Saudi Arabia, Germany Eye Broader Cooperation in Energy, Infrastructure

Saudi Pavilion at the Berlin Tourism Fair (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Saudi Pavilion at the Berlin Tourism Fair (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Saudi Arabia, Germany Eye Broader Cooperation in Energy, Infrastructure

Saudi Pavilion at the Berlin Tourism Fair (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Saudi Pavilion at the Berlin Tourism Fair (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Bilateral relations between Saudi Arabia and Germany are witnessing a growing positive development, strengthened by recurring high-level talks and visits, with Riyadh considered as an important partner for Berlin as a regional power. The Kingdom is Germany’s second-largest trading partner in the Arab world, while Germany is the Kingdom’s fourth-largest supplier.

Florian Rohde, Head of Directorate Economic and Growth Policy at the German Ministry of Finance, told Asharq Al-Awsat that "Saudi Arabia is an important partner for Germany as a regional power. Bilateral relations are increasingly positive and have been further intensified by regular high-level talks and visits."

"Saudi Arabia is Germany's second-largest trading partner in the Arab world after the United Arab Emirates, while Germany is Saudi Arabia's fourth-largest supplier. Within 'Vision 2030' and the goal of restructuring the economy in Saudi Arabia, there are excellent opportunities for further expansion of trade and an increased cooperation in various economic and energy sectors between the two countries," he noted.

Rohde explained that cooperation between the two countries currently rests on a broad economic and investment partnership covering several fields, most notably energy, infrastructure, and renewable energy technologies.

He spoke about his participation in the recent Future Investment Initiative held in Riyadh, affirming that this initiative represents a leading platform for opening new horizons for qualitative and positive investment among nations.

"My participation in the Future Investment Initiative is primarily aimed at fostering dialogue and exploring opportunities for future cooperation with Saudi partners from both the public and private sectors. I see this forum as an excellent platform to exchange ideas on innovation, sustainability and investment priorities. I look forward to discussions that may lay the ground for future cooperation. Investment is the foundation for an economy´s growth and employment. Germany will continue to be an attractive destination for investment and one of the most open economies in the world."

Rohde noted that cooperation between Riyadh and Berlin is based on an extensive economic and investment partnership encompassing various sectors such as energy, infrastructure, and renewable energy technologies. He said that the Future Investment Initiative serves as a vital bridge to address current challenges and enhance opportunities for sustainable growth.

Rohde pointed out that in 2024, the volume of trade exchange between the two sides reached $11.3 billion, $9.4 billion of which represented German exports to Saudi Arabia, compared to $1.9 billion in imports.

"In 2024, the value of goods exported from Germany to Saudi Arabia was approximately 9.4 billion US dollars, and the value of goods imported was approximately 1.9 billion US dollars. In times during which the global economy is increasingly under pressure, our economic partnership has proven to be resilient – and is even becoming stronger."

According to Rohde, despite growing pressure on the global economy, the bilateral economic partnership has demonstrated resilience and continues to strengthen year after year.

He also expected Germany’s economy to witness noticeable improvement starting next year, driven by the domestic economy. He revealed that Germany plans to invest 500 billion euros ($574.4 billion) in infrastructure and climate protection over the next 12 years.

"Germany has made important decisions by investing 500 billion euros in infrastructure and climate protection over the forthcoming twelve years. The gross domestic product is expected to rise by 1.3 percent next year (2026) and by 1.4 percent in 2027."

Rohde acknowledged that global developments have affected Germany’s economy due to their impact on markets and increased volatility.



Euro Zone Inflation Surges Past ECB Target on Oil Shock

Shelves filled with fruit inside a supermarket in Berlin (Reuters)
Shelves filled with fruit inside a supermarket in Berlin (Reuters)
TT

Euro Zone Inflation Surges Past ECB Target on Oil Shock

Shelves filled with fruit inside a supermarket in Berlin (Reuters)
Shelves filled with fruit inside a supermarket in Berlin (Reuters)

Euro zone inflation soared past the European Central Bank's 2% target this month due to surging oil and gas prices, heightening a policy dilemma as expensive energy drags growth and risks generating a self-reinforcing inflation spiral.

Oil prices have nearly doubled as a result of the Iran war and the ECB is now debating whether to raise interest rates to prevent this surge from becoming entrenched in the price of other goods and services, Reuters reported.

Overall inflation in the 21 countries sharing the euro currency jumped to 2.5% in March from 1.9% a month earlier, below expectations for 2.6% in a Reuters poll of economists, as energy costs rose 4.9%.

"The previously price-stable environment is saying goodbye" said Alexander Krueger, chief economist at Hauck Aufhaeuser Lampe. "What matters is that this inflationary dirt does not feed through into the core rate." A closely-watched figure on underlying inflation, which excludes volatile ⁠food and energy, ⁠meanwhile, fell to 2.3% from 2.4%, data from Eurostat, the EU's statistics agency showed on Tuesday.

Basic economic theory argues that central banks should look past one-off price shocks generated by supply disruptions, especially because monetary policy works with long lags.

But a quick rise in energy inflation can easily broaden out if companies start building this into selling prices and workers begin demanding higher wages for the loss of disposable income.

High energy prices should increasingly make other goods more expensive and push up core inflation, said Commerzbank's chief economist ⁠Joerg Kraemer, forecasting headline inflation will rise above 3% by May unless the war ends quickly. The public may also start doubting the ECB's resolve if it remains idle, firming the case for rate hikes even in the event of large but not so persistent inflation episodes, ECB President Christine Lagarde said last week.

Financial markets now see three interest rate hikes from the ECB this year, with the first in either April or June.

"The mounting inflation pressure suggests that the ECB will raise its key interest rates in April or, at the latest, in June," Kraemer said. While some policymakers, such as the influential Bundesbank head Joachim Nagel, said that a rate hike as soon as April was an option, others, including ECB board member Isabel Schnabel, have warned against hasty action.

But policymakers agree that the ECB must act if energy starts ⁠generating second round ⁠price pressures, especially since domestic inflation had been above 2% for years.

Services inflation, the single largest item in the consumer price basket and the key gauge for domestic inflation, fell to 3.2% in March from 3.4% a month earlier.

Part of the issue is that the ECB was late in recognizing the inflation problem in 2021/22, arguing for months that the surge was transitory and would pass. It only raised rates when price growth hit 8%, forcing the central bank into its steepest tightening cycle in its history.

But the bloc is now in a very different position, so comparisons with 2022 are not entirely valid.

Rates are already higher, budget policy is tighter, the labor market has been weakening for months and there is no pent-up demand created by pandemic-era lockdowns.

The ECB will next meet on April 30.

"We find it hard to see the ECB moving at the next meeting at the end of April," said Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING. "Unless the ghosts of 2022 are really keeping policymakers awake at night."


China Expresses 'Gratitude' after 3 Ships Transit Hormuz Strait

FILE - Ships sail through the Arabian Gulf toward the Strait of Hormuz as the sun sets in the United Arab Emirates Monday, March 23, 2026. (AP Photo, File)
FILE - Ships sail through the Arabian Gulf toward the Strait of Hormuz as the sun sets in the United Arab Emirates Monday, March 23, 2026. (AP Photo, File)
TT

China Expresses 'Gratitude' after 3 Ships Transit Hormuz Strait

FILE - Ships sail through the Arabian Gulf toward the Strait of Hormuz as the sun sets in the United Arab Emirates Monday, March 23, 2026. (AP Photo, File)
FILE - Ships sail through the Arabian Gulf toward the Strait of Hormuz as the sun sets in the United Arab Emirates Monday, March 23, 2026. (AP Photo, File)

Beijing expressed "gratitude" on Tuesday as it said three Chinese ships had transited the crucial Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has all but closed during the war in the Middle East.

"Following coordination with relevant parties, three Chinese vessels recently transited the Strait of Hormuz; we express our gratitude to the relevant parties for the assistance provided," foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told a regular press conference.

Mao did not offer ‌details about the ‌Chinese ships.

Ship-tracking data showed two Chinese container ships sailed through the Strait of ⁠Hormuz on Monday ⁠on their second attempt to leave the Gulf after turning back on Friday.

The vessels sailed in close formation out of the strait and into open waters, data on the MarineTraffic platform showed.

"Both vessels successfully crossed on a second attempt today, marking the first container vessels to leave the Persian Gulf since the start of the conflict, excluding Iranian flag vessels," said Rebecca Gerdes, data analyst with Kpler, which owns MarineTraffic.

"Both vessels are steaming at an elevated speed toward the Gulf of Oman at the moment."

Officials from China's COSCO, the shipping group that operates ⁠the two vessels, did not respond to requests for comment. COSCO had said in a March 25 client advisory, that it had resumed bookings for general cargo containers for shipments from Asia to the Gulf including the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Iraq.

Iran has launched attacks on Gulf shipping and threatened more, stranding hundreds of vessels and 20,000 seafarers inside the Gulf.


UNDP: Arab Countries May Lose Up to $194 Billion from Iran War

FILE PHOTO: A cargo ship in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah in United Arab Emirates, March 11, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A cargo ship in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah in United Arab Emirates, March 11, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
TT

UNDP: Arab Countries May Lose Up to $194 Billion from Iran War

FILE PHOTO: A cargo ship in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah in United Arab Emirates, March 11, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A cargo ship in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah in United Arab Emirates, March 11, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo

The military escalation in the Middle East, now into its fifth week, may cost economies in the region from 3.7 to 6 percent of their collective Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a staggering loss of $120-194 billion, a new United Nations study found.

“Coupled with an estimated rise in unemployment of up to 4 percentage points or 3.6 million jobs lost—more than the total jobs created in the region in 2025, these reversals will push up to 4 million people into poverty,” according to an analysis by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which was released early Tuesday.

The assessment - “Military Escalation in the Middle East: Economic and Social Implications for the Arab States region” - exposes the concerning reality of structural vulnerabilities characteristic to the region, which enable a short lived military escalation to generate profound and widespread socio economic impacts that may persist over a long-term.

The agency said it had studied a number of different scenarios to determine how the conflict, which began on Feb. 28, might affect countries in the region. The report’s authors indicated that the damage could be profound, even if the war ends relatively soon.

“A short-lived military escalation in the Middle East could generate profound and widespread socio-economic impacts across the Arab States region,” they said.

“Since the escalation began, maritime security risks and attacks on tankers have sharply curtailed shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz,” said the study.

The Strait remains the world’s most critical maritime energy chokepoint, it added.

It warned that even limited military escalation or accidental incidents affecting the Strait can rapidly destabilize global energy markets and trigger sharp price movements.

The study added that simulations suggest that the military escalation could generate substantial but uneven macroeconomic impacts across the Arab States region.

Simulations indicate the Gulf Cooperation Council countries would experience macroeconomic impacts. GDP is projected to decline between 5.2 percent under the moderate disruption scenario and 8.5 percent under the most severe scenario.

The Levant region (Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria) could experience significant macroeconomic losses across all scenarios. Compared to the No-War scenario GDP is projected to decline between 5.2 percent and 8.7 percent.

These translate into between approximately 2.8 and 3.3 million additional people pushed into poverty.

The Human Development Index (HDI) declines by approximately –0.2 to –0.4 percent, corresponding to a loss of roughly half a year to nearly one year of human development progress. These impacts are most pronounced in the Levant, where losses translate into setbacks of around one to one and a half years.

According to the study, the war could also have significant implications for the region’s monetary, fiscal and financial conditions.

“The region’s central banks may therefore need to raise interest rates and intervene in foreign currency markets to contain foreign exchange and inflationary pressures and to provide liquidity support to banks,” it said.