Beirut Port Investigator Refuses to Apprise File to French Judicial Delegation

Judge Tarek Bitar (NNA)
Judge Tarek Bitar (NNA)
TT

Beirut Port Investigator Refuses to Apprise File to French Judicial Delegation

Judge Tarek Bitar (NNA)
Judge Tarek Bitar (NNA)

A visiting French judicial delegation brought the 2020 Beirut port explosion file back to the forefront, through intensive meetings with concerned Lebanese judicial officials.

The French judges inquired about the suspension of Lebanon's investigation into the explosion, which has also obstructed the independent French probe into the killing of three French citizens in the port explosion.

The probe into the August 4, 2020 explosion has been pending since the end of 2021 due to lawsuits filed successively by defendants, including current MPs and former ministers, against the judicial investigator, Judge Tarek Bitar, who supervises the investigations.

Headed by Judge Nicolas Aubertin, the French mission first met with the assistant prosecutor general, Judge Sabouh Sleiman as he represents the Court of Cassation in this file.

The delegation then held a four-hour meeting with Bitar, which saw a long debate about the reasons behind the obstruction of the investigations, informed sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

They added that Bitar refused to inform the French judges of the content of the investigation or provide them with any document, given that he was removed from the case due to the response claims filed against him.

But the judicial investigator promised the French delegation to provide them with assistance after the resumption of the probe..

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Bitar stressed that the investigation “will continue and will not surrender to the will of obstructers.”

“I hope that the judiciary will find legal solutions that will allow the resumption of the investigations in a normal and regular manner…” he said.

The families of the port explosion victims held a sit-in on Thursday in front of the Palace of Justice building in Beirut, protesting the probe halt and calling on France to help form an international fact-finding committee.

They requested a meeting with the French judicial mission to discuss their suffering and the political authorities’ persistence in sabotaging the Lebanese inquiry.

The financial investigation file

Meanwhile, the European prosecutors who arrived this week in Beirut, continued their investigations in Beirut into the financial corruption probe, and listened to the testimony of witnesses Raed Charafeddine, a former first deputy governor of the Banque du Liban, and Naaman Nadour, a BDL head of department.

The attorneys general at the Court of Cassation, Mirna Kallas and Imad Kabalan, also took part in the session.

A judicial source told Asharq Al-Awsat that questions revolved around the financial situation and banking operations, most of which are directed at a company owned by Raja Salameh, brother of Riad Salameh.



US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
TT

US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)

Recent statements by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on his willingness to meet Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to normalize relations between the two countries have sparked mixed reactions.
While the Syrian opposition sees the possibility of such a meeting despite the challenges, Damascus views the statements as a political maneuver by the Turks. Meanwhile, the United States has tied the normalization process to achieving a political solution in Syria based on UN Security Council Resolution 2254, issued in 2015.
Turkish media reported on Thursday that a US administration official, who was not named, confirmed that Washington is against normalizing relations with the Syrian regime under Assad. He emphasized that Washington cannot accept normalizing ties with Damascus without progress toward a political solution that ends the conflicts in Syria.
Meanwhile, the head of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces, Hadi al-Bahra, stated that a meeting between Assad and Erdogan is possible despite the obstacles. In a statement to Reuters on Thursday, Bahra said the meeting is feasible, even though Ankara is fully aware that the Assad regime cannot currently meet its demands and understands the regime’s limitations.
Bahra pointed out that the UN-led political process remains frozen and that he had briefed US and Western officials on the latest developments in the Syrian file. On Saturday, Bahra participated in a consultative meeting in Ankara with the Syrian Negotiation Commission, along with a high-level delegation from the US State Department, during which they exchanged views on the political solution and the need to establish binding mechanisms for implementing international resolutions related to the Syrian issue.
On the other side, Assad’s special advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, dismissed Erdogan’s announcement that Ankara is awaiting a response from Damascus regarding his meeting with Assad for normalization as another political maneuver with ulterior motives.
Shaaban, speaking during a lecture at the Omani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was reported by Turkish media on Thursday, stated that any rapprochement between the two countries is contingent on its withdrawal of forces from Syrian territory.