How to Choose the Best Wireless Headphones

Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press
Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press
TT

How to Choose the Best Wireless Headphones

Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press
Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press

Like it or not, more smartphone manufacturers are ditching headphone jacks to make their devices slimmer and trimmer. The charitable companies offer dongles that let you use standard headphones, but most would prefer you buy wireless versions instead. Whether you listen to music while you run, work out at the gym, ride the train, or just as you walk around, here’s how to figure out whether wireless is best for you, and which headphones to buy.

Bluetooth audio has come a long way.

All isn’t lost. Wireless audio used to be synonymous with awful sound, but that was years ago. Most wireless headphones use Bluetooth, the same short-range technology that lets your phone talk to your car, for example, or your wireless mouse talk to your laptop. Bluetooth audio used to sound horrible because it’s short-range and not designed for large amounts of information, and it had to be heavily compressed to work.

But that was then, and wireless headphones sound much better today. (Don’t believe us? Try this blind audio test. You may even notice the difference between Bluetooth and wired audio yourself!)

“Bluetooth really isn’t a massive audio compromise anymore. (Despite what certain audiophiles tell you.),” Lauren Dragan, audio/video expert for The Wirecutter, the New York Times product review site, explained in an email:

“There are some fantastic Bluetooth headphones out there, but you’ll likely pay more money to get that audio quality than you would for traditional corded headphones. Why? Because Bluetooth component technology costs money to make/purchase, and it’s generally not something that headphone manufacturers can cut corners on.”

As Bluetooth headphones have evolved, so has the wireless technology that powers them. Newer versions, including the new Bluetooth 5.0, available on Apple’s latest iPhone and coming in the next generation of Android devices, promises faster transfer speeds for more data, which translates to better audio quality and richer sound in your ears.

These days, Bluetooth headphones and earbuds are available at multiple price points and come designed for people who need them to stay put while they run or exercise, or to be unobtrusive while you walk around town or ride the subway. There are even models that promise superior audio quality, if you’re willing to pay.

Consider the what and when of listening.

So now that you know that wireless audio isn’t the end of the world, consider your use case. The Wirecutter has a rundown of the best uses for wireless headphones here. Let’s be fair — even if you’re a die-hard audiophile — someone who loves just sitting and listening to your music for that full, deep, immersive experience — the times you might use wireless headphones probably aren’t those when you’d really appreciate your music.

For example, if you’re commuting on the bus or subway, or going for a run, or even working out at the gym, you’re probably not really focused on the nuances of the music. You need it to help you get through that last mile, or drown out the noise of the train or your chatty car-pool friend, but it’s hardly the time to really dive into the finer points of the guitars in your favorite song, or truly appreciate the vocal range of your favorite singer.

More likely, you’ll need headphones that also allow for a sense of what’s going on around you, but still blocks out some outside noise. This is called “isolation” (the audio term for “blocking outside or unwanted noise”) and is ideal if you plan to wear your wireless headphones in public.

You also need your headphones to connect to your phone easily, and stay connected without dropping or forcing you to stop listening and reconnect them. You may also be concerned with battery life, since you’ll want them to stay charged while you run or commute. Keep all of that in mind when you go shopping.

Alternatively, let’s say you want wireless headphones for the office. You may need a pair with more focus on audio quality, since you’ll likely use them while sitting at your desk working. You may also want something that blocks out the din of your office, but not so much that you’ll be startled by if a colleague walks up to speak with you. You might consider something with “active noise cancellation,” the term for headphones that have their own built-in microphone, listens to the sounds around you and creates a sound wave that actively cancels it out.

Isolation is generally less expensive, since it doesn’t require the technology (or the battery power) for active noise cancellation. However, noise canceling headphones are the best at blocking out sound for you to focus on the music. It’s worth keeping in mind, though, that they don’t necessarily sound better than anything else. So if you’re concerned with audio quality, don’t rush for the box with “noise cancellation” on the side.

Bottom line, think about whether you’ll use your wireless headphones in public — where you need situational awareness — or in private, where you’ll want a quieter listening experience. Then you can consider your audio quality needs, since they’ll probably depend on the previous answer.

Don’t blow your budget, even if manufacturers want you to.

Once you’ve considered when and where you need your new wireless headphones, it’s time to think about what you want to spend — or more appropriately, to avoid spending too much. There are plenty of wireless headphone models available at tons of different price points, but Ms. Dragan offered this advice against going too cheap: “When headphone companies want to cut the price of a headphone, they usually cut corners on build quality or drivers. Sometimes, if a headphone is out long enough, the price can start to drop over time, and we’ve seen that with Jabra and a few other companies.”

So keep in mind that the cheapest wireless headphones on the market probably skimp on those elements. Build quality is the thing that makes your headphones feel sturdy and solid as opposed to cheap and flimsy. The drivers are the best indicator of audio quality — so cheap drivers mean tinny, robotic sound. High quality ones generally mean great sound, but higher prices.

Most importantly, don’t be fooled by manufacturer bells and whistles that have little to do with your actual listening experience. It’s worth spending extra for battery life if you want your headphones to last longer between recharges, but customizable LED lighting probably isn’t. Active noise cancellation costs more and will drain your battery faster. A built-in microphone, so you can take calls, may be worth your money depending on your use case, but consider that before you buy, and don’t overspend on features you won’t use.

Some suggestions, but expect new models soon.

Headphones are difficult to shop for because you can’t really try them before you buy a pair. Ms. Dragan has tested hundreds of pairs and written several reviews at The Wirecutter to help. She has specific suggestions if you’re looking for the best wireless headphones for exercise, full-on over-ear Bluetooth headphones (perhaps more ideal for office listening than portability), the best portable wireless earbuds for those who want it all: audio quality, the ability to answer calls, portability and moderate isolation, and even the best “true” wireless headphones, as in no wires at all, even connecting one earbud to the other.

Each review offers a top pick and subsequent options for budget shoppers, or people who are looking for an upgrade and are willing to spend more for some extra features. However, keep in mind that new models are on the way.

“We’ve not seen a change in Bluetooth version in a while. We were in the 4.0 and 4-iterations (4.1, 4.2, etc.) and Bluetooth 5 is here, which means there will be a rush by headphone manufacturers to try to get audio fans to upgrade,” she explained.

That means you can expect even lower prices on these older headphones in the coming months, and new versions on the market before or around the holidays that promise longer battery life, better sound quality and, of course, compatibility with the newest phones. You don’t need to wait, and those same Wirecutter guides will be updated when new models are released, but maybe put a pair on your holiday shopping list and see give it some thought before you buy.

The New York Times



Nvidia, Joining Big Tech Deal Spree, to License Groq Technology, Hire Executives

The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)
The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Nvidia, Joining Big Tech Deal Spree, to License Groq Technology, Hire Executives

The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)
The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)

Nvidia has agreed to license chip technology from startup Groq and hire away its CEO, a veteran of Alphabet's Google, Groq said in a blog post on Wednesday.

The deal follows a familiar pattern in recent years where the world's biggest technology firms pay large sums in deals with promising startups to take their technology and talent but stop short of formally acquiring the target.

Groq specializes in what is known as inference, where artificial intelligence models that have already been trained respond to requests from users. While Nvidia dominates the market for training AI models, it faces much more competition in inference, where traditional rivals such as Advanced Micro Devices have aimed ‌to challenge it ‌as well as startups such as Groq and Cerebras Systems.

Nvidia ‌has ⁠agreed to a "non-exclusive" ‌license to Groq's technology, Groq said. It said its founder Jonathan Ross, who helped Google start its AI chip program, as well as Groq President Sunny Madra and other members of its engineering team, will join Nvidia.

A person close to Nvidia confirmed the licensing agreement.

Groq did not disclose financial details of the deal. CNBC reported that Nvidia had agreed to acquire Groq for $20 billion in cash, but neither Nvidia nor Groq commented on the report. Groq said in its blog post that it will continue to ⁠operate as an independent company with Simon Edwards as CEO and that its cloud business will continue operating.

In similar recent deals, Microsoft's ‌top AI executive came through a $650 million deal with a startup ‍that was billed as a licensing fee, and ‍Meta spent $15 billion to hire Scale AI's CEO without acquiring the entire firm. Amazon hired ‍away founders from Adept AI, and Nvidia did a similar deal this year. The deals have faced scrutiny by regulators, though none has yet been unwound.

"Antitrust would seem to be the primary risk here, though structuring the deal as a non-exclusive license may keep the fiction of competition alive (even as Groq’s leadership and, we would presume, technical talent move over to Nvidia)," Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday after Groq's announcement. And Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's "relationship with ⁠the Trump administration appears among the strongest of the key US tech companies."

Groq more than doubled its valuation to $6.9 billion from $2.8 billion in August last year, following a $750 million funding round in September.

Groq is one of a number of upstarts that do not use external high-bandwidth memory chips, freeing them from the memory crunch affecting the global chip industry. The approach, which uses a form of on-chip memory called SRAM, helps speed up interactions with chatbots and other AI models but also limits the size of the model that can be served.

Groq's primary rival in the approach is Cerebras Systems, which Reuters this month reported plans to go public as soon as next year. Groq and Cerebras have signed large deals in the Middle East.

Nvidia's Huang spent much of his biggest keynote speech of 2025 arguing that ‌Nvidia would be able to maintain its lead as AI markets shift from training to inference.


Italy Watchdog Orders Meta to Halt WhatsApp Terms Barring Rival AI Chatbots

The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)
The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Italy Watchdog Orders Meta to Halt WhatsApp Terms Barring Rival AI Chatbots

The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)
The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)

Italy's antitrust authority (AGCM) on Wednesday ordered Meta Platforms to suspend contractual terms ​that could shut rival AI chatbots out of WhatsApp, as it investigates the US tech group for suspected abuse of a dominant position.

A spokesperson for Meta called the decision "fundamentally flawed," and said the emergence of AI chatbots "put a strain on our systems that ‌they were ‌not designed to support".

"We ‌will ⁠appeal," ​the ‌spokesperson added.

The move is the latest in a string by European regulators against Big Tech firms, as the EU seeks to balance support for the sector with efforts to curb its expanding influence.

Meta's conduct appeared capable of restricting "output, market ⁠access or technical development in the AI chatbot services market", ‌potentially harming consumers, AGCM ‍said.

In July, the ‍Italian regulator opened the investigation into Meta over ‍the suspected abuse of a dominant position related to WhatsApp. It widened the probe in November to cover updated terms for the messaging app's business ​platform.

"These contractual conditions completely exclude Meta AI's competitors in the AI chatbot services ⁠market from the WhatsApp platform," the watchdog said.

EU antitrust regulators launched a parallel investigation into Meta last month over the same allegations.

Europe's tough stance - a marked contrast to more lenient US regulation - has sparked industry pushback, particularly by US tech titans, and led to criticism from the administration of US President Donald Trump.

The Italian watchdog said it was coordinating with the European ‌Commission to ensure Meta's conduct was addressed "in the most effective manner".


Amazon Says Blocked 1,800 North Koreans from Applying for Jobs

Amazon logo (Reuters)
Amazon logo (Reuters)
TT

Amazon Says Blocked 1,800 North Koreans from Applying for Jobs

Amazon logo (Reuters)
Amazon logo (Reuters)

US tech giant Amazon said it has blocked over 1,800 North Koreans from joining the company, as Pyongyang sends large numbers of IT workers overseas to earn and launder funds.

In a post on LinkedIn, Amazon's Chief Security Officer Stephen Schmidt said last week that North Korean workers had been "attempting to secure remote IT jobs with companies worldwide, particularly in the US".

He said the firm had seen nearly a one-third rise in applications by North Koreans in the past year, reported AFP.

The North Koreans typically use "laptop farms" -- a computer in the United States operated remotely from outside the country, he said.

He warned the problem wasn't specific to Amazon and "is likely happening at scale across the industry".

Tell-tale signs of North Korean workers, Schmidt said, included wrongly formatted phone numbers and dodgy academic credentials.

In July, a woman in Arizona was sentenced to more than eight years in prison for running a laptop farm helping North Korean IT workers secure remote jobs at more than 300 US companies.

The scheme generated more than $17 million in revenue for her and North Korea, officials said.

Last year, Seoul's intelligence agency warned that North Korean operatives had used LinkedIn to pose as recruiters and approach South Koreans working at defense firms to obtain information on their technologies.

"North Korea is actively training cyber personnel and infiltrating key locations worldwide," Hong Min, an analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, told AFP.

"Given Amazon's business nature, the motive seems largely economic, with a high likelihood that the operation was planned to steal financial assets," he added.

North Korea's cyber-warfare program dates back to at least the mid-1990s.

It has since grown into a 6,000-strong cyber unit known as Bureau 121, which operates from several countries, according to a 2020 US military report.

In November, Washington announced sanctions on eight individuals accused of being "state-sponsored hackers", whose illicit operations were conducted "to fund the regime's nuclear weapons program" by stealing and laundering money.

The US Department of the Treasury has accused North Korea-affiliated cybercriminals of stealing over $3 billion over the past three years, primarily in cryptocurrency.