Saudi Arabia Largest Donor to Humanitarian Effort in Yemen

Ceremony to lay the cornerstone of a school in Abyan, Yemen, with Saudi funding (SDRPY)
Ceremony to lay the cornerstone of a school in Abyan, Yemen, with Saudi funding (SDRPY)
TT

Saudi Arabia Largest Donor to Humanitarian Effort in Yemen

Ceremony to lay the cornerstone of a school in Abyan, Yemen, with Saudi funding (SDRPY)
Ceremony to lay the cornerstone of a school in Abyan, Yemen, with Saudi funding (SDRPY)

Saudi Arabia has been Yemen's largest donor since the beginning of the war launched by the Houthi militia, with 30 percent of the total aid provided to the country, according to data issued by the Yemeni government and the United Nations.

The data showed that the development financing gap widened significantly due to the cumulative GDP losses totaling about $126 billion and essential recovery and reconstruction needs, estimated at between $20 and $25 billion, and include 12 sectors and 16 cities.

- Funds go to relief

The report, issued by the Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation funded by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) country office on key priorities for recovery and reconstruction, estimated that the data is "not complete."

The report stressed that the situation "requires a comprehensive assessment of the damage" from late 2014 until now to reach more accurate estimates of recovery and reconstruction needs.

Since the beginning of the conflict, most of the funds sent to Yemen have been directed to humanitarian and relief aid as the number of people in need of assistance continues to increase.

According to the report, the number increased in the last two years from 7.20 million in 2021 to 18 million in 2022, 9.12 million of which are urgently needed, according to the Humanitarian Needs Overview.

- Saudi Arabia provided 30%

The report indicated that official development aid recorded an increase from about $3.1 billion in 2014 to $5.3 billion in 2017, coinciding with the intensification of war and the urgent growing need for humanitarian aid.

Humanitarian aid stabilized at about $7.2 billion in 2020, and the per capita share of development aid increased to $116 in 2017 before declining to $85.26 in 2020.

The report asserted that Saudi Arabia was at the forefront of donor countries with about 30 percent, followed by UAE with about 25 percent, then the US, the World Bank, and the UK.

It shows that the volume of total investment as a percentage of GDP averaged 1.14 percent between 2014 and 2020 and says that the highest contribution of the volume of total investments to GDP amounted to 19 percent in 2019.

According to the report, private investment also recorded an average of 2.11 percent of GDP compared to an average of three percent for public investment for the same period, given the limited state budget, investment expenditures, and war conditions.

- A decline in per capita

The report stated that at the beginning of the conflict, the donor funds were directed toward humanitarian relief to meet the emergencies and their repercussions on the population, who lost their homes and sources of income, forcing them to flee.

The report expected about 19 million people would suffer from acute food insecurity during the second half of this year, while about 538,000 children will suffer from acute malnutrition. It warned that they risk losing their lives, with over four million displaced persons.

According to the report, the humanitarian crisis in Yemen has become one of the worst crises in the world.

The data showed that the financial requirement is about $6.1 billion, but the pledges amounted to about $900 million, with a coverage of 3.56 percent.

Requirements for funding humanitarian needs continued to rise and amounted to $3.4 billion in 2022, but the percentage of donor pledges coverage amounted to only 2.30 percent, which is the lowest during the period of conflict and war.

The low percentage may have come from donors' tendency to prioritize the war crisis in Ukraine, where donor pledges reached 2.38 percent, the year that witnessed the coronavirus outbreak, which certainly affected the priorities of donor countries.

The report concludes that, on average, donor pledges for the humanitarian response did not exceed 9.48 percent for 2015-2022, contributing to funding gaps for humanitarian needs at the end of each year.

According to the UN classification, the per capita share of foreign aid in Yemen is the lowest at the regional level and was estimated at $41 in 2013, compared to about $74 for regional countries and about $51 for developing countries.

The data also indicate that the average per capita share of foreign aid in Yemen was at most $4.22 during 1991-2013 and that the impact of this development was not significantly tangible, as the weak economic situation contributed to the conflict.

Most development support programs were halted, which contributed to the decline in economic growth and even led to negative growth rates and cumulative losses in the gross domestic product, increasing poverty and unemployment rates, according to the report.



Israeli Defense Minister: We Will Never Withdraw our Forces from Gaza

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz. (dpa)
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz. (dpa)
TT

Israeli Defense Minister: We Will Never Withdraw our Forces from Gaza

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz. (dpa)
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz. (dpa)

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday that Israel “will never withdraw from the Gaza Strip,” announcing that new settlement outposts will be established in the northern part of the enclave “when the appropriate time comes.”

Israeli media reported that Katz made the remarks during a ceremony held in Beit El, stating: “We will do this in the right way and at the right time. There will be those who protest, but we are ministers.”


A Shaky Start for Lebanon’s Financial Gap Bill

Depositors hold protest banners against the draft deposit recovery law during popular demonstrations on the road to the Presidential Palace (Asharq Al-Awsat). 
Depositors hold protest banners against the draft deposit recovery law during popular demonstrations on the road to the Presidential Palace (Asharq Al-Awsat). 
TT

A Shaky Start for Lebanon’s Financial Gap Bill

Depositors hold protest banners against the draft deposit recovery law during popular demonstrations on the road to the Presidential Palace (Asharq Al-Awsat). 
Depositors hold protest banners against the draft deposit recovery law during popular demonstrations on the road to the Presidential Palace (Asharq Al-Awsat). 

A widening wave of objections in Lebanon to the draft “financial gap” bill has exposed the hurdles facing its passage in parliament.

Prepared by a ministerial and legal committee chaired by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, the bill has drawn resistance from influential political and sectoral actors, bolstering the opposition voiced by depositors’ associations and the banking lobby.

Conflicting ministerial positions ahead of Monday’s special cabinet session to review the final draft underscore the sharp disputes likely to intensify once the bill is formally sent to parliament, a senior financial official told Asharq Al-Awsat.

With parliamentary elections due next spring, candidates are wary of confronting voters or powerful interest groups.

According to the government’s forthcoming brief, the bill marks the end of years of disorder and the start of a clear path to restore rights, protect social stability, and rebuild confidence in the financial system after six years of paralysis, silent erosion of deposits, and crisis mismanagement.

It is framed not as a narrow technical fix, but as a strategic shift, from denying losses and letting them fall haphazardly, to acknowledging and organizing them within an enforceable legal framework.

The government argues the plan would protect about 85% of depositors by enabling access to a guaranteed portion of savings, up to $100,000 over four years, while preserving the nominal value of all deposits via central bank–guaranteed bonds maturing in 10, 15, and 20 years.

Banks, however, have openly declared their “fundamental reservations and strong objection” to the bill on financial regularization and deposit treatment.

Professional associations and unions have joined depositors’ groups in opposing proposals they say would load the bulk of losses onto depositors, either through direct haircuts or by stretching repayment over one to two decades.

The Beirut Order of Engineers added its voice, warning that the near-final draft manages collapse rather than delivers reform, distributing losses unfairly at the expense of depositors and productive sectors, and failing to explicitly protect union funds.

Legal objections have also surfaced over provisions with retroactive effect, taxes, levies, and accounting adjustments applied to transfers made after the crisis erupted in autumn 2019, as well as to past deposit returns.

Banks say such measures constitute an unjustified infringement of rights and lack sound legal and financial grounding or precedent.

The financial official noted that these retroactive elements could be challenged before the State Council, as they contradict the principle that laws apply only after promulgation. Most transactions, he added, were conducted under then-valid laws and central bank approvals.

By contrast, previous governments compelled the central bank to spend more than $11 billion on poorly controlled subsidies, much of which was smuggled abroad, notably to Syrian markets.

Banks insist that any credible solution must begin with a precise, transparent assessment of the financial gap at the Central Bank, based on audited, unified accounts and realistic financial modeling.

They argue that the plan effectively wipes out banks’ capital and - under loss-sharing rules set by Law 23/2025 - ultimately hits depositors, while the state avoids settling its debts to the central bank or covering its balance-sheet shortfall.

 

 

 


Gazans Fear Renewed Displacement after Israeli Strikes

This overview shows a destroyed mosque and other buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on October 7, 2024 on the first anniversary of the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
This overview shows a destroyed mosque and other buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on October 7, 2024 on the first anniversary of the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
TT

Gazans Fear Renewed Displacement after Israeli Strikes

This overview shows a destroyed mosque and other buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on October 7, 2024 on the first anniversary of the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
This overview shows a destroyed mosque and other buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on October 7, 2024 on the first anniversary of the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)

When her children, trembling with fear, ask where the family can go to escape Israel's continued bombardment in southern Gaza's Khan Yunis area, Umm Ahmed has no answer.

In her small, devastated village near Khan Yunis city, recent Israeli drone and artillery strikes shattered the tenuous sense of peace delivered by a ceasefire that has largely held since October 10, AFP said.

Residents say the strikes have targeted neighborhoods east of the so-called Yellow Line -- a demarcation established under the truce between Israel and Hamas.

The Israeli military says its troops are deployed in the area in accordance with the ceasefire framework, accusing Hamas militants of "crossing the Yellow Line and carrying out terrorist activities".

More than two years after Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel sparked a devastating war, tens of thousands of Gazans still live in tents or damaged homes in these areas, where the Israeli army maintains control and operates checkpoints.

Now, many fear being forced from their homes, compelled to move west of the Yellow Line.

"We don't sleep at night because of fear. The bombardments in the east are relentless," said Umm Ahmed, 40.

"My children tremble at every explosion and ask me, 'Where can we go?' And I have no answer."

Her home in Bani Suheila has been completely destroyed, yet the family has stayed, pitching a tent beside the ruins.

"Staying close to our destroyed home is easier than facing the unknown," Umm Ahmed said.

Crossing the Yellow Line to Al-Mawasi, west of Khan Yunis, is not an option for them.

There, makeshift camps stretch as far as the eye can see, housing tens of thousands of Palestinians who fled the fighting.

"There is no place left for anyone there, and not enough food or water," Umm Ahmed said, as Gaza remains trapped in a catastrophic humanitarian crisis.

- 'We will not leave' -

The Israeli military blames continued threats from the Hamas group for its actions in the area.

The Israeli military said in a statement to AFP that the army’s “current operations in Gaza, and their deployment in the Yellow Line area in particular, are carried out to address direct threats from terrorist organizations in Gaza.”

The war in Gaza began with Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 that resulted in the deaths of 1,221 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.

Since the war began, more than 70,000 people have been killed in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry.

The vast majority of Gaza's more than two million residents were displaced during the war, many multiple times.

A fragile ceasefire has been in place since October 10, though both sides regularly accuse each other of violations.

Under the truce, Israeli forces withdrew to positions east of the Yellow Line.

Earlier this month, Israeli army chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir described the Yellow Line as the "new border line" with Israel.

"The Yellow Line is a new border line -- serving as a forward defensive line for our communities and a line of operational activity," he said to reserve soldiers in Gaza.

For Palestinian officials, the line is seen as a tool for permanent displacement.

"The objective is to frighten residents, expel them from their areas, and force them west," said Alaa al-Batta, mayor of Khan Yunis, denouncing the bombardments as "violations of the ceasefire agreement".

Mahmud Baraka, 45, from Khuzaa, east of Khan Yunis, described constant artillery fire and home demolitions in the area.

"It feels like we are still living in a war zone," he said.

"Explosions happen as if they are right next to us. The objective of the occupation is clear: to intimidate us and drive us out, so the region is emptied."

For now, residents feel trapped between bombardment and displacement, uncertain how long they can endure.

Despite the danger, Abdel Hamid, 70, refuses to leave his home located north of Khan Yunis, where he lives with his five children.

"We will not leave... this is our land," he said.

"Moving would not be a solution, but yet another tragedy."