Former Jordan PM Mudar Badran: Declaration of Iraq War and End of Peace Efforts

Asharq Al-Awsat releases excerpts from the former prime minister’s new memoir.

Late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (L) meets with former Jordanian PM Mudar Badran (R) and Prince Zeid bin Shaker.
Late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (L) meets with former Jordanian PM Mudar Badran (R) and Prince Zeid bin Shaker.
TT

Former Jordan PM Mudar Badran: Declaration of Iraq War and End of Peace Efforts

Late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (L) meets with former Jordanian PM Mudar Badran (R) and Prince Zeid bin Shaker.
Late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (L) meets with former Jordanian PM Mudar Badran (R) and Prince Zeid bin Shaker.

Asharq Al-Awsat is exclusively publishing excerpts from a new memoir, “Al-Qarar” (The Decision), by former Jordanian Prime Minister Mudar Badran. The book will be officially released in Amman on August 17. The memoirs are filled with developments and stances that will be revealed for the first time, including moments Jordan experienced in the last quarter of the 20th Century.

In the second part of the series, Badran recalls Jordan’s preparations to confront the impact of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on Jordan, including allowing Islamists to join the government he was heading in an attempt to avert the economic crisis caused by the halt in oil supplies from Iraq. He also recalls the dangerous trip he made to Baghdad on the second day of the war and his meetings with Taha Yassin Ramadan and Tariq Aziz and how he realized how ill-prepared the Iraqi military was for the war.

Saddam Hussein continued to cling on to his position that the Iraqi army will withdraw from Kuwait only if Israel withdrew from Jerusalem and occupied territories. of course, that was an opportunity for Israel to destroy Iraq with American weapons.

I reached the conclusion early on that initiatives will be futile in resolving the crisis. After the failure of the initiatives proposed by late King Hussein and Algerian President Chadli Bendjedid, the United States informed our ambassador and their ambassador informed me that initiatives will not pass and that the Americans and their army were already on the ground.

From that point on, we began to witness the impact of the international position towards Iraq. We realized that the war was imminent and we began to take our precautions. Some optimism remained, but that, of course, is not enough.

In order to strengthen our internal front, I carried out a government reshuffle on January 1, 1990. I allowed lawmakers from the Islamist movement to join my cabinet at a time the drums of war were being beaten. I realized the need for collective work and had since becoming prime minister been committed to King Hussein’s instructions to include the Islamists in government. I believed the time was right to include them. King Hussein had even told me to grant them the education portfolio if they wanted it.

I was reluctant to meet their demands and refused to give them the education portfolio. I spent three days negotiating with them and each day they would approach me with names. I told them: “I am asking you for portfolios. I am in charge of choosing names, not you.”

The most important development to take place before the new cabinet’s first meeting was John Major’s election as British prime minister, defeating Margaret Thatcher, who had adopted a very hardline position against Saddam, in sharp contrast with her successor. Our primary concern during that first meeting was making the necessary preparations for any military development. We did not want the people to be affected by any shortage in basic goods. We therefore, prepared necessary supplies of essential goods. My main concern was oil and that the war would cut off Iraqi supplies from us. I resorted to a ship in Aqaba port where we stored enough oil to last us 18 days, which was enough time to find an alternative to the Iraqi supplies.

We were also preparing for any potential danger from Israel. We were reassured from trusted sources, however, that the Israeli army was acting normally and had deployed anti-aircraft systems on the West Bank mountains, in a defensive, not offensive, move. We said that any Israeli attack on Aqaba that would target food supplies will be met with attacks on Eilat, where their oil supplies were being stored.

I was shocked when parliament later demanded to discuss military plans. How could I allow it? Military plans are not discussed at parliament or in front of the media. We would not repeat the same mistake as the 1967 war. I explained to them our media plan and told them that Iraq does not display its military might on television. Why should I display this power when Baghdad itself does not?

To war
Despite all the efforts that were exerted to resolve the crisis peacefully, military preparations were the sign that war was upon us. Despite this, we continued to pursue a peaceful solution. We did not want to lose hope. (US President George) Bush visited Europe and we planned a meeting between him and King Hussein in Paris. King Hussein indeed contacted the White House, but the Americans cancelled the meeting. He wanted to propose to Bush the possibility of meeting with Saddam. After our efforts failed, we tried to arrange a meeting between US Secretary of State James Baker and his Iraqi counterpart Tariq Aziz. We hoped that this meeting, if it yielded a positive outcome, could pave the way for a meeting between Bush and Saddam.

As the situation began to unravel on the ground, we sensed that the Baker-Aziz meeting will be futile. The US had become more extreme in its position and its soldiers were headed to war. The Baker-Aziz meeting was set for January 3 in a hope that a Bush-Saddam meeting would be held nine days later. We were certain that the meeting, had it been held, would have eased the tense political statements about war. The Iraqis were prepared to discuss the peaceful option.

Ultimately, the two meetings were never held. Instead, Baker and Aziz met on January 9 and we had hoped that the meeting would have a positive impact on the crisis.

The situation continued to unravel rapidly. King Hussein had just returned from a trip to Britain, Germany and Luxembourg and he continued to advocate Jordan’s peaceful resolution of the crisis and the need to show the same great attention to other Middle Eastern affairs. Such an approach would play into the political solution to the Iraqi crisis in Kuwait.

I was meeting with parliament and (then United Nations Secretary-General Javier Pérez) de Cuéllar was about to hold his second meeting with Saddam. The first had ended without any cause for optimism. All we needed from the Iraqis was for the leadership to take a position that would take away the opportunity to carry out any military operation the US was planning. Such an opportunity meant that we would be allowing the Soviet Union, as an eastern bloc, to return to its maneuvers against the western bloc.

This was followed by a dangerous development: The US Congress’ approval to grant George Bush the authority to declare war. This confirmed that the US was headed to war against Iraq. That day was January 15.

January 17, 1991 was a sad, painful, long and difficult day. It was the day when peaceful efforts failed and war was declared.

Immediately, King Hussein met with the emergency committees at the national assembly and government. I had never seen him so sad before. He revealed to us all efforts carried out by head of the Royal Court, Prince Zeid bin Shaker, to avert the war. He had paid a visit to Riyadh in a last-ditch effort to reach a solution based on Iraqi-Saudi dialogue. The Saudis informed him that he should head to Iraq and demand their immediate withdrawal (from Kuwait). If the Iraqis refuse to make such a declaration, then he should instead.

The meeting was difficult, but King Hussein gave us strength and lifted our spirits and spoke about the values and principles of Arabism. He remained optimistic that the nation would emerge free and victorious from the crisis. He also revealed his latest political push, which was a message he received from Mikhail Gorbachev, who informed him that he tried to delay the military strike by a day or two to persuade Baghdad to withdraw. The air strike, however, was faster than Russia.

During our meeting, we presented Hussein with our assessment of the crisis. We predicted that some 200,000 people would flee to Turkey, 200,000 to Iraq, 100,000 to Syria and 750,000 to Jordan, forcing us to deal with a dangerous challenge. We informed King Hussein that the Iraqis expected the Americans to drop 18,000 tons of explosives and bombs over them, during some 2,500 air raids.

At 2 am on the second day of the attack on Baghdad, Iraq attacked Israel. It fired eight rockets at Tel Aviv, seven of which exploded. Observers said Israel would use Jordanian airspace to retaliate, which we would not allow. We were ordered that any attack on Aqaba would be met with a strike on Eilat.

We feared that the oil refinery may be targeted. It was a matter of life or death for us. So, it was suggested that it be shut down and emptied to avert any danger should the worst-case scenario unfold. We suggested that the oil be stored at gas stations.

As for Israeli violations of our airspace, we were ordered to fire at any attempt and the Americans were informed of this.

To Baghdad under fire
On the second day of the war on Iraq, I carried out a secret visit to Baghdad. I arranged the visit despite the uneasiness of King Hussein and Prince Zeid bin Shaker due to its high security risk and high political risk if it was uncovered. I forged ahead, however. I prepared two vehicles and had them loaded with enough fuel and brought in gallons more that were stored in the trunks.

We began the journey without knowing anything about the route. We didn’t know how long the trip would take. I didn’t even tell my family.

The route was deserted. It was dangerous because two fast-traveling vehicles could be easily detected and targeted. We resorted to two cars in case one of them broke down. We drove at 200 kilometers an hour in armored vehicles on the international highway. It was a risk as any problem on the road would be difficult to avoid by such heavy cars. I did not sleep a minute throughout the trip. I wanted to memorize the route to ensure a safe return home.

It was a dangerous adventure. We could see the fighter jets overhead, flying towards Baghdad where they would strike before returning to their bases. We used to pass Iraqi checkpoints and they used to ask us for bread. I wondered at this. How could the Iraqi army not take into account the need to feed its soldiers while they were at war?

We drove ahead at high speed and reached Baghdad. We stopped at our embassy and found it closed. The guards informed us that the employees were on their lunchbreak and contacted them to return. I asked: “How can you shut the embassy?” They said that they were not informed of my visit and that if they did not head out for lunch at this hour, restaurants and shops will be closed. They told me that the only food available was bulgur, because bread and flour could no longer be found in Baghdad.

I told them to contact (foreign minister) Tariq Aziz and (first Vice President) Taha Yassin Ramadan to inform them that I was in Baghdad and wanted to meet them.

I left behind the armored vehicles and was transported by an Iraqi pickup truck to meet with Aziz and Ramadan. I was shocked with these weak measures in confronting an international war. Aziz did not have enough fuel. I asked: “How am I supposed to return to Amman? My cars have run out of fuel.”

I wondered how they could wage a war without ensuring they had a sufficient food, fuel or energy supply. I told them that even Jordan, which was not involved in the war, had completed its precautions even before the conflict began. I advised them to secure all logistic precautions and draw up a comprehensive plan to ensure that Baghdad is supplied with its food, medicine and fuel needs. Indeed, I broke the siege on Baghdad in several ways. I guaranteed that they would continue to receive all essential goods and even sent them oil that was refined in Jordan.

I met with Ramadan for four hours. He informed me that they were doing well and that the developments were less than what they expected. He said they were very well organized militarily. I criticized their administrative management, whereby shops were closed, no police was deployed on the streets and the people were left without water, electricity, bread and fuel. There was but one gas station that was operating by hand because of a power outage in Baghdad. Despite all this, the people were going about their normal lives. When a strike happens, they head to bomb shelters.

I was told that some residents of Baghdad had headed north and to the Iranian border. Ramadan told me that the military strikes missed 80 percent of their targets, assuring me that Iraq can shoot down a number of coalition jets and that their pilots will be captured, dead or alive.

Two raids took place as I was in Baghdad. The anti-aircraft defenses kept the jets at bay. The Iraqis were seeking to lure the coalition forces into a ground battle. I was told that the attack against Israel was not planned, but it was a response to American false claims that Iraq’s missile launch platforms had been destroyed. Ramadan told me that the platforms were taken from the Soviet Union and that Iraq had built new ones because the figures were stolen from the Russians and leaked to the US.

The third and final part of the series of excerpts concludes on Tuesday.



Saudi Heritage Commission Uncovers Over 1,700 Artifacts at Ancient Al-Juhfah Miqat Site

Discoveries included diverse fragments used in daily life, six pottery kilns, a water channel - SPA
Discoveries included diverse fragments used in daily life, six pottery kilns, a water channel - SPA
TT

Saudi Heritage Commission Uncovers Over 1,700 Artifacts at Ancient Al-Juhfah Miqat Site

Discoveries included diverse fragments used in daily life, six pottery kilns, a water channel - SPA
Discoveries included diverse fragments used in daily life, six pottery kilns, a water channel - SPA

Saudi Arabia's Heritage Commission completed the first season of its joint scientific mission with the University of Exeter at the ancient Al-Juhfah Miqat site, uncovering more than 1,700 artifacts, including pottery, glass, stone pieces, shells, and worked objects, confirming the site's significance along the Egyptian pilgrimage route.

Discoveries included diverse fragments used in daily life, six pottery kilns, a water channel believed to have served pilgrims and travelers, and 13 tombstones dating to the Umayyad and Abbasid periods. Some finds originated from the Levant, Egypt, and Ethiopia, reflecting the diverse origins of pilgrims who passed through this miqat, SPA reported.

Al-Juhfah Miqat is located 187 kilometers northwest of Makkah and has been an established miqat since the early Islamic period, associated with the Prophet's migration, and is known to have flourished in the second Hijri century, with water facilities and shops serving pilgrims.

These works are part of the Heritage Commission's efforts to survey and document archaeological sites along the Hijrah route between Makkah and Madinah, using advanced technologies to reveal the historical and civilizational depth of the Kingdom.


Makkah Museum Displays Rare Quran Manuscript Dating Back to 1843

The manuscript is distinguished by its precise script written in black ink with full diacritical marks - SPA
The manuscript is distinguished by its precise script written in black ink with full diacritical marks - SPA
TT

Makkah Museum Displays Rare Quran Manuscript Dating Back to 1843

The manuscript is distinguished by its precise script written in black ink with full diacritical marks - SPA
The manuscript is distinguished by its precise script written in black ink with full diacritical marks - SPA

The Holy Quran Museum in the Hira Cultural District in Makkah showcases a collection of rare Quranic artifacts and collectibles that document Muslims’ care for the Holy Quran throughout the ages. Among the most notable exhibits is a rare Quran dating back to 1259 AH, corresponding to 1843 AD, which stands as a historical testament to the beauty of Quranic manuscript writing and ornamentation.

The manuscript is distinguished by its precise script written in black ink with full diacritical marks. Its pages are adorned with gilded borders, golden verse separators, and intricate floral decorations that highlight the advanced craftsmanship achieved in the gilding and embellishment of Quran manuscripts during that historical period, SPA reported.

Information accompanying the artifact indicates that the Quran later underwent restoration and rebinding to protect it from deterioration. This step helped preserve this rare Quranic treasure and maintain it as a witness to a cultural and civilizational legacy spanning more than a century and a half.

The display of this Quran is part of the educational and cultural content presented by the Holy Quran Museum, which enables visitors and pilgrims to explore diverse examples of historical Qurans and rare manuscripts and to learn about the various stages of writing, copying, and decorating Quranic manuscripts across different Islamic eras.

The museum serves as a prominent cultural and educational destination in Makkah, highlighting the historical efforts of Muslims in serving and preserving the Holy Quran. It also promotes awareness of the value of Islamic heritage associated with the Holy Quran through modern museum displays and interactive educational experiences that enrich visitors’ experiences and enhance their connection with the history of the Holy Quran.


Nigerian Museum Revamp Brings Treasures within Reach

Tinuke Odunfa, the interior designer of the gallery, aimed to modernize the space and present Nigerian history in an an 'immersive' environment. OLYMPIA DE MAISMONT / AFP
Tinuke Odunfa, the interior designer of the gallery, aimed to modernize the space and present Nigerian history in an an 'immersive' environment. OLYMPIA DE MAISMONT / AFP
TT

Nigerian Museum Revamp Brings Treasures within Reach

Tinuke Odunfa, the interior designer of the gallery, aimed to modernize the space and present Nigerian history in an an 'immersive' environment. OLYMPIA DE MAISMONT / AFP
Tinuke Odunfa, the interior designer of the gallery, aimed to modernize the space and present Nigerian history in an an 'immersive' environment. OLYMPIA DE MAISMONT / AFP

Gazing at two large engraved 16th-century elephant tusks on display at Nigeria's National Museum Lagos, a guide surprised visitors by telling them: "You can touch them gently".

One of the three galleries at the museum in Nigeria's cultural and entertainment hub has been remodeled to allow visitors to interact with some artefacts, reversing the typical ban on touching exhibits, as well as take unrestricted photographs in an effort to engage younger audiences, curator Nkechi Adedeji told AFP.

As the group felt the texture of the elephant tusks to the tune of Afrobeats softly playing on overhead speakers, a young photographer was busy snapping away, likely for a social media post.

According to Tinuke Odunfa, the interior designer of the gallery, the plan was to modernize the space and present Nigerian history in an "intentional" and "immersive" environment.

"Everything was intentional in terms of how the space should be experienced, in terms of the colors, how the space leads you," Odunfa told AFP.

The gallery holds one of the country's most extensive collections, including major archaeological and ethnographic artefacts such as 5th-century terracotta by indigenous Nok people.

Its white walls are lined with artefacts encased in glass, arranged chronologically from the oldest to the newest, each accompanied by brief notes.

A few other items of the permanent exhibition, "Echoes of the Past", especially those made of wood and metal, are laid out in such a way that visitors can touch and "feel them", the museum's head of exhibition Olusegun Adeleye, 51, said.

Low ambient lighting casts a soft glow across the gallery, giving the space a quiet, reflective atmosphere.

Lagos, the vibrant mega city of more than 20 million people, and often described as Nigeria's melting pot, inspired Odunfa's design.

- 'Coming in droves' -

Since the renovated gallery opened to the public in April, it has been drawing more visitors than before, Adedeji said, without giving figures.

Its Instagram-ready spaces are drawing more schoolchildren and young adults, with pictures and videos increasingly shared online, making it a popular destination among "content creators".

"They come here, do content and before you know it, it is all over the place," Adedeji said. "Youths are coming in droves now".

"I love the way the artefacts are displayed," Oyin Isioye, a 25-year-old photographer, visiting the museum for the first time, told AFP. "I learned a lot of things... where the artefacts are from, what they represent."

- Repatriation calls -

In one corner of the gallery, three empty cases contain a sheet of paper bearing the inscription "British museum, how far??" (meaning "what's up?" in Nigerian Pidgin).

The installation sends a message to foreign museums that Nigeria is ready to pursue the repatriation of its looted artefacts.

Western museums, including those in Britain, the Netherlands and Germany, have in recent years returned several hundred artefacts, but countless more remain in galleries in Europe and America.

"This renovation shows that we can protect and preserve our objects ourselves, we do not need any other country to do it for us," said Adedeji.

The remodeling, funded by a private entity, also aimed at creating more display areas for the collection, the bulk of which are kept in storage.

More projects are in the works. Another gallery at the Lagos museum has been shut for renovation, along with other sites nationwide.

And Nigerian authorities are seeking partners to support future upgrades in preparation for more repatriated artefacts.