Largest Study Reveals Diversity of Habitats in Red Sea

Scientists take a picture of the lionfish in the Red Sea. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Scientists take a picture of the lionfish in the Red Sea. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Largest Study Reveals Diversity of Habitats in Red Sea

Scientists take a picture of the lionfish in the Red Sea. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Scientists take a picture of the lionfish in the Red Sea. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The Red Sea Development Company, the developer of the world's most ambitious renewable tourism projects, has published the results of one of the largest environmental studies on the ecosystems of living organisms, which it conducted in the Red Sea region.

The research study was released at the five-day UN Ocean Conference in Lisbon, Portugal, which kicked off its activities on June 27.

The event has drawn senior officials and scientists from more than 120 countries to the Atlantic port city in Southwest Europe, as well as activists dismayed by the failure to come up with international rules that might ensure ocean sustainability.

The 11-month long study was conducted along the Saudi Arabian Red Sea coast and revealed the rich diversity of habitats, flora, and fauna in one of the world’s largest environmental surveys of wildlife ecosystems.

It includes a number of endangered species, such as the Halavi Guitarfish, Hawksbill Sea Turtle, Sooty Falcon and an eight-meter-high single coral colony estimated to be around 600 years old.

The company conducted this study, which represents the largest effort of its kind by a private sector development company, to understand and evaluate natural systems before and during the development processes.

The study is similar to the initiatives undertaken by government agencies at the national level.

It underlines the importance of creating a valuable database to understand the status of the local environment through the studies and analyses in the demographic and behavioral fields and the natural habitats of living organisms in the 200 kilometer-long coastal line, as part of the company’s leading destination.

“We want to prove to the world and our peers in the tourism industry that creating world-class destinations can go hand-in-hand with protecting and enhancing the environment,” said CEO John Pagano.

“We’re challenging ourselves and others to do better and be better as global pioneers in responsible development and are appealing to action for tourism as an industry to step up when it comes to the impact on wildlife and biodiversity,” Pagano added.

Tourism is considered one of the most influential sectors and exerts pressure on terrestrial and marine organisms and the surrounding natural systems.

United Nations environment research shows that the growth of tourism and its impact on the environment is growing at an unsustainable rate, with a 154% increase in energy consumption, 131% increase in greenhouse gas emissions, and 152% increase in water consumption expected by 2050 if action is not taken.



Russian ‘Spy Whale’ in Norway Wasn’t Shot Dead, Likely Died of Infection

FILE - In this photo taken in April 2019 a beluga whale found in Arctic Norway is fed. (Jorgen Ree Wiig, Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries via AP)
FILE - In this photo taken in April 2019 a beluga whale found in Arctic Norway is fed. (Jorgen Ree Wiig, Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries via AP)
TT

Russian ‘Spy Whale’ in Norway Wasn’t Shot Dead, Likely Died of Infection

FILE - In this photo taken in April 2019 a beluga whale found in Arctic Norway is fed. (Jorgen Ree Wiig, Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries via AP)
FILE - In this photo taken in April 2019 a beluga whale found in Arctic Norway is fed. (Jorgen Ree Wiig, Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries via AP)

A beluga whale that lived off Norway’s coast and whose harness ignited speculation that it was a Russian spy, was not shot to death as claimed by animal rights groups but died of a bacterial infection, Norwegian police said Friday.
A final autopsy by Norway's Veterinary Institute “concludes that the probable cause of death was bacterial infection -- possibly as a result of a wound in the mouth from a stuck stick,” Amund Preede Revheim, head of the North Sea and Environment section of the police in south-western Norway said.
“There have been no findings from the autopsy that indicate that the whale has been shot,” he stressed, adding that the autopsy had been “made difficult by the fact that many of the whale’s organs were very rotten.” As there was no indication of foul play, there was no reason to start a criminal investigation into its death, The Associated Press quoted Preede Revheim as saying.
The tame beluga, which was first spotted in 2019 not far from Russian waters with a harness reading “Equipment St. Petersburg,” had been nicknamed "Hvaldimir,” combining the Norwegian word for whale — hval — and the first name of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
It was found floating in a southern Norway bay on Aug. 31.
In September, animal advocate groups OneWhale and NOAH filed a police report saying that the animal’s wounds suggested it was intentionally killed.
They pointed at several wounds found on the animal’s skin, including what was interpreted as a bullet hole.
“Assessments made by the Veterinary Institute and the police’s forensic technicians are that these are not gunshot wounds. X-rays of the chest and head were carried out without any projectiles or other metal fragments being detected,” police said in a statement.
Earlier, police had described a stick about 35 centimeters (14 inches) long and 3 centimeters (1 inch) wide which was found wedged in the animal’s mouth, its stomach was empty and its organs had broken down, police said. No further details were given.
The 4.2-meter (14-foot) long and 1,225-kilogram (2,700-pound) whale was first spotted by fishermen not far from the Arctic town of Hammerfest.
Its harness, along with what appeared to be a mount for a small camera, led to media speculation that it was a “spy whale.” Experts say the Russian navy is known to have trained whales for military purposes. Media reports also have speculated that the whale might have been trained as a therapy animal.
There was no immediate reaction from OneWhale or NOAH.