.

He added that the strategy includes forging new partnerships with the private sector to reduce import costs and support the national economy.

According to SIPRI, Egypt recorded the lowest military spending among Arab countries in 2025 even as global military expenditure rose 2.9% from the previous year to $2.887 trillion. Algeria recorded the highest military-spending among Arab countries, at 8.83% of GDP.

Egypt has recently showcased a range of domestically produced defense systems, including armored vehicles, drones and air defense platforms displayed at the EDEX 2025 defense exhibition held in Cairo last December.

Among the systems highlighted were the Raad 300, a multiple-caliber guided rocket launcher capable of striking targets at ranges of up to 300 kilometers, and the Jabbar 150 unmanned aerial vehicle, which Egyptian officials describe as possessing advanced offensive capabilities.

The unveiling of the Jabbar 150 attracted attention in Israel. In a report published on June 8, Israeli website Natziv.net said Israeli security agencies were monitoring advances in Egyptian military technology and assessing their strategic implications.

Major General Nasr Salem, a military analyst, noted that Egypt’s drive to deepen domestic weapons production is intended both to secure military supply lines and reduce the cost of importing arms.

“Part of Egypt’s strategy to diversify its sources of armaments is based on localizing military industries,” Salem told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He stressed that the prolonged nature of modern conflicts requires armies to maintain a continuous flow of weapons and ammunition, adding that some military estimates suggest the cost of a single day of combat can equal a year’s defense procurement budget for some armed forces.

“For that reason, the best option for countries is to manufacture their own weapons,” he said.

Salem cautioned, however, that building a domestic defense industry is itself costly and requires access to advanced technologies capable of competing with foreign systems.

He added that local production offers another advantage: the ability to design weapons tailored to a country’s operational environment and the needs of its armed forces.

Major General Samir Ragab said expanding local defense production also helps reduce pressure on foreign-currency resources.

“No country in the world can achieve complete self-sufficiency in armaments,” Ragab told Asharq Al-Awsat, noting that certain categories of advanced weapons will continue to be imported from countries with more sophisticated defense-industrial capabilities.

Nevertheless, he said, a strong domestic defense-industrial base enhances the Egyptian military’s capabilities and provides Cairo with greater flexibility to develop weapons systems suited to its own requirements.


Israeli Military Warns of Imminent Strikes on South Lebanon

 Smoke billows from southern Lebanon following an Israeli strike, as seen from Marjeyoun, Lebanon, June 12, 2026. (Reuters)
Smoke billows from southern Lebanon following an Israeli strike, as seen from Marjeyoun, Lebanon, June 12, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israeli Military Warns of Imminent Strikes on South Lebanon

 Smoke billows from southern Lebanon following an Israeli strike, as seen from Marjeyoun, Lebanon, June 12, 2026. (Reuters)
Smoke billows from southern Lebanon following an Israeli strike, as seen from Marjeyoun, Lebanon, June 12, 2026. (Reuters)

The Israeli military on Saturday warned of imminent strikes on south Lebanon, telling residents of 20 towns and villages including many near Nabatieh city to evacuate despite a ceasefire in its war with Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, according to AFP.

"For your safety, you should evacuate your homes immediately and move to the north of the Zahrani River," the military's Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee said in a post on X.

"Anyone who is in the vicinity of Hezbollah installations or means of warfare is endangering their lives," he added, accusing the movement of violating the truce.


Sharaa: Syria Seeks to Stop Lebanon War, Not Join It

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa (SANA)
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa (SANA)
TT

Sharaa: Syria Seeks to Stop Lebanon War, Not Join It

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa (SANA)
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa (SANA)

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa has moved to quell renewed speculation that Syria could become involved in the war in Lebanon, saying reports that Damascus intends to intervene militarily are “mere rumors.”

Sharaa said Syria’s position at this stage was based on “seeking to stop the war in Lebanon, not becoming involved in it.”

His remarks came during a meeting with a delegation from the Damascus countryside. He said demarcating the Syrian-Lebanese border was “not currently a priority” given more urgent files, foremost among them the case of about 1.4 million displaced Syrians in Lebanon and efforts to find a suitable mechanism to ensure their return.

US President Donald Trump had recently reaffirmed Washington’s goal of delivering a strong blow to Hezbollah. According to him, Israel has done what is necessary in the south, but there is still much left to eliminate Hezbollah. He then hinted at possibly having to ask Syria’s involvement.

Trump’s remarks prompted a wave of interpretations, amid reports of a possible visit by Sharaa to Washington. The Syrian presidency denied those reports.

Sources in Damascus told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US remarks were “a form of reshuffling the cards” and fell within “the framework of negotiating statements and sending messages to Iran.”

The sources said, “So far, there has been no official US request to Damascus related to any form of Syrian military intervention in Lebanon.” They said Tom Barrack, Trump’s envoy to Syria and Iraq and Washington’s ambassador in Ankara, had previously asked Damascus “to take a clear, explicit and serious position against Hezbollah.”

The sources said Damascus believes it already has such a position, reflected in border control, cutting smuggling routes and high-level coordination with the Lebanese government.

They added that “entering the quagmire of war and sending military forces unilaterally is completely ruled out,” and that it was “very, very early” to discuss the possibility of Syrian forces entering Lebanon in support of the Lebanese army.

Brigadier General Hassan Abdul Ghani, commander of the Border Guard Forces in the Syrian Arab Army, met last Thursday with a Lebanese army delegation headed by liaison official Brigadier General Michel Boutros, in the presence of several officers.

The talks focused on issues of mutual concern, mainly “enhancing cooperation and coordination between the two sides in border control and combating smuggling activities, in a way that contributes to strengthening border security between the two countries.”

At the same time, Syria’s Interior Ministry said “Lebanon is a sovereign state and not a backyard, as the former regime viewed it,” stressing that “coordination with Lebanon is the basic pillar for any assistance Syria provides to Lebanon.”

Sharaa had expressed Syria’s readiness to provide Lebanon with whatever support and assistance it can, within available capabilities and circumstances, when he received former Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati in Damascus on the ninth of this month.

Media reports said Sharaa told Mikati that “Lebanon’s stability and security constitute a direct Syrian interest,” and that Damascus was keen to build the best relations with the Lebanese state on the basis of mutual respect, good neighborliness and non-interference in internal affairs.

The meeting between Sharaa and Mikati, which lasted for hours, discussed the state of bilateral relations between Damascus and Beirut and prospects for developing them in the next stage, along with several economic and investment files of mutual interest, in light of the transformations taking place in the region.