Sisi Stresses Importance of Reaching Legally Binding Agreement on GERD

Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) as it appears in a satellite image taken on July 20 (AFP)
Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) as it appears in a satellite image taken on July 20 (AFP)
TT

Sisi Stresses Importance of Reaching Legally Binding Agreement on GERD

Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) as it appears in a satellite image taken on July 20 (AFP)
Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) as it appears in a satellite image taken on July 20 (AFP)

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi asserted the need to reach a legally binding agreement with Ethiopia before starting the second filling of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD).

Sisi discussed the latest developments concerning GERD with the president of Djibouti Ismail Omar Guelleh in a telephone call.

The two leaders agreed on the need to resolve the GERD dispute to avoid its negative impact on regional security and stability.

Egypt and Sudan have been negotiating with Ethiopia for almost 10 years to conclude a legal agreement regulating the filling and operation of the dam, which Addis Ababa built on the main tributary of the Nile to generate electric power.

Egypt fears the potential negative impact of GERD on the flow of its annual share of the Nile’s 55.5 billion cubic meters of water, while Sudan warns that filling the dam without an agreement will damage its dams.

The Spokesman for the Egyptian Presidency, Bassam Rady, stated that both presidents discussed several issues on bilateral cooperation, in light of the bilateral and regional cooperation to achieve common interests and maintain security and stability, especially in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea.

For his part, Guelleh affirmed Djibouti's pride in the historical and fraternal relations with Cairo, especially that Egypt is always keen to meet the development needs of his country.


Guelleh pointed out that there are broad prospects for developing relations and promoting cooperation frameworks in various fields.

On Friday, Ethiopia reiterated its rejection of the involvement of international parties in the negotiations, stressing that the pressure of Sudan and Egypt would not push it to accept the treaty on dividing Nile waters.

Water relations between Egypt and the Nile Basin countries are governed by treaties and protocols signed by Britain during the colonial era in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The 1959 agreement between Cairo and Khartoum was later added to the treaties.

Ethiopian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Demeke Mekonnen warned that unnecessary pressures through deliberate politicization or sabotage should rule policies over the Nile, stressing that encouraging cooperation should be the “guiding spirit”.

“Ethiopia would never agree with such unfair terms that seek to maintain the hydro-hegemony of Egypt and Sudan,” said Mekonnen during a virtual conference hosted by the Ethiopian Embassy in London.

The Ethiopian FM indicated that the negotiations over the GERD provide an opportunity if Egypt and Sudan follow a constructive approach to achieving a win-win outcome within the framework of the ongoing African Union-led process.

Recently, Cairo and Addis Ababa exchanged accusations on the responsibility for the faltering GERD negotiations.

The Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry held Ethiopian intransigence responsible for the current failure, in exchange for flexibility on the Egyptian and Sudanese side.

The Foreign Ministry affirmed that Egypt is still working within the framework of negotiations to resolve the crisis, in a way that does not harm the interests of Cairo and Khartoum.

Addis Ababa intends to start the second filling of the dam during the rainy season next summer, regardless of reaching an agreement.

Sudan has formally requested four-party mediation of the EU, UN, US, and the AU in the GERD issue, which was accepted by Egypt and rejected by Ethiopia.



Damascus, SDF Move to Close Political Detainee File

Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 
Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 
TT

Damascus, SDF Move to Close Political Detainee File

Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 
Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 

Syrian authorities are working with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to close the file of political detainees held by both sides, as part of ongoing coordination between Damascus and the Kurdish-led force.

Families in al-Hasakah province recently demanded the release of relatives from Alaya Prison in Qamishli, which remains under SDF control. Local sources said prison officials told families that no detainees remained at the facility and that some prisoners had been transferred to Iraq last month along with other Syrian inmates under a bilateral arrangement reportedly mediated by Washington.

At the same time, the Syrian government is preparing to resolve the broader detainee issue linked to the SDF. A presidential team operating in al-Hasakah is compiling lists of prisoners held by the SDF in preparation for their release. In return, Damascus is expected to free a new group of detainees held by the government in the coming days.

Video circulating online showed families gathering outside Alaya Prison seeking information about their relatives. The Hasakah Media Center said SDF personnel told them the prison held no detainees and that those previously held had been transferred to Iraq on terrorism-related charges.

Families told the outlet that some detainees had been arrested by the SDF for raising the Syrian flag, displaying images of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, or posting comments on social media.

Local reports, however, suggest some prisoners may still be held in Alaya. The SDF had previously transferred detainees there from al-Hasakah Central Prison, widely known as Ghuwayran Prison, before it was handed over to government authorities. Other detention sites include prisons in al-Aqtaan and al-Shaddadi.

Alaya Prison has been one of the SDF’s main detention facilities for individuals accused of criminal, security, or political offenses. According to available figures, it previously held about 1,000 detainees, most of whom have since been released.

A second round of prisoner releases involving SDF detainees is expected soon. Brigadier General Ziad al-Ayesh, the Syrian presidential envoy overseeing implementation of the January 29, 2026 agreement between Damascus and the SDF, said the process would include individuals previously detained during clashes with government forces in earlier “law-enforcement operations.”

In an interview with Syrian Al-Ikhbariah TV, al-Ayesh said the Syrian state intends to take over prisons formerly controlled by the SDF. Their administration would be transferred to the Interior Ministry and placed under judicial supervision by the Justice Ministry to ensure full state oversight.

He added that Damascus is also working with the SDF to release all political detainees, prisoners of conscience, and those detained in connection with events during the years of the Syrian uprising.

On March 10, the Syrian government and the SDF exchanged the release of 200 detainees. Al-Ayesh stated that Damascus aims to close the detainee file as part of a broader “national integration” process intended to promote reconciliation and strengthen the country’s unity.

Meanwhile, in remarks during a funeral for SDF fighters in Ayn al-Arab (Kobani), SDF commander Mazloum Abdi said that the group is working to return about 300 prisoners to the Syrian government in the coming days, as well as recover the bodies of fighters killed in recent clashes.

Further releases are expected before Nowruz on March 21, which Syria will celebrate this year for the first time as an official national holiday under Decree No. 17.

 

 

 


Iraq Warns Drone Strikes Could Trigger al-Qaeda Prison Break

Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)
Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)
TT

Iraq Warns Drone Strikes Could Trigger al-Qaeda Prison Break

Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)
Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)

Iraq’s Ministry of Justice warned Sunday that repeated drone attacks near Baghdad International Airport pose a danger to a nearby prison holding high-risk al-Qaeda inmates.

In a statement, the ministry said areas around the airport and Airport Prison - also known as Karkh Central Prison near Abu Ghraib - have been struck several times in recent days. The most serious attack occurred late Saturday, when projectiles landed close to the facility.

“Some of these strikes occurred near the prison, raising concerns about the security of a facility that houses highly dangerous terrorist prisoners,” the ministry said.

Authorities stressed that security measures remain in place but warned that projectiles landing nearby could disrupt precautionary plans or damage prison infrastructure.

The attacks targeted the Logistics Support Center at Baghdad airport, which has faced multiple drone strikes in recent days. The facility is located near Victoria Base, where US military advisers are stationed. Karkh Central Prison, next to the airport, is believed to hold al-Qaeda members transferred from Syria to Iraq.

A security source said inmates have been chanting slogans inside the prison whenever drones strike nearby, apparently hoping the attacks might create an opportunity to escape.

Electricity to the prison was also cut after unidentified attackers struck the al-Zaytoun power station, which supplies the facility, the source said. Authorities activated backup generators to maintain operations.

The source warned the situation could echo the 2013 prison break, when hundreds of militants escaped Iraqi prisons and later helped extremist groups seize large parts of Iraq in 2014 after advancing from Syria.

An Iraqi security official said air defenses at the Logistics Support Center, formerly Camp Victoria, engaged three explosive-laden drones on Saturday evening.

The drones were shot down near the US facility and the Martyr Mohammed Alaa Air Base, the source said, without providing details on casualties or damage. Another drone approaching the airport earlier Saturday was also intercepted.

Political Reaction

Iraq’s Coordination Framework, a coalition of Shiite political factions, condemned what it described as attacks targeting positions of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and other security units that left several personnel dead or wounded.

The bloc said the strikes violate Iraq’s sovereignty and threaten national stability, while reiterating opposition to attacks on state infrastructure and diplomatic missions.

The statement came hours after a strike killed three PMF members at a site in Baghdad, followed by a rocket attack on the US Embassy in the capital.

Calls to Review US Security Pact

Meanwhile, Shiite lawmakers are pushing to cancel the US-Iraq security agreement signed in 2009 under former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki.

MP Saqr Hassan of the Sadiqoun bloc said he had collected more than 170 parliamentary signatures requesting that the agreement’s cancellation be debated in the next session. He added the move was prompted by what lawmakers describe as US violations of the agreement, calling recent actions “a betrayal and an unjustified attack.”

Lawmakers are also awaiting a decision from parliamentary leaders on holding a special session to debate canceling the pact and possibly closing the US Embassy in Baghdad.


Lebanon–Israel Talks: A ‘Political Declaration’ and Return to UN Resolution 1701?

Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
TT

Lebanon–Israel Talks: A ‘Political Declaration’ and Return to UN Resolution 1701?

Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 

Hopes for imminent negotiations between Lebanon and Israel have been tempered after Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Sunday that no talks are expected in the coming days, despite reports suggesting discussions could begin this week on a French-backed plan to end the conflict.

France’s Foreign Ministry also said there was no French initiative currently on the table, casting further doubt on speculation about a diplomatic breakthrough.

Reports in Tel Aviv had suggested negotiations might begin Wednesday around a proposal centered on a political declaration that could serve as the basis for a non-aggression agreement between the two countries and possibly pave the way for a broader peace arrangement.

But Saar said Israel has no intention of entering direct negotiations with Lebanon to end the war that began earlier this month.

Political sources in Tel Aviv described his comments as a familiar Israeli tactic aimed at maintaining pressure on Hezbollah and the Lebanese government while keeping the diplomatic track ambiguous. According to these sources, Israel is unlikely to enter negotiations unless Hezbollah halts its attacks.

A Lebanese official told Agence France-Presse on Saturday that “negotiations are on the table and preparations are under way to form a delegation,” but stressed that Lebanon needs an Israeli commitment to a ceasefire before talks can begin.

Israel’s Channel 12 reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has tasked former strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer with handling the Lebanese file and managing any potential negotiations with the United States and Lebanon.

A source in Tel Aviv also said the US administration had asked Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, to oversee the negotiations.

Meanwhile, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, speaking in Beirut, said diplomatic channels remain open to end the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

‘Positive Contribution’

Political sources in Tel Aviv said Washington had urged Israel to help create conditions for negotiations by reducing strikes in Lebanon and avoiding civilian infrastructure.

That request, however, reportedly lost momentum after the bombing of the Zahrani Bridge over the Litani River. According to the sources, Washington’s main red lines for Israel are avoiding strikes on Beirut–Rafic Hariri International Airport and the city’s seaport.

Channel 12 reported that the proposed negotiations would focus on a political declaration in which Lebanon would recognize Israel while Israel would affirm Lebanon’s territorial integrity.

The process would begin with a ceasefire followed by a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory.

Sources familiar with the proposal said the plan — reportedly drafted by France — includes what would be an unprecedented step: Lebanese recognition of Israel. Negotiations supported by the United States and France would aim to reach the political declaration within a month.

Paris or Cyprus?

Talks would initially take place at the level of senior diplomats before moving to higher-level political negotiations. France reportedly wants to host the discussions in Paris, while Israel prefers Cyprus.

The proposed declaration would reaffirm Israel’s commitment to Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Both sides would also recommit to UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 war, as well as the 2024 ceasefire agreement.

Lebanon would pledge to prevent attacks on Israel from its territory and move ahead with plans to disarm Hezbollah and end its military activity. The Lebanese Army would redeploy south of the Litani River, while Israel would withdraw within a month from areas captured since the start of the current conflict.

Monitoring of ceasefire violations would be carried out through a US-led mechanism. UNIFIL would verify Hezbollah’s disarmament south of the Litani, while an international coalition authorized by the UN Security Council would oversee broader disarmament across Lebanon.

Under the French proposal, Lebanon would declare its readiness to negotiate a permanent non-aggression agreement with Israel within two months, formally ending the state of war between the two countries.

Israel would then withdraw from five positions in southern Lebanon that its forces have held since November 2024. The final stage would involve demarcating permanent borders between Israel and Lebanon — and between Lebanon and Syria — by the end of 2026.