UK Would Resume Bilateral Ties with Sudan Only Under Civilian-Led Government

Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)
Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)
TT
20

UK Would Resume Bilateral Ties with Sudan Only Under Civilian-Led Government

Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)
Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)

Two British officials said there are significant differences between parties to the Sudanese conflict, stressing that dialogue must include all parties to resolve the current political crisis in the country.

The officials stressed that the UK expects the military side not to obstruct the political settlement, noting that the resumption of bilateral relations with London is tied to forming a civilian-led transitional government in Sudan.

UK Special Envoy for Sudan and South Sudan Robert Fairweather said it wasn't easy, but it is essential to listen to all parties and discuss establishing confidence and making progress.

Fairweather was on a three-day visit to Sudan, accompanied by the UK's envoy to the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea, Sarah Montgomery.

He highlighted significant differences between the Sudanese parties, and said the UK received some positive indications. However, he stressed that actions are more important than words.

The two British officials reiterated their country's support for dialogue between the parties to reach a settlement that leads to a political breakthrough, represented by the formation of a civilian-led transitional government.

During his visit to Sudan, the envoy met with the Chairman of the Transitional Sovereign Council, General Abdulfattah al-Burhan, Forces of Freedom and Change, and the National Consensus Forces, affiliated with the army.

Fairweather stressed the need for all to "demonstrate flexibility and compromise if real progress is to be made. Vital for Sudanese actors and coalitions to unite and deliver transition demanded by people of Sudan."

For his part, Burhan affirmed the need to reach a national consensus, expand the base of political participation, and return to the transitional path after the military component announced its withdrawal from the political process.

He expressed his confidence in the Trilateral Mechanism as a platform, calling on the UK and the international community to urge the parties to cooperate and achieve a political settlement.

The visit affirms London's support for a settlement that leads to a political breakthrough and the formation of a framework for a comprehensive civilian transitional government in Sudan.

Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that British officials held a meeting with the Trilateral Mechanism, consisting of UNITAMS, the African Union, and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), where civil and military forces held talks.

Britain participates in the quadripartite mechanism, which includes Saudi Arabia, the US, and the UAE, that seeks to bring the positions closer between the army and the civilian forces to reach a political settlement to resolve the crisis.

UNITMAS Chief Volker Perthes stressed the inevitable need for political dialogue and said the path requires an explicit agreement on the tasks of the transitional period and the distribution of roles and responsibilities among various players.

Perthes asserted that military leaders should not play political roles, noting that the Trilateral Mechanism will continue exerting efforts with its partners in the international community to reach a political agreement.

He said: "Almost all stakeholders, including notably the military, have expressed that they want the Trilateral Mechanism to play a role – either in bringing the different initiatives together, coming up with bridging proposals or eventually mediating an agreement with the military."



UN Agencies Warn Israel Plans for Aid Distribution Endanger Lives in Gaza

Palestinian boys salvage bread from a makeshift bakery hit in Israeli strikes at the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on May 8, 2025. (AFP)
Palestinian boys salvage bread from a makeshift bakery hit in Israeli strikes at the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on May 8, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

UN Agencies Warn Israel Plans for Aid Distribution Endanger Lives in Gaza

Palestinian boys salvage bread from a makeshift bakery hit in Israeli strikes at the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on May 8, 2025. (AFP)
Palestinian boys salvage bread from a makeshift bakery hit in Israeli strikes at the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on May 8, 2025. (AFP)

International aid agencies warned on Friday that plans presented by Israel to control aid distribution in Gaza, including a US-backed proposal, will only increase suffering and death in the devastated Palestinian territory, which has been under a total Israeli blockade for nearly 10 weeks.

They urged Israel to lift its ban on all food, medicine and other supplies entering Gaza, which has caused a surge of malnutrition and hunger among Palestinians as supplies rapidly dwindle.

“Humanitarian aid should never be used as a bargaining chip,” UNICEF spokesperson James Elder said in Geneva.

The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said that a new system for delivering humanitarian aid and food to Gaza was being launched, with deliveries set to begin “very soon.”

He said that details would be announced in the coming days. He depicted it as independent from Israel, which he said wouldn't be involved in distribution. He said that private companies would provide security, while Israel's military would secure the perimeters of aid areas from afar.

“I will be the first to admit it will not be perfect, especially in the early days,” Huckabee said.

A new US-backed group called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has put forward an aid distribution plan along the lines of Israel’s demands, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The group is made up of American security contractors, former government officials, ex-military officers and humanitarian officials.

It wasn't immediately clear if this was the plan that Huckabee was referring to. But aid workers have said the creation of the group does little to assuage their concerns.

The UN has rejected Israeli plans to control aid Israel has spoken for weeks of imposing a new aid system in Gaza, but has given no details publicly. The United Nations and most aid groups, which have led the aid operation in Gaza since the war began, have refused to participate, saying the details provided by Israel in private discussions violate humanitarian principles.

They say that the plans floated by Israel center on creating a limited number of distribution hubs inside Gaza to which Palestinians would have to come to receive food — armed security companies would transport the aid and guard the hubs. Israel also wants to vet recipients of the help, aid workers say.

Elder, of UNICEF, said that the plan as presented to the aid community appeared “designed to reinforce control over life-sustaining items as a pressure tactic.” He said that it doesn’t comply with Israel’s obligations to allow and facilitate impartial humanitarian relief.

He said that the plan would entrench forced displacement “for political and military purposes,” as Palestinians will be forced to move to be closer to distribution hubs. The most vulnerable, including children, older people and those suffering from illness, may not be able to get to the hubs. It also endangers people by forcing them to seek aid from militarized areas.

“More children are likely to suffer and risk death and injury as a consequence of this plan,” Elder said. “There is a simple alternative. Lift the blockade, let humanitarian aid in, save lives.”

Huckabee called on UN agencies and independent aid groups to join the new aid mechanism.

But Jens Laerke, spokesperson for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or OCHA, said Friday that multiple meetings with Israeli officials haven't assuaged UN concerns over the plans.

“The current shape that we have been briefed about by (Israeli officials) would not allow us to resume lifesaving activities at the scale that was possible prior to the total blockade of Gaza,” he said.

Israel imposed its blockade on Gaza on March 2, then resumed bombardment of the territory, breaking a two-month ceasefire. It says the moves aim to pressure Hamas to release its remaining hostages and disarm. Rights groups have called the blockade a “starvation tactic” and possible war crime.

The government has said that aid won’t resume until a new distribution mechanism is in place, accusing Hamas and other militants of siphoning off large amounts of the help. The UN and aid workers deny that there is significant diversion, saying that the UN strictly monitors distribution.

Throughout the war, multiple UN agencies and other humanitarian groups have been trucking in supplies and distributing them as close as possible to where Palestinians were located. Before the blockade, aid groups were distributing supplies at hundreds of locations around Gaza.

The operation has been led by UNRWA, the main UN agency for Palestinian refugees. Israel has banned the agency since last year, alleging that its staff have been infiltrated by Hamas. UNRWA, which employs more than 10,000 staff in Gaza, said that it acts quickly to remove any staff suspected of having militant ties, and that Israel hasn't given it evidence of its claims.

UNRWA spokesperson Juliette Touma said that it would be “impossible to replace UNRWA” to deliver aid to Gaza’s 2.3 million people.

“We are the largest humanitarian organization. We have the largest reach,” she said. The agency also provides shelters, runs warehouses and trucking services for aid distribution. “It is very, very difficult to imagine any humanitarian operation without UNRWA.”

In its proposal, the Gaza Humanitarian Fund said that it would initially set up four distribution sites, each serving 300,000 people. That would cover about half of Gaza’s population. The system would be scaled up to meet the needs of 2 million people. But the proposal doesn't give a time frame. It said that subcontractors would use armored vehicles to transport supplies from the Gaza border to distribution sites, where they would also provide security. The aim would be to avert criminal gangs and other armed groups, it said.

Touma said that claims of aid diversion are hard to counter when there are no independent media or monitoring on the ground in Gaza. Israel has barred international media from entering the territory. When the ceasefire was in place, reports of looting significantly decreased, she added.

Laerke said that “the looting of a few trucks here and there” wasn't the main problem for aid distribution.

“The problem is the blockage of hundreds of aid trucks that should go into the Gaza Strip every single day. That is the root cause of the humanitarian crisis there.”