Disappointment in Lebanon Over Postponement of Paris Conference to Support Army

A Lebanese Army patrol. (EPA)
A Lebanese Army patrol. (EPA)
TT

Disappointment in Lebanon Over Postponement of Paris Conference to Support Army

A Lebanese Army patrol. (EPA)
A Lebanese Army patrol. (EPA)

Lebanese circles expressed disappointment over the postponement of the Lebanese Army Support Conference, which was scheduled to be held in Paris on Feb. 27.

They said the decision “contradicts the international community’s desire to strengthen the army’s capabilities to assume its responsibilities, especially with regards to the implementation of UN Security Council resolution 1701.”

However, sources close to caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati told Asharq Al-Awsat that the postponement was linked to ongoing talks between countries concerned with the conference, pending the “appropriate conditions” that would allow the event to be held.

They stressed that there was no backing down from supporting the army.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Defense Minister Maurice Slim said the Lebanese Army would “remain committed to its national responsibility and its defense and security tasks throughout all Lebanese lands.”

“The Paris conference reflected the extent of international interest in supporting the military establishment in Lebanon,” he said, noting that the army’s weapons and equipment are supplied by “friendly countries.”

The army is always committed to its national role despite its low numbers and weak equipment, he stated.

Slim added that resolution 1701, issued in 2006, stipulates the deployment of 15,000 Lebanese soldiers on the southern border, but the army does not have enough troops to do so.

He underlined the need for the support of “friendly countries interested in stability in the region, and the commitment of all parties to international resolutions.”

The army, in cooperation with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), has been deployed in the South since the end of the July 2006 war.

This cooperation was a factor of stability in the South despite the Israeli violations of Lebanese sovereignty.

The minister stressed that the army’s cooperation with the international forces in the South “remains strong and solid and in compliance with international resolutions.”

“The Lebanese state adheres to Security Council resolutions, especially resolution 1701, but violations always come from the Israeli enemy, by land, sea and air,” he underlined.

The minister went on to say: “We told all the foreign officials we met that we urgently have to equip combat soldiers, and that we also need to create new combat units if necessary to increase the number of the troops in the South.”

The postponement or cancellation of the Paris conference was on the agenda of meetings of the Foreign Relations Committee delegation in the US Congress in Beirut last week.

Sources who followed the preparations of the conference said the decision “does not mean abandoning support for the military establishment, but rather allows some space to secure the best conditions for the meeting’s success.”

Former coordinator between the Lebanese government and the UNIFIL, Brigadier General Mounir Shehadeh, said several reasons could be behind the postponement of the Paris conference, including disputes between the United States and France within the Quintet Committee.



Tunisia Groups Urge Inclusion of Rejected Candidates in Poll

FILE PHOTO: Tunisian President Kais Saied attends a signing ceremony with Chinese President Xi Jinping (not pictured) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China May 31, 2024. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang/Pool/File Photo/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Tunisian President Kais Saied attends a signing ceremony with Chinese President Xi Jinping (not pictured) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China May 31, 2024. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang/Pool/File Photo/File Photo
TT

Tunisia Groups Urge Inclusion of Rejected Candidates in Poll

FILE PHOTO: Tunisian President Kais Saied attends a signing ceremony with Chinese President Xi Jinping (not pictured) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China May 31, 2024. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang/Pool/File Photo/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Tunisian President Kais Saied attends a signing ceremony with Chinese President Xi Jinping (not pictured) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China May 31, 2024. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang/Pool/File Photo/File Photo

A petition signed by prominent Tunisians and civil society groups was published on Saturday urging that rejected candidates be allowed to stand in the October 6 presidential election, Agence France Presse reported.

Signed by 26 groups including Legal Agenda, Lawyers Without Borders and the Tunisian Human Rights League, it welcomed an administrative court decision this week to reinstate three candidates who had been disqualified.

They are Imed Daimi, who was an adviser to former president Moncef Marzouki, former minister Mondher Zenaidi and opposition party leader Abdellatif Mekki.

The three were among 14 candidates barred by the Tunisian election authority, ISIE, from standing in the election.

If they do take part, they will join former parliamentarian Zouhair Maghzaoui and businessman Ayachi Zammel in challenging incumbent President Kais Saied.

Saturday's petition was also signed by more than 180 civil society figures including Wahid Ferchichi, dean of the public law faculty at Carthage University.

It called the administrative court "the only competent authority to adjudicate disputes related to presidential election candidacies.”

The petition referred to statements by ISIE head Farouk Bouasker, who on Thursday indicated that the authority will soon meet to finalize the list of candidates, "taking into consideration judicial judgements already pronounced.”

This has been interpreted as suggesting the ISIE may reject new candidacies if they are the subject of legal proceedings or have convictions.

The administrative court's rulings on appeals "are enforceable and cannot be contested by any means whatsoever,” the petition said.

It called on the electoral authority to "respect the law and avoid any practice that could undermine the transparency and integrity of the electoral process.”