Dell to Asharq Al-Awsat: AI in Saudi Arabia Enters Production, Not Experimentation Phase

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
TT

Dell to Asharq Al-Awsat: AI in Saudi Arabia Enters Production, Not Experimentation Phase

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies

Saudi Arabia became a focal point of discussion in the “Dell Technologies World 2026” in Las Vegas this week about the next phase of artificial intelligence.

The question is no longer just about the size of investment in infrastructure or national capacity building, but about the difference the Kingdom can make in a global market transitioning from AI experimentation to its operational deployment within institutions.

In exclusive remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Michael Dell, Chairman and CEO of Dell Technologies, stated that what the company sees in Saudi Arabia is a “deep commitment to modernizing the Kingdom,” highlighting its significant energy resources and Dell's collaboration with Humain and other companies in the Kingdom, in addition to a regional facility through which the company works to “aggregate these capabilities and build infrastructure for customers in the region.”

He added that every country today is going through a phase of re-understanding what the transition towards AI means, and how citizens and industries can be empowered to drive the economy forward. In the same session, Dell described Saudi Vision 2030 as “highly ambitious,” and the ambition for AI under this vision as “impressive.”

The Operation Test

From this point, the real discussion about Saudi Arabia and artificial intelligence begins. The narrative is no longer solely about the volume of investments, the speed of data center construction, or the number of announced national projects.

The challenge of the next test relates to how this national capability can be transformed into operational value within government entities, banks, hospitals, energy and telecommunications companies, and smart cities. It's about how institutions move from AI experiments to systems that operate daily, on real data, within secure environments, and at a predictable cost.

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies, places this transformation in a clear context.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the conference, he states that the biggest barrier for institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf as they transition from AI experimentation to production is not a single isolated factor, but an interconnected system encompassing infrastructure, governance, skills, cyber resilience, cost, and operating models.

However, he considers “data readiness” to be the primary obstacle. He adds: “Without a reliable and AI-ready data foundation, even the most advanced infrastructure is insufficient, and pilot projects falter before reaching production.”

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies

Data Before the Model

This point appears fundamental to Dell's assessment of the Saudi phase, as the company indicates that 96 percent of Saudi institutions now view AI as a key part of their business strategy, according to its research on the state of innovation and AI.

However, this indicator, despite its importance, does not mean that the path to production has become easy. Many institutions still operate through outdated and fragmented systems, distributed data, inconsistent governance, and limited access to reliable real-time data.

According to Amin, the fastest-advancing institutions are those that treat AI “not as a standalone tool, but as a transformation of the entire operating model.”

Here lies the difference between ambition and operational infrastructure. An institution that wants to use AI for customer service, risk management, predictive maintenance, or patient data analysis not only needs a robust model but also requires its data to be discoverable, governed, reliable, and usable by AI systems in a timely manner.

Amin defines AI-ready data as data that is “discoverable, governed, reliable, and usable by AI systems in real-time.” This definition transforms the discussion from a narrow technical question to an institutional one: Does the institution know where its data is, who can use it, and can it be trusted when fed into a model or intelligent agent?

Data from Sensitive Sectors

In the Saudi banking sector, this could mean linking customer, transaction, and risk data across different environments while maintaining compliance and governance. In hospitals, it involves securely organizing clinical and imaging data so that AI can support diagnosis or improve operations without compromising patient privacy. For government entities, it means unifying citizen and operational data while preserving sovereignty and security controls. As for energy companies, it might involve combining operational, sensor, and geographic data to support predictive maintenance and improve performance.

Dell states that updates to its Dell AI Data Platform specifically target this point, by indexing billions of files and linking them into governed data pipelines. The platform includes capabilities such as GPU-accelerated SQL analytics, achieving up to six times faster performance, and vector indexing up to 12 times faster.

These details might seem technical, but they actually determine the speed at which an institution transitions from a limited experiment to a widely operational AI service. The slower data is accessed or the less organized it is, the more the data pipelines themselves become an operational bottleneck. Amin notes that these capabilities help reduce response time, improve accuracy, and expand AI services with higher efficiency.

Local Operating Economics

As AI transitions to more sensitive and continuous workloads, another question emerges: when does private or institution-controlled infrastructure become more suitable than the public cloud? Amin does not present this as a stark choice between cloud and private infrastructure; he believes the public cloud remains important for experimentation, flexibility, and quick access to AI services. However, he adds that there comes a stage where controlled infrastructure becomes “strategically better,” especially when workloads involve sensitive national or financial data, or when response time requirements are critical.

This aligns with what Dell presented at the conference regarding Deskside Agentic AI, a solution aimed at running some AI agents locally on high-performance workstations, rather than relying entirely on cloud programming interfaces.

The company states that this solution can, in some cases, reach a break-even point with the cost of cloud programming interfaces within three months, and reduce spending by up to 87 percent within two years. Amin interprets these figures from a broader perspective, stating that technology managers in Saudi Arabia must evaluate the economics of AI “over its full lifecycle, not just by focusing on initial infrastructure costs.” The cloud might appear attractive at the outset, but it can become more expensive when running continuous generative or agentic workloads at the scale of a large enterprise.

Processor Efficiency

For Saudi Arabia, this issue is also linked to sectors with regulatory and sensitive natures. Amin acknowledges that the most realistic use cases today are those that deliver clear productive and operational value while maintaining manageable governance.

He points out that private assistants within institutions and workflow in regulated sectors represent a compelling starting point in the Kingdom, due to the strong focus on data security and sovereignty. He also believes that programming assistants are rapidly gaining momentum because they offer direct benefits to development teams.

The transition to production requires not only data and architecture but also infrastructure capable of handling high workload density. In heavy AI environments, processing units are insufficient if data does not move quickly between computing, storage, and applications.

Amin notes that the network design in PowerRack includes a switching capacity exceeding 800 terabits per second per rack, explaining that the practical meaning of this capacity is to eliminate data traffic bottlenecks between GPUs, storage, and applications. The longer GPUs wait for data, the lower the efficiency of infrastructure investment. Conversely, when data moves with low latency, training and inference operations become faster and more effective.

Cooling as a Strategic Factor

This discussion cannot be separated from cooling and power, as AI increases rack density and power requirements within data centers, making cooling a strategic, not just operational, factor.

Amin notes that the ability of Dell PowerCool C7000 to support facility water temperatures up to 40 degrees Celsius means that data centers can operate with higher efficiency in hot climates, reducing reliance on energy-intensive cooling.

In Saudi Arabia, where the government and private sector are investing in sovereign AI infrastructure, he believes that cooling “is no longer merely an operational issue,” but has become linked to scalability, energy efficiency, and long-term viability.

Data and Model Security

Cyber resilience is part of AI readiness; an intelligent system is not reliable if its data is corruptible, its models are exploitable, or its infrastructure is not recoverable. Amin points out that an AI system “is only as reliable as the data and models it operates on,” and a cyberattack that corrupts data or harms a model can have significant consequences.

Therefore, he believes that the maturity of cyber resilience will directly impact the extent to which institutions trust expanding their adoption of AI. Here, Dell offers tools like Cyber Detect, which it claims can detect data corruption resulting from ransomware attacks and accurately identify the last known clean version.

Openness and Sovereignty

With Dell's expanded partnerships with Google, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Palantir, ServiceNow, and SpaceXAI, the company emphasizes that institutions do not want to tie their AI strategy to a single model, cloud platform, or infrastructure package.

This openness, in Amin's view, gives institutions a “choice” and reduces vendor lock-in risks, allowing them to develop their capabilities as technology evolves. This is crucial in a fast-moving market like Saudi Arabia, where integration and interoperability can become strategic advantages in themselves.

When Mohamed Amin was asked about the Saudi sectors that would first require AI-ready infrastructure, he placed government, energy, telecommunications, finance, and smart cities at the forefront, due to the volume of their data, their national importance, and the operational value that AI can unlock.

These sectors are also most closely linked to sovereignty, compliance, and security requirements. Therefore, building a secure and scalable AI infrastructure appears not merely a technical upgrade, but part of institutions' ability to transform the Vision's ambitions into measurable daily operations.

Between Michael Dell's response regarding Saudi Arabia and Mohamed Amin's vision for the region, the picture of the next phase becomes clear. The Kingdom is not entering the AI race merely from the perspective of consumption or experimentation, but from the perspective of building institutional capability.

However, true capability will not be measured solely by the number of data centers or the volume of investment, but by institutions' ability to prepare their data, choose where to run their workloads, manage costs, protect their models and data, and scale their use without losing control or governance.



Trump Confirms Meeting with Anthropic’s Amodei, Repeats Dismissal of AI Fears

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appears by video during a UN Security Council meeting on artificial intelligence during the 81st United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York on September 23, 2026. (AFP)
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appears by video during a UN Security Council meeting on artificial intelligence during the 81st United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York on September 23, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Trump Confirms Meeting with Anthropic’s Amodei, Repeats Dismissal of AI Fears

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appears by video during a UN Security Council meeting on artificial intelligence during the 81st United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York on September 23, 2026. (AFP)
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appears by video during a UN Security Council meeting on artificial intelligence during the 81st United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York on September 23, 2026. (AFP)

US President Donald Trump confirmed that he plans to have a dinner meeting with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on Sunday night, but reaffirmed his stance against slowing the pace of AI development.

Trump also reiterated his belief that new regulations would open the door for China to outpace the United States in AI advancement. Although he acknowledged Amodei's concern that going too fast on artificial intelligence could expand risks, Trump said it's more important for the United States to maintain a technological edge over China.

"We're about maybe a year and a half up on China," Trump told Fox ‌News while attending ‌the Presidents Cup golf tournament in Illinois. "We're leading, and we're building ‌tremendous, trillions ⁠of dollars' worth ⁠of places. And why should we give that up?"

Trump, confirming earlier reporting by Axios and Reuters, told Fox News that he would have dinner with Amodei on Sunday night. The meeting comes as the CEOs of Anthropic rivals have called for slowing development of increasingly capable AI systems. These include OpenAI, Google’s DeepMind, Microsoft and xAI.

A groundswell has risen in favor of federal intervention after OpenAI said in July that an autonomous AI agent went rogue during a security test and hacked ⁠into another company.

Incidents of rogue AI agents are not a cause ‌for alarm, Trump told Fox News. "I don't worry about ‌it," he said, adding that he remains confident in the technology and its potential.

Amodei is not the ‌only major tech figure trying to bend Trump's ear on AI regulation. In an ‌interview that aired earlier on Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said he would like to meet with Trump to discuss AI.

"I hope that, given my life's work in the field, my saying how unique and different this is and how concerned I am will add to what he's ‌hearing from other people," Gates said, echoing calls by Amodei and others for new AI regulations.

"You need law enforcement and the politicians ⁠to get into the ⁠discussion about what safeguards and monitoring look like," Gates said in a taped interview. "And that has to be a required thing."

Trump has previously described the chorus of AI concerns as a "hoax." Gates argued that safeguards would not dramatically hinder the industry, and that the risks of not implementing them are real.

"It's not a hoax at all," Gates told NBC.

Warnings about AI's risks are not new. But they took on added urgency this month after researchers in leading AI labs attached both a timeline and a probability to those concerns.

Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon warned that AI could kill us all by the end of the decade, prompting US lawmakers to call for new rules to govern the technology.

Evan Hubinger, Anthropic's alignment science lead, echoed Coxon's warning, saying there was a more than 10% chance of such an event within the next decade.


OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs Called to Appear at Australian AI Probe

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends a state dinner hosted by US President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump for Chinese President Xi Jinping and his wife, Peng Liyuan, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 24, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends a state dinner hosted by US President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump for Chinese President Xi Jinping and his wife, Peng Liyuan, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 24, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
TT

OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs Called to Appear at Australian AI Probe

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends a state dinner hosted by US President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump for Chinese President Xi Jinping and his wife, Peng Liyuan, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 24, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends a state dinner hosted by US President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump for Chinese President Xi Jinping and his wife, Peng Liyuan, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 24, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

The CEOs of ‌OpenAI and Anthropic have been called to appear at an Australian Senate inquiry on AI, the head of the probe said on Sunday, days after the revelation that a rogue OpenAI bot had hacked the country's health-system database.

The Medicare breach, condemned by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, is one of the highest-profile incidents of AI agents accessing external systems outside the US, said Reuters.

OpenAI's Sam Altman and Anthropic's Dario Amodei have been sent written requests ‌to appear at ‌the inquiry, which is to ‌hold public ⁠hearings in the capital ⁠Canberra on Thursday, said a spokesperson for Senator Sarah Hanson-Young of the Australian Greens party, who chairs the probe.

OpenAI and Anthropic did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours.

The OpenAI agent's incursion on one of the country's most used government agencies ⁠may prompt Albanese's Labor government to toughen ‌AI-specific laws it is ‌readying for next year, adding pressure to Australia-US relations already tested ‌by Canberra's ban on social media for teens, ‌tech policy experts say.

The Senate inquiry is examining the potential impacts of AI and data centers on Australian communities, industries, water and energy. It is one of several state ‌and federal probes into AI.

"There are serious questions for Sam Altman to answer about the ⁠OpenAI hack ⁠of Australian government websites," Hanson-Young said in a statement. Altman and Amodei "must front up, face the Senate's questions and have an honest conversation about what effective, lasting regulation of this industry should look like", she said.

Albanese, who revealed the June breach of Medicare on Thursday, called it "unacceptable", saying he had voiced "extreme concern" to Altman.

OpenAI says it only learned of the breach — one of at least four of Australian government websites — in August. It says the incident was not intentional and did not compromise any private information.


AI Startup Urges Optimism from Europe despite Safety Fears

'The main thing that can wipe out humanity is stupidity,' says Robin Rombach, CEO of AI startup Black Forest Labs. Silas Stein / AFP
'The main thing that can wipe out humanity is stupidity,' says Robin Rombach, CEO of AI startup Black Forest Labs. Silas Stein / AFP
TT

AI Startup Urges Optimism from Europe despite Safety Fears

'The main thing that can wipe out humanity is stupidity,' says Robin Rombach, CEO of AI startup Black Forest Labs. Silas Stein / AFP
'The main thing that can wipe out humanity is stupidity,' says Robin Rombach, CEO of AI startup Black Forest Labs. Silas Stein / AFP

Europe needs to view artificial intelligence with more optimism -- despite growing warnings about its dangers -- or risk falling further behind, the head of a leading European AI start-up warned.

"I think the mindset in Europe needs to shift to one of optimism and to one of opportunity, and not to one of risk and fear," Robin Rombach, CEO of German AI image generation specialist Black Forest Labs, told AFP.

Europe lags behind the United States and China when it comes to cutting-edge AI models. Policymakers and firms have been scrambling to find ways to make up lost ground.

But the debate has shifted to safety in recent weeks, after security lapses sparked calls from some industry leaders for development of the technology to be slowed down.

Based in the medieval German city of Freiburg, Rombach's company -- which takes its name from the nearby Black Forest -- has emerged as a prominent developer of AI image-generation models.

The startup, valued at around $3.25 billion, recently hit the headlines when it announced US director Martin Scorsese as an advisor, prompting an angry response from some in Hollywood concerned about AI taking production jobs.

Rombach, 33, helped develop latent diffusion, a breakthrough that underpins many of today's AI image-generation systems.

This propelled Rombach and a group of fellow computer scientists to found the AI lab in 2024. With just over 100 staff, its FLUX models generate still and moving images from text, and the company is now also expanding into physical AI.

Its latest model has been tested at carmaker Audi as part of a project aimed at enabling robots to perform production-line tasks.

Despite its roots in Freiburg -- Rombach comes from the area -- the firm's ties to the United States and its tech scene are also strong.

The company has a second headquarters in San Francisco and secured early backing from Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz.

- 'Stupidity' is biggest risk -

Rombach said that when Black Forest Labs was founded, there was no "real startup ecosystem" in Europe, particularly for "frontier deep tech".

"If you want to build a frontier model in a very competitive space, you need to do this quickly."

"Certain ingredients" are needed for success, such as a lot of capital and computing power, he added.

As well as Black Forest Labs, Europe has other competitive AI companies, including France's Mistral, but is still seen as trailing US firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic and Chinese labs such as DeepSeek.

Zach Meyers of CERRE, a Brussels-based think tank, echoed some of Rombach's concerns, saying the "biggest barrier" to AI growth and innovation in Europe was access to capital.

Most European companies rely on financing from banks, which are traditionally more cautious than venture capital investors about backing businesses that may take years to become profitable, said Meyers, an expert in EU digital policy.

"That is not how technology markets work, particularly with a really nascent technology like AI," he told AFP.

Safety concerns related to AI have escalated after incidents of the technology getting around controls during tests, sparking dire warnings from some about the threats that it poses.

Rombach emphasized his company's focus on "open-weight" AI models, some of which can be downloaded by researchers and developers, "increases transparency, increases safety".

He called for an open approach to AI development, warning it would be "fundamentally wrong" for such a crucial technology to be controlled by a few companies, rendering oversight more difficult.

But for Rombach, the biggest danger rests in potential human failings.

"The main thing that can wipe out humanity is stupidity," he said.