Exclusive- The Bazaaris’ Revolt in Iran: Who is behind it?

Iranian shops closed at the ancient Grand Bazaar in Tehran on June 25, 2018. ATTA KENARE / AFP
Iranian shops closed at the ancient Grand Bazaar in Tehran on June 25, 2018. ATTA KENARE / AFP
TT

Exclusive- The Bazaaris’ Revolt in Iran: Who is behind it?

Iranian shops closed at the ancient Grand Bazaar in Tehran on June 25, 2018. ATTA KENARE / AFP
Iranian shops closed at the ancient Grand Bazaar in Tehran on June 25, 2018. ATTA KENARE / AFP

For a second-day running Tehran’s Grand Bazaar remained shut with its example imitated in the capital’s other business districts such as Maqsud-Shah, Qaysarieh, Khayyam, Sayyed Vali and Pachenar among others. At the same time bazaars in several other cities, notably Isfahan, Mash’had, Bandar Abbas, Kerman and Tabriz also organized token strikes in sympathy with Tehrani merchants.

Shutting the Grand Bazaar is not easy and had not happened since the heady days of 1978-79 when the uprising against the Shah was heading for its peak.

The Grand Bazaar consists of over 40 interlinked passages covering a total distance of 10.6 kilometers. The passages are divided into 20 segments each specializing in some trade, from food-shops, to goldsmith workshops to carpet show-rooms to whatever a megacity of almost 15 million inhabitants might need.

However, the Grad Bazaar isn’t just a mega shopping mall; it is the core of a whole way of life.

It contains six mosques, 30 hotels, more than 20 banks, six libraries, nine religious seminaries, 13 primary and secondary schools, two theaters, and a “House of Force” (zurkhaneh) where actual or putative “tough guys” practice traditional wrestling and body-building.

Bazaar merchants also provide a good chunk of the income reaped by the Shiite clergy in the form of “khoms” (one-fifth of revenue), “sahm-Imam” (Imam’s share), and a whole range of other voluntary donations. Without money from the bazaar and similar institutions in the provinces the Shi’ite clergy might not have been able to maintain its status through many ups-and-downs in Iran’s stormy history.

Traditionally the Grand Bazaar has also played a key role in fostering social cohesion, mostly through associations representing people from Iran’s 31 provinces. The largest of these are the Azerbaijani Association followed by the Association of Isfahanis in the capital.

Moe than 500 charities depend on support from Grand Bazaar which is also linked with countless Sufi fraternities. The Qaemiyah Movement, that organizes the birthday of the Hidden Imam on 15 Shaaban on the lunar calendar, has an estimated 1.2 million members in Greater Tehran. The same organization flexes its muscles every year in the mourning months of Muharram and Safar by fielding over 500 mourning processions (known as dasteh sineh-zani) in all parts of Tehran, the sprawling capital which covers an area of 662 square kilometers. Its provincial associations maintain networks all over Iran and, if and when necessary, can bring additional “muscle” to the capital from hundreds of towns and thousands of villages near and far.

More importantly, perhaps, the Grand Bazaar is the source of direct or indirect employment for more than 600,000 people.

The early history of the Grand Bazaar dates back to some 400 years ago in the Safavid Era. But the main structures of the present network were built some 200 years ago under the Qajars. Under Reza Shah the Great, the founder of the Pahlavi Dynasty, the Grand Bazaar adopted a critical profile towards the new regime because of its modernization project that included clipping the wings of the clergy and promoting European-style trading companies. Under the last Shah, relations initially improved but only slightly, and from 1978 onwards ended up with open hostility towards the Pahlavi regime. Most Iran experts agree that, without strong financial and manpower support from the Grand bazaar, the late Ayatollah Ruhallah Khomeini ad his Communist allies, would not have been able to seize power without much of a fight.

Since then, the Grand Bazaar’s enthusiasm for the Khomeinist regime has cooled somewhat without turning into open hostility. Thus the current events must be regarded either as fleeting aberration or as a serious sign that the Khomeinist regime may be losing one of its major bases of support.

Of course, since nothing in Iran is ever what it seems to be, the protests may well be part of the power struggle within the Khomeinist establishment.

If that is the case, one must assume that the more radical faction, presenting the “Supreme Guide” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as their mascot, helped foment the protest as coup de grace to President Hassan Rouhani’s moribund administration.

To be sure, there are facts that underline such a theory.

Radical members of the Islamic Majlis, among them Ahmad Amir-Abadi, Fatemeh Zolqadr and Ayatollah Mujtaba Zolnur, are openly talking about impeaching Rouhani or forcing him to resign. In fact, 71 radical Majlis members signed a motion on Tuesday giving Rouhani 15 days to offer a new policy or face impeachment.

They think that with the so-called “nuke deal” concocted by former US President Barack Obama now virtually dead, Rouhani has lost his administration’s political “jewel in the crown”.

The fact that some top military figures, among them former Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Gen. Yahya Rahim Safavi and former Baseej (Mobilization) Commander Gen. Ghayb-Parvar have also indirectly criticized Rouhani gives weight to that theory.

Several radical members of the clergy, among them Ayatollah Nuri Hamadani and Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi have come out in support of the bazaaris and emitted dire warnings to Rouhani and his team.

Other analysts, however, believe that the bazaar is reflecting wider concerns within the Iranian society at a time of growing economic hardship and socio-political repression. Similar concerns caused last winter’s nationwide uprising that spread to over 1,250 cities across the country.

Several facts lend credence to that analysis. To start with, the official media are not branding the current protest as “another Zionist-CIA plot” as they have always done since 1979. Some outlets claim that the protests were fomented by “troublemakers” or “economic saboteurs” but no attempt is made to link them with exiled groups or traditional nationalist or Islamist-Marxist opponents of the regime.

One thing is certain: The Grand Bazaar has well-established and tested mechanisms for popular mobilization and a show of force in the streets. If it is angry, it can show its anger. And when it does, it would be foolish for anyone not to take notice.



Chinese Leader Xi Meets US National Security Adviser as the Two Powers Try to Avoid Conflict

In this photo released by Xinhua News Agency, Chinese President Xi Jinping, right, meets with White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. (Li Xueren/Xinhua via AP)
In this photo released by Xinhua News Agency, Chinese President Xi Jinping, right, meets with White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. (Li Xueren/Xinhua via AP)
TT

Chinese Leader Xi Meets US National Security Adviser as the Two Powers Try to Avoid Conflict

In this photo released by Xinhua News Agency, Chinese President Xi Jinping, right, meets with White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. (Li Xueren/Xinhua via AP)
In this photo released by Xinhua News Agency, Chinese President Xi Jinping, right, meets with White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. (Li Xueren/Xinhua via AP)

Chinese leader Xi Jinping met with US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on Thursday as the latter wound up a three-day visit with the stated aim of keeping communications open in a relationship that has become increasingly tense in recent years.
Sullivan, on his first trip to China as the main adviser to President Joe Biden on national security issues, earlier met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and a top general from the Central Military Commission, The Associated Press said.
Starting with a trade war that dates back to 2018, China and the United States have grown at odds over a range of issues, from global security, such as China’s claims over the South China Sea, to industrial policy on electric vehicle and solar panel manufacturing. Sullivan’s trip this week is meant to keep the tensions from spiraling into conflict.
“We believe that competition with China does not have to lead to conflict or confrontation. The key is responsible management through diplomacy,” he told reporters at a news conference shortly before leaving Beijing.
Both governments are eager to keep relations on an even keel ahead of a change in the US presidency in January. They said they remain committed to managing the relationship, following up on a meeting between Xi and Biden in San Francisco last November.
“While great changes have taken place in the two countries and in China-US relations, China’s commitment to the goal of a stable, healthy and sustainable China-US relationship remains unchanged,” Xi said.
“President Biden is committed to responsibly managing this consequential relationship to ensure that competition does not veer into conflict or confrontation, and to work together where our interests align,” Sullivan said.
The two countries agreed to work toward a phone call between Xi and Biden in the coming weeks, and Sullivan indicated the two could meet in person at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation or Group of 20 summits later this year.
“The likelihood is they’ll both be there and if they are, it would only be natural for them to have the chance to sit down with one another,” he said.
Xi and Sullivan’s meeting also touched on the issues of American citizens detained in China, on Taiwan and also on the clashes between China and Philippines in the South China Sea.
The two also discussed China’s support for Russia, as a recent US assessment found that the country was exporting technology that Russia uses to manufacture missiles, tanks and other weaponry. They also discussed efforts to end the Ukraine war, but Sullivan said they did not make any progress on that issue.
Sullivan said an agreement to have a call between the military commanders in the Indo-Pacific region was a “very positive outcome” of his meetings and that they hope to deepen military-to-military communication so it can be passed on to whoever succeeds Biden as president.
The decades-old issues surrounding Taiwan have taken renewed prominence as the island’s ties with China become increasingly strained over Beijing's claims that Taiwan is part of China.
Taiwan, a self-governing island that split from communist China in 1949, has rejected Beijing’s demands that it accept unification with the mainland. The US is obligated under a domestic law to provide the island with sufficient hardware and technology to deter invasion.
Danny Russel, a vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York and who served on the national security council in the Obama administration, said the meeting between Sullivan and Xi was particularly important because Sullivan was seen by the Chinese leadership as “a direct extension” of the US president and that Sullivan’s messaging was viewed as “coming straight from Biden.”
Sullivan also met one of China’s vice chairs of the Central Military Commission, Gen. Zhang Youxia, on Thursday morning — a rare meeting with a visiting US official.
Zhang said that reunification of Taiwan with the mainland is “the mission and responsibility” of the military, according to a statement from China’s Defense Ministry.
“China demands that the United States stop military collusion between the US and Taiwan, stop arming Taiwan and stop spreading false narratives about Taiwan,” the statement said, without elaborating on what the false narratives are.
Sullivan said “it is rare that we have the opportunity to have this kind of exchange” and underscored “the need for us to responsibly manage US-China relations.”
A White House statement said the two had “recognized the progress in sustained, regular military-military communications over the past 10 months” and noted an agreement announced the previous day to hold a telephone call between commanders at the theater-level in the near future. On Taiwan, the US statement said only that Sullivan had raised the importance of cross-Strait peace and stability.
China suspended communication between the two militaries and in a few other fields after a senior US lawmaker, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, visited Taiwan in August 2022. Talks were only gradually resumed more than a year later, after Xi and Biden met outside San Francisco in November.
A theater-level call would be between Adm. Samuel Paparo, who heads the US Indo-Pacific Command in Hawaii, and his Chinese counterpart, said Russel, of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
“This theater command-level dialogue is critical for crisis prevention but something the Chinese military has been resisting,” said Russel, a former assistant US secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs.
Paparo said this week that the US military is open to consultations about escorting Philippine ships in the South China Sea, where they have clashed with Chinese ships trying to block them from small islands and outcroppings that both countries claim.