G20 Leaders Praise the Results of New Delhi Summit

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)
TT

G20 Leaders Praise the Results of New Delhi Summit

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)

The G20 leaders participating in the New Delhi summit praised its success after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a joint declaration despite disagreements over the Ukraine war.

The US Principal Deputy National Security Adviser, Jon Finer, considered the declaration a "big potential step forward" regarding sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Finer explained in press statements that the declaration reflects the agreement of major economies required to uphold international law and Russia to respect international law.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov hailed the G20 summit, saying it was a "success for Moscow."

He said it was a sign that the global south would no longer blindly follow the Western powers.

"They don't want to be told to follow the Zelenskiy formula," Lavrov said, referring to the Ukrainian president.

Another indication of the summit's success included the meeting between US President Joe Biden and Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang, who led his country's delegation to New Delhi.

During a press conference, Biden said: "My team, my staff still meets with President Xi's people and cabinet."

"I met with his No.2 person in India today."

He added: "We talked about stability," and the Southern Hemisphere. "It wasn't confrontational at all."

-Joint declaration

Modi told the leaders attending the summit in New Delhi that they reached a consensus on the declaration, which called on all states to abide by the principles of international law, including respecting territorial integrity and sovereignty, international humanitarian law, and the multilateral system that protects peace and stability.

The declaration emphasized that states must "refrain from the threat or use of force to seek territorial acquisition" and that "the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is inadmissible."

The declaration called for implementing the Black Sea initiative to safely flow grain, food, and fertilizer from Ukraine and Russia.

Moscow pulled out of the agreement in July over a failure to meet its demands to implement a parallel agreement easing rules for its food and fertilizer exports.

The declaration said the group agreed to address debt vulnerabilities in low and middle-income countries "in an effective, comprehensive and systematic manner" but did not make any fresh action plan.

It said countries pledged to strengthen and reform multilateral development banks while it accepted the proposal for tighter regulation of cryptocurrencies.

Modi inaugurated the meeting by calling on members to end a "global trust deficit" and announced that the bloc was granting permanent membership to the African Union to make it more representative.

- Ukrainian disappointment

Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Oleg Nikolenko took a screenshot of the relevant section of the joint declaration, with several pieces of the text crossed out in red and corrected with wording that reflects Ukraine's position.

"G20 adopted a final declaration. We are grateful to the partners who tried to include strong wording in the text. However, regarding Russia's aggression against Ukraine, the G20 has nothing to be proud of. This is how the main elements of the text could look to be closer to reality," he said.

"Ukraine is grateful to the partners who tried to include strong formulations in the text."

Furthermore, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz lauded the declaration for supporting Ukraine's territorial and sovereign integrity.

He noted that it was a success that Russia ultimately abandoned its objection to such a decision simply because all others moved in this direction.

In turn, French President Emmanuel Macron said on Sunday that the G20, founded to solve international economic issues, was not necessarily the place to expect diplomatic progress on the war in Ukraine.

However, he said the G20 declaration was not a diplomatic victory for Russia.

"This G20 confirms once again the isolation of Russia," Macron told a press conference after the summit's closing ceremony.

- 200 hours of negotiation

India's G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant said it took over 200 hours of non-stop negotiations to deliver a consensus on the G20 declaration adopted at the Leaders' Summit.

He explained that the Indian diplomats held 300 bilateral meetings and circulated 15 drafts on the contentious Ukraine conflict with their counterparts.

Kant pointed out that Brazil was among the countries that helped reach a consensus on the paragraph allocated to Ukraine within the statement.

For his part, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva described the summit as "successful," noting that "we cannot let geopolitical issues sequester the G20 agenda of discussions. We have no interest in a divided G20. We need peace and cooperation instead of conflict."

Modi handed over the presidency of the G20 to Lula, affirming his "support" to Brazil, which will host the upcoming summit scheduled for November 2024 in Rio de Janeiro.

- An invitation to Putin

Lula said Putin would be invited to next year's event, adding that he planned to attend a BRICS bloc of developing nations meeting due in Russia before the Rio meeting.

He announced that the Russian leader would not be arrested in Brazil if he attended the G20 meeting next year.

In March, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant against Putin, accusing him of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine.

Russia denied its forces have engaged in war crimes or forcibly taken Ukrainian children.



Top Israel Court Hears Petitions to Oust Far-Right Minister

Israeli Supreme Court judges assemble on the day of the hearing for a petition to force Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to oust Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir from his position, following allegations Ben-Gvir used his role to intervene in investigations and operational matters, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem April 15, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli Supreme Court judges assemble on the day of the hearing for a petition to force Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to oust Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir from his position, following allegations Ben-Gvir used his role to intervene in investigations and operational matters, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem April 15, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Top Israel Court Hears Petitions to Oust Far-Right Minister

Israeli Supreme Court judges assemble on the day of the hearing for a petition to force Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to oust Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir from his position, following allegations Ben-Gvir used his role to intervene in investigations and operational matters, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem April 15, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli Supreme Court judges assemble on the day of the hearing for a petition to force Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to oust Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir from his position, following allegations Ben-Gvir used his role to intervene in investigations and operational matters, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem April 15, 2026. (Reuters)

Israel's High Court was on Wednesday hearing four petitions backed by the country's attorney general that seek to oust hardline National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

The case is the latest example of the tension between the judiciary and one of the most right-wing governments in Israel's history, and has been sharply criticized by several other ministers.

The petitions seek Ben-Gvir's removal on the grounds that he has undermined the independence of the police.

The petitions won the support of Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, who in January asked the court to order Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to explain why he was not dismissing the cabinet member.

In her request, Baharav-Miara accused Ben-Gvir of "abusing his position to improperly influence the activities of the Israel Police in the most sensitive areas of law enforcement and investigations, and of violating basic democratic principles".

Ahead of the hearing, Ben-Gvir was defiant, calling for the "arrest and investigation" of the attorney general.

"(She) says I set policy and change the police -- she's right. She says I interfere in appointments, and appointed more than 1,000 people in order to implement my policy -- she's right about that too," he said, flanked by supporters.

"Attempts to interfere with a minister's appointment and his powers is dangerous for democracy. Democracy will not fall; the judicial dictatorship will fall," he vowed.

Justice Minister Yariv Levin also weighed in, denouncing the hearing as "illegal" and saying "the judges' decision will have no validity".

And Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, a former justice minister, urged the court "to refrain from harming democracy", saying the case -- which seeks to compel Netanyahu to dismiss Ben-Gvir -- "goes too far," he wrote on Telegram.

On Monday, Netanyahu submitted his 129-page response to the bid to oust Ben-Gvir, arguing it was an "unconstitutional demand" and that the court lacked authority to interfere in government decisions or in the appointment of ministers.

Last month, he described the attorney general's request as "inconceivable... in the midst of an existential war", saying her call to dismiss a senior minister, against whom no criminal investigation had been opened, "harms the foundations of democracy".


UN Nuclear Chief Urges Strict Iran Checks in Any Deal to End War

01 November 2004, Austria, Vienna: The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flies in front of the UN seat in Vienna. (dpa)
01 November 2004, Austria, Vienna: The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flies in front of the UN seat in Vienna. (dpa)
TT

UN Nuclear Chief Urges Strict Iran Checks in Any Deal to End War

01 November 2004, Austria, Vienna: The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flies in front of the UN seat in Vienna. (dpa)
01 November 2004, Austria, Vienna: The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flies in front of the UN seat in Vienna. (dpa)

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog said Wednesday that “very detailed” measures to verify Iran’s nuclear activities must be included in a potential US-Iran agreement to end their war in the Middle East.

International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi stressed the need for the thorough verification regime for Iran’s nuclear program, as US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that a second round of talks with Iran could happen over the next two days.

The Trump administration has said that preventing Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon is a key war aim. Iran has previously said it isn't developing such weapons but rejected limits on its nuclear program.

Last weekend in Pakistan, an initial round of talks between the two countries failed to produce an agreement. The White House said Iran’s nuclear ambitions were a central sticking point. But an Iranian diplomatic official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the closed-door talks, denied that negotiations had failed over Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

“Iran has a very ambitious, wide nuclear program so all of that will require the presence of IAEA inspectors,” Grossi told reporters in Seoul. “Otherwise, you will not have an agreement. You will have an illusion of an agreement.”

He said that any agreement on nuclear technology “requires very detailed verification mechanisms.”

Iran has not allowed the IAEA access to its nuclear facilities bombed by Israel and the United States during a 12-day war in June, according to a confidential IAEA report circulated to member states and seen by The Associated Press in February.

The report stressed that it “cannot verify whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities,” or the “size of Iran’s uranium stockpile at the affected nuclear facilities.”

Iran has long insisted its program is peaceful, but the IAEA and Western nations say Tehran had an organized nuclear weapons program up until 2003.

The IAEA has maintained Iran has a stockpile of 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60% purity, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.

That stockpile could allow Iran to build as many as 10 nuclear bombs, should it decide to weaponize its program, Grossi said earlier.

Such highly enriched nuclear material should normally be verified every month, according to the IAEA’s guidelines.


North Korea Boosting Ability to Make Nuclear Arms, Says UN Watchdog

 Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi speaks during a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, April 15, 2026. (Kim Hong-Ji/Pool Photo via AP)
Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi speaks during a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, April 15, 2026. (Kim Hong-Ji/Pool Photo via AP)
TT

North Korea Boosting Ability to Make Nuclear Arms, Says UN Watchdog

 Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi speaks during a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, April 15, 2026. (Kim Hong-Ji/Pool Photo via AP)
Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi speaks during a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, April 15, 2026. (Kim Hong-Ji/Pool Photo via AP)

North Korea is showing a "very serious increase" in its ability to produce atomic weapons, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog said Wednesday on a visit to Seoul.

The diplomatically isolated north is believed to operate multiple facilities for enriching uranium, a key step in making nuclear warheads, South Korea's spy agency has said.

They include one at the Yongbyon nuclear site, which Pyongyang purportedly decommissioned after talks but later reactivated in 2021.

"In our periodic assessments, we have been able to confirm that there's a rapid increase in the operations" of the Yongbyon reactor, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi told reporters in Seoul.

The agency also observed a rise in operations at Yongbyon's reprocessing unit and light-water reactor, as well as the activation of other facilities, Grossi said.

"All that points to a very serious increase in the capabilities of (the) DPRK in the area of nuclear weapons production, which is estimated at a few dozen warheads," he said, using North Korea's official name.

North Korea, which conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, is under rafts of UN sanctions for its banned weapons programs.

It has declared that it will never surrender its nuclear weapons, and cut off access to IAEA inspectors in 2009.

The agency has noted the construction of a "new facility similar to the enrichment facility in Yongbyon", Grossi said.

It was "not easy to calculate" any production increases without visiting the site.

However, "we consider, looking at external features of the facility, that there will be significant increase in the enrichment capacity of the DPRK", he said.

Asked whether Russia was assisting North Korea's nuclear development, Grossi said the IAEA had not seen "anything in particular in that regard".

North Korea has sent ground troops and artillery shells to support Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and observers say Pyongyang is receiving military technology assistance from Moscow in return.