Advanced US Radar and Special Israeli Unit to Hunt Hamas Leader, Sinwar

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)
Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)
TT

Advanced US Radar and Special Israeli Unit to Hunt Hamas Leader, Sinwar

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)
Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades member who was killed in fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021 (AFP)

By Mark Mazzetti, Ronen Bergman, Julian E. Barnes and Adam Goldman

 

In January, Israeli and American officials thought they had caught a break in the hunt for one of the world’s most wanted men.
Israeli commandos raided an elaborate tunnel complex in the southern Gaza Strip on Jan. 31 based on intelligence that Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader, was hiding there, according to American and Israeli officials.
He had been, it turned out. But Sinwar had left the bunker beneath the city of Khan Younis just days earlier, leaving behind documents and stacks of Israeli shekels totaling about $1 million. The hunt went on, with a dearth of hard evidence on his whereabouts.
Since the Oct. 7 attacks in Israel that he planned and directed, Sinwar has been something of a ghost: never appearing in public, rarely releasing messages for his followers and giving up few clues about where he might be.
He is by far Hamas’s most important figure, and his success in evading capture or death has denied Israel the ability to make a foundational claim: that it has won the war and eradicated Hamas in a conflict that has decimated the group’s ranks but also destroyed the Gaza Strip and killed tens of thousands of civilians.
American and Israeli officials said Sinwar abandoned electronic communications long ago, and he has so far avoided a sophisticated intelligence dragnet. He is believed to stay in touch with the organization he leads through a network of human couriers. How that system works remains a mystery.
It is a playbook used by Hamas leaders in the past, and by other leaders like Osama bin Laden. And yet Sinwar’s situation is more complex, and even more frustrating to American and Israeli officials.
Unlike bin Laden in his last years, Sinwar is actively managing a military campaign. Diplomats involved in ceasefire negotiations in Doha, Qatar, say that Hamas representatives insist they need Sinwar’s input before they make major decisions in the talks. As the most respected Hamas leader, he is the only person who can ensure that whatever is decided in Doha is implemented in Gaza.
Interviews with more than two dozen officials in Israel and the United States reveal that both countries have poured vast resources into trying to find Sinwar.
Officials have set up a special unit inside the headquarters of Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence service, and American spy agencies have been tasked with intercepting Sinwar’s communications. The United States has also provided ground-penetrating radar to Israel to help in the hunt for him and other Hamas commanders.
Killing or capturing Sinwar would undoubtedly have a dramatic impact on the war. American officials believe it would offer Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel a way to claim a significant military victory and potentially make him more willing to end military operations in Gaza.
But it is less clear what effect Sinwar’s death would have on negotiations for the release of hostages seized on Oct. 7. Removing him might make his successors far less willing to make a deal with Israel.
Communicating with Sinwar has become more difficult, said Israeli, Qatari, Egyptian and American officials. He used to respond to messages within days, but the officials said that it has taken much longer to get a response from him in recent months, and that some of his deputies at times have been his proxies in those discussions.
Sinwar, who is 61, was declared the group’s top political leader in early August, days after Ismail Haniyeh, the previous political chief, was killed in an Israeli assassination plot in Tehran.
But, in reality, Sinwar has long been considered Hamas’s de facto leader, even if the group’s political operatives based in Doha held the official leadership titles.
The pressure on the Hamas leader has made it far more difficult for him to communicate with military commanders and direct day-to-day operations, although American officials said that he still has the ability to dictate the group’s broad strategy.
It was weeks after the Oct. 7 attacks, which killed at least 1,200 people, when a special committee of senior Israeli intelligence and military officials approved a kill list of top Hamas commanders and political officials. Many of the men on the list, including Haniyeh, have been killed in the months since.
With each assassination, the Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, has put an “X” over a name on the diagram of the Hamas leadership he keeps on his wall.
But Sinwar, the most important of all, remains at large.
Life Underground
Before the war, Sinwar was a towering presence in Gaza.
He gave interviews, presided over military exercises and even made a televised appearance to present an award to a show depicting a Hamas attack on Israel — an eerie precursor to Oct. 7.
During the first weeks of the war, Israeli intelligence and military officials believe that Sinwar was living in a warren of tunnels beneath Gaza City, the largest city in the strip and one of the first targeted by Israeli military forces.
During one early raid on a tunnel in Gaza City, Israeli soldiers found a video — filmed days earlier — of Sinwar in the midst of moving his family to a different hiding spot under the city. Israeli intelligence officials believe that Sinwar kept his family with him for at least the first six months of the war.
Back then, Sinwar still used cellular and satellite phones — made possible by cell networks in the tunnels — and from time to time spoke to Hamas officials in Doha. American and Israeli spy agencies were able to monitor some of those calls but were not able to pinpoint his location.
As Gaza ran low on fuel, Gallant pushed for new shipments to Gaza to power generators needed to keep the cell networks running so that the Israeli eavesdropping could continue — over the objections of ultra right members of the Israeli government who wanted the fuel shipments cut off to punish the residents of Gaza.
During this period, the spy agencies gained glimpses of his life underground, including his voracious consumption of Israeli news media and his insistence on watching the 8pm news on Israeli TV.
In November, a freed Israeli hostage described how Sinwar had addressed a large number of Israeli captives not long after the Oct. 7 attacks. Speaking in Hebrew, which he learned during his years in an Israeli prison, Sinwar told them that they were safe where they were, and that no harm would come to them, according to the hostage’s account.
Israeli officials said that all Hamas operatives hiding underground, even Sinwar, must occasionally come out of the tunnels for health reasons. But the tunnel network is so vast and complex — and Hamas fighters have such good intelligence about the whereabouts of Israeli troops — that Sinwar can sometimes come above ground without being discovered.
Sinwar eventually moved south to Khan Younis, the city where he was born, Israeli and American officials believe, and probably occasionally traveled from there to the city of Rafah through a stretch of tunnel.
By the time the Khan Younis bunker was raided on Jan. 31, Sinwar had fled, Israeli officials said.
He stayed one step ahead of his pursuers, who sometimes made boastful comments about how close they were to finding him.
In late December, as Israeli military units began excavating tunnels in one area of the city, Gallant bragged to reporters that Sinwar “hears the bulldozers of the Israeli army above him, and he will meet the barrels of our guns soon.”
It appears Sinwar fled the Khan Younis bunker in some haste, leaving the many piles of Israeli shekels behind.
Shared Interests
Almost immediately after the Oct. 7 attacks, Israeli military intelligence and Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic security service, established a cell inside Shin Bet headquarters with the singular mission of finding Sinwar.
The CIA also set up a task force, and the Pentagon dispatched special operations troops to Israel to advise the Israel forces on the looming war in Gaza.
The United States, which considers Hamas a terrorist organization, and Israel established channels to share information about the location of Sinwar and other top Hamas commanders, and the hostages.
“We’ve devoted considerable effort and resources to the Israelis for the hunt for the top leadership, particularly Sinwar,” said Jake Sullivan, the White House national security adviser. “We’ve had people in Israel sitting in the room with the Israelis working this problem set. And obviously we have a lot of experience hunting high-value targets.”
In particular, the Americans have deployed ground-penetrating radar to help map the hundreds of miles of tunnels they believe are under Gaza, with new imagery combined with Israeli intelligence gathered from captured Hamas fighters and troves of documents to build out a more complete picture of the tunnel network.
One senior Israeli official said American intelligence support had been “priceless.”
The Israelis and Americans have a mutual interest in locating Hamas commanders and the dozens of hostages, including Americans, who remain in Gaza.
But one person familiar with the intelligence-sharing arrangement, who discussed it on the condition of anonymity, describes it as often “very lopsided” — with the Americans sharing more than the Israelis give in return. At times, the person said, the Americans provide information about Hamas leaders in the hopes that the Israelis will direct some of their own intelligence resources toward finding the American hostages.
Rise to the Top
During the 1980s, in the years after he was recruited by Hamas’s founder, Sheik Ahmed Yassin, Sinwar’s influence in the group grew steadily.
He took over as the head of Hamas’s internal security unit, a group charged with finding and punishing Palestinians suspected of collaborating with Israeli authorities as well as anyone who commits blasphemy.
He spent years in an Israeli prison but was released in October 2011 along with more than 1,000 other prisoners as part of an exchange for Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier captured by Hamas.
In 2017, Sinwar was named Hamas’s leader in Gaza.
While he has had an outsized impact on decision-making within Hamas, Sinwar has shaped his positions in close coordination with a group of Hamas political and military leaders in Gaza, according to analysts who have studied Hamas.
The circle of confidants has included Marwan Issa, a Hamas military commander killed in March; Rawhi Mushtaha, a member of Hamas’s political office in Gaza; Izzeldin al-Haddad, a senior commander in the military wing; Mohammed Sinwar, Sinwar’s brother and a top official in the military wing; and Muhammad Deif, the leader of the military wing, according to Ibrahim al-Madhoun, an Istanbul-based expert who maintains a close relationship with Hamas.
But Sinwar’s network of advisers has been steadily shrinking: Some top Hamas commanders have been killed, some captured, and others were outside of Gaza when the war began and have not been able to return since.
Deif was the most senior adviser to Sinwar, but was less disciplined than his boss. He came above ground far more regularly, allowing Western intelligence agencies to pinpoint his whereabouts.
It was on one of those occasions, Israeli officials say, when he was killed in an airstrike.

 

The New York Times



Damascus, SDF Move to Close Political Detainee File

Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 
Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 
TT

Damascus, SDF Move to Close Political Detainee File

Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 
Former detainees released from Alaya Prison, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Qamishli, in February (Al-Furat). 

Syrian authorities are working with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to close the file of political detainees held by both sides, as part of ongoing coordination between Damascus and the Kurdish-led force.

Families in al-Hasakah province recently demanded the release of relatives from Alaya Prison in Qamishli, which remains under SDF control. Local sources said prison officials told families that no detainees remained at the facility and that some prisoners had been transferred to Iraq last month along with other Syrian inmates under a bilateral arrangement reportedly mediated by Washington.

At the same time, the Syrian government is preparing to resolve the broader detainee issue linked to the SDF. A presidential team operating in al-Hasakah is compiling lists of prisoners held by the SDF in preparation for their release. In return, Damascus is expected to free a new group of detainees held by the government in the coming days.

Video circulating online showed families gathering outside Alaya Prison seeking information about their relatives. The Hasakah Media Center said SDF personnel told them the prison held no detainees and that those previously held had been transferred to Iraq on terrorism-related charges.

Families told the outlet that some detainees had been arrested by the SDF for raising the Syrian flag, displaying images of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, or posting comments on social media.

Local reports, however, suggest some prisoners may still be held in Alaya. The SDF had previously transferred detainees there from al-Hasakah Central Prison, widely known as Ghuwayran Prison, before it was handed over to government authorities. Other detention sites include prisons in al-Aqtaan and al-Shaddadi.

Alaya Prison has been one of the SDF’s main detention facilities for individuals accused of criminal, security, or political offenses. According to available figures, it previously held about 1,000 detainees, most of whom have since been released.

A second round of prisoner releases involving SDF detainees is expected soon. Brigadier General Ziad al-Ayesh, the Syrian presidential envoy overseeing implementation of the January 29, 2026 agreement between Damascus and the SDF, said the process would include individuals previously detained during clashes with government forces in earlier “law-enforcement operations.”

In an interview with Syrian Al-Ikhbariah TV, al-Ayesh said the Syrian state intends to take over prisons formerly controlled by the SDF. Their administration would be transferred to the Interior Ministry and placed under judicial supervision by the Justice Ministry to ensure full state oversight.

He added that Damascus is also working with the SDF to release all political detainees, prisoners of conscience, and those detained in connection with events during the years of the Syrian uprising.

On March 10, the Syrian government and the SDF exchanged the release of 200 detainees. Al-Ayesh stated that Damascus aims to close the detainee file as part of a broader “national integration” process intended to promote reconciliation and strengthen the country’s unity.

Meanwhile, in remarks during a funeral for SDF fighters in Ayn al-Arab (Kobani), SDF commander Mazloum Abdi said that the group is working to return about 300 prisoners to the Syrian government in the coming days, as well as recover the bodies of fighters killed in recent clashes.

Further releases are expected before Nowruz on March 21, which Syria will celebrate this year for the first time as an official national holiday under Decree No. 17.

 

 

 


Iraq Warns Drone Strikes Could Trigger al-Qaeda Prison Break

Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)
Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)
TT

Iraq Warns Drone Strikes Could Trigger al-Qaeda Prison Break

Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)
Mourners pray by the caskets of two slain fighters from Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataeb Hezbollah), who were killed in a strike on their site in Baghdad's al-Jadriya area, during their funeral at the shrine of Imam Ali in Iraq's central holy city of Najaf on March 14, 2026. (Photo by Qassem al-KAABI / AFP)

Iraq’s Ministry of Justice warned Sunday that repeated drone attacks near Baghdad International Airport pose a danger to a nearby prison holding high-risk al-Qaeda inmates.

In a statement, the ministry said areas around the airport and Airport Prison - also known as Karkh Central Prison near Abu Ghraib - have been struck several times in recent days. The most serious attack occurred late Saturday, when projectiles landed close to the facility.

“Some of these strikes occurred near the prison, raising concerns about the security of a facility that houses highly dangerous terrorist prisoners,” the ministry said.

Authorities stressed that security measures remain in place but warned that projectiles landing nearby could disrupt precautionary plans or damage prison infrastructure.

The attacks targeted the Logistics Support Center at Baghdad airport, which has faced multiple drone strikes in recent days. The facility is located near Victoria Base, where US military advisers are stationed. Karkh Central Prison, next to the airport, is believed to hold al-Qaeda members transferred from Syria to Iraq.

A security source said inmates have been chanting slogans inside the prison whenever drones strike nearby, apparently hoping the attacks might create an opportunity to escape.

Electricity to the prison was also cut after unidentified attackers struck the al-Zaytoun power station, which supplies the facility, the source said. Authorities activated backup generators to maintain operations.

The source warned the situation could echo the 2013 prison break, when hundreds of militants escaped Iraqi prisons and later helped extremist groups seize large parts of Iraq in 2014 after advancing from Syria.

An Iraqi security official said air defenses at the Logistics Support Center, formerly Camp Victoria, engaged three explosive-laden drones on Saturday evening.

The drones were shot down near the US facility and the Martyr Mohammed Alaa Air Base, the source said, without providing details on casualties or damage. Another drone approaching the airport earlier Saturday was also intercepted.

Political Reaction

Iraq’s Coordination Framework, a coalition of Shiite political factions, condemned what it described as attacks targeting positions of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and other security units that left several personnel dead or wounded.

The bloc said the strikes violate Iraq’s sovereignty and threaten national stability, while reiterating opposition to attacks on state infrastructure and diplomatic missions.

The statement came hours after a strike killed three PMF members at a site in Baghdad, followed by a rocket attack on the US Embassy in the capital.

Calls to Review US Security Pact

Meanwhile, Shiite lawmakers are pushing to cancel the US-Iraq security agreement signed in 2009 under former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki.

MP Saqr Hassan of the Sadiqoun bloc said he had collected more than 170 parliamentary signatures requesting that the agreement’s cancellation be debated in the next session. He added the move was prompted by what lawmakers describe as US violations of the agreement, calling recent actions “a betrayal and an unjustified attack.”

Lawmakers are also awaiting a decision from parliamentary leaders on holding a special session to debate canceling the pact and possibly closing the US Embassy in Baghdad.


Lebanon–Israel Talks: A ‘Political Declaration’ and Return to UN Resolution 1701?

Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
TT

Lebanon–Israel Talks: A ‘Political Declaration’ and Return to UN Resolution 1701?

Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 

Hopes for imminent negotiations between Lebanon and Israel have been tempered after Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Sunday that no talks are expected in the coming days, despite reports suggesting discussions could begin this week on a French-backed plan to end the conflict.

France’s Foreign Ministry also said there was no French initiative currently on the table, casting further doubt on speculation about a diplomatic breakthrough.

Reports in Tel Aviv had suggested negotiations might begin Wednesday around a proposal centered on a political declaration that could serve as the basis for a non-aggression agreement between the two countries and possibly pave the way for a broader peace arrangement.

But Saar said Israel has no intention of entering direct negotiations with Lebanon to end the war that began earlier this month.

Political sources in Tel Aviv described his comments as a familiar Israeli tactic aimed at maintaining pressure on Hezbollah and the Lebanese government while keeping the diplomatic track ambiguous. According to these sources, Israel is unlikely to enter negotiations unless Hezbollah halts its attacks.

A Lebanese official told Agence France-Presse on Saturday that “negotiations are on the table and preparations are under way to form a delegation,” but stressed that Lebanon needs an Israeli commitment to a ceasefire before talks can begin.

Israel’s Channel 12 reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has tasked former strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer with handling the Lebanese file and managing any potential negotiations with the United States and Lebanon.

A source in Tel Aviv also said the US administration had asked Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, to oversee the negotiations.

Meanwhile, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, speaking in Beirut, said diplomatic channels remain open to end the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

‘Positive Contribution’

Political sources in Tel Aviv said Washington had urged Israel to help create conditions for negotiations by reducing strikes in Lebanon and avoiding civilian infrastructure.

That request, however, reportedly lost momentum after the bombing of the Zahrani Bridge over the Litani River. According to the sources, Washington’s main red lines for Israel are avoiding strikes on Beirut–Rafic Hariri International Airport and the city’s seaport.

Channel 12 reported that the proposed negotiations would focus on a political declaration in which Lebanon would recognize Israel while Israel would affirm Lebanon’s territorial integrity.

The process would begin with a ceasefire followed by a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory.

Sources familiar with the proposal said the plan — reportedly drafted by France — includes what would be an unprecedented step: Lebanese recognition of Israel. Negotiations supported by the United States and France would aim to reach the political declaration within a month.

Paris or Cyprus?

Talks would initially take place at the level of senior diplomats before moving to higher-level political negotiations. France reportedly wants to host the discussions in Paris, while Israel prefers Cyprus.

The proposed declaration would reaffirm Israel’s commitment to Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Both sides would also recommit to UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 war, as well as the 2024 ceasefire agreement.

Lebanon would pledge to prevent attacks on Israel from its territory and move ahead with plans to disarm Hezbollah and end its military activity. The Lebanese Army would redeploy south of the Litani River, while Israel would withdraw within a month from areas captured since the start of the current conflict.

Monitoring of ceasefire violations would be carried out through a US-led mechanism. UNIFIL would verify Hezbollah’s disarmament south of the Litani, while an international coalition authorized by the UN Security Council would oversee broader disarmament across Lebanon.

Under the French proposal, Lebanon would declare its readiness to negotiate a permanent non-aggression agreement with Israel within two months, formally ending the state of war between the two countries.

Israel would then withdraw from five positions in southern Lebanon that its forces have held since November 2024. The final stage would involve demarcating permanent borders between Israel and Lebanon — and between Lebanon and Syria — by the end of 2026.