US Report: Pandemic Increased Challenges Facing Women in Arab World

Two women pose for a selfie outside Rafik Hariri hospital in Beirut, Lebanon. Reuters file photo
Two women pose for a selfie outside Rafik Hariri hospital in Beirut, Lebanon. Reuters file photo
TT
20

US Report: Pandemic Increased Challenges Facing Women in Arab World

Two women pose for a selfie outside Rafik Hariri hospital in Beirut, Lebanon. Reuters file photo
Two women pose for a selfie outside Rafik Hariri hospital in Beirut, Lebanon. Reuters file photo

A US report has said that one year into the global pandemic, the status of women in the Arab region and the Middle East has regressed, particularly on the economic, social, and political fronts.

Akin to global trends, the region has witnessed a surge in gender-based violence and in job losses amongst employed women; adding to the myriad challenges women already face in society, especially in war-torn countries like Yemen, Syria, and Libya, where the hardships they endure are amplified, said a report published by the Middle East Program of the Wilson Center in Washington to mark International Women’s Day.

It presented eight new blogs. These authors are women writers, scholars, and professionals from the Middle East and North Africa region who shine a light on the women of MENA said Merissa Khurma, Program Director, Middle East Program, Merissa Khurma.

As the world continues to grapple with COVID-19 and its variants, confronted with unequal access to vaccinations, exhausted healthcare systems, and ailing economies, the impacts on women will likely worsen further. Thus it is imperative to address the challenges women are facing at home and abroad. That is indeed the mandate of the newly formed Gender Policy Council under the Biden-Harris White House, said the report.

Women's rights activist Kahina Bouagache paints a grim picture as victims of femicide increase in Algeria under pandemic conditions, stressing that “gender equality to prevent violence against women must not only be mandatory but also implemented effectively.” She adds that interventions to address GBR “must address the particular needs of women and girls; they must be treated as equal partners in all efforts to build peace, actors in the economy, and support the nation all together.”

In Bahrain, journalist Wafa Alaam points to the challenges Bahraini women face on the legal and political fronts despite the government’s appreciation for empowering them. She urges the Biden administration to work with its allies in the region, including Bahrain, to “implement general political reforms that will include women by opening the way for civil society and to reform restrictive legislation that discriminates against women.

Margot Badran, Senior Fellow, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim Christian Understanding, Georgetown University, writes that US foreign assistance to Egypt is “best utilized by prioritizing support for the training of women among the urban and rural poor—the vast majority of the population—in healthcare provision and income generating activities.” She observes that women’s efforts are key to ending the pandemic in Egypt at the family, community and national levels.

Haleh Esfandiari, Distinguished Fellow; Director Emerita, Middle East Program, highlights the human rights challenges facing women in Iran, urging the United States to listen to the voices of human rights and women’s activists such as that of Nasrin Sotoudeh in both the homeland and the diaspora, for it is “these women, active on the ground, who best understand what needs to be done and the kind of support they need.”

Leila Hanafi, International Development Lawyer with the World Bank Group, emphasizes strengthening the formal justice system in Morocco while also acknowledging informal justice practices, explaining that one of the biggest obstacles in her country “is to address the legislative gaps that persist with disparities between the laws on the books and their implementation.” She adds that the US “should engage with both the formal and informal justice systems to ensure that justice programming promotes recognition of basic human rights standards, which are central to the Biden-Harris foreign policy agenda.”

In Tunisia, Lilia Labidi, Visiting Research Professor, Middle East Institute, National University of Singapore; Former Minister for Women’s Affairs (January to December 2011), Government of Tunisia, writes that the COVID-19 pandemic has elevated the role of women scientists and healthcare workers. She sees this as a “critical moment for ‘science diplomacy’ between countries such as Tunisia and the United States,” adding that the GPC, “can invigorate scientific exchanges by emphasizing the accomplishments and ambitions of women scientists.”

And from Yemen, Iman Al Harithi, who works as an advisor for GIZ-Yemen for the program, reminds us that while Yemeni women played a key role in the 2011 uprisings, the ravages of war have most severely impacted women and girls. Lacking a formal system that protects women, Al Hairithi urges international organizations and global leaders, including the United States, to engage women in the political process, because “without women's political engagement within the peace negotiation and political system, Yemen won’t have a stable future and the governing system will remain weak and fragile.”



Lebanese Parties Warn Against Hezbollah Keeping Light Weapons

Lebanese Shiite mourners gathered on Monday in Beirut’s southern suburbs to mark Ashura in a ceremony organized by Hezbollah (AFP)
Lebanese Shiite mourners gathered on Monday in Beirut’s southern suburbs to mark Ashura in a ceremony organized by Hezbollah (AFP)
TT
20

Lebanese Parties Warn Against Hezbollah Keeping Light Weapons

Lebanese Shiite mourners gathered on Monday in Beirut’s southern suburbs to mark Ashura in a ceremony organized by Hezbollah (AFP)
Lebanese Shiite mourners gathered on Monday in Beirut’s southern suburbs to mark Ashura in a ceremony organized by Hezbollah (AFP)

A recent proposal circulating in Lebanon that would allow Hezbollah to retain its light weapons while surrendering heavy and medium arms has triggered widespread political backlash, with critics warning it poses a grave threat to state sovereignty and public safety.

The suggestion, floated amid long-running debate over the group’s arsenal, argues that other political parties and armed groups also possess light weapons for various reasons. But key political factions have rejected the idea outright, citing Lebanon’s bloody past and the potential for renewed violence.

Opponents of the proposal have pointed to the events of May 7, 2008, when Hezbollah fighters overran parts of Beirut and Mount Lebanon in a show of military force, underscoring the dangers of allowing any non-state group to keep arms.

“Classifying weapons as heavy, medium or light is useless,” said Kataeb Party leader Sami Gemayel in a post on X. “If heavy arms threaten Lebanon’s regional security, light weapons are even more dangerous to the foundations of the state.”

Gemayel reiterated that only the Lebanese army and legitimate security forces should bear arms, calling for the country to be entirely free of weapons held by non-state actors.

MP Ghada Ayoub, of the Lebanese Forces-led "Strong Republic" bloc, echoed that view, insisting the state must assert full sovereignty over all Lebanese territory and outlaw any form of armed presence outside the official security apparatus.

“There is only one armed group operating outside the state, and that is Hezbollah,” Ayoub told Asharq al-Awsat. “It must become a purely political party and clearly, unequivocally declare an end to its military activity.”

Ayoub also criticized recent remarks by Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem, who vowed the group’s “resistance” would continue “without asking anyone’s permission.”

“The Lebanese state is responsible for enforcing a monopoly on the use of arms,” she said. “It must stop playing the role of a mediator or hiding behind the fear of war and internal strife. Time is not on Lebanon’s side.”

Ahmad Al-Kheir, a lawmaker with the “National Moderation” bloc, dismissed the proposal as “stillborn,” warning that light weapons have already been used to intimidate citizens and skew political dynamics.

“We saw yesterday how light arms were paraded through Beirut’s streets in a blatant attempt at provocation and coercion,” he said. “This is the real danger - using these weapons as leverage in political life, as we saw in the May 7 events and the occupation of downtown Beirut.”

“No one in Lebanon will accept this,” Al-Kheir added.

Additionally, critics warn that allowing any non-state entity to retain weapons threatens state authority and risks further destabilizing the country.

Al-Kheir urged Hezbollah and any other party in possession of light weapons to hand them over to the state, citing the recent example set by former Progressive Socialist Party (PSP) leader Walid Jumblatt.

“Jumblatt announced that his party had surrendered its weapons weeks ago. This is the model to follow,” he told Asharq al-Awsat.

MP Waddah Al-Sadek, of the Change Coalition, said he had no objection to a phased disarmament process that begins with heavy and medium weapons, followed by light arms. He dismissed fears of civil war, saying only one side is armed.

“Armed conflict requires two sides. The army will not engage in internal fighting,” he said. “This talk of civil war is just fear-mongering unless Hezbollah resorts again to something like the May 7 scenario to avoid disarming.”

Al-Sadek stressed that Lebanon’s response to the US proposal - reportedly outlining phased disarmament - will be critical. “Does anyone really have an alternative to engaging with this proposal?” he asked.

Deputy head of the Free Patriotic Movement, Naji Hayek, said all weapons must be handed over, rejecting the idea that civilians or political groups should be allowed to keep light arms for self-defense.

“This theory no longer holds,” Hayek told Asharq al-Awsat, adding that training camps used to militarize society should be shut down. “Light and medium weapons are not only with Hezbollah - they exist with other parties that have military structures, and these too must be dismantled.”

Political analyst Qassem Qassir, who is close to Hezbollah’s thinking, said there is no internal consensus, nor any agreement with Hezbollah, to give up its heavy and medium arms while retaining light weapons.

“The party insists the issue is still the Israeli occupation and ongoing aggression,” he said. “For Hezbollah, no discussion on disarmament is possible until those threats end.”

Qassir warned that if a political solution to the weapons issue is not reached, “we will inevitably face military risks and internal conflict.”

Jumblatt announced in late June that his party had handed over its remaining weapons, including light and medium arms that were gradually accumulated after the May 7 clashes in 2008 during a period of heightened tension with Hezbollah.

He said the weapons had been centrally stored and fully turned over to the Lebanese state.