Queen Elizabeth II’s Coffin Takes Long Road through Scotland

Mourners paid tribute to Queen Elizabeth II as Edinburgh prepared to receive her coffin. Lesley Martin AFP
Mourners paid tribute to Queen Elizabeth II as Edinburgh prepared to receive her coffin. Lesley Martin AFP
TT

Queen Elizabeth II’s Coffin Takes Long Road through Scotland

Mourners paid tribute to Queen Elizabeth II as Edinburgh prepared to receive her coffin. Lesley Martin AFP
Mourners paid tribute to Queen Elizabeth II as Edinburgh prepared to receive her coffin. Lesley Martin AFP

Queen Elizabeth II’s flag-draped coffin slowly processed through the rugged Scottish countryside Sunday on a final days-long journey from her beloved Balmoral Castle to London. Mourners packed bridges and city streets and lined rural roads and highways, some tossing flowers to honor the monarch who reigned for 70 years.

The hearse drove past piles of bouquets and other tributes as it led a seven-car cortege from Balmoral, where the queen died Thursday at age 96, for a six-hour trip through Scottish towns to Holyroodhouse palace in Edinburgh. The late queen's coffin was draped in the Royal Standard for Scotland and topped with a wreath made of flowers from the estate, including sweet peas, one of the queen's favorites.

The procession was a huge event for Scotland as the UK takes days to mourn its longest-reigning monarch, the only one most Britons have ever known. Hours before the coffin's arrival in Edinburgh, the Scottish capital, people turned out early to grab a space by police barricades. By afternoon, crowds were 7-8 people deep in places, eager to be part of such a historic occasion.

“I think she has been an ever-constant in my life. She was the queen I was born under, and she has always been there,” said Angus Ruthven, a 54-year-old civil servant from Edinburgh as he awaited the arrival of the coffin.

“I think it is going to take a lot of adjusting that she is not here. It is quite a sudden thing. We knew she was getting frailer, but it will be a good reign for King Charles,” he predicted.

The first village the cortege passed through was Ballater, where residents regard the royal family as neighbors. Hundreds of people watched in silence and some threw flowers in front of the hearse as it passed.

“She meant such a lot to people in this area. People were crying, it was amazing to see,” said Victoria Pacheco, a guest house manager.

In each Scottish town and village the entourage drove through, they were met with muted scenes of respect. People stood mostly in silence; some clapped politely, others pointed their phone cameras at the passing cars. In Aberdeenshire, farmers lined the route with an honor guard of dozens of tractors.

Before reaching the Scottish capital, the cortege traveled down what is effectively a royal memory lane — passing through locations laden with House of Windsor history. Those included Dyce, where in 1975 the queen formally opened the UK’s first North Sea oil pipeline, and Fife, near St. Andrews University, where her grandson Prince William, now the Prince of Wales, studied and met his future wife, Catherine.

Sunday's solemn drive came as the queen’s eldest son was formally proclaimed the new monarch — King Charles III — in the rest of the nations of the United Kingdom: Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It came a day after a pomp-filled accession ceremony in England for that king that was steeped in ancient tradition and political symbolism.

“I am deeply aware of this great inheritance and of the duties and heavy responsibilities of sovereignty, which have now passed to me,” Charles said Saturday.

Just before the proclamation was read Sunday in Edinburgh, a protester appeared with a sign condemning imperialism and urging leaders to “abolish the monarchy.” She was taken away soon afterward by police. Reaction to the protest was mixed. One man shouted, “Let her go! It’s free speech!” while others shouted: “Have some respect!”

Still, there was also some booing in Edinburgh when Joseph Morrow, Lord Lyon King of Arms, finished his proclamation with the words “God save the king!”

Ann Hamilton, 48, said she thought it was “absolutely terrible” that people booed the royal family during the proclamation of King Charles III in Edinburgh.

“There’s tens of thousands of people here today to show their respect. For them to be here, heckling through things, I think it was terrible. If they were so against it, they shouldn’t have come,” she said.

Still, it was a sign of how some, including Britain's former colonies, are struggling with the legacy of the monarchy. Earlier, proclamations were read in other parts of the Commonwealth, including Australia and New Zealand.

Charles, even as he mourned his late mother, was getting to work at Buckingham Palace, meeting with the secretary-general and other representatives of the Commonwealth. Many in those nations are grappling with affection for the queen and lingering bitterness over their colonial legacies, which ranged from outright slavery to corporal punishment in African schools to looted artifacts held in British cultural institutions.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who had started laying the groundwork for an Australian republic after an election in May, said Sunday that now was the time not for a change but for paying tribute to the late queen.

India, a former British colony, observed a day of state mourning, with flags lowered to half-staff on all government buildings throughout the country.

Amid the grief enveloping the House of Windsor, there were hints of a possible family reconciliation. Prince William and his brother Harry, together with their respective wives, Catherine, Princess of Wales, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, delighted mourners near Windsor Castle with a surprise joint appearance Saturday.

The queen's coffin was taking a circuitous journey back to the capital. On Monday, it will be taken from Holyroodhouse to nearby St. Giles’ Cathedral in Edinburgh, where it will remain until Tuesday, when it will be flown to London. The coffin will be moved from Buckingham Palace on Wednesday to the Houses of Parliament to lie in state until a state funeral at Westminster Abbey on Sept. 19.

In Ballater, the Rev. David Barr said locals consider the royals as “neighbors” and try to treat them as locals when they spend summers in the Scottish Highlands.

“When she comes up here, and she goes through those gates, I believe the royal part of her stays mostly outside,” he said. “And as she goes in, she was able to be a wife, a loving wife, a loving mum, a loving gran and then later on a loving great-gran — and aunty — and be normal.”

Elizabeth Taylor, from Aberdeen, had tears in her eyes after the hearse carrying the queen's coffin passed through Ballater.

“It was very emotional. It was respectful and showed what they think of the queen,” she said. “She certainly gave service to this country, even up until a few days before her death.”



Iran Threatens to Expand War to Indian Ocean if US Attacks Again

People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
TT

Iran Threatens to Expand War to Indian Ocean if US Attacks Again

People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters

An adviser to Iran's supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei warned on Thursday that Tehran may expand the Middle East war to the Indian Ocean if the US attacks again.

"Since the conflict has spread from the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz to the Red Sea, it is possible that, in response to more war, the front will expand even further, reaching the Indian Ocean and perhaps beyond," said Yahya Rahim Safavi in a video released by Iran's Fars news agency.

Yemen's Houthis, fighting government forces, recently took control of the Red Sea coastline, tightening their grip on the strategic Bab al-Mandab Strait, which links Asia to Europe via the Suez Canal.

Iran has long provided military support to the Houthis but denies any involvement in the Yemen conflict.

Tehran has also locked down the Strait of Hormuz off the Iranian coast, in retaliation for US-Israeli strikes that triggered the Middle East war at the end of February.

Iran and the United States are now vying for control of Hormuz, through which much of the world's oil and gas passed before the war.

Iranian officials had already threatened to expand the geographic scope of the conflict if US strikes resume.

But Thursday's warning is the first time an adviser to Iran's supreme leader explicitly mentioned the Indian Ocean, home to a strategic US-British military base at Diego Garcia, nearly 4,000 kilometers from Iran.

Officials from both countries held talks in New York this week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in a further attempt to end the conflict.

Iran has put forward its conditions for ending the war, including the lifting of sanctions targeting its economy and the unconditional release of its frozen assets abroad.

In an exclusive interview with AFP on Tuesday, a spokesman for Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Mohebi, also mentioned ending the war in Yemen.


Rich Nations Should Foot Climate Bill, Says Nepal Minister

People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)
People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Rich Nations Should Foot Climate Bill, Says Nepal Minister

People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)
People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)

Wealthy nations must pay for climate disasters that devastate countries that are least responsible for the crisis, yet bear its brunt, Nepal's foreign minister told AFP on Thursday.

The Himalayan nation suffered one of the worst catastrophes in its history late last month when a tsunami-like flood, triggered by a high-altitude glacial mountain collapse along the Nepal-China border, cut a swathe of destruction.

More than 1,400 people died, 6,000 are still missing, and the economic devastation runs in the billions of dollars.

"What we're trying to convey to the world is this: these issues of climate change are not theoretical anymore," Minister of Foreign Affairs Shisir Khanal said in an interview at Nepal's permanent mission, during the United Nation's high-level week.

"These are becoming real, and the frequency of such disasters are likely to happen more often over the next few years as the temperature rises, as the glaciers melt."

Scientists from the World Weather Attribution (WWA) have described the event as a "compound crisis" in which local geological instability combined with long-term warming that has led to glacier retreat and permafrost thaw.

Nepal has contributed negligibly to the breakdown of the global climate system, Khanal added.

More than 90 percent of its electricity comes from hydropower, over 70 percent of new cars sold are electric, and the nation contributes just 0.1 percent of global greenhouse gases.

"So why should we, who have not had any contribution to this issue, only bear the burden?"

- $5 billion disaster cost -

Khanal said his meetings in New York had been productive, with the United States announcing $31 million in new flood recovery support.

The G7 informally promised support at a meeting on Wednesday, he said, and Britain has also vowed to help.

Still, the scale of the challenges is enormous: preliminary estimates by his government put the cost of the disaster at $5 billion.

Nepal has asked the UN's Loss and Damage fund for $20 million, the maximum allowed, but a tiny fraction of what it needs.

The fund, established in 2022 in the aftermath of catastrophic floods in Pakistan, has yet to make even its first disbursement and is dramatically underfunded -- and observers see Nepal as a key test.

Khanal said, however, he had been encouraged by cash assistance and rescue teams sent by Nepal's neighbors, as well as the Nepalese diaspora who had sent money directly to the Prime Minister's Relief Fund.

Previously, he said, Nepalis preferred to donate to international organizations and local nonprofits -- but that has changed since the election of new Prime Minister Balendra Shah, a former rapper who won power on the back of a youth-led movement.

Jeremy Konyndyk, a former USAID official under Joe Biden, has criticized President Donald Trump's administration for sweeping aid cuts to Nepal after it took office, including for flood prediction and glacier inventories.

"There's no early warning system that probably exists in the world right now to imagine a compounded disaster of that nature," Khanal said. "But obviously what USAID and other institutions used to provide us is financial and technical assistance."

Nepal now needs more such assistance from the world to develop more complex systems involving satellites to monitor the rate of glacial melt and provide advance warnings, he said.


White House Reinstates Access to CNN, MS NOW and Politico Following Judge’s Order

Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)
Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)
TT

White House Reinstates Access to CNN, MS NOW and Politico Following Judge’s Order

Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)
Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)

The White House said on Thursday it has reinstated journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico after a federal judge deemed US President Donald Trump's ban of the three news outlets likely unconstitutional and ordered their access immediately restored.

The midday reinstatement came after a chaotic few hours earlier on Thursday when the journalists continued to be blocked from entering the White House grounds. That prompted the three news organizations to request an immediate hearing before US District Judge Tim Kelly, who issued his decision overnight.

Kelly, acting in a lawsuit brought by CNN, MS NOW and Politico on Monday, ordered a halt to Trump's ban for 14 days in a press freedom case that has played out over the past week in the courtroom and White House grounds.

Kelly found that the revocation of the White House credentials of the journalists "likely violated their constitutional due process rights."

The judge, who Trump appointed in 2017 during his first presidential term, also raised doubts about the US Justice Department's national security arguments for justifying the ban, noting that Trump himself had said the action was due to what the president alleged was false or negative coverage.

Hours after Kelly issued his order, CNN, MS NOW and Politico told the judge they remained ‌barred, and asked for ‌the emergency hearing. Politico said its reporter's credentials were confiscated. An MS NOW reporter said she was blocked from the White ‌House. CNN ⁠said some ⁠of its staff members were denied entry onto the grounds.

In response, Micah Stopperich, the director of press operations at the White House, said in a court filing that the White House began the process of reinstating press badges for affected reporters at 7:25 a.m., and that the "White House press team dropped badges at the entry gate for members of the press to pick up around 9:55 a.m."

After receiving Stopperich's declaration, the judge denied the request by the news organizations for an emergency hearing but gave them an opportunity to inform him of any factual developments later in the day.

The sharpest conflict yet between Trump and the press played out during a key diplomatic moment for the US president: his appearance at the United Nations General Assembly in New York and his hosting of Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday.

A source familiar with the White House television press pool said its members would not reinstate their coverage ⁠until the White House formally reinstates CNN to the pool. Earlier this week, they had suspended pooled coverage in solidarity with CNN.

There ‌were no TV pool cameras set up for Xi's arrival on the White House's South Lawn on Thursday ‌morning, and FOX News, MS NOW and CNN did not air the two leaders' arrival ceremony live.

During Trump's welcome of Xi to the White House, the president made a joke to ‌photographers in the Oval Office about the Chinese having the friendliest press corps.

CNN is one of the five news organizations – along with ABC, CBS, FOX News and ‌NBC – that make up the primary White House television pool. They share the costs of covering the president, take turns organizing coverage and provide footage to other outlets.

CNN had been scheduled to cover Trump's trip to New York for the General Assembly on Monday, but was not able to provide a pool feed.

NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS

Trump announced the ban on Friday on his social media platform, saying those news organizations "shouldn't be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they're covering the President of the United States." Trump framed their reporting as a threat to US national ‌security.

The three outlets sued Trump and other members of his administration, saying the ban violated the US Constitution's First Amendment protections for free speech and a free press, as well as their due process rights. A coalition of press freedom groups ⁠and dozens of news organizations, including Reuters, later ⁠filed a legal brief supporting the three news outlets.

Kelly ordered the Trump administration to immediately return the outlets' press passes and stop enforcing the ban for two weeks. The judge rejected the administration's stated national security concerns.

"The record lacks factual support for defendants' contention that the revocation of plaintiffs' hard passes will in fact protect national security or that national security will be endangered if the court orders their passes reinstated while this litigation proceeds," Kelly wrote.

In a filing on Tuesday, the Justice Department accused the outlets of threatening national security with their coverage, citing stories about US missile stockpiles, construction of Trump's White House ballroom and turnout at the recent Republican midterm convention.

Theodore Boutrous, an attorney for the three outlets, welcomed the judge's decision in a statement, saying: "This is a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, due process and the rule of law. We greatly appreciate the court's swift action."

TENSIONS WITH THE PRESS

Although other presidential administrations have battled with the press, Trump's campaign against the media has been unprecedented.

Upending decades of tradition, his White House had denied basic access to many major news organizations, launched personal attacks on journalists and filed multiple lawsuits against news organizations.

Kelly's ruling came a day after Trump experienced another legal setback.

On Wednesday, an Iowa judge dismissed Trump's 2024 lawsuit against the Des Moines Register newspaper and pollster J. Ann Selzer.

Trump sued the Register, its parent company Gannett and Selzer over a poll published ahead of the November 2024 US election that showed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris leading him in Iowa. Trump accused the newspaper and its longtime pollster of fraudulently misleading readers.

In his ruling Wednesday, Iowa District Judge Scott Beattie said the poll was legally protected speech.