Sources: Iran Threatens Army Base in Washington, Top US General

In this Friday March 19, 2021, photo a District of Columbia Fire Boat checks buoys in the waterway next to Fort McNair, seen in background in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
In this Friday March 19, 2021, photo a District of Columbia Fire Boat checks buoys in the waterway next to Fort McNair, seen in background in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
TT

Sources: Iran Threatens Army Base in Washington, Top US General

In this Friday March 19, 2021, photo a District of Columbia Fire Boat checks buoys in the waterway next to Fort McNair, seen in background in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
In this Friday March 19, 2021, photo a District of Columbia Fire Boat checks buoys in the waterway next to Fort McNair, seen in background in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Iran has made threats against Fort McNair, an Army base in Washington D.C., and against the Army’s vice chief of staff, two senior US intelligence officials said.

They said communications intercepted by the National Security Agency in January showed that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard discussed mounting “USS Cole-style attacks” against the base, referring to the October 2000 suicide attack in which a small boat pulled up alongside the Navy destroyer in the Yemeni port of Aden and exploded, killing 17 sailors.

The intelligence also revealed threats to kill Gen. Joseph M. Martin and plans to infiltrate and surveil the base, according to the officials, who were not authorized to publicly discuss national security matters and spoke on condition of anonymity. The base, one of the oldest in the country, is Martin's official residence.

The threats are one reason the Army has been pushing for more security around Fort McNair, which sits alongside Washington's bustling newly developed Waterfront District, The Associated Press reported.

City leaders have been fighting the Army’s plan to add a buffer zone of about 250 feet to 500 feet (75 meters to 150 meters) from the shore of the Washington Channel, which would limit access to as much as half the width of the busy waterway running parallel to the Potomac River.

The Pentagon, National Security Council and NSA either did not reply or declined to comment when contacted by AP.

As District of Columbia officials have fought the enhanced security along the channel, the Army has offered only vague information about threats to the base.

At a virtual meeting in January to discuss the proposed restrictions, Army Maj. Gen. Omar Jones, commander of the Military District of Washington, cited “credible and specific" threats against military leaders who live on the base. The only specific security threat he offered was about a swimmer who ended up on the base and was arrested.

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the district’s sole representative in Congress, was skeptical. “When it comes to swimmers, I’m sure that must be rare. Did he know where he was? Maybe he was just swimming and found his way to your shore?” she said.

Jones conceded that the swimmer was “not a great example there, but our most recent example” of a security breach.

He said the Army has increased patrols along the shoreline, erected more restricted area signs and placed cameras to monitor the Washington Channel.

Puzzled city officials and frustrated residents said the Army's request for the buffer zone was a government overreach of public waterways.

Discussions about the Fort McNair proposal began two years ago, but the recent intelligence gathered by the NSA has prompted Army officials to renew their request for the restrictions.

The intercepted chatter was among members of the Quds Force of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and centered on potential military options to avenge the US killing of the former Quds leader, Gen. Qassem Soleimani, in Baghdad in January 2020, the two intelligence officials said.

They said Tehran’s military commanders are unsatisfied with their counterattacks so far, specifically the results of the ballistic missile attack on Ain al-Asad airbase in Iraq in the days after Soleimani's killing.

No US service members were killed in that strike but dozens suffered concussions.

Norton told the AP that in the two months since the January meeting, the Pentagon has not provided her any additional information that would justify the restrictions around Fort McNair.

“I have asked the Department of Defense to withdraw the rule because I’ve seen no evidence of a credible threat that would support the proposed restriction,” Norton said. “They have been trying to get their way, but their proposal is more restrictive than necessary.”

She added: “I have a security clearance. And they have yet to show me any classified evidence” that would justify the proposal. Norton pointed out that the Washington Navy Yard and Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, which also have access to district waters, do not have restricted zones along their shorelines and have not requested them.

The proposed changes, outlined in a Federal Register notice, would prohibit both people and watercraft from “anchoring, mooring or loitering" within the restricted area without permission.

The notice specifies the need for security around the Marine Helicopter Squadron, which transports American presidents, and the general and staff officers’ quarters located at the water’s edge. The southern tip of Fort McNair is home to the National War College, where midlevel and senior officers gunning for admiral or general study national security strategy.

The Washington Channel is the site of one of the city's major urban renewal efforts, with new restaurants, luxury housing and concert venues. The waterway flows from the point where the city’s two major rivers, the Potomac and Anacostia, meet.

It’s home to three marinas and hundreds of boat slips. About 300 people live aboard their boats in the channel, according to Patrick Revord, who is the director of technology, marketing and community engagement for the Wharf Community Association.

The channel also bustles with water taxis, which serve 300,000 people each year, river cruises that host 400,000 people a year and about 7,000 kayakers and paddleboarders annually, Revord said during the meeting.

Residents and city officials say the restrictions would create unsafe conditions by narrowing the channel for larger vessels traversing the waterway alongside smaller motorboats and kayakers.

Guy Shields, a retired Army infantry colonel and member of the Capitol Yacht Club who opposes the restrictions around Fort McNair, said during the meeting that waterway restrictions wouldn’t boost security.

“Those buoys aren’t going to do anything to enhance security. It will increase congestion in an already congested area,” Shields said. “And I’ll say, signs do not stop people with bad intentions.”

It’s unclear whether the new intelligence will change the city’s opposition to the Army’s security plan.



Danish Intelligence Warns of Russian Plans to Sabotage Defense Industry

A police officer in Denmark (Danish Interior Ministry via Facebook) 
A police officer in Denmark (Danish Interior Ministry via Facebook) 
TT

Danish Intelligence Warns of Russian Plans to Sabotage Defense Industry

A police officer in Denmark (Danish Interior Ministry via Facebook) 
A police officer in Denmark (Danish Interior Ministry via Facebook) 

Danish authorities have uncovered plans and preparations for Russian sabotage in Denmark, the newspaper Berlingske reported on Wednesday.

Companies in the defense industry linked to military aid for Ukraine are among the main targets, Emil Græsholm, head of counter-intelligence at the Danish Security and Intelligence Service (PET), told the newspaper.

“The main objective is to stop specific deliveries for Ukraine's defense,” Græsholm was quoted as saying. “At the same time, the aim is to frighten us so that we no longer support the Ukrainians and do not expand our own defense capabilities.”

The intelligence service usually keeps a low profile, but Græsholm said the threat was sufficiently concrete to warrant a public warning.

“The selection of targets and the preparations are so specific that we believe it is necessary to go public with the message that this is a threat that must be taken seriously,” he told Berlingske.

Græsholm cited arson as one possible aim of the Russian plans and urged companies in the defense industry to tighten security measures.

Russia is also trying to recruit “ordinary Danes” for its plans, often without them knowing they are working for Moscow, according to Græsholm.

“It could involve taking photos or videos of companies or facilities that can then be used for sabotage plans,” he said. He urged people in Denmark to be suspicious if they were approached with such requests.

PET expects the threat to continue to grow “in scale and complexity,” the report said.

“It is directed against Ukrainian defense manufacturers in Denmark,” Græsholm said. “But we can see that the Russians are generally interested in the defense industry in Denmark.”


Spain Report Flags Moroccan Police Failings in Ceuta Migrant Rush

Demonstrators take part in a rally against the presence of migrants and the situation after the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants last month in Ceuta, Spain. (AFP) 
Demonstrators take part in a rally against the presence of migrants and the situation after the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants last month in Ceuta, Spain. (AFP) 
TT

Spain Report Flags Moroccan Police Failings in Ceuta Migrant Rush

Demonstrators take part in a rally against the presence of migrants and the situation after the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants last month in Ceuta, Spain. (AFP) 
Demonstrators take part in a rally against the presence of migrants and the situation after the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants last month in Ceuta, Spain. (AFP) 

Spain’s Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska has asked the country’s National Police to verify a report that allegedly links Moroccan security forces to the unprecedented movement of migrants toward Ceuta at the end of July, AFP reported on Wednesday.

Earlier, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez ruled out any involvement by Morocco in the crisis. Instead, he blamed Russia, Israel and what he called an “ultra-right international,” accusing them of spreading false information about the influx of migrants.

But El Español newspaper said a document allegedly submitted by the National Center for Immigration and Borders (CENIF) to Spain’s National Court attributed a role to Moroccan security personnel in the mass arrival of migrants in Ceuta on July 30 and 31.

Sources at the ministry said Marlaska has asked National Police Director General Francisco Pardo to determine whether the report exists, whether its contents are accurate, and when the security services became aware of the information.

Marlaska said information related to an event classified as a matter of national security should reach the country’s senior security authorities without delay.

Over 70,000 migrants irregularly crossed from Morocco into the tiny Spanish territory between July 30 and 31 in an unprecedented surge at one of the European Union's only two land borders with Africa, prompting alarm across the bloc. At least 100 people died in the attempt, according to Ceuta's local authorities.

In an interview with Cadena SER radio, Sanchez said, “When people talk and speculate about the participation of Moroccan authorities, I deny this outright.”

Protests over security in Spain's North African enclave of Ceuta escalated into clashes between locals and police last week, a month after a mass influx of migrants from Morocco.

Police charged protesters at a beach after a group of demonstrators moved into the area where migrants have been sleeping, with some belongings set on fire during the disturbances, images broadcast on Spanish public television showed.

Earlier, dozens of protesters staged a sit-in to temporarily prevent Red Cross vehicles from reaching the beach to distribute food to hundreds of migrants staying in the area.


IAEA: Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program Is Unclear

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi (AP) 
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi (AP) 
TT

IAEA: Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program Is Unclear

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi (AP) 
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi (AP) 

The status of a key part of Iran's nuclear program remains unknown while international inspectors have yet to gain access to nuclear facilities, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported on Tuesday, as the country’s six-month conflict with the United States shows no signs of resolution.

IAEA monitors cannot verify the location or status of Iran’s stockpile of near-bomb grade uranium, according to the 11-page restricted report that was sent to member states and cited by Bloomberg and Reuters.

“The agency’s lack of information about this nuclear material and access to facilities to verify it is a matter of proliferation concern,” IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi wrote in the report.

He added that Iran needs to allow inspectors back in “with the utmost urgency.”

The IAEA report on Iran followed Grossi's visit to Washington. It also came as the US launched a new wave of strikes against targets in Iran, increasing tensions as both countries compete for control of the Strait of Hormuz waterway.

Grossi repeated his demands for Iran to allow inspectors to resume their work and called for a negotiated resolution to the US-Iran conflict.

Stockpiles Cannot Be Verified

The report on Iran showed there had again been no progress. Inspectors have yet to return to nuclear sites the United States and Israel bombed in June 2025.

Until those attacks, the IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from the roughly 90% of weapons-grade uranium. That is enough material, if enriched further, for 10 nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick, and Iran also had material enriched to lower levels.

Before the June 2025 strikes, the IAEA reported that Iran held approximately 8,599.6 kilograms of low-enriched uranium alongside over 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium, according to Bloomberg.

How much of that remains is unclear.

“It is more than a year since the Agency lost continuity of knowledge in relation to the previously declared inventories of LEU (low-enriched uranium) and HEU (highly enriched ⁠uranium) enriched up to 60% U-235 at the declared nuclear facilities affected by the attacks of June 2025,” the report said.

“The Agency's lack of information about this nuclear material and access to facilities to verify it is a matter of proliferation concern ... and needs to be addressed with the utmost urgency,” it added.

IAEA inspections of Iran dropped by more than half last year after the country imposed new restrictions following a 12-day conflict in which Israel and the US attacked its nuclear sites.

Inspectors will be allowed to visit Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant in mid-September, the IAEA reported.

A War that Disrupted the Nuclear Path

Uncertainty around Iran’s nuclear program has exasperated with the war that began on February 28, when the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran.

Since then, Washington and Tehran witnessed several months of fighting and attempts to negotiate, before reaching a tentative understanding in June. The accord was supposed to allow the agency access to Iran’s nuclear sites and begin a new set of talks on Iran’s nuclear program, but that agreement quickly collapsed.

US President Donald Trump insists that military action is necessary to ensure Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon.

Iran has always denied seeking a nuclear weapon but has never satisfactorily explained to the agency why it has enriched uranium to 60%.

The IAEA report comes before a meeting next week of the agency’s board of governors in Vienna to consider a new resolution censuring Iran.