Israel Welcomes Palestinian Aid in Controlling Jerusalem Wildfires

Israeli firefighters struggling to extinguish fires in Jerusalem mountains (AP)
Israeli firefighters struggling to extinguish fires in Jerusalem mountains (AP)
TT

Israel Welcomes Palestinian Aid in Controlling Jerusalem Wildfires

Israeli firefighters struggling to extinguish fires in Jerusalem mountains (AP)
Israeli firefighters struggling to extinguish fires in Jerusalem mountains (AP)

Israeli emergency and firefighting units could not contain the wildfires in Jerusalem for the third day in a row. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority (PA) sent two firefighting teams to assist Israeli first responders.

Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid sought to request international assistance to help in extinguishing the fire, and Turkey was quick to offer its service, which Tel Aviv rejected.

The fire authority stressed that it could put out the fires at this stage and was satisfied with the assistance of the Palestinian crews, which proved to be very effective in extinguishing the forest fire near Haifa 11 years ago.

Fire Chief Inspector General Dedi Simchi said he was optimistic that the fire would be under control and requested international aid to combat the massive wildfires.

Simchi also said the result of human activity caused the fire, noting: "We don’t know if this was negligence, malice, or arson, but we’ll continue investigating.”

Several right-wing members of the Knesset accused Palestinian parties of setting the fires.

The fire department canceled all holidays of about 100 crew members, who make up about 90 percent of the workforce. They were joined by several volunteers and the army who used its helicopters to put out the fires.

The fire burned over 20 square kilometers of forest, forcing hundreds of families to evacuate their homes in several communities just outside Jerusalem.

An ecologist with the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, Yariv Malichi, explained that the type of trees that the Jewish National Fund (JNF) planted in the Judean Hills is particularly susceptible to fire in dry climates.

“Pine trees are much more flammable because of their chemical composition. They are also very dry and tall,” noted Malichi.

He warned that the forests that the JNF planted at the beginning of the state are not suitable for the dry Mediterranean climate, describing these forests as “a ticking time bomb when it comes to fires.”

Malichi stressed that all the fires in Israel are caused by humans, intentionally or unintentionally, because there are many people roaming in the area.

Malichi explained that the area is full of wadis and deep valleys, creating what he called the “perfect conditions for a firestorm.”

Sources in the Arab villages near the fires reported that the Israeli authorities called on citizens to leave their homes for fear that the fire would approach them. But they refused.

Arab citizens feared history would repeat itself and they’d face the same situation as the Palestinian Nakba.



Israel-Hamas Deal Compared to Swiss Cheese, Full of Gaps

Israelis block road in Jerusalem, demanding agreement implementation and hostage release (AFP)
Israelis block road in Jerusalem, demanding agreement implementation and hostage release (AFP)
TT

Israel-Hamas Deal Compared to Swiss Cheese, Full of Gaps

Israelis block road in Jerusalem, demanding agreement implementation and hostage release (AFP)
Israelis block road in Jerusalem, demanding agreement implementation and hostage release (AFP)

The ceasefire and prisoner exchange deal reached between Israel and Hamas on Wednesday evening is facing a crisis that could prevent it from going forward before it gets Israeli approval or is put into effect.
The agreement is full of gaps, much like Swiss cheese. Despite outlining three phases aimed at bringing the war to a close, it is accompanied by Israeli military actions that continue to claim dozens of lives in Gaza.
Asharq Al-Awsat reviewed the deal’s terms and the different interpretations from both sides.
The first issue comes from the opening of the agreement’s appendix: Practical procedures and mechanisms to implement the agreement for the exchange of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners and the return to a sustainable calm which would achieve a permanent ceasefire between the two sides.
What does “sustainable calm” mean? In Israel, officials say it means Israel has the right to resume fighting after the first phase. Palestinians, however, claim US President-elect Donald Trump’s administration has promised the war won’t restart. Both sides interpret the term differently.
The goal of the agreement is clear: release all Israeli prisoners—alive or dead—captured by Palestinians. In return, Israel will release a “negotiated number” of Palestinian prisoners.
The exchange is set to begin on “Day One,” the day the ceasefire takes effect, but it's still unclear when that will be.
In the first phase (42 days), the agreement calls for “a temporary halt to military operations by both sides and the withdrawal of the Israeli army eastward” from “high-population areas along the Gaza border, including the Gaza Valley.”
Hamas claims the maps provided for this were incomplete.
Even though the agreement mentions “the return of displaced people to their homes and withdrawal from Gaza Valley,” people will have to walk several kilometers and vehicles will be inspected, which could lead to disagreements and clashes.
As for humanitarian aid, the agreement allows for its entry starting on “Day One” (600 trucks daily, including 50 fuel trucks, with 300 heading to northern Gaza).
This includes fuel for the power plant and equipment for debris removal, rehabilitation, and hospital operations.
But the agreement doesn’t clarify how the aid will be distributed or who will control it. Will Hamas continue to oversee it? Will Israel agree? If Hamas takes charge, what happens then? This could lead to further complications.
The criteria for the first phase of the prisoner exchange are clear, but the agreement states that “the prisoner exchange terms for the first phase will not apply to the second phase.”
Hamas wants more Palestinian prisoners released, but Israel rejects this. If disagreements have arisen over clear criteria in the first phase, what will happen when the criteria are more vague?
The agreement sets a deadline of “Day 16” for indirect talks to finalize the conditions for the second phase, particularly regarding the prisoner exchange.
One clause is seen by Israel as not requiring it to carry out the second phase, while Hamas views it as a guarantee to prevent the war from restarting. The clause states: “Qatar, the US, and Egypt will make every effort to ensure continued indirect negotiations until both sides agree on the terms for the second phase.”
However, the phrase “make every effort” does not create a binding legal obligation.
The agreement is full of gaps that could become major problems for both sides. While this doesn’t mean the deal should be dismissed, it shows that many parts of the agreement are fragile and depend on mutual trust and good intentions—both of which are lacking in this region.