When Tanks Become Toys for Sudanese Children

Displaced children from Khartoum in eastern Sudan (AFP)
Displaced children from Khartoum in eastern Sudan (AFP)
TT

When Tanks Become Toys for Sudanese Children

Displaced children from Khartoum in eastern Sudan (AFP)
Displaced children from Khartoum in eastern Sudan (AFP)

In worn-torn Sudan, children’s favorite games have become imitating the sound of warplanes as they pass over their heads, and the crashes of shells exploding around them. So you see them popping balloons, and shouting: “Shell... Shell... Rocket... Let’s go inside before it kills us.”

War turned into a terrifying game in the hands of Sudanese children.

Weapons are a substitute for candy

Children no longer ask their parents for candies, a ball, or even a bicycle. Rather, they want a fighter plane, guns, or a four-wheel-drive armed vehicle...

The scenes of blood flowing before their eyes, the corpses lying on the sides of the roads, and the terrifying sounds of war have all changed their notion of enjoyment.

Five-year-old Mohammad did not ask his father for “chocolate” as usual, but rather he told him to buy a “tank.”

Shocked, the father said: “It is impossible; because tanks are owned by the army only to defend the people.”

The child replied innocently: “Then ask the army to give us one and we will return it to them after the end of the war.”

As for Khadija Hussein’s three sons, their games turned into “imitating the Rapid Support Forces.”

They see these fighters roaming the streets, day and night, carrying their weapons, or riding armed cars.

Old children’s games, or football, do no longer interest Sudan’s kids. Their favorite pastime is now imitating war scenes.

Violence takes over the childhood

Khadija told Asharq Al-Awsat: “My children were kind and gentle. War turned them into violent kids, who fight and can destroy anything, even the furniture in the house.”

Nahid Jabrallah, director of Sima Center, which specializes in combating violence against women and children, said: “Even if the child does not suffer a direct physical injury, the war may cause him a psychological disability, and may make him violent, or lead him into isolation. The psychological impact on children becomes clearer in refugee shelters.”

She added that the presence of children in war zones and fighting harms their psychological stability, while the conditions in displacement centers exacerbate their problems, causing them to suffer psychological distress and a state of panic and terror.

Children in Sudan use the names of war figures to call each other. Those include Al-Burhan and Hemedti. Some of them have become known by these names among their friends in different neighborhoods.



What Is the ‘Shiite Duo’s’ Problem with Salam’s Appointment as Lebanon’s PM?

Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam waves as he arrives to meet with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (not pictured) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam waves as he arrives to meet with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (not pictured) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
TT

What Is the ‘Shiite Duo’s’ Problem with Salam’s Appointment as Lebanon’s PM?

Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam waves as he arrives to meet with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (not pictured) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam waves as he arrives to meet with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (not pictured) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (EPA)

Several observers have questioned the strong opposition by the “Shiite duo” of Hezbollah and the Amal movement of the appointment of Nawaf Salam as Lebanon’s prime minister.

Head of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc MP Mohammed Raad went so far on Monday to declare that the party had been “deceived with the aim of creating division and exclusion” in the country.

Salam was named prime minister on Monday after earning 84 votes from parliamentary blocs. His predecessor Najib Mikati received nine, while the Shiite duo abstained from naming anyone.

Back in 2023, the duo had agreed to a so-called “French initiative” that suggested the election of Hezbollah and Amal’s candidate Suleiman Franjieh as president in exchange for Salam to be named prime minister.

Salam, who in February 2024 was named head of the International Court of Justice, boasts a long history of opposing Israel, which should have earned him Hezbollah’s strong support. He resigned from the post after being designated prime minister.

Figures close to the duo said that one of the issues Hezbollah has with Salam is that since the October 2019 anti-government protests in Lebanon, he has been viewed as the opposition and West’s candidate for the position of prime minister.

Political anlayst Dr. Kassem Kassir told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hezbollah and Amal don’t view Salam as a rival as they had agreed to his nomination in line with the French initiative.

The problem, however, lies in how he was nominated. He explained that internal and foreign forces had reached an agreement that would see Joseph Aoun elected president and Mikati named prime minister, he said.

However, it appears that some sort of internal and foreign “coup” had taken place and that led to Salam’s nomination and appointment, he remarked.

On whether the dispute can be resolved, Kassir said “positive stances” during the government formation process may tackle the issue.

“The Shiite duo fear that there may be an agenda aimed at excluding its influential role in political life,” he added.

A handout photo made available by the Lebanese Presidency Press Office shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (L) speaking with Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri (R) during a meeting at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (Lebanese Presidency Press Office)

Hezbollah had warned on Monday that Salam’s government may be “unconstitutional” should it fail to meet its demands and aspirations.

Raad said: “We have the right to demand the formation of a constitutional government. A government that violates joint coexistence is not legal.”

Constitutional expert Dr. Saeed Malek said “constitutionality” is one of the foundations of Lebanon’s political system.

The constitution clearly states that there can be no legitimacy to an authority that violates mutual coexistence, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

However, the issue of “constitutionality” must not be brought up when a certain party wants to deliver a political message and prevent the remaining parties from building a state and practicing their rights, he stressed.

“Yes, the Shiite duo does represent Shiites in Lebanon, but they don’t represent all Lebanese Shiites. The community boasts figures who enrich the Shiite sect, so a government can be formed with them,” Kassir said.

“A government would be unconstitutional if not a single Shiite figure is represented in it,” he underlined.

On whether the government needs the vote of confidence of the Shiite MPs, he said the constitution does not stipulate that a cabinet needs the vote of all segments. “It simply says that it needs the vote of confidence,” he added.

“At the end of the day, the issue of ‘constitutionality’ is a right, but one must not exploit this right with the aim to obstruct state functioning and the formation of a government,” Malek stressed.

“No party has the right to obstruct a new presidential term under the pretext of ‘constitutionality’,” he stated.