Libyan Parliament Rejects Egypt’s ‘Unilateral’ Demarcation of Maritime Borders

Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)
Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)
TT

Libyan Parliament Rejects Egypt’s ‘Unilateral’ Demarcation of Maritime Borders

Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)
Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)

The Foreign Affairs and Defense Committees of the Libyan Parliament reiterated their rejection of Egypt’s unilateral demarcation of the western maritime borders.

In a joint statement, the two committees considered this declaration “an unacceptable violation of Libyan sovereignty.”

The committees expressed their surprise at Egypt’s declaration, without any prior consultations.

They stated that “this step at this difficult time that the country is going through is a violation of Libyan interests in the Mediterranean. This is an unfair demarcation under international law, which clearly encroaches on the Libyan maritime borders.”

They confirmed their rejection of the decision, and renewed their request that Cairo immediately retract its declaration. They said the move “harms the historical relations between the two countries, as Egypt is expected to take into account the political circumstances that Libya is going through.”

The committees stressed that “any demarcation should be through negotiations that guarantee the mutual interests of the two countries, and in accordance with the principles of the UN and the Laws of the Sea.”

Separately, Libyan parliamentary spokesman Abdullah Bilheg denied what was reported about closing parliamentary headquarters in the eastern city of Benghazi.

“We warn all media not to be drawn into this false news,” said Bilheg.

Moreover, sources close to Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, Commander-in-Chief of the Libyan National Army, which is stationed in the east of the country, denied intentions for announcing the separation of the eastern region from western Libya.

Some had claimed that Haftar wanted to install himself as a military ruler of the Cyrenaica region.

Hours before Haftar’s Independence Day speech, in Al-Kish Square in the eastern city of Benghazi, his opponents said that he was about to announce the disengagement or separation of eastern and southern Libya from Tripoli.

Some also predicted that the leader would announce the closure of oil fields and ports.



Hezbollah Urges Lebanese State to Push for Israel’s Pullout

A United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) vehicle drives as residents who were displaced because of the hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel return to the Lebanese village of Khiam, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Karamallah Daher
A United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) vehicle drives as residents who were displaced because of the hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel return to the Lebanese village of Khiam, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Karamallah Daher
TT

Hezbollah Urges Lebanese State to Push for Israel’s Pullout

A United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) vehicle drives as residents who were displaced because of the hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel return to the Lebanese village of Khiam, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Karamallah Daher
A United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) vehicle drives as residents who were displaced because of the hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel return to the Lebanese village of Khiam, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Karamallah Daher

Hezbollah said on Thursday that Israel has to completely withdraw from Lebanon as the 60-day period in a ceasefire deal comes to an end, adding that the Lebanese state should push for guarantee for the withdrawal.

The Iran-backed group also said in a statement that it was following developments and any breach to the agreement would not be accepted.

Israel and Hezbollah agreed in November to an American- and French-mediated ceasefire, bringing an end to more than a year of fighting. Under the deal, Israeli forces were to withdraw from Lebanon and Hezbollah forces were to withdraw from south of the Litani river over the 60-day period ending next Monday morning.

Hezbollah said in its statement that it was the Lebanese state’s responsibility to act and press the countries sponsoring the ceasefire agreement should Israel delay its military pullout from south Lebanon.

Caretaker National Defense Minister Maurice Sleem on Thursday met with acting Army Commander Major General Hassan Audi at his office in Yarzeh to discuss the situation in southern Lebanon and the implementation stages of the ceasefire arrangements.

Sleem reaffirmed Lebanon's firm position on the necessity of the Israeli troop withdrawal from the South in line with the ceasefire deadline of January 26.

Speaker Nabih Berri also discussed the matter with head of the Ceasefire Monitoring Committee, US General Jasper Jeffers, in Ain al-Tineh.

Discussions reportedly focused on developments on the Israeli withdrawal from remaining occupied territories in southern Lebanon, as well as Israeli violations of the ceasefire agreement and UN Resolution 1701.