Algeria Airport Bombing: A Reading into the Confessions of the Perpetrators

The Houari Boumedienne Airport after its bombing in 1992. (Getty Images)
The Houari Boumedienne Airport after its bombing in 1992. (Getty Images)
TT

Algeria Airport Bombing: A Reading into the Confessions of the Perpetrators

The Houari Boumedienne Airport after its bombing in 1992. (Getty Images)
The Houari Boumedienne Airport after its bombing in 1992. (Getty Images)

A bombing targeted on August 26, 1992, Algeria’s Houari Boumedienne Airport. It was evidence that the country was headed towards a confrontation between the security forces and Islamist extremists. The bombing was not the first attack carried out by supporters of the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) in wake of the annulment of elections which the party was on the brink of winning.

The results of the first round of the elections were annulled in January 1992, marking the beginning of what is known in Algeria as the “Black Decade” that left thousands of casualties.

The airport bombing claimed the lives of nine people and wounded 118 others. The mastermind of the operation was Hocine Abderrahim, former deputy head of the FIS that was banned after the annulment of the polls.

Abderrahim and a number of his supporters were arrested in wake of the attack. Among the detainees was Rachid Hechaichi, a pilot in the national carrier Air Algérie and head of the “Islamic Syndicate”. National television broadcast their confessions and they were also published in local newspapers. Abderrahim was sentenced to death in May 1993 and he was executed along with four others.

Asharq Al-Awsat is publishing a series of British government documents that shed light on the British view of the bombing that was based on a report by the UK embassy in Algiers.

The report was written by Charge d’Affaires Keith Bloomfield after the confessions of the accused were shown on television and before their execution.

The report concluded that there was a “growing shift towards radicalism” in the FIS that was eclipsing its more moderate movements.

“You might find it useful to have a more detailed analysis of the various revelations on TV recently about Islamic terrorism in Algeria,” read the report.

“Before looking at what those concerned actually said, it is worth asking whether they are the real terrorists, and whether their confessions are genuine. In the Arab world (and elsewhere) staged 'confessions' are a common propaganda weapons and, in the case of the Algiers airport bombers, the multiple links between the FIS and the terrorists look too convenient to the regime's purpose to be entirely credible,” it added.

“Despite the FIS attempts to muddy the waters (e.g. by rumors that one of those who appeared on TV had been dead for several weeks as a result of torture) the general feeling here is nonetheless that Hocine Abderrahim and his co-conspirators are genuine. We know for example that Abderrahim was elected as FIS deputy for Bouzareah on 26 December 1991, and we have been able to confirm that he was indeed in Madani’s cabinet,” it continued.

“As to whether the confessions have been subject to manipulation, the answer has to be a firm 'Yes'. Despite allegations of torture, the way in which the individuals spoke did not look like a classic torture-induced performance,” it noted. “The confessions could however have been extracted in return for promises of clemency, and there are some who believe that they were filmed with hidden cameras.”

“It is also odd that, while claiming responsibility for other previous bombs, there was no mention of the second wave of airline bombings on 23 September - a possible explanation is that the TV confessions were filmed before 23 September,” said the report.

“As for the presentation of the confessions, both on the TV and subsequently the press, this was undoubtedly stage-managed. All sorts of conclusions have been drawn, many of which are completely unjustified by what was actually said.”

The report went on to note that nowhere in the confessions was there: “any indication that the airport or other bombs were ordered by the FIS. (Abderrahim said it was his own idea.) Any indication that the 'mainstream' FIS leadership (as opposed to discredited former leaders) had any contact with violent groups before the January coup. Any indication that foreign governments, as opposed to individuals or groups operating on foreign soil, were involved in supplying money or weapons.”

“What is alleged in the confessions is that several armed Islamist groups came into being during that time of the FIS's legality, that there was coordination between them, and that four former FIS leaders whose membership of the FIS was suspended at Batna in July 1991.

“Are these confessions plausible? Hachemi Sahnouni and Azouz Zebda have both recently appeared to give evidence in court in a separate case, and have both spoken to the press. (...) In their press interviews, both deny Abderrahim's accusations.”

“I do not want to imply by putting forward these theories that the FIS is unconnected with the current terrorist campaign. Indeed, my letter of 7 September pointed out the growing radicalization of the FIS and the eclipse of the moderate Djaz'ara faction since January. But clearly, we must beware of taking the TV confessions at their face value. They are just one element in a fairly complicated picture and reinforce once again the dangers of talking about 'the FIS' as if it were a monolithic whole.”

“One spin-off of the confessions and the subsequent publicity has been a fair amount of new information about individuals in the Algerian Islamic movement. We are now systematically recording such information on a card index,” said the report.



Iranians Fear Trump Comeback will Bring Them More Pain

A woman walks past the former US embassy compound in Tehran, which has skulls embedded in the wall - AFP
A woman walks past the former US embassy compound in Tehran, which has skulls embedded in the wall - AFP
TT

Iranians Fear Trump Comeback will Bring Them More Pain

A woman walks past the former US embassy compound in Tehran, which has skulls embedded in the wall - AFP
A woman walks past the former US embassy compound in Tehran, which has skulls embedded in the wall - AFP

When Donald Trump was last in the White House, he pursued a policy of "maximum pressure" against Iran, including punishing sanctions.

Now that he is set to begin another term as US president in January, anxiety is mounting in Tehran that more of the same will follow.

During Trump's first term, the United States also killed a revered Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps general in an airstrike on Baghdad airport in Iraq.
"It will be harmful for Iran," said 37-year-old Bashir Abbaspour, who works at a private company, reflecting widespread concern in Iran as news broke on Wednesday of Trump's victory.

His win came with the Middle East in turmoil after the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, triggered by the unprecedented attack by Iran-backed Palestinian militant group Hamas on Israel.

Iranians best remember Trump for his campaign of intensified sanctions and Washington's 2018 withdrawal from a landmark nuclear deal that offered Tehran sanctions relief in return for curbs on its nuclear ambitions.

The deal's collapse took a toll on ordinary Iranians grappling with galloping inflation and a sharp depreciation of the rial against the US dollar.

"The sanctions will increase, and with that, the prices will too. It's not a good thing for Iran," Abbaspour said of Trump's comeback.

Washington officially broke off relations with Tehran a year after the Islamic revolution in 1979, and ties have been frozen ever since.

- 'No difference' -

On Wednesday, the conservative Jam-e Jam newspaper featured front-page pictures of the two main US candidates, the Republican Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris, with two demons depicted looming behind them.

"The result of the US elections will make no difference for us," read the daily's main headline, citing Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

Reza Aram, a 51-year-old insurance agent, agreed. He said Washington's attitude towards Iran "won't change", regardless of who is president there.

"Iran's relations (with the US) will be the same (with Trump) as with Democrats," he said.

President Masoud Pezeshkian, who took office in Iran in July, has said he sought to shore up ties with West and revive the nuclear deal and end Iran's isolation.

But in recent weeks, Araghchi has said indirect nuclear talks with the United States have stopped because of regional tensions.

On October 1, Iran fired around 200 missiles at Israel in retaliation for the killing of Iran-backed militant leaders including Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah and a Revolutionary Guards commander.

In April, in its first ever direct assault on Israeli territory, Iran launched hundreds of drones and missiles in response to a deadly strike on its consulate in Damascus, which it blamed on Israel.

- 'Under pressure' -

During Trump's first term, supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final say in all matters of state, called him "unbalanced" and "foul-mouthed" as he addressed laughing crowds in Tehran.

When in 2020 Trump ordered the killing of Iran's esteemed IRGC general Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad, Tehran responded by attacking bases housing US troops in Iraq.

In the months leading up to Tuesday's vote in the United States, American officials charged that Iran was attempting to interfere in the elections, and Trump accused Tehran of posing "big threats" to his life.

On July 13, after a gunman wounded Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania, US media reported that authorities had received intelligence about an alleged Iranian plot against him.

Iran roundly denied the accusations as "malicious".

Now, with Trump due to be back in office soon and with memories of his previous term still fresh, Iranians find themselves left with little but hope for better days ahead.

"I'm worried right now about the situation of the country and its economy," said 56-year-old Zahra Eghbali. "People are under pressure."

"Both sides should come to an agreement that is to the benefit of the people."