Palestinian Govt Sparks Deep Dispute between Fatah and Hamas

This handout picture provided by the Palestinian Authority's Press Office (PPO) shows Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas (L) posing with the newly appointed Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa, in Ramallah on March 14, 2024. (Photo by PPO / AFP / Handout)
This handout picture provided by the Palestinian Authority's Press Office (PPO) shows Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas (L) posing with the newly appointed Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa, in Ramallah on March 14, 2024. (Photo by PPO / AFP / Handout)
TT

Palestinian Govt Sparks Deep Dispute between Fatah and Hamas

This handout picture provided by the Palestinian Authority's Press Office (PPO) shows Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas (L) posing with the newly appointed Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa, in Ramallah on March 14, 2024. (Photo by PPO / AFP / Handout)
This handout picture provided by the Palestinian Authority's Press Office (PPO) shows Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas (L) posing with the newly appointed Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa, in Ramallah on March 14, 2024. (Photo by PPO / AFP / Handout)

The Palestinian government, which has yet to be even formed, sparked a deep dispute between the Fatah and Hamas movements, levelling the harshest criticism against Hamas since the eruption of the war on Gaza.

The dispute first started when Hamas said Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was “out of touch with reality” for appointing Dr. Mohammad Mustafa on Thursday to form a new government.

Fatah responded by saying: “Those who caused Gaza to return under Israeli occupation and caused a nakba (catastrophe) to befall the Palestinian people, especially in Gaza, have no right to make dictates related to national priorities.”

“The real side that is out of touch with reality and the Palestinian people is the Hamas leadership that has until this moment failed to realize the extent of the catastrophe endured by our oppressed people in Gaza and the rest of the Palestinian territories,” it stressed in a statement.

It wondered how Hamas could speak of unilateral action and division when “it did not consult the Palestinian leadership or any other national Palestinian party” when it took the decision “to embark on an adventure on October 7 that has led to a nakba that is more severe than the 1948 Nakba.”

“Has Hamas consulted the Palestinian leadership as it now negotiates with Israel and offers one concession after the other to it?” it wondered, while accusing the movement of only seeking the personal safety of its leaders.

It also accused it of seeking an agreement with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that would keep the movement in Gaza so that it could continue to sow division between the Palestinian people.

Moreover, Fatah said the “life of luxury the Hamas leadership is living in seven-star hotels has blinded it to reason,” calling on it to end its policy of foreign agendas and return to the national fold.

Hamas, the Islamic Jihad, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Palestinian National Initiative movement slammed Abbas’ appointment of Mustafa as prime minister.

In a statement, they accused the Palestinian Authority (PA) of continuing its unilateral approach and dismissing all efforts to restore Palestinian unity.

“We reject such an approach that has harmed and continues to harm our people and national cause,” they declared.

“The top national priority lies in confronting the barbaric systematic Zionist aggression and its genocide and war of starvation, not forming a new government,” they added.

They accused Abbas of deciding to form a new government without seeking national agreement first, “which consolidates his unilateral approach and deepens the division during such a pivotal historic moment.”

“The president’s move reflects the extent of the crisis within the Palestinian leadership, how out of touch with reality it is and the huge gap between it and our people, its concerns and aspirations,” said the statement.

Mustafa is a well-known businessman and economic expert. He succeeds Mohammed Shtayyeh, who resigned to meet American and international demands for reform in the PA.

Hamas was expecting Abbas to consult it in naming a new PM and was taken by surprise when he completely ignored it.

A source from the PA told Asharq Al-Awsat that ties between Fatah and Hamas have not improved even after the eruption of the war on Gaza.

Abbas took his decision out of his belief that there was no need to wait for anyone and that the priorities that Hamas listed demand the formation of a capable government.

Hamas has been demanding providing relief to the people and the rebuilding of Gaza.

The source stressed that Mustafa’s appointment was taken in line with understandings reached with Arab and western countries that are involved in the post-war arrangements in Gaza.

Hamas, which can no longer rule Gaza, should not impede those who can save and aid the people there, it went on to say.

Mustafa is seeking to form a government of independent non-partisan experts. He has a three-week deadline to announce a lineup.



Tunisian Journalist, a Critic of Saied, Sentenced to 1 Year in Prison

Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
TT

Tunisian Journalist, a Critic of Saied, Sentenced to 1 Year in Prison

Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki

Prominent Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki and critic of President Kais Saied said on Wednesday that he was sentenced to one year in prison over posts he made on social media.

El Mekki, known for his political commentary, was a regular host on Mosaique FM's flagship "Midi Show" before he left the station.

Authorities opened an investigation against him in 2024 under Decree 54 -- a law Saied enacted to combat "false news" -- after he decried poor conditions at a public hospital morgue in the coastal city of Sfax.

A lower court had dismissed the case, but an appeals court handed him the 12-month jail term, he said on Facebook.

The National Syndicate of Tunisian Journalists condemned the ruling in a statement, warning of a "worrying trend" and a "climate of intimidation and self-censorship.”

Mekki has been prosecuted three times since 2023, in each case over comments he had made online or in the media.

Although Mekki has recently distanced himself from the media, he remains active on social networks. He is also a member of the editorial board of Rachma, an independent Tunisian media platform.

Freedom of expression was celebrated as a main achievement of the 2011 uprising that toppled president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia. But since Saied's July 25, 2021 power grab, several NGOs and the opposition have lamented a decline in rights and freedoms.


Trump’s Remarks on Soleimani Spark Debate in Iraq

US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)
US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)
TT

Trump’s Remarks on Soleimani Spark Debate in Iraq

US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)
US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)

Despite US President Donald Trump’s praise for Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi during their White House meeting on Tuesday, remarks about the 2020 killing of Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani and former Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) deputy chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis triggered a broad political debate in Iraq.

Greeting al-Zaidi at the White House, Trump described him as “a warrior” and praised the “tremendous chemistry” between them, predicting that the Iraqi premier would remain in office “for a long period of time.”

Turning to the January 2020 US drone strike near Baghdad International Airport, Trump again defended the operation, saying: “And I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today... I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani.”

Without mentioning al-Muhandis by name, Trump added: “By the way, a very bad person went with him. They happened to meet at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq, a leader there, was killed in the same incident.”

He then turned to al-Zaidi with a smile and asked: “So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question before. Maybe you know the answer better than I do.”

Al-Zaidi replied: “At that time, I wasn’t working in politics. This visit is about the future and what we can do together. We’re not concerned with the old past. We’ve had enough of the suffering it caused.”

Munqith Dagher, head of the Independent Institute of Administration and Civil Society Studies (IIACSS) research group, said al-Zaidi had handled the exchange better than many had expected.

Writing on X, he argued that, whether instinctive or the product of media training, the prime minister’s body language and responses spared both himself and Iraq unnecessary embarrassment during one of Trump’s characteristic attempts to put visiting leaders on the spot.

Dagher added that al-Zaidi’s answer could have been even stronger had he delivered it with greater seriousness.

Writer and researcher Adnan Tomeh offered a different assessment, arguing that politics is measured first and foremost by the careful choice of words. He said al-Zaidi could have given a more diplomatic answer that preserved room for maneuver but instead appeared to sidestep the question.

The strongest criticism came from Iran-aligned factions.

Al-Muhandis’ family issued a sharply worded statement accusing Trump of revealing his fear of the consequences of his “crimes,” particularly in Iraq, while rebuking al-Zaidi for distancing himself from the country’s past.

The family also claimed the Washington visit was intended to dismantle the PMF as an “ideological force,” to further US efforts aimed at controlling Iraq’s oil wealth, and to advance calls for disarming armed groups under the slogan of restricting weapons to the state.

Akram al-Kaabi, secretary-general of the US-designated Harakat al-Nujaba, also condemned Trump’s remarks, describing Soleimani and al-Muhandis as “symbols of the resistance.”


Arab League Secretary-General Reaffirms Support for Sudan’s Unity, National Institutions

Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy speaks during a press conference at the Arab League headquarters in Cairo, Egypt, Monday, July 13, 2026. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)
Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy speaks during a press conference at the Arab League headquarters in Cairo, Egypt, Monday, July 13, 2026. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)
TT

Arab League Secretary-General Reaffirms Support for Sudan’s Unity, National Institutions

Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy speaks during a press conference at the Arab League headquarters in Cairo, Egypt, Monday, July 13, 2026. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)
Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy speaks during a press conference at the Arab League headquarters in Cairo, Egypt, Monday, July 13, 2026. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)

Secretary-General of the League of Arab States Nabil Fahmy reaffirmed the organization’s support for Sudan’s unity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity during a phone call with Sudanese Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Mohieldin Salem.

He also reiterated the Arab League’s support for preserving Sudan’s national institutions and rejection of any external interference in the country’s internal affairs, the Saudi Press Agency reported on Wednesday.

During the call, Salem congratulated the Arab League chief on assuming office and wished him success in leading Arab joint action.

Fahmy stressed the importance of securing an immediate ceasefire, ensuring the delivery of humanitarian aid, and protecting civilians to pave the way for a Sudanese-owned political process that would achieve security, stability, and development.

He also affirmed the readiness of the Arab League’s General Secretariat to support efforts aimed at ending the crisis and to coordinate with regional and international parties in a manner that serves Sudan’s interests.