China's Landfills Brim with Textile Waste as Fast Fashion Reigns

A worker feeds discarded textiles to a shredding machine at the Wenzhou Tiancheng Textile Company in eastern China's Zhejiang province on March 20, 2024. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)
A worker feeds discarded textiles to a shredding machine at the Wenzhou Tiancheng Textile Company in eastern China's Zhejiang province on March 20, 2024. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)
TT

China's Landfills Brim with Textile Waste as Fast Fashion Reigns

A worker feeds discarded textiles to a shredding machine at the Wenzhou Tiancheng Textile Company in eastern China's Zhejiang province on March 20, 2024. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)
A worker feeds discarded textiles to a shredding machine at the Wenzhou Tiancheng Textile Company in eastern China's Zhejiang province on March 20, 2024. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)

At a factory in Zhejiang province on China’s eastern coast, two mounds of discarded cotton clothing and bed linens, loosely separated into dark and light colors, pile up on a workroom floor. Jacket sleeves, collars and brand labels protrude from the stacks as workers feed the garments into shredding machines.
It’s the first stage of a new life for the textiles, part of a recycling effort at the Wenzhou Tiancheng Textile Company, one of the largest cotton recycling plants in China, The Associated Press reported.
Textile waste is an urgent global problem, with only 12% recycled worldwide, according to fashion sustainability nonprofit Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Even less — only 1% — are castoff clothes recycled into new garments; the majority is used for low-value items like insulation or mattress stuffing.
Nowhere is the problem more pressing than in China, the world’s largest textile producer and consumer, where more than 26 million tons of clothes are thrown away each year, according to government statistics. Most of it ends up in landfills.
And factories like this one are barely making a dent in a country whose clothing industry is dominated by “fast fashion” — cheap clothes made from unrecyclable synthetics, not cotton. Produced from petrochemicals that contribute to climate change, air and water pollution, synthetics account for 70% of domestic clothing sales in China.
China's footprint is worldwide: E-commerce juggernaut brands Shein and Temu make the country one of the world’s largest producers of cheap fashion, selling in more than 150 countries.
To achieve a game-changing impact, what fashion expert Shaway Yeh calls “circular sustainability” is needed among major Chinese clothing brands so waste is avoided entirely.
“You need to start it from recyclable fibers and then all these waste textiles will be put into use again,” she said.
But that is an elusive goal: Only about 20% of China’s textiles are recycled, according to the Chinese government — and almost all of that is cotton.
Chinese cotton is not without a taint of its own, said Claudia Bennett of the nonprofit Human Rights Foundation. Much of it comes from forced labor in Xinjiang province by the country's ethnic Uyghur minority.
"One-in-five cotton garments globally is linked to Uyghur forced labor,” Bennett said.
In May, the US blocked imports from 26 Chinese cotton traders and warehouses to avoid goods made with Uyghur forced labor. But because the supply chain is so sketchy, Uyghur cotton is used in garments produced in other countries that don't bear the “made-in-China” label, Bennett said.
“Many, many, many clothing brands are linked to Uyghur forced labor through the cotton," she said. They "hide behind the lack of transparency in the supply chain.”
While China is a global leader in the production of electric cars and electric-powered public transit and has set a goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060, its efforts in promoting fashion sustainability and recycling textiles have taken a back seat.
According to a report this year from independent fashion watchdog Remake assessing major clothing companies on their environmental, human rights and equitability practices, there's little accountability among the best-known brands.
The group gave Shein, whose online marketplace groups about 6,000 Chinese clothing factories under its label, just 6 out of a possible 150 points. Temu scored zero.
Also getting zero were US label SKIMS, co-founded by Kim Kardashian, and low-price brand Fashion Nova. US retailer Everlane was the highest-scorer at 40 points, with only half of those for sustainability practices.
China’s domestic policy doesn’t help.
Cotton recycled from used clothing is banned from being used to make new garments inside China. This rule was initially aimed at stamping out fly-by-night Chinese operations recycling dirty or otherwise contaminated material.
But now it means the huge spools of tightly woven rope-like cotton yarn produced at the Wenzhou Tiancheng factory from used clothing can only be sold for export, mostly to Europe.
Making matters worse, many Chinese consumers are unwilling to buy used items anyway, something the Wenzhou factory sales director, Kowen Tang, attributes to increasing household incomes.
“They want to buy new clothes, the new stuff,” he said of the stigma associated with buying used.
Still, among younger Chinese, a growing awareness of sustainability has contributed to the emergence of fledgling “remade” clothing businesses.
Thirty-year-old designer Da Bao founded Times Remake in 2019, a Shanghai-based brand that takes secondhand clothes and refashions them into new garments. At the company's work room in Shanghai, tailors work with secondhand denims and sweatshirts, stitching them into funky new fashions.
The venture, which began with Da Bao and his father-in-law posting their one-off designs online, now has a flagship store in Shanghai’s trendy Jing’an District that stocks their remade garments alongside vintage items, such as Levi’s and Carhartt jackets.
The designs are “a combination of the past style and current fashion aesthetic to create something unique,” Bao said.
Zhang Na has a fashion label, Reclothing Bank, that sells clothes, bags and other accessories made from materials such as plastic bottles, fishing nets and flour sacks.
The items' labels have QR codes that show their composition, how they were made and the provenance of the materials. Zhang draws on well-established production methods, such as textile fibers made from pineapple leaf, a centuries-old tradition originating in the Philippines.
“We can basically develop thousands of new fabrics and new materials,” she said.
Reclothing Bank began in 2010 to give “new life to old things,” Zhang said of her store in a historic Shanghai alley with a mix of Western and Chinese architecture. A large used clothes deposit box sat outside the entrance.
“Old items actually carry a lot of people’s memories and emotions,” she said.
Zhang said she has seen sustainability consciousness grow since she opened her store, with core customers in their 20s and 30s.
Bao Yang, a college student who dropped by the store on a visit to Shanghai, said she was surprised at the feel of the clothes.
“I think it’s amazing, because when I first entered the door, I heard that many of the clothes were actually made of shells or corn (husks), but when I touched the clothes in detail, I had absolutely no idea that they would have this very comfortable feel,” she said.
Still, she conceded that buying sustainable clothing is a hard sell. “People of my age are more addicted to fast fashion, or they do not think about the sustainability of clothes," she said.
Recycled garments sold at stores like Reclothing Bank have a much higher price tag than fast-fashion brands due to their costly production methods.
And therein lies the real problem, said Sheng Lu, professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware.
“Studies repeatedly show consumers are not willing to pay higher for clothing made from recycled materials, and instead they actually expect a lower price because they see such clothing as made of secondhand stuff,” he said.
With higher costs in acquiring, sorting and processing used garments, he doesn't see sustainable fashion succeeding on a wide scale in China, where clothes are so cheap to make.
“Companies do not have the financial incentive,” he said.
For real change there needs to be “more clear signals from the very top," he added, referring to government targets like the ones that propelled China's EV industry.
Still, in China "government can be a friend to any sector,” Lu said, so if China's communist leaders see economic potential, it could trigger a policy shift that drives new investment in sustainable fashion.
But for now, the plastic-wrapped cones of tightly-wound cotton being loaded onto trucks outside the Wenzhou Tiancheng factory were all headed to overseas markets, far from where their recycling journey began.
“Fast fashion definitely is not out of fashion” in China, Lu said.



Gap, American Eagle Fall as Weak Apparel Demand Signals Constrained Consumer Spending

A man walks past a Gap store on Oxford Street in London, Britain, July 1, 2021. (Reuters)
A man walks past a Gap store on Oxford Street in London, Britain, July 1, 2021. (Reuters)
TT

Gap, American Eagle Fall as Weak Apparel Demand Signals Constrained Consumer Spending

A man walks past a Gap store on Oxford Street in London, Britain, July 1, 2021. (Reuters)
A man walks past a Gap store on Oxford Street in London, Britain, July 1, 2021. (Reuters)

Shares of apparel makers Gap and American Eagle Outfitters dropped 15% and 10%, respectively, in premarket trade on Friday after weak annual forecasts, as consumers curb discretionary spending amid a tough macroeconomic climate.

Gap cut its annual sales forecast, while American Eagle maintained its full-year comparable sales and operating profit outlook but flagged a contraction in current-quarter gross margin, stoking worries about near-term demand.

US inflation posted its biggest increase ‌in three ‌years, while consumer sentiment hit a record low ‌in ⁠May, forcing households to ⁠tap savings and cut back on discretionary purchases such as clothes and accessories.

Both companies flagged weakness in certain women's seasonal categories, weighing on current-quarter results.

At Gap, which is undergoing a turnaround under CEO Richard Dickson, pressure centered on Old Navy, its largest banner, where seasonal women's apparel failed to connect ⁠with shoppers.

"Old Navy was the key swing ‌factor," BTIG analysts said in ‌a note.

"Weakness was concentrated in seasonal categories like dresses, where the assortment missed ‌on fashion and value, weighing on conversion despite solid traffic."

American ‌Eagle also came under pressure as strong demand at Aerie failed to offset weakness at its namesake brand, with women's bottoms hurt by changing fashion trends and a colder spring.

In a bid to ‌attract Gen Z shoppers and boost sales, the denim retailer, last month, unveiled a second ⁠campaign with "Euphoria" ⁠star Sydney Sweeney for its summer season denim shorts collection, a year after a viral and controversial ad featuring the actress fueled a stock rally.

Barclays noted heavy marketing spending is expected to recur in Q2 2026, but "bottoms including denim have since returned to underperformance".

It added American Eagle brand may struggle to lap its high-profile Sydney Sweeney and Travis Kelce campaigns and drive earnings growth in H2 2026.

Gap currently trades at 10.30 times its estimated earnings for the next 12 months, compared with 9.70 times for American Eagle and 7.43 times for Abercrombie & Fitch, according to LSEG data.


Clothing Rental Services Promise a Sustainable Alternative to Fast Fashion. Experts Say It Depends

A shopper browses for clothing at a Walmart store in Flagstaff, Arizona, US, October 19, 2022. (Reuters)
A shopper browses for clothing at a Walmart store in Flagstaff, Arizona, US, October 19, 2022. (Reuters)
TT

Clothing Rental Services Promise a Sustainable Alternative to Fast Fashion. Experts Say It Depends

A shopper browses for clothing at a Walmart store in Flagstaff, Arizona, US, October 19, 2022. (Reuters)
A shopper browses for clothing at a Walmart store in Flagstaff, Arizona, US, October 19, 2022. (Reuters)

For weddings, vacations or other special occasions, more consumers are turning to clothing rental services instead of buying something new.

These subscription-based services, often marketed as a sustainable alternative to fast fashion, ship straight to customers everything from everyday and workwear to dresses, handbags and formalwear. Then, the items are returned for someone else to use.

“I haven’t bought anything for a big occasion since 2019,” said Sasha Eck, a user of clothing rental services.

Along with giving her continuous and affordable access to newer, trendier clothes, she said renting formalwear made more sense than spending the equivalent of a month's rent on a dress she would only wear once. A recent survey from ThredUp suggests others face the same predicament, with the resale platform finding 87% of wedding guests said they had purchased at least one outfit they wore only once.

Clothing rental services appear to be an environmentally ethical alternative: One garment can be worn by multiple people instead of being tethered to a single closet. But fashion and logistics experts say the reality of rental subscriptions is more complicated, especially once shipping, returns and consumer habits are factored in.

The promise (and problem) of rental fashion

Kate Fletcher, a professor of sustainability, design and fashion systems at Manchester Metropolitan University, said rental services can sometimes encourage the same mindset that drives fast fashion.

“In theory, the embodied resources within that garment get a chance to be worked harder by having that many more people wear it. And so that’s the sort of compelling argument of it,” she said.

But Fletcher said many of those environmental benefits can be undermined by repeated shipping, returns and cleaning.

Aja Barber, a sustainability consultant and writer, said people often overlook the footprint of those processes.

“When you think about rental, you don’t think about the packaging that comes every time you get something from rental. You don’t think about the carbon footprint of shipping the item to you. And you certainly don’t think about the carbon footprint of dry cleaning,” said Barber.

Still, both experts said rental services can have advantages in certain situations.

“If you are someone who occasionally has to wear occasion-wear and you don’t want to buy a dress that you’re going to wear just once, I think it can be really impactful,” said Barber.

Fletcher pointed to older, more localized rental models, like with suit or gown rentals, where customers visited a shop, were fitted in person and later returned the item. She said those systems often had a very different environmental profile than modern, app-based rental services that rely on repeated shipping.

Why shipping matters

The rise of online shopping has heightened the environmental affect of “last mile delivery" — the final stage of transporting a package from a fulfillment center to a customer’s home. Transportation is already one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, said Johanna Amaya, assistant professor of supply chain management at Pennsylvania State University.

“The more deliveries going to our homes, the more delivery that goes to our preferred location, the more that impact on the environment,” said Amaya.

Rental services can also create an added logistical challenge because the process involves two trips — one to deliver the clothing and another to return it.

Amaya said fast shipping can also make delivery systems less efficient because companies have less time to consolidate packages into fuller routes.

“The longer they can wait to consolidate more orders and use the capacity of the delivery vehicles, the better,” said Amaya.

She added that returning items to centralized locations, like parcel lockers or post offices, may be less environmentally impactful than home pickup services.

So what should consumers do?

Experts say renting can still be a better option in some situations, particularly for special occasion outfits that may otherwise only be worn once. But they also said consumers should think carefully about how often they are ordering, shipping and returning clothing.

Fletcher encouraged people to “look within a wardrobe and yourself before you look without and try and get a new piece.”

Amaya said consumers can reduce the environmental impact by avoiding rush shipping and choosing consolidated or pickup delivery options when possible.

And the broader sustainability challenge in fashion cannot be solved by a single service or product alone, Fletcher said.

For consumers trying to shop more sustainably overall, experts said some of the simple options may still be the most effective, like re-wearing clothing, repairing items, swapping with friends, buying secondhand or donating pieces so they continue to be used.

“The best thing we can do is engage with fashion as a practice. So, a lived experience of what it is to be dressed — full of capabilities of who I can be in the world — and not as something to buy,” Fletcher said. “Fashion as shopping, that sort of idea of it, is something that industry has encouraged us to believe is the only way of engaging with fashion. And fundamentally, that’s only going to lead to more climate impacts.”


'Robots Need Clothes': Humanoids Hit Catwalk in Seoul

Each human model and their android companion took turns to strut their stuff in unison. Pedro PARDO / AFP
Each human model and their android companion took turns to strut their stuff in unison. Pedro PARDO / AFP
TT

'Robots Need Clothes': Humanoids Hit Catwalk in Seoul

Each human model and their android companion took turns to strut their stuff in unison. Pedro PARDO / AFP
Each human model and their android companion took turns to strut their stuff in unison. Pedro PARDO / AFP

There were no naked robots in sight at a fashion show held in Seoul with a high-tech twist, where pairs of people and humanoids hit the catwalk in matching outfits.

A tasseled blue Texan-style ensemble -- complete with a cowboy hat for the robot -- and a retro silver puffer jacket were among the looks showcased at the event on Thursday.

Each human model and their shorter android companion took turns to strut their stuff in unison on stage, AFP said.

The designs, including silky dresses and billowing space-age black trousers like those worn by rock star David Bowie in the 1970s, were carefully fitted to the robots' skeletal frames.

Galaxy Corporation, the entertainment company behind the display, said it was meant to ask: "How can humans and robots coexist?"

"We realized that robots, too, need to wear clothes," CEO Choi Yong-ho said.

"Just as every human being is unique, we believe that every single robot should also be distinct."

The clothes were designed by the company, whose spokesperson said it hopes to launch them under the brand name "MACH 33" at the end of the year.

The robot models at the Seoul fashion show appeared to be a humanoid made by Chinese startup Unitree, which are popular due to their relatively low cost.

Increasingly dexterous robots have proven themselves capable of performing choreographed dances, participating in races, and even able to land backflips.

Financial services firm Morgan Stanley predicts the world could have more than a billion humanoids by 2050.

But fully automated robots -- using emerging physical AI technology -- are still rare, with most impressive displays remotely operated or pre-programmed.