Exclusive - Hezbollah Ban in Germany: Culmination of Years of Investigation in Illicit Activity

Special police investigate the Hezbollah-linked Imam Mahdi center in Muenster, western Germany, April 30, 2020. (AP)
Special police investigate the Hezbollah-linked Imam Mahdi center in Muenster, western Germany, April 30, 2020. (AP)
TT

Exclusive - Hezbollah Ban in Germany: Culmination of Years of Investigation in Illicit Activity

Special police investigate the Hezbollah-linked Imam Mahdi center in Muenster, western Germany, April 30, 2020. (AP)
Special police investigate the Hezbollah-linked Imam Mahdi center in Muenster, western Germany, April 30, 2020. (AP)

At 6 am on April 30, some 50 members of the German police raided the Irshad center in Berlin. They had a search and investigation warrant to find evidence that implicates the association in funding and promoting the Lebanese Hezbollah party.

Just a day earlier, the German government banned Hezbollah in the country, designating it as a terrorist organization, ending the distinction between its military and political wings.

At 6:30 pm that same day, the center posted a nearly 40-minute lecture by Shafiq al-Jaradi, a Lebanese cleric and graduate of Iran’s Qom Seminary. Jaradi is a professed Hezbollah supporter, who shocked St. Joseph University students when he made the admission during a lecture in Beirut years ago. Jaradi never hid his support. On March 25, he hailed the Iran-backed Hezbollah, tweeting that the party’s managing of civilian crises can be compared to that of developed countries.

Despite this open support, the Irshad center denies having ties with a “terrorist organization.” At any rate, the German government and association may have a different definition of terrorism. Jaradi, during a lecture before Holy Spirit University of Kaslik students said that terrorism is an “often misused word.”

A day after the raid, the center posted a statement on its Facebook page, vowing to pursue legal means to confront the “unjust political media campaign” against it. It did not refer to Hezbollah in its statement or deny supporting it.

Irshad center

The Irshad was one of four religious centers raided by German police in Berlin. Raids also took place against other centers in four cities over their suspected affiliation with Hezbollah. No one was arrested, but that does not mean that warrants are not coming. “This is only the beginning,” said Foreign Minister Heiko Maas.

Despite the militia’s blacklisting in Germany, the move is unlikely to impact the party in Lebanon or Berlin’s policy towards Beirut, German diplomats told Asharq Al-Awsat. Germany still considers Hezbollah a “main element of Lebanese society” and a participant in parliament and successive governments. The blacklisting of the party in Germany does not change this.

MP Marian Wendt, of the ruling Christian Democratic Union of Germany, has been calling for Hezbollah’s blacklisting for years. Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, he said Berlin was “realistically” assessing the political situation.

“We know that Hezbollah is important in Lebanon and that it is a partner in rule. We know we have to cooperate with it if we want to support the Lebanese people. This does not contradict with our stance that it is a terrorist party,” he explained. He cited how Germany communicates with the Taliban movement, which Berlin had blacklisted, because it cannot dismiss while providing aid to Afghanistan.

Terror financing

Wendt said his party has for years been trying to blacklist Hezbollah in order to dry up one of its significant sources of finances. The German authorities are well aware of the party’s activities on its soil. “We know that Hezbollah is using Germany as a front to collect donations to fund terrorism in Lebanon. We know of their organized crime and money-laundering operations,” he revealed.

Wendt stressed that along with the CDU, he was determined to “weaken Hezbollah and Iran’s influence in the region.”

Germany is relatively close to Iran and had played the role of mediator between Hezbollah and Israel in past prisoner swaps. The decision to ban the party in Germany may therefore, have a negative impact on Berlin’s role in such diplomatic channels.

Wendt dismissed the concerns. He also dismissed Lebanon’s summoning of the German ambassador in wake of the ban. Lebanon is an “important” partner for Germany, said the MP, ruling out the possibility that the ban may affect these relations. The ban, he stressed, throws the ball in Lebanon’s court where the people are urged to reject having a “terrorist party” play an influential role in government.

Ties with Iran

On the ban’s impact on relations with Tehran, the German Foreign Ministry said Iran did not submit any formal complaint over the move despite its threat that Berlin “will pay the price.” Laughing, Wendt wondered: “What will Iran do? Impose sanctions on German companies? Iran is in no position to object or tell us what we should and shouldn’t do.”

“What it should do is return to the negotiations table and quit harassing vessels in the Hormuz Strait and sparking conflicts in the region,” he suggested.

Weeks ago, European countries, led by Germany, activated the Instex mechanism in order to deliver medical aid to Tehran as it combats the coronavirus outbreak. This was the first time the mechanism has ever been used. Several German companies had kicked off projects in Tehran after the signing of the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. These same companies withdrew from Iran when Washington quit the deal and reimposed sanctions on Tehran. Berlin, as it seems, appears unconcerned about “bothering” Iran, which is clinging on to any western support it can get as it confronts an American administration that is bent on bringing it to its knees.

Double standards

At any rate, Germany appears to be treating Iran with the same “double standards” it adopts with the Taliban and Hezbollah. For instance, on the one hand it maintains good political ties with the Tehran regime, while on the other, it arrests and puts on trial its spies in Germany. In 2018, it arrested a diplomat from the Iranian embassy in Austria while he was visiting Germany. It accused him of plotting to assassinate Iranian opposition figures in Europe.

Political analyst Najeh al-Obeidy told Asharq Al-Awsat that Germany has been actively preventing Iran from expanding its influence on its territories, while at the same time, maintaining relations with Tehran.

Previous bans

Germany has been closing in on Hezbollah’s activities for years. It has taken small steps in the past, such as banning the party’s al-Manar television in 2009. In 2014, it banned an orphans charity that was actually a front for the Martyrs Organization, which is run by Hezbollah. Nearly all the funds collected by the charity had been transferred to the Organization, which is an integral part of Hezbollah. “The charity operated for nearly 17 years in Germany, gathering money for orphans, but they were actually being sent to Hezbollah in Lebanon that was using them to buy weapons and rockets to use against the Lebanese and Syrian people,” said then German chief of domestic intelligence Hans Georg Maassen.

Obeidy said German’s slow or even lax approach in confronting Hezbollah’s activities can be attributed to its concern over the repercussions of its actions. He said some experts believe the crackdown will force some organizations to go underground, which will impact surveillance activities against them.

Years of criminal activity

Hezbollah does not have a clear organizational structure in Germany. Terrorism expert Jassem Mohammed said that Hezbollah employs various fronts behind which it operates. It is these fronts that are usually targeted in raids.

Militias in Germany are not only active in collecting donations and spreading propaganda, but they operate drugs and money-laundering networks through several mediators, who mainly work in the car trade.

Germany has been aware of these activities for at least 15 years. Back in 2008, it arrested four Lebanese men at Frankfurt airport after it discovered 9 million euros in their luggage and which they were trying to transfer to Beirut. They were allegedly going to be delivered to a figure who is close to Hezbollah secretary general Hassan Nasrallah. The bust was two years in the making after police monitored the activity of two Lebanese living in Germany and who were convicted of forming a ring to launder money generated from the cocaine trade. The suspects worked in the auto industry and had received military training by Hezbollah, but the charges were not proven in court.

Their arrest led to the launch of the so-called Cedar Operation in 2016 that led to the discovery of a drug smuggling and money-laundering network that operated in six European countries. All 14 members of the ring were either Lebanese or of Lebanese origins. Four operated in Germany.

The “cedar gang” transferred drug money generated in Latin America to Europe and Africa by buying expensive cars, watches and jewelry to later send to Lebanon, where they are sold on the black market at their original value. Investigators at the time tried to prove that the money was being funneled to Hezbollah in Lebanon or that the operations were being ordered by the party. The probe led nowhere. It is suspected that the four gang members generated some 20 million euros between 2011 and 2015.



Iran Revolutionary Guards Officers Reject Iraqi Calls to Halt Attacks

A man gestures with picture of Iran's slain supreme leader Ali Khamenei next to Iranian and Iraqi flags from a atop a truck during celebrations welcoming the two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran in Baghdad's central Tahrir Square on April 8, 2026.(AFP)
A man gestures with picture of Iran's slain supreme leader Ali Khamenei next to Iranian and Iraqi flags from a atop a truck during celebrations welcoming the two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran in Baghdad's central Tahrir Square on April 8, 2026.(AFP)
TT

Iran Revolutionary Guards Officers Reject Iraqi Calls to Halt Attacks

A man gestures with picture of Iran's slain supreme leader Ali Khamenei next to Iranian and Iraqi flags from a atop a truck during celebrations welcoming the two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran in Baghdad's central Tahrir Square on April 8, 2026.(AFP)
A man gestures with picture of Iran's slain supreme leader Ali Khamenei next to Iranian and Iraqi flags from a atop a truck during celebrations welcoming the two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran in Baghdad's central Tahrir Square on April 8, 2026.(AFP)

Iraqi sources said officers from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, who oversee armed factions in Iraq, have rebuffed attempts by Shiite politicians to halt attacks inside the country.

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, they have effectively acted as a “shadow military supervisor” in Baghdad, maintaining a “pressure front” against Washington and preparing for a breakdown in negotiations.

Asharq Al-Awsat reported on March 24 that officers from the Quds Force, the foreign arm of the Revolutionary Guards, had deployed to Iraq to run attrition operations and set up an alternative operation room.

According to the sources, Quds Force officers have moved between Iraqi cities to oversee attacks, help factions develop locally made drone munitions, and provide missile-related expertise, with targets updated continuously.

Daily target lists

One source said Revolutionary Guards officers provided Iraqi armed groups with daily lists of targets, munitions volumes, and strike timing.

They oversaw the deployment of specialized cells installing drone launch platforms and surveillance units in safe houses at new locations, avoiding coordinates previously tracked by US aircraft before and during the war.

By the fourth week of the war, one source said, the structure of the “resistance” in Iraq had shifted. Core factions moved to a new model built on semi-independent networks that are difficult to dismantle.

A person close to the factions described a system that distributes roles across specialized field cells operating flexibly in complex security environments.

Iraqi sources said the Revolutionary Guards engineered faction networks to ensure plausible deniability through layered structures that provide deterrence and ambiguity.

Some cells were tasked with cross-border attacks targeting interests in neighboring Arab states, as the indirect confrontation widened across overlapping regional arenas.

An unidentified strike hit a house in Khor al-Zubair in Basra, about 150 km from Kuwait, destroying a radar and a launch platform. Members of a cell, including a commander from Kataib Hezbollah, were killed along with two others.

The Revolutionary Guards denied carrying out attacks on Gulf Arab states on Thursday, but “is capable of using Iraqi groups to carry out this task,” a source close to the factions said.

In the final week of the war, before a temporary ceasefire, Iranian officers ordered the redeployment of faction units that had withdrawn from Nineveh and Kirkuk, telling them to retake positions ceded to other forces under US strikes, revealed the sources.

Revolutionary Guards officer does not answer calls

Two figures from the ruling Coordination Framework and the Iraqi government said leaders of four Shiite parties had held talks in recent weeks with Iranian officials inside Iraq to press for a halt to attacks on US interests, but were ignored.

One influential Quds Force officer in Baghdad “does not answer calls from Iraqi politicians, even allies within the Coordination Framework,” the sources said, adding that he communicates only with operational commanders in armed factions.

The contacts reflect attempts to contain escalation and prevent Iraq from sliding into a broader conflict, as pressure mounts on the government to rein in armed groups. But “local political will is diminishing to an unprecedented level,” an Iraqi official said.

Security officials have voiced frustration over what they described as the “growing dominance” of officers from the Revolutionary Guards.

A senior Iraqi official, speaking at a private security meeting, said: “How is it possible that we cannot stop this man? Who is this ‘Abu so-and-so’? Why can’t we arrest him, or at least stop these attacks?”

Leaders within the Coordination Framework said the issue may largely stem from poor communication, noting that Iranian officials rely on strict security protocols.

‘Military supervisor’

Figures within the Coordination Framework said field officers linked to the Revolutionary Guards are effectively becoming a “military supervisor” running a conflict front with the US from inside Iraq, regardless of Iraqi considerations.

They said Iran’s refusal to halt attacks signals it sees little hope in talks with Washington and that the “front is ready to ignite”.

Iraqi officials said the situation underscores the scale of the challenge facing security institutions in areas beyond the state’s direct control.

The US State Department said Iraqi militias receive government financial, operational, and political cover, and that authorities have failed to curb them or limit their attacks, according to a statement issued on Thursday.

Politicians within the Coordination Framework said the conduct of Revolutionary Guards officers reflects Iran’s intent to keep Iraq as a pressure front against the United States as the Pakistan-mediated negotiation kick off.

But they warned that this risks pushing Iraq’s political system toward chaos, accelerating its regional isolation.


Lebanon Heads to Historic Israel Talks with Few Hopes Except to Staunch Bloodshed

 Protesters wave Hezbollah and Iran's flags during a protest against the Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, in front the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, April 10, 2026. (AP)
Protesters wave Hezbollah and Iran's flags during a protest against the Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, in front the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, April 10, 2026. (AP)
TT

Lebanon Heads to Historic Israel Talks with Few Hopes Except to Staunch Bloodshed

 Protesters wave Hezbollah and Iran's flags during a protest against the Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, in front the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, April 10, 2026. (AP)
Protesters wave Hezbollah and Iran's flags during a protest against the Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, in front the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, April 10, 2026. (AP)

Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun has called for historic direct talks with longtime foe Israel since war erupted a month ago - a month in which Israel's military has forced more than a million Lebanese to flee, levelled parts of Beirut and triggered sectarian friction.

Now that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has finally answered the call to talk peace, Lebanon is in its weakest position to deliver it, experts said.

Armed group Hezbollah, which is locked in clashes with invading Israeli troops in south Lebanon, is opposed to direct negotiations - throwing into question whether it would abide by any ceasefire agreed by the state.

"The talks that will take place between Lebanon and Israel are frankly pointless, because those conducting them in the name of Lebanon have no leverage to negotiate," a Lebanese official close to the group told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

MORE THAN 300 KILLED IN DAY OF STRIKES

Israel intensified air attacks on Lebanon after Hezbollah fired missiles into Israel on March 2, three days into the US-Israeli war on Iran. It has since widened a ground offensive.

Shiite ‌Muslims, the community ‌from which Hezbollah draws its support and which has borne the brunt of Israel's strikes, have told Reuters ‌they ⁠have little faith ⁠in a state they see as failing to defend them.

Netanyahu's instructions to his cabinet to prepare for direct talks came a day after Israeli strikes across Lebanon killed more than 300 people, one of the bloodiest days for Lebanon since its civil war ended in 1990.

Rescuers were still pulling mangled bodies out of the wreckage of pulverized buildings on Friday as families held funerals across Lebanon. Israeli bombardment has destroyed public infrastructure across southern Lebanon and killed several Lebanese state security forces on Friday.

"Israel's brutality does not distinguish between one civilian and another, nor between Muslim and Christian, in this country. We must all stand together to confront this barbarity and this aggression," said Hassan Saleh, a Lebanese man attending a funeral in the southern city of Tyre.

STATE'S STANDING DETERIORATES

Many Lebanese, including two officials ⁠who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said they saw Netanyahu's belated acceptance of talks as a ‌fig leaf, aimed at generating goodwill in Washington as the US begins talks with Iran ‌this weekend, while ultimately keeping the war in Lebanon going.

"Just because Israel agreed to negotiate with us doesn't mean it's going to be easy. The problem is ‌that we don't have any other option," said Nabil Boumonsef, deputy editor-in-chief of Lebanon's Annahar newspaper.

Lebanon's state has historically been weak, hamstrung by corruption, ‌a sectarian power-sharing system that is frequently deadlocked and cycles of internal fighting and wars between Hezbollah and Israel.

Lebanese have repeated the refrain of "there is no state" for decades, but recent crises have degraded the government's standing even further.

Lebanon's financial system collapsed in 2019 and a 2020 chemical explosion at the Beirut port killed more than 200 people. No one has been held to account for either.

In September 2024, an Arab Barometer survey found that 76% of Lebanese had no trust at all in ‌their government.

The following month, Israel sent troops into Lebanon and escalated its bombing campaign after a year of exchanging fire with Hezbollah. More than 3,700 people were killed in Lebanon.

A HOUSE DIVIDED

Even after ⁠a US-brokered ceasefire in November 2024, Israel ⁠kept troops in Lebanon and continued its strikes against what it said was Hezbollah infrastructure. Those who returned to demolished southern Lebanese towns spent their own savings to rebuild their houses without state help.

Thousands more who could not return home said their own government was at fault for failing to secure Israel's withdrawal through diplomacy. The US and Israel, meanwhile, blamed the Lebanese state and army for failing to fulfil a promise under the 2024 ceasefire deal to fully strip Hezbollah of its arsenal.

Lebanese officials said disarming Hezbollah by force would trigger civil strife and talks to convince the group to abandon its weapons were failing as Israel still occupied Lebanese land.

After Hezbollah entered the regional war on March 2, Lebanon outlawed its military activities. But the army did not stop the group's missile launches, with officials again citing the risk of internal conflict.

Netanyahu has said talks would focus on Hezbollah's disarmament and a historic peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon, who have technically been at war since Israel's founding in 1948.

But both are hard to imagine after such a deadly week.

Lebanon was heading into talks as a house divided, said Michael Young of the Carnegie Endowment's Middle East Center.

Disarming Hezbollah "means entering into a confrontation with the entire Shiite community, which will not accept Hezbollah’s disarmament because they feel they are surrounded by enemies", he said.

"We’re weak because we’re unclear on the terms of reference of negotiations, divided over the question of negotiations, because our demands will be rejected and because we cannot do what we need to do to secure an Israeli withdrawal."


By the Numbers: US Thrashed Military Targets in Iran, but Some Capabilities Remain

 Government supporters walk past a billboard depicting Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei as they gather to mark the 40th day since the killing of his father, slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Thursday, April 9, 2026. (AP)
Government supporters walk past a billboard depicting Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei as they gather to mark the 40th day since the killing of his father, slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Thursday, April 9, 2026. (AP)
TT

By the Numbers: US Thrashed Military Targets in Iran, but Some Capabilities Remain

 Government supporters walk past a billboard depicting Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei as they gather to mark the 40th day since the killing of his father, slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Thursday, April 9, 2026. (AP)
Government supporters walk past a billboard depicting Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei as they gather to mark the 40th day since the killing of his father, slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Thursday, April 9, 2026. (AP)

Since the ceasefire between Iran and the US was announced, leaders in President Donald Trump's administration have been quick to say Iranian military and arms capacity have been all but wiped out during weeks of fighting.

But there is also an acknowledgment that Tehran retains some capabilities, whether to strike back or defend itself.

Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this week said the US military has hit more than 13,000 targets. He listed high percentages for attacks or destruction to Iran's air defenses, navy and weapons factories.

However, the totals stop short of Iran's military capabilities being “decimated” as the Republican president has asserted.

Independent data from Armed Conflict Location & Event Data, a US-based group that tracks conflicts around the world, shows Iranian strikes persisted at a relatively steady and uninterrupted pace since the war began Feb. 28 through Wednesday.

Here's a look at what the US says has been targeted, has been degraded or remains from Iran, by the numbers:

About 80% of Iran's air defense systems 'destroyed'

Caine told reporters Wednesday at the Pentagon that the US has struck more than 1,500 air defense targets, more than 450 ballistic missile storage facilities and 800 one-way attack drone storage facilities. He said, “All of these systems are gone.”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth similarly claimed that “Iran no longer has an air defense” and that “we own their skies” before conceding soon afterward that Iran “can still shoot — we know that.”

Hegseth later elaborated, saying that while the Iranians may “have a system here or there,” they no longer had an air defense “system that's capable of defending their skies.”

Neither Caine nor Hegseth said what the remaining 20% of Iran's air defenses looked like or which parts of the country have the ability to carry out the sporadic fire they described.

Caine offered no new details about what kind of weapon the Iranians used to shoot down a US F-15E Strike Eagle last week. It was the first time an American military jet was shot down during the war, showing Tehran's continued ability to hit back despite assertions from the Trump administration.

Trump described it on Monday as a “handheld shoulder missile, heat-seeking missile.”

More than 90% of Iran's regular Navy fleet 'sunk'

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Wednesday that the Iranian navy was “completely annihilated.”

While 150 Iranian ships “are at the bottom of the ocean,” Caine said, only half the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard's small attack boats — ships the government used to swarm and harass warships and merchants in the Strait of Hormuz — have been sunk.

Caine also said that after more than 700 strikes, the military believed it has destroyed more than 95% of Iran's naval mines.

Since the US has not said how large Iran's stockpile was before the war, it's unknown how many naval mines make up the remaining 5%. Semiofficial news agencies in Iran published a chart Thursday suggesting the Revolutionary Guard put sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial trade route for oil, during the war.

The message is likely designed to be a pressure tactic as Iran, Israel and the United States head into negotiations this weekend in Pakistan. Independent analysts say they have seen no change in merchant traffic through the strait since the tenuous ceasefire began this week.

About 90% of Iran's weapons factories 'attacked'

Caine said Wednesday that the military “destroyed Iran's defense industrial base” while pointing to the fact that the US and allies attacked “approximately 90% of their weapons factories.”

He also said, “nearly 80% of Iran's nuclear industrial base was hit, further degrading their attempts to attain a nuclear weapon.”

While he noted that Iran was no longer able to produce certain components like solid rocket motors, he stopped short of saying that Iran could not eventually rebuild or get weapons in other ways or that the factories attacked had actually been destroyed or rendered unusable.

Trump acknowledged this possibility when he warned countries against arming Iran.

“A Country supplying Military Weapons to Iran will be immediately tariffed, on any and all goods sold to the United States of America, 50%, effective immediately,” Trump said in a social media post on Wednesday.

More than 90% interception rate in Israel

Meanwhile, Israel's military pointed to how many drones or missiles it has been able to stop from landing. It said it had an interception rate of more than 90% through its aerial defense systems.

Over the decades, Israel has developed a sophisticated system capable of detecting incoming fire and deploying only if a projectile is headed toward a population center or sensitive military or civilian infrastructure.

Israeli leaders say the system isn't 100% guaranteed but credit it with preventing serious damage and countless casualties.