UNIFIL Demands Perpetrators of Attacks Against its Forces in S. Lebanon Be Put on Trial

Guterres meets with UNIFIL troops during his visit to Lebanon this week. (Twitter)
Guterres meets with UNIFIL troops during his visit to Lebanon this week. (Twitter)
TT

UNIFIL Demands Perpetrators of Attacks Against its Forces in S. Lebanon Be Put on Trial

Guterres meets with UNIFIL troops during his visit to Lebanon this week. (Twitter)
Guterres meets with UNIFIL troops during his visit to Lebanon this week. (Twitter)

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) demanded that the perpetrators behind Wednesday's attack on its Irish contingent be put on trial.

This was the first time since 2006 that the peacekeeping force, deployed in southern Lebanon, uses such a firm tone in dealing with attacks its troops occasionally come under as they carry out their duties.

In a statement, UNIFIL said Wednesday's incident was "unacceptable" and a "violation" of the agreement signed by Lebanon.

The perpetrators must be brought to justice, it urged, amid speculation that the attack was aimed at delivering a political message from Hezbollah towards the international community.

The attack had notably taken place as UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was concluding a four-day trip to Lebanon. Guterres had toured the UNIFIL headquarters during his trip.

Guterres had angered the Iran-backed party when he suggested during an exclusive interview with Asharq Al-Awsat that Hezbollah be transformed into a political party like others in Lebanon.

Wednesday's incident unfolded when some youths in the southern town of Shakra protested against UNIFIL members taking photos on their phone of some locations in the town, said witnesses.

The UNIFIL patrol was driving in one of the town's neighborhoods without a Lebanese army escort.

Residents surrounded the patrol and attacked its vehicles after one of the UN troops was seen taking the photos.

Field sources said that as the patrol attempted to leave the area, it struck two youths and two vehicles, forcing the residents to again surround the troops and prevent them from leaving. They then attacked the patrol with sticks and stones before Lebanese soldiers arrived at the scene and evacuated the UN forces.

Military sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that contacts were made at the highest levels to contain the incident and prevent similar ones from happening again in the future.

This is not the first time that such attacks take place. They often happen when UNIFIL patrols veer off their normal patrol paths and enter neighborhoods, leading locals to confront them.

This is the first time, however, that UNIFIL uses firm rhetoric in addressing these attacks, describing Wednesday's incident as "dangerous".

Deputy Director of UNIFIL's Media Office Candice Ardell told the National News Agency that depriving the UN troops of freedom of movement and attacking those who serve peace is unacceptable.

She referred to remarks by Guterres a day earlier in which he stressed that UNIFIL enjoys complete freedom to access areas that fall within its areas of operations in line with the agreement between it and the Lebanese government and UN Security Council resolution 1701.

UNIFIL and Lebanese authorities are probing Wednesday's attack.

The attack took place amid growing calls for the implementation of international resolutions related to Lebanon, including 1559 that demands limiting the possession of arms in the country to the state.

Residents of the South have also reported that UNIFIL has recently increased its patrols in the region after its movements were restricted to specific streets and areas.

The Foreign Ministry said Prime Minister Najib Mikati had contacted Foreign Minister Abdullah Bou Habib to discuss the incident.

In a statement, it said it regretted the attack and was awaiting the results of the probe. It stressed that it rejects any form of attack against UNIFIL troops, reiterating Lebanon's commitment to international resolutions, especially 1701.

Political researcher Ali al-Amin said Wednesday's attack was a "strong message" from Hezbollah to the international forces amid mounting calls for the implementation of international resolutions and American pressure to amend UNIFIL's mandate and expand its duties.

UNIFIL's mandate is renewed in August of every year.

Amin said Hezbollah is demanding that the situation in the South remain as it is, meaning the international troops' duties should be limited to what they are right now and not decided by international resolutions.

In other words, the party opposes amending UNIFIL's mission and expanding its mission.

Amin, a critic of Hezbollah, added that such a message does not come from a position of power by the party, but rather of weakness because it is "confused" over the regional scene and talks of a settlement in Syria.

Moreover, he remarked that the party wanted to create a crisis after Wednesday's attack instead of avoiding its circulation in the media "because it wants its message to reach the UN and international community" and inform them that UNIFIL operates in Hezbollah's area of operations.

Amin noted, however, that the incident was criticized on social media because the residents of the South believe that the international troops bring stability to their region.

The UNIFIL deployment assures the locals against any potential war and their presence in the South is the last remaining international cover provided to Lebanon amid mounting crises it is enduring, he explained.



Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)

Israel’s insistence that France can not be a member of the international committee that will monitor a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon is due to a series of French practices that have disturbed Israel recently, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed.
These practices are most notably attributed to the French judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, who has joined other judges to unanimously issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the sources revealed.
“The Israeli government is following with concern the French role at The Hague,” they said, noting that veteran French lawyer Gilles Devers led a team of 300 international lawyers of various nationalities who volunteered to accuse Israel of “committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
According to the Israeli Maariv newspaper, Israeli officials believe that Devers, who signed the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Galant, would not have dared to do so without having received a green light from French President Emmanuel Macron.
Israeli sources also mentioned other reasons for Israel’s anger at France, such as the government’s decision to bar Israeli firms from exhibiting at the Euronaval arms show near Paris earlier this month.
French officials have repeatedly said that Paris is committed to Israel's security and point out that its military helped defend Israel after Iranian attacks in April and earlier this month.
Paris has so far also refused to recognize the Palestinian state. But the Israeli government is not satisfied. It wants France to follow the United States and blindly support its war in Gaza and Lebanon.
Tel Aviv also feels incredibly confident that France should be punished, and therefore, decided that Paris could not participate in the Lebanese ceasefire agreement, knowing that the Israeli government itself has traveled to Paris several times begging for its intervention, especially during the war on Lebanon.
Meanwhile, an air of optimism has emerged in Israel around the chances for an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon following negotiations led by US envoy Amos Hochstein.
But any optimism relies on Netanyahu’s final decision. The PM is still conducting talks with his friends and allies of the far right who reject the ceasefire agreement and instead, demand that Lebanese citizens not be allowed to return to their villages on the border with Israel. They also request that a security belt be turned into a permanently depopulated and mined zone.
Hochstein Talks
Meanwhile, political sources in Israel claim that what is holding up a ceasefire deal so far is Lebanon. According to Israel's Channel 12, Hochstein expressed a “firm stance” during his talks with the Lebanese side. The envoy delivered clear terms that were passed on to Hezbollah, which the channel said “led to significant progress” in the talks.
Israeli officials said that Tel Aviv is moving towards a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon with Hezbollah in the coming days.
The channel said that during his late visit to Tel Aviv, coming from Beirut after talks with Speaker Nabih Barri, Hochstein said, “I placed before them (Lebanese officials) a final warning, and it seems to have been effective.”
Iran Obstacle
Despite the “positive atmosphere,” informed diplomatic sources pointed to a major obstacle: Iran.
Channel 12 quoted the sources as saying that Lebanon has not yet received the final approval required from Iran, which has significant influence over Hezbollah.

According to the draft proposal, the Lebanese Army must be redeployed to the south and carry out a comprehensive operation to remove weapons from villages. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will “supervise and monitor the implementation of the operation.”
Channel 12 said Israel believes that such details could still derail the agreement. It also said that Hezbollah could violate the truce.
“In such cases, Israel would have to conduct military operations inside the Lebanese territory,” the channel reported, adding that “one of the unsettled issues is related to the committee that will oversee the implementation of the agreement between Israel and Lebanon.”
The sources said Tel Aviv “insists that France is not part of the agreement, nor part of the committee that will oversee its implementation.”