US Judge Finds Israel's NSO Group Liable for Hacking in WhatsApp Lawsuithttps://english.aawsat.com/technology/5093832-us-judge-finds-israels-nso-group-liable-hacking-whatsapp-lawsuit
US Judge Finds Israel's NSO Group Liable for Hacking in WhatsApp Lawsuit
Israeli cyber firm NSO Group's exhibition stand is seen at "ISDEF 2019", an international defense and homeland security expo, in Tel Aviv, Israel June 4, 2019. REUTERS/Keren Manor/File Photo
US Judge Finds Israel's NSO Group Liable for Hacking in WhatsApp Lawsuit
Israeli cyber firm NSO Group's exhibition stand is seen at "ISDEF 2019", an international defense and homeland security expo, in Tel Aviv, Israel June 4, 2019. REUTERS/Keren Manor/File Photo
A US judge ruled on Friday in favor of Meta Platforms' WhatsApp in a lawsuit accusing Israel's NSO Group of exploiting a bug in the messaging app to install spy software allowing unauthorized surveillance.
US District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland, California, granted a motion by WhatsApp and found NSO liable for hacking and breach of contract.
The case will now proceed to a trial only on the issue of damages, Hamilton said. NSO Group did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment, according to Reuters.
Will Cathcart, the head of WhatsApp, said the ruling is a win for privacy.
"We spent five years presenting our case because we firmly believe that spyware companies could not hide behind immunity or avoid accountability for their unlawful actions," Cathcart said in a social media post.
"Surveillance companies should be on notice that illegal spying will not be tolerated."
Cybersecurity experts welcomed the judgment.
John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher with Canadian internet watchdog Citizen Lab — which first brought to light NSO’s Pegasus spyware in 2016 — called the judgment a landmark ruling with “huge implications for the spyware industry.”
“The entire industry has hidden behind the claim that whatever their customers do with their hacking tools, it's not their responsibility,” he said in an instant message. “Today's ruling makes it clear that NSO Group is in fact responsible for breaking numerous laws.”
WhatsApp in 2019 sued NSO seeking an injunction and damages, accusing it of accessing WhatsApp servers without permission six months earlier to install the Pegasus software on victims' mobile devices. The lawsuit alleged the intrusion allowed the surveillance of 1,400 people, including journalists, human rights activists and dissidents.
NSO had argued that Pegasus helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies fight crime and protect national security and that its technology is intended to help catch terrorists, pedophiles and hardened criminals.
NSO appealed a trial judge's 2020 refusal to award it "conduct-based immunity," a common law doctrine protecting foreign officials acting in their official capacity.
Upholding that ruling in 2021, the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals called it an "easy case" because NSO's mere licensing of Pegasus and offering technical support did not shield it from liability under a federal law called the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, which took precedence over common law.
The US Supreme Court last year turned away NSO's appeal of the lower court's decision, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.
Google, Meta, TikTok Hit by EU Consumer Complaints about Handling of Financial Scamshttps://english.aawsat.com/technology/5275768-google-meta-tiktok-hit-eu-consumer-complaints-about-handling-financial-scams
FILE PHOTO: The logo of Meta is seen during the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo
Google, Meta, TikTok Hit by EU Consumer Complaints about Handling of Financial Scams
FILE PHOTO: The logo of Meta is seen during the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo
Alphabet's Google, Meta Platforms and TikTok were hit with complaints from European Union consumer groups on Thursday for allegedly failing to protect users from financial scams on their platforms, putting them at risk of regulatory fines.
The move highlights growing pressure worldwide on Big Tech to do more to address the negative impacts of social media, particularly for children and vulnerable users.
The complaints, filed by the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) and 29 of its members in 27 European countries, were submitted to the European Commission and national regulators under the Digital Services Act, which requires large online platforms to do more to tackle illegal and harmful content, Reuters reported.
"Meta, TikTok and Google not only fail to proactively remove fraudulent ads but also do little when being notified about such scams," BEUC Director General Agustin Reyna said in a statement.
"If they fail to address the financial scams circulating on their platforms, fraudsters will continue to reach millions of European consumers daily, leaving people at risk of losing hundreds to thousands of euros to fraud," he said. Google and Meta rejected the complaints and said they work proactively to protect their users.
A Google spokesperson said: "We strictly enforce our ad policies, blocking over 99% of violating ads before they ever run. Our teams constantly update these defences to stay ahead of scammers and protect people."
Meta said it found and removed over 159 million scam ads last year, 92% before anyone reported them. "We invest in advanced AI, tools, and partnerships to stop them," a spokesperson said.
TikTok said it takes action against violations, adding that scams are an industry-wide challenge while bad actors constantly adapt their tactics.
The consumer groups, meanwhile, said they reported nearly 900 ads suspected of breaching EU laws between December last year and March this year but the platforms only took down 27% of the ads and 52% of the reports were rejected or ignored.
The groups urged regulators to investigate whether the companies were complying with the rules and to impose fines for breaches.
DSA fines can reach as much as 6% of a company's global annual turnover.
SDAIA Outlines Comprehensive Data Quality Journey to Support National AI Initiativeshttps://english.aawsat.com/technology/5275751-sdaia-outlines-comprehensive-data-quality-journey-support-national-ai
SDAIA Outlines Comprehensive Data Quality Journey to Support National AI Initiatives
The Saudi Authority for Data and Artificial Intelligence (SDAIA)
The Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA) highlighted data quality as a critical foundation for enhancing information reliability, boosting performance, and enabling accurate business decisions, as part of its efforts during the Year of Artificial Intelligence 2026 to raise awareness about data importance.
The authority noted that high data quality serves as the cornerstone for sustainable national trust, integrated digital services, operational savings, entrepreneurship, and readiness for artificial intelligence applications, SPA reported.
SDAIA stated that the data quality journey spans five phases, beginning with a creation phase, where data is entered according to standardized criteria.
This is followed by a storage and organization phase to structure data and eliminate duplication, and an integration and sharing phase, which assesses quality before data is reused.
The journey continues through an analysis and use phase, where report accuracy is tied directly to source quality, and culminates in a continuous improvement phase, which utilizes analysis and user feedback to constantly refine data sets.
SDAIA called on organizations to adopt comprehensive data quality practices and strictly adhere to national regulations and standards. This includes integrated data quality planning, prioritizing initial assessments, developing data rules, and establishing clear performance indicators to measure improvement.
The authority also emphasized the importance of conducting periodic reviews and enabling users to report quality problems, which will ultimately maximize the efficiency of digital services and AI applications across the Kingdom.
Dell to Asharq Al-Awsat: AI in Saudi Arabia Enters Production, Not Experimentation Phasehttps://english.aawsat.com/technology/5275232-dell-asharq-al-awsat-ai-saudi-arabia-enters-production-not-experimentation-phase
Dell to Asharq Al-Awsat: AI in Saudi Arabia Enters Production, Not Experimentation Phase
Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
Saudi Arabia became a focal point of discussion in the “Dell Technologies World 2026” in Las Vegas this week about the next phase of artificial intelligence.
The question is no longer just about the size of investment in infrastructure or national capacity building, but about the difference the Kingdom can make in a global market transitioning from AI experimentation to its operational deployment within institutions.
In exclusive remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Michael Dell, Chairman and CEO of Dell Technologies, stated that what the company sees in Saudi Arabia is a “deep commitment to modernizing the Kingdom,” highlighting its significant energy resources and Dell's collaboration with Humain and other companies in the Kingdom, in addition to a regional facility through which the company works to “aggregate these capabilities and build infrastructure for customers in the region.”
He added that every country today is going through a phase of re-understanding what the transition towards AI means, and how citizens and industries can be empowered to drive the economy forward. In the same session, Dell described Saudi Vision 2030 as “highly ambitious,” and the ambition for AI under this vision as “impressive.”
The Operation Test
From this point, the real discussion about Saudi Arabia and artificial intelligence begins. The narrative is no longer solely about the volume of investments, the speed of data center construction, or the number of announced national projects.
The challenge of the next test relates to how this national capability can be transformed into operational value within government entities, banks, hospitals, energy and telecommunications companies, and smart cities. It's about how institutions move from AI experiments to systems that operate daily, on real data, within secure environments, and at a predictable cost.
Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies, places this transformation in a clear context.
In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the conference, he states that the biggest barrier for institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf as they transition from AI experimentation to production is not a single isolated factor, but an interconnected system encompassing infrastructure, governance, skills, cyber resilience, cost, and operating models.
However, he considers “data readiness” to be the primary obstacle. He adds: “Without a reliable and AI-ready data foundation, even the most advanced infrastructure is insufficient, and pilot projects falter before reaching production.”
Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
Data Before the Model
This point appears fundamental to Dell's assessment of the Saudi phase, as the company indicates that 96 percent of Saudi institutions now view AI as a key part of their business strategy, according to its research on the state of innovation and AI.
However, this indicator, despite its importance, does not mean that the path to production has become easy. Many institutions still operate through outdated and fragmented systems, distributed data, inconsistent governance, and limited access to reliable real-time data.
According to Amin, the fastest-advancing institutions are those that treat AI “not as a standalone tool, but as a transformation of the entire operating model.”
Here lies the difference between ambition and operational infrastructure. An institution that wants to use AI for customer service, risk management, predictive maintenance, or patient data analysis not only needs a robust model but also requires its data to be discoverable, governed, reliable, and usable by AI systems in a timely manner.
Amin defines AI-ready data as data that is “discoverable, governed, reliable, and usable by AI systems in real-time.” This definition transforms the discussion from a narrow technical question to an institutional one: Does the institution know where its data is, who can use it, and can it be trusted when fed into a model or intelligent agent?
Data from Sensitive Sectors
In the Saudi banking sector, this could mean linking customer, transaction, and risk data across different environments while maintaining compliance and governance. In hospitals, it involves securely organizing clinical and imaging data so that AI can support diagnosis or improve operations without compromising patient privacy. For government entities, it means unifying citizen and operational data while preserving sovereignty and security controls. As for energy companies, it might involve combining operational, sensor, and geographic data to support predictive maintenance and improve performance.
Dell states that updates to its Dell AI Data Platform specifically target this point, by indexing billions of files and linking them into governed data pipelines. The platform includes capabilities such as GPU-accelerated SQL analytics, achieving up to six times faster performance, and vector indexing up to 12 times faster.
These details might seem technical, but they actually determine the speed at which an institution transitions from a limited experiment to a widely operational AI service. The slower data is accessed or the less organized it is, the more the data pipelines themselves become an operational bottleneck. Amin notes that these capabilities help reduce response time, improve accuracy, and expand AI services with higher efficiency.
Local Operating Economics
As AI transitions to more sensitive and continuous workloads, another question emerges: when does private or institution-controlled infrastructure become more suitable than the public cloud? Amin does not present this as a stark choice between cloud and private infrastructure; he believes the public cloud remains important for experimentation, flexibility, and quick access to AI services. However, he adds that there comes a stage where controlled infrastructure becomes “strategically better,” especially when workloads involve sensitive national or financial data, or when response time requirements are critical.
This aligns with what Dell presented at the conference regarding Deskside Agentic AI, a solution aimed at running some AI agents locally on high-performance workstations, rather than relying entirely on cloud programming interfaces.
The company states that this solution can, in some cases, reach a break-even point with the cost of cloud programming interfaces within three months, and reduce spending by up to 87 percent within two years. Amin interprets these figures from a broader perspective, stating that technology managers in Saudi Arabia must evaluate the economics of AI “over its full lifecycle, not just by focusing on initial infrastructure costs.” The cloud might appear attractive at the outset, but it can become more expensive when running continuous generative or agentic workloads at the scale of a large enterprise.
Processor Efficiency
For Saudi Arabia, this issue is also linked to sectors with regulatory and sensitive natures. Amin acknowledges that the most realistic use cases today are those that deliver clear productive and operational value while maintaining manageable governance.
He points out that private assistants within institutions and workflow in regulated sectors represent a compelling starting point in the Kingdom, due to the strong focus on data security and sovereignty. He also believes that programming assistants are rapidly gaining momentum because they offer direct benefits to development teams.
The transition to production requires not only data and architecture but also infrastructure capable of handling high workload density. In heavy AI environments, processing units are insufficient if data does not move quickly between computing, storage, and applications.
Amin notes that the network design in PowerRack includes a switching capacity exceeding 800 terabits per second per rack, explaining that the practical meaning of this capacity is to eliminate data traffic bottlenecks between GPUs, storage, and applications. The longer GPUs wait for data, the lower the efficiency of infrastructure investment. Conversely, when data moves with low latency, training and inference operations become faster and more effective.
Cooling as a Strategic Factor
This discussion cannot be separated from cooling and power, as AI increases rack density and power requirements within data centers, making cooling a strategic, not just operational, factor.
Amin notes that the ability of Dell PowerCool C7000 to support facility water temperatures up to 40 degrees Celsius means that data centers can operate with higher efficiency in hot climates, reducing reliance on energy-intensive cooling.
In Saudi Arabia, where the government and private sector are investing in sovereign AI infrastructure, he believes that cooling “is no longer merely an operational issue,” but has become linked to scalability, energy efficiency, and long-term viability.
Data and Model Security
Cyber resilience is part of AI readiness; an intelligent system is not reliable if its data is corruptible, its models are exploitable, or its infrastructure is not recoverable. Amin points out that an AI system “is only as reliable as the data and models it operates on,” and a cyberattack that corrupts data or harms a model can have significant consequences.
Therefore, he believes that the maturity of cyber resilience will directly impact the extent to which institutions trust expanding their adoption of AI. Here, Dell offers tools like Cyber Detect, which it claims can detect data corruption resulting from ransomware attacks and accurately identify the last known clean version.
Openness and Sovereignty
With Dell's expanded partnerships with Google, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Palantir, ServiceNow, and SpaceXAI, the company emphasizes that institutions do not want to tie their AI strategy to a single model, cloud platform, or infrastructure package.
This openness, in Amin's view, gives institutions a “choice” and reduces vendor lock-in risks, allowing them to develop their capabilities as technology evolves. This is crucial in a fast-moving market like Saudi Arabia, where integration and interoperability can become strategic advantages in themselves.
When Mohamed Amin was asked about the Saudi sectors that would first require AI-ready infrastructure, he placed government, energy, telecommunications, finance, and smart cities at the forefront, due to the volume of their data, their national importance, and the operational value that AI can unlock.
These sectors are also most closely linked to sovereignty, compliance, and security requirements. Therefore, building a secure and scalable AI infrastructure appears not merely a technical upgrade, but part of institutions' ability to transform the Vision's ambitions into measurable daily operations.
Between Michael Dell's response regarding Saudi Arabia and Mohamed Amin's vision for the region, the picture of the next phase becomes clear. The Kingdom is not entering the AI race merely from the perspective of consumption or experimentation, but from the perspective of building institutional capability.
However, true capability will not be measured solely by the number of data centers or the volume of investment, but by institutions' ability to prepare their data, choose where to run their workloads, manage costs, protect their models and data, and scale their use without losing control or governance.
لم تشترك بعد
انشئ حساباً خاصاً بك لتحصل على أخبار مخصصة لك ولتتمتع بخاصية حفظ المقالات وتتلقى نشراتنا البريدية المتنوعة
