Dell to Asharq Al-Awsat: AI in Saudi Arabia Enters Production, Not Experimentation Phase

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
TT

Dell to Asharq Al-Awsat: AI in Saudi Arabia Enters Production, Not Experimentation Phase

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies
Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies

Saudi Arabia became a focal point of discussion in the “Dell Technologies World 2026” in Las Vegas this week about the next phase of artificial intelligence.

The question is no longer just about the size of investment in infrastructure or national capacity building, but about the difference the Kingdom can make in a global market transitioning from AI experimentation to its operational deployment within institutions.

In exclusive remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Michael Dell, Chairman and CEO of Dell Technologies, stated that what the company sees in Saudi Arabia is a “deep commitment to modernizing the Kingdom,” highlighting its significant energy resources and Dell's collaboration with Humain and other companies in the Kingdom, in addition to a regional facility through which the company works to “aggregate these capabilities and build infrastructure for customers in the region.”

He added that every country today is going through a phase of re-understanding what the transition towards AI means, and how citizens and industries can be empowered to drive the economy forward. In the same session, Dell described Saudi Vision 2030 as “highly ambitious,” and the ambition for AI under this vision as “impressive.”

The Operation Test

From this point, the real discussion about Saudi Arabia and artificial intelligence begins. The narrative is no longer solely about the volume of investments, the speed of data center construction, or the number of announced national projects.

The challenge of the next test relates to how this national capability can be transformed into operational value within government entities, banks, hospitals, energy and telecommunications companies, and smart cities. It's about how institutions move from AI experiments to systems that operate daily, on real data, within secure environments, and at a predictable cost.

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies, places this transformation in a clear context.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the conference, he states that the biggest barrier for institutions in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf as they transition from AI experimentation to production is not a single isolated factor, but an interconnected system encompassing infrastructure, governance, skills, cyber resilience, cost, and operating models.

However, he considers “data readiness” to be the primary obstacle. He adds: “Without a reliable and AI-ready data foundation, even the most advanced infrastructure is insufficient, and pilot projects falter before reaching production.”

Mohammed Amin, Senior Vice President for Central Eastern Europe, Middle East, Türkiye and Africa at Dell Technologies

Data Before the Model

This point appears fundamental to Dell's assessment of the Saudi phase, as the company indicates that 96 percent of Saudi institutions now view AI as a key part of their business strategy, according to its research on the state of innovation and AI.

However, this indicator, despite its importance, does not mean that the path to production has become easy. Many institutions still operate through outdated and fragmented systems, distributed data, inconsistent governance, and limited access to reliable real-time data.

According to Amin, the fastest-advancing institutions are those that treat AI “not as a standalone tool, but as a transformation of the entire operating model.”

Here lies the difference between ambition and operational infrastructure. An institution that wants to use AI for customer service, risk management, predictive maintenance, or patient data analysis not only needs a robust model but also requires its data to be discoverable, governed, reliable, and usable by AI systems in a timely manner.

Amin defines AI-ready data as data that is “discoverable, governed, reliable, and usable by AI systems in real-time.” This definition transforms the discussion from a narrow technical question to an institutional one: Does the institution know where its data is, who can use it, and can it be trusted when fed into a model or intelligent agent?

Data from Sensitive Sectors

In the Saudi banking sector, this could mean linking customer, transaction, and risk data across different environments while maintaining compliance and governance. In hospitals, it involves securely organizing clinical and imaging data so that AI can support diagnosis or improve operations without compromising patient privacy. For government entities, it means unifying citizen and operational data while preserving sovereignty and security controls. As for energy companies, it might involve combining operational, sensor, and geographic data to support predictive maintenance and improve performance.

Dell states that updates to its Dell AI Data Platform specifically target this point, by indexing billions of files and linking them into governed data pipelines. The platform includes capabilities such as GPU-accelerated SQL analytics, achieving up to six times faster performance, and vector indexing up to 12 times faster.

These details might seem technical, but they actually determine the speed at which an institution transitions from a limited experiment to a widely operational AI service. The slower data is accessed or the less organized it is, the more the data pipelines themselves become an operational bottleneck. Amin notes that these capabilities help reduce response time, improve accuracy, and expand AI services with higher efficiency.

Local Operating Economics

As AI transitions to more sensitive and continuous workloads, another question emerges: when does private or institution-controlled infrastructure become more suitable than the public cloud? Amin does not present this as a stark choice between cloud and private infrastructure; he believes the public cloud remains important for experimentation, flexibility, and quick access to AI services. However, he adds that there comes a stage where controlled infrastructure becomes “strategically better,” especially when workloads involve sensitive national or financial data, or when response time requirements are critical.

This aligns with what Dell presented at the conference regarding Deskside Agentic AI, a solution aimed at running some AI agents locally on high-performance workstations, rather than relying entirely on cloud programming interfaces.

The company states that this solution can, in some cases, reach a break-even point with the cost of cloud programming interfaces within three months, and reduce spending by up to 87 percent within two years. Amin interprets these figures from a broader perspective, stating that technology managers in Saudi Arabia must evaluate the economics of AI “over its full lifecycle, not just by focusing on initial infrastructure costs.” The cloud might appear attractive at the outset, but it can become more expensive when running continuous generative or agentic workloads at the scale of a large enterprise.

Processor Efficiency

For Saudi Arabia, this issue is also linked to sectors with regulatory and sensitive natures. Amin acknowledges that the most realistic use cases today are those that deliver clear productive and operational value while maintaining manageable governance.

He points out that private assistants within institutions and workflow in regulated sectors represent a compelling starting point in the Kingdom, due to the strong focus on data security and sovereignty. He also believes that programming assistants are rapidly gaining momentum because they offer direct benefits to development teams.

The transition to production requires not only data and architecture but also infrastructure capable of handling high workload density. In heavy AI environments, processing units are insufficient if data does not move quickly between computing, storage, and applications.

Amin notes that the network design in PowerRack includes a switching capacity exceeding 800 terabits per second per rack, explaining that the practical meaning of this capacity is to eliminate data traffic bottlenecks between GPUs, storage, and applications. The longer GPUs wait for data, the lower the efficiency of infrastructure investment. Conversely, when data moves with low latency, training and inference operations become faster and more effective.

Cooling as a Strategic Factor

This discussion cannot be separated from cooling and power, as AI increases rack density and power requirements within data centers, making cooling a strategic, not just operational, factor.

Amin notes that the ability of Dell PowerCool C7000 to support facility water temperatures up to 40 degrees Celsius means that data centers can operate with higher efficiency in hot climates, reducing reliance on energy-intensive cooling.

In Saudi Arabia, where the government and private sector are investing in sovereign AI infrastructure, he believes that cooling “is no longer merely an operational issue,” but has become linked to scalability, energy efficiency, and long-term viability.

Data and Model Security

Cyber resilience is part of AI readiness; an intelligent system is not reliable if its data is corruptible, its models are exploitable, or its infrastructure is not recoverable. Amin points out that an AI system “is only as reliable as the data and models it operates on,” and a cyberattack that corrupts data or harms a model can have significant consequences.

Therefore, he believes that the maturity of cyber resilience will directly impact the extent to which institutions trust expanding their adoption of AI. Here, Dell offers tools like Cyber Detect, which it claims can detect data corruption resulting from ransomware attacks and accurately identify the last known clean version.

Openness and Sovereignty

With Dell's expanded partnerships with Google, Hugging Face, OpenAI, Palantir, ServiceNow, and SpaceXAI, the company emphasizes that institutions do not want to tie their AI strategy to a single model, cloud platform, or infrastructure package.

This openness, in Amin's view, gives institutions a “choice” and reduces vendor lock-in risks, allowing them to develop their capabilities as technology evolves. This is crucial in a fast-moving market like Saudi Arabia, where integration and interoperability can become strategic advantages in themselves.

When Mohamed Amin was asked about the Saudi sectors that would first require AI-ready infrastructure, he placed government, energy, telecommunications, finance, and smart cities at the forefront, due to the volume of their data, their national importance, and the operational value that AI can unlock.

These sectors are also most closely linked to sovereignty, compliance, and security requirements. Therefore, building a secure and scalable AI infrastructure appears not merely a technical upgrade, but part of institutions' ability to transform the Vision's ambitions into measurable daily operations.

Between Michael Dell's response regarding Saudi Arabia and Mohamed Amin's vision for the region, the picture of the next phase becomes clear. The Kingdom is not entering the AI race merely from the perspective of consumption or experimentation, but from the perspective of building institutional capability.

However, true capability will not be measured solely by the number of data centers or the volume of investment, but by institutions' ability to prepare their data, choose where to run their workloads, manage costs, protect their models and data, and scale their use without losing control or governance.



'Tech Debt Coming Due': AI-found Flaw Signals Chaos Ahead

Michael Daniel is president of the Cyber Threat Alliance and was a White House cybersecurity coordinator under former US president Barack Obama. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP
Michael Daniel is president of the Cyber Threat Alliance and was a White House cybersecurity coordinator under former US president Barack Obama. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP
TT

'Tech Debt Coming Due': AI-found Flaw Signals Chaos Ahead

Michael Daniel is president of the Cyber Threat Alliance and was a White House cybersecurity coordinator under former US president Barack Obama. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP
Michael Daniel is president of the Cyber Threat Alliance and was a White House cybersecurity coordinator under former US president Barack Obama. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP

Companies and government agencies rushed this week to patch two critical flaws in PHP, the programming language that runs a large share of the world's websites.

The vulnerability to potential hackers was found by using a powerful model from OpenAI in one of the most high-profile demonstration of AI's cyber capabilities.

AFP spoke with Michael Daniel, president of the Cyber Threat Alliance and a former White House cybersecurity coordinator under former US president Barack Obama, about what the episode means as AI tools find software flaws faster than ever.

The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Q: What does the PHP episode tell us?

A: This is the beginning of a pretty chaotic period, given the abilities of the advanced models. I've been saying for years that the logical conclusion of these AI models being able to find vulnerabilities at speed and at scale is that there's going to be a flood of these vulnerabilities.

Rob Joyce [former cybersecurity director at the US National Security Agency] has referred to it as the great cleansing forest fire of old software. I've talked about our tech debt coming due.

The incentives have been for people to keep software as long as possible, and we don't really factor these risks into the cost of having the software. You're not incurring a direct cost on your books for this old software, but in reality you are, only it's an implicit cost until something like this happens.

Q: What should organizations be doing?

A: Preparing to get your software updated, be prepared to keep it updated, and be prepared to implement patches when they come out.

There's going to be a flood of vulnerabilities, a flood of patches and a flood of mitigations, and not all of them will be created equal.

For a lot of smaller organizations that don't have a lot of internal capacity, what you've got to do is shift your organization to be able to accept the vendor updates as fast as you can.

Q: Is every flaw dangerous?

A: Historically, the exploitation rate for vulnerabilities has been five or six percent, and there's no indication that number is going up. But now when bad guys exploit a vulnerability, they're able to do so much more quickly.

It used to take a month or two for a proof of concept to come out, and then another month or two for it to show up in exploit kits (used by bad actors). That's now measured in hours or days.

Q: What does that mean for large companies?

A: Most businesses essentially ran a zero-risk tolerance for breaking things, so they would test the hell out of a patch before they put it into production. Now they don't have that time.

If the risk of breaking something by putting this patch into place is one percent, but the risk of being attacked could cost me 50 million dollars...now I've got an interesting trade-off.

Q: Are advanced AI tools reliable at finding real flaws?

A: There's a lot of noise. The PHP one is a prime example of a real one, but there's an awful lot out there that are either not real or are on software that's never exposed to the internet. We've got to improve our triage system.

Q: Where does this lead us in two or three years?

A: We're going to turn these AI tools on software that hasn't been deployed yet, so one would hope we start to deploy software that has fewer vulnerabilities to begin with. You burn out all the old stuff, and it makes way for new growth that's more secure from the beginning.

It's not like this solves our cybersecurity problem, but it does change the nature of it going forward.


CEO: Amazon Cloud Capacity Sold Out Through 2027

FILE PHOTO: Amazon CEO Andy Jassy speaks during an Amazon Devices launch event in New York City, US, February 26, 2025. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Amazon CEO Andy Jassy speaks during an Amazon Devices launch event in New York City, US, February 26, 2025. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
TT

CEO: Amazon Cloud Capacity Sold Out Through 2027

FILE PHOTO: Amazon CEO Andy Jassy speaks during an Amazon Devices launch event in New York City, US, February 26, 2025. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Amazon CEO Andy Jassy speaks during an Amazon Devices launch event in New York City, US, February 26, 2025. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said on Friday that Amazon Web Services' cloud computing capacity is largely sold out through 2027, with significant commitments extending into 2028, on growing demand for AI infrastructure.

In a video podcast with Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Ben Horowitz and general partner Erik Torenberg, Jassy said Amazon is struggling to keep pace ⁠with the insatiable ⁠demand from AI labs and enterprises.

Earlier this year, Amazon had said it would spend about $220 billion in capital expenditure for 2026.

According to Reuters, Jassy said the ⁠company "could invest a lot more and it wouldn't be a bad use of capital," considering cloud-computing capacity for 2026 is already sold out.

"2027 is largely sold out. We always leave a certain amount for on demand and our inference service bedrock, or EC2, but largely sold out ⁠all ⁠the big chunks. A good chunk of 2028 is sold out," he said.

EC2 is an AWS service that provides cloud servers for running applications, while Bedrock gives customers access to AI models to build generative AI applications.

Amazon is scheduled to report third quarter results on October 29.


New ‘Scentronic’ Technology Can Detect and Transmit Aromas Remotely

Ohio State University researcher Chunyu Yang wears a prototype odor generator device which is part of a technology called Scentronic that can detect scents and transmit them remotely, at Columbus, Ohio, on June 13, 2025, in this image released October 21, 2026. (Shaoru Cheng/Handout via Reuters)
Ohio State University researcher Chunyu Yang wears a prototype odor generator device which is part of a technology called Scentronic that can detect scents and transmit them remotely, at Columbus, Ohio, on June 13, 2025, in this image released October 21, 2026. (Shaoru Cheng/Handout via Reuters)
TT

New ‘Scentronic’ Technology Can Detect and Transmit Aromas Remotely

Ohio State University researcher Chunyu Yang wears a prototype odor generator device which is part of a technology called Scentronic that can detect scents and transmit them remotely, at Columbus, Ohio, on June 13, 2025, in this image released October 21, 2026. (Shaoru Cheng/Handout via Reuters)
Ohio State University researcher Chunyu Yang wears a prototype odor generator device which is part of a technology called Scentronic that can detect scents and transmit them remotely, at Columbus, Ohio, on June 13, 2025, in this image released October 21, 2026. (Shaoru Cheng/Handout via Reuters)

People can readily share images and sounds digitally, as evidenced by the billions of smartphones in use globally that often overload the human senses of sight and hearing. But smell generally remains missing from remote communication. That could soon change.

Researchers have developed technology that features an electronic nose that recognizes certain smells, like the distinctive aroma of coffee, and then instructs a small and wearable remote device to release scent molecules matching it. The digital communication can take place at any distance, from across the room to around the world.

"In simple terms, it connects 'smelling something here' with 'recreating the corresponding smell somewhere else,'" said Chunyu Yang, an Ohio State University doctoral student in materials science and engineering and lead author of a study describing the technology published in the journal Science Advances.

"The idea is to add smell to the visual and audio information we already share remotely, making those experiences more engaging," Yang said.

The researchers call this latest development in the field of digital scent technology "Scentronic."

"What makes Scentronic ‌different is that ‌it brings odor sensing and generation together for remote sharing. To the best of our knowledge, ‌our ⁠study is the ⁠first to explore this integration in a compact platform for remote odor sharing," Yang said.

The researchers created an e-nose, a device that uses an array of gas sensors to detect chemical compounds associated with different odors. A machine-learning model then classifies odors that the e-nose has been trained to recognize — cake, coffee and oranges.

The technology uses an online platform to transmit the odor information to a scent generator, which then releases fragrances to recreate the aroma at the receiving end. The scent molecules themselves are not transmitted over the internet.

The e-nose device is roughly 6 inches (15 cm) in diameter and is portable, though not designed to be worn. The researchers developed several versions of ⁠the odor generator, including wristband, necklace and handheld designs.

'EVERYDAY ODORS'

At this point, the e-nose recognizes ‌just the five scents.

"We chose these because they are familiar everyday odors with ‌different scent profiles, making them useful examples for demonstrating the system. We have not yet expanded beyond those categories," Yang said.

"A broader scent library ‌is possible in principle, but an unlimited repertoire is far beyond what we have demonstrated. Recognizing an odor and accurately reproducing ‌it are separate challenges. Covering a useful range of everyday scents is a more realistic goal, although that would still require substantial development," Yang said.

The receiving device cannot recreate every smell Scentronic encounters.

"To support additional odors, we would need to train the electronic nose to recognize them and provide corresponding scented liquids in the odor generator," Yang said.

The researchers see various potential applications for the technology.

"For example, someone could share the scent of ‌a meal with family or friends who live far away. Other potential applications include more immersive virtual and augmented reality experiences and online shopping that allows customers to sample selected scents remotely," ⁠Yang said.

'A RESEARCH PROTOTYPE'

The research ⁠was conducted and the devices developed without the involvement of a company, Yang said.

"At present, this is a research prototype. Moving toward commercialization would require a larger, more diverse training dataset and reliable odor recognition under real-world conditions, where smells often occur in mixtures," Yang said.

"The odor generator would also need further development to support more scents while remaining compact and convenient to use. Other considerations include scent fidelity, refillability, durability, manufacturing costs and the safety of repeated exposure to the scented mist," Yang said.

Smartphones are becoming increasingly capable. Could they in the future incorporate scent technology so that, for instance, a person at a tailgate party before an Ohio State football game could call a friend and share video, audio and the aroma of hot dogs on the grill?

"In principle, a smartphone could connect to a scent-generating accessory. Integrating everything into the phone itself would be more challenging because the scent reservoirs, electronics and atomizers all take up space and add weight. Miniaturization and convenient refilling would be important considerations," Yang said.

"The tailgate example illustrates the idea well. A future system could potentially combine video and audio with a corresponding scent, provided it could recognize the relevant odor and the receiver had a suitable scent formulation available. Our current system has not demonstrated the transmission of a grilling-hot-dog scent or the exact mixture of smells at a tailgate party," Yang said.