EU to Drastically Change Its Policy on Migration

Migrants disembark from rescue ship Sea-Watch 3 as they arrive at the port of Catania, Italy, January 31, 2019. (File Photo: Reuters)
Migrants disembark from rescue ship Sea-Watch 3 as they arrive at the port of Catania, Italy, January 31, 2019. (File Photo: Reuters)
TT

EU to Drastically Change Its Policy on Migration

Migrants disembark from rescue ship Sea-Watch 3 as they arrive at the port of Catania, Italy, January 31, 2019. (File Photo: Reuters)
Migrants disembark from rescue ship Sea-Watch 3 as they arrive at the port of Catania, Italy, January 31, 2019. (File Photo: Reuters)

The exact number of migrants who have drowned in the Mediterranean Sea is still unknown ever since they have been flocking on rubber or wooden boats to European shores to escape misery, violence, and persecution in their homelands.

International agencies, such as the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) estimate the number to be more than 60,000 migrants.

However, concerned European governments say they do not have accurate figures and usually refer to reports of rescue missions, which reduce this number to 40,000. Non-governmental organizations believe the number to be around 100,000 or even more.

The lack of accurate information on the numbers of migrants who drown as they try to cross the Mediterranean or embark on a difficult migration journey to Europe reflects the decline of human empathy among European societies, according to a report issued by European Commission's Center for Social Research.

The center will use the report for the discussion and development of Europe’s migration policy for the next five years.

The way things appear do not reflect the real situation of the migration crisis that may implode at any moment, warned the report.

One of the striking conclusions of the report is that recent election results in Europe showed that most EU citizens became more concerned with basic rights and showed a greater interest in humanitarian policy approach to the migration crisis.

The report strongly criticizes the EU's refugee agreement with Turkey in 2016 and considers its provisions “a clear violation of human rights.”

It also criticizes the bilateral cooperation agreements between some European countries, especially Italy with Libya, to prevent the flow of migrants across their coasts and send them to detention centers that frequently violate basic human rights.

The report noted that criminalizing the work of non-governmental organizations and rescue missions at sea violates the principles and values on which the European Union was founded.

The report concluded with a number of recommendations such as calling on the EU to lead efforts to develop an international policy to address the migration crisis, unite or coordinate national migration policies, and support local initiatives such as programs to integrate immigrants into European societies.

It also called for restoring political influence in African countries, where the EU finances development projects, in order to impose standards of respect for human rights, and exert greater efforts to address the Libyan crisis.



South Korean Opposition Submits Motion to Impeach Country's Acting President

South Korea's acting President Han Duck-soo speaks at the government complex in Seoul, South Korea, Thursday, Dec. 26, 2024. (Choi Jae-koo/Yonhap via AP)
South Korea's acting President Han Duck-soo speaks at the government complex in Seoul, South Korea, Thursday, Dec. 26, 2024. (Choi Jae-koo/Yonhap via AP)
TT

South Korean Opposition Submits Motion to Impeach Country's Acting President

South Korea's acting President Han Duck-soo speaks at the government complex in Seoul, South Korea, Thursday, Dec. 26, 2024. (Choi Jae-koo/Yonhap via AP)
South Korea's acting President Han Duck-soo speaks at the government complex in Seoul, South Korea, Thursday, Dec. 26, 2024. (Choi Jae-koo/Yonhap via AP)

South Korea’s main opposition party submitted a motion on Thursday to impeach the country’s acting leader over his reluctance to fill three Constitutional Court vacancies ahead of the court’s review of rebellion charges against impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol stemming from his short-lived martial law decree on Dec. 3.
The court appointments have stalled amid an intensifying dispute between the liberal opposition and Yoon’s conservative party, and the potential impeachment of Prime Minister Han Duck-soo may deepen the political paralysis that has halted high-level diplomacy and rattled financial markets, The Associated Press reported.
The opposition-controlled National Assembly also passed motions calling for the appointment of three Constitutional Court justices as the court prepares to start deliberations on whether to dismiss or reinstate Yoon. The vote came shortly after Han reiterated in a televised statement that he wouldn’t appoint the justices without bipartisan consent.
National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik urged Han to swiftly appoint the justices, saying that his calls for bipartisan consent essentially amounted to a refusal and “infringes on the National Assembly’s right to select Constitutional Court justices.”
Yoon’s People Power Party, whose members mostly boycotted the National Assembly vote, argued that Han shouldn’t exercise presidential authority to appoint the proposed justices while Yoon has yet to be formally removed from office.
The main opposition Democratic Party has accused the conservatives of undermining the court process to save Yoon’s presidency, and its motion to impeach Han could go to a floor vote as early as Friday. The Democrats’ floor leader, Park Chan-dae, said Han’s comments showed “he lacks both the qualifications to serve as the acting leader and the will to uphold the Constitution.”
Yoon’s presidential powers were suspended after the National Assembly voted to impeach him on Dec. 14 over an attempted power grab that lasted only hours but has triggered weeks of political turmoil that has shaken one of Asia’s most robust democracies.
To formally end Yoon’s presidency, at least six justices on the nine-member Constitutional Court must vote in favor. Three seats remain vacant following retirements and a full bench could make conviction more likely.
The court, which is to hold a pretrial hearing in Yoon’s case on Friday, has said it believes the acting president can exercise the right to appoint justices.
Three of the court’s nine justices are directly appointed by the president. Three are nominated by the head of the Supreme Court and three by the National Assembly, and they are then formally appointed by the president in what is widely considered a procedural matter.
The three seats that are currently open are to be nominated by lawmakers. South Korea’s Constitution states that the National Assembly “selects” three spots on the court rather than recommends, suggesting that the presidential appointments for these spots are a formality rather than a substantive authority, according to some legal experts.
“The consistent spirit reflected in our Constitution and laws is that an acting president should focus on maintaining stability in governance to help the country overcome crisis while refraining from exercising significant powers exclusive to the president, including appointments to constitutional institutions,” Han said. “I will withhold the appointment of Constitutional Court justices until the ruling and opposition parties submit an agreed-upon proposal.”
Han has also clashed with the Democrats over his vetoes of bills calling for independent investigations of Yoon and corruption allegations involving his wife, Kim Keon Hee.
If Han is impeached, Choi Sang-mok, the country’s deputy prime minister and finance minister, is next in line.
The impeachment vote against Han could face legal ambiguities. Most South Korean officials can be impeached with a simple majority of the National Assembly, but impeaching presidents requires two-thirds. The rival parties differ on which standard should apply to an acting president. The Democratic Party controls 170 of the National Assembly’s 300 seats, so it would need support from members of other parties including Yoon’s own to get a two-thirds majority.
While focusing on defending himself in the Constitutional Court, Yoon has dodged several requests by law enforcement authorities to appear for questioning over rebellion charges and also blocked searches of his office.
Authorities have already arrested Yoon’s defense minister, police chief and several other military commanders involved in the attempt to implement martial law, which harkened back to the days of authoritarian leaders the country hasn’t seen since the 1980s.
In a news conference in Seoul, Yoo Seung Soo, lawyer for former Defense Minister Kim Yong Hyun, repeated Yoon’s claim that his martial law decree was to “sound alarm against ... political abuse” by an opposition that has bogged down his agenda, and did not amount to a rebellion.