Yarmouk Camp: Gaza-like Destruction, Uncertainty Amid Temporary Decisions

The destruction within Syria’s Yarmouk camp mirrors the scenes of war in Gaza (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The destruction within Syria’s Yarmouk camp mirrors the scenes of war in Gaza (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Yarmouk Camp: Gaza-like Destruction, Uncertainty Amid Temporary Decisions

The destruction within Syria’s Yarmouk camp mirrors the scenes of war in Gaza (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The destruction within Syria’s Yarmouk camp mirrors the scenes of war in Gaza (Asharq Al-Awsat)

This is not Gaza. It is the Yarmouk camp in Syria.
Simply reading the sign repeatedly at the entrance of the Palestinian camp near Damascus is not enough to cement this truth in the visitor’s mind.
One must constantly remind themselves, with every step and glance, that this is not Gaza, but the Yarmouk camp, just 18 kilometers from Umayyad Square. The camp faced systematic destruction and a long siege, leading to the deaths of over 150 residents, mostly children, from hunger and thirst.
The few families who returned after the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime or in recent years are barely visible among the vast destruction, which stretches beyond what the eye or camera can capture.
A passerby emerging from the rubble or children returning from their makeshift classes at the nearby UNRWA school might seem like a scene from a film.
But this is the daily reality for the survivors.
“There are no services in the camp,” locals told Asharq Al-Awsat.
“No electricity, running water, internet, or basic healthcare—just ruined buildings, endless destruction, and dust.”
The memory of the starvation siege still lingers in Yarmouk.
A young man who survived the 2018 siege spoke to Asharq Al-Awsat on the condition of anonymity.
“I remember the first piece of bread I ate after days of hunger. The taste never leaves me. After nearly a week without food or water, I remembered seeing a bag of bread in our neighbors' fridge,” he recalled.
“I mustered the strength to go and found the fridge, burned by airstrikes, still attached to the bread. Only the ends of the loaves had survived, though they were moldy... I ate it like a feast.”
The young man then showed old photos of himself, looking pale and thin, almost like a different person. Like him, many men, including heads of households, feared death or arrest if they went to food distribution points. These supplies, trickling in from local factions and the UN, came with great risk. Many "humanitarian corridors" became traps for men and young people.
Since 2011, the camp has endured military targeting, airstrikes, and intense battles. But in 2018, Yarmouk faced one of its darkest moments. After the 2011 uprising, many Palestinians supported it, including activists and Hamas members.
In response, Ahmed Jibril’s Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine–General Command, along with other pro-Assad factions, launched a violent attack on the camp and Free Syrian Army groups.
Barrel bombs fell on Yarmouk and nearby areas like Al-Hajar Al-Aswad, Al-Tadamon, and Yalda. The situation worsened with the presence of a ISIS stronghold in the southern part of the camp, connecting to those areas.
Founded in 1957, Yarmouk camp, covering around 2.5 kilometers, was once a bustling commercial center, home to nearly 1.5 million people, including Syrians, Palestinians, and some Iraqis. Today, fewer than 8,000 people remain, according to UNRWA estimates.
While many compare Yarmouk’s current situation to Gaza, the issue extends beyond the camp. It is one of 15 Palestinian camps in Syria, with over eight suffering severe destruction, all needing rebuilding and support like Yarmouk, as well as other damaged Syrian neighborhoods and areas around Damascus.
Residents face total neglect, uncertain about their future, the fate of missing family members, and the condition of their homes. Their biggest complaint is a sense of being abandoned, with no social, service, or political support.
They feel like orphans of the former regime, armed groups, and the revolution all at once.
Even the Palestinian factions that once controlled the camp now live in Damascus's middle-class and upscale neighborhoods, with some having moved to Beirut.
For years, civilians were trapped between ISIS, other factions, and the regime. Sources confirm that ISIS in Damascus was founded by a former prisoner from Yalda, released by the regime after the 2011 protests.
He was joined by an Iraqi officer living in Yarmouk, both of whom defected from Al-Nusra Front.
For nearly two years, ISIS expanded into nearby areas like Al-Hajar Al-Aswad, Al-Tadamon, and the southern part of Yarmouk, forming a large network of smaller extremist groups that fought and defeated the Free Syrian Army at the time.
During this period, ISIS militants were treated at the government-run Al-Mahini Hospital, later becoming the first armed group to negotiate with the former regime in southern Damascus. They left in organized convoys of buses to the desert of Sweida after surrendering military checkpoints, while Yarmouk residents remained fully besieged.
Asharq Al-Awsat passed the site of the “Ali Al-Wahsh” checkpoint, where a massacre killed 1,200 Yarmouk civilians (according to documented figures).
The worst part of this massacre was not just the number of victims, but the deception used to lure residents with promises of a safe passage for aid after the siege. Once there, men were executed, and women and children were forcibly displaced. Many residents, fearing for their lives, chose to stay hungry rather than risk going for help.
Diaa Suleiman, who lived through that time as a teenager and is now a father of three, said: “After all we went through, we’ve been betrayed. We are completely abandoned. No one looks at us, not even those who caused this. We need protection. We need answers... We need to know where we stand.”
An unofficial meeting, details of which were leaked, took place between Yarmouk faction leaders and representatives of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. The agreement was that Palestinian fighters would hand over their weapons to the new regime in Syria, following a broader call for all factions to do the same.
While Palestinian weapons in Yarmouk were never used against Israel but instead in internal conflicts to support Assad’s regime, their removal now seems like the least difficult demand.
The value of these weapons has completely disappeared, especially since Yarmouk is now empty and destroyed. Restoring any authority there will require rebuilding both the infrastructure and the people.
“The major challenge ahead is how to define the legal and civil status of Palestinians and protect them through the law,” Ayman Abu Hashem, general coordinator of the Palestinian-Syrian Assembly (Maseer), told Asharq Al-Awsat.
Unlike most Palestinian refugee communities, Syrian law grants Palestinians the right to work, own property, and enjoy all civil rights, except voting. However, it excludes those who arrived after the 1967 war or from Jordan after 1970, and those constitute a significant number.
While most Palestinians in Syria see themselves as also Syrian, Hashem said their main demand is to gain Syrian citizenship while keeping their Palestinian identity.
“We don’t want to be seen as giving up the right of return or our connection to Palestine. But we and our children deserve Syrian citizenship, like anyone born and raised in a country, becoming a dual citizen,” explained Hashem.



Pilot Zone Tests Hezbollah’s Commitment to Withdraw South of the Litani

Israeli soldiers aboard an armored vehicle along the Lebanon border (file photo – Reuters) 
Israeli soldiers aboard an armored vehicle along the Lebanon border (file photo – Reuters) 
TT

Pilot Zone Tests Hezbollah’s Commitment to Withdraw South of the Litani

Israeli soldiers aboard an armored vehicle along the Lebanon border (file photo – Reuters) 
Israeli soldiers aboard an armored vehicle along the Lebanon border (file photo – Reuters) 

A proposed pilot zone in South Lebanon has been narrowed to six villages as part of the sixth round of Lebanese-Israeli negotiations held Tuesday and Wednesday in Rome. The plan is intended to test implementation of reciprocal withdrawals by Israel and Hezbollah.

The proposed zone includes Western Zawtar (Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh), Froun, Ghandouriyeh, Qalaouiyeh, Burj Qalaouiyeh, and Srifa. Parts of one village remain under Israeli occupation, while the other five are under Israeli fire control. The area is divided into two sectors: Eastern Zawtar (Zawtar al-Sharqiyeh), north of the Litani River, and the remaining villages south of the river.

Srifa lies about five kilometers from the nearest Israeli ground position in Wadi al-Hujayr. Israeli forces never entered the town after withdrawing to the border security zone in South Lebanon in 1985, before their full withdrawal from the country in 2000.

Lebanese sources familiar with the contacts told Asharq Al-Awsat that the pilot zone remains only a proposal. They said the Lebanese Army has not yet been briefed on the outcome of the negotiations because none of its representatives are participating directly in the talks.

Withdrawal for Withdrawal

The proposal effectively divides the area into two sectors: one where Israeli forces are deployed on the outskirts and another where Hezbollah maintains a presence. Under the plan, both sides would withdraw simultaneously, allowing the Lebanese Army to deploy only after Israeli troops and Hezbollah fighters have vacated their respective positions.

The Litani River runs along the outskirts of Eastern Zawtar, Froun, and Srifa. The Israeli military believes the interconnected deep valleys contain Hezbollah rocket-launching sites, citing the intensive strikes it carried out there during the recent war. Israeli ground forces also conducted incursions into the outskirts of Froun last month.

Ghandouriyeh, Qalaouiyeh, and Burj Qalaouiyeh occupy strategic high ground overlooking villages east of Wadi al-Hujayr that are still occupied by the Israeli military. The three villages lie more than 10 kilometers from the Lebanese-Israeli border.

Hezbollah has not commented on the proposal. Last month, Secretary-General Naim Qassem said that “the ceiling of sovereignty can be achieved by remaining within the framework of the November 27, 2024 agreement, on the basis of areas south of the Litani River only.” He also called for an unconditional Israeli withdrawal and for a comprehensive review of Lebanon’s national security strategy after such a withdrawal.

Lebanese Army Measures

Ahead of technical talks between the Lebanese and Israeli armies, expected Friday under US auspices and facilitation to discuss implementation mechanisms — including an Israeli withdrawal and Lebanese Army deployment — the Lebanese military began field measures in one of the proposed pilot-zone villages.

Local media reported that the army set up a large checkpoint at the entrance to Srifa from Deir Kifa and tightened inspections of vehicles and motorcycles entering the town.

Meanwhile, the Israeli military carried out demolition operations in Beit Yahoun, Bint Jbeil, Khiam, and Kounine, bulldozed roads linking Bint Jbeil to the border town of Maroun al-Ras, and opened fire on residents attempting to inspect orchards near Majdal Zoun and Mansouri.


Hamas and Mediators Reach Broad Agreement on Road Map, Await Israel’s Response

Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)
Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)
TT

Hamas and Mediators Reach Broad Agreement on Road Map, Await Israel’s Response

Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)
Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)

Hamas and Gaza ceasefire mediators have reached broad agreement on a proposed “road map” during meetings in Cairo, according to two Hamas sources and a Palestinian faction official.

A Hamas delegation led by Khalil al-Hayya left Cairo on Monday evening for Doha to offer condolences following the death of Qatar’s former emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani.

The delegation is expected to travel to Türkiye for talks on mediators’ proposals concerning weapons, other outstanding issues and the future of Palestinian elections.

The discussions will also cover Hamas’ internal leadership election, due to conclude within two weeks after voting was completed in Gaza and the West Bank, with ballots from the movement’s overseas branch still pending.

According to one Hamas source and the Palestinian faction official, negotiators reached broad consensus on nearly all 15 provisions of a road map presented in April by Nickolay Mladenov, the Board of Peace’s High Representative for Gaza, and revised several times since.

They said mediators had developed compromise language for Article 5, governing employees of the Hamas-run administration in Gaza, and Article 8, covering the collection and storage of weapons.

A second Hamas source said 13 of the 15 provisions had been agreed almost in full, while Articles 5 and 8 remained unresolved. He added that partial understandings had been reached on both, but Hamas would first consult its political and military leadership inside and outside Gaza before deciding on the final wording.

All three sources said the meetings brought together mediators from Egypt, Qatar and Türkiye, along with Mladenov and members of his team, including US advisers, as well as Egypt’s intelligence chief, Hassan Rashad.

One Hamas source and the Palestinian faction official described the talks as broadly positive. They said negotiators had agreed on legal formulations concerning government employees that would safeguard their rights while allowing the proposals to be reviewed by legal experts.

On weapons, they said the parties had agreed on language affirming the principle of collecting and storing heavy weapons, while providing further clarification on what constitutes heavy weaponry and how the arrangement would be implemented. The draft also reiterates the dismantling of armed gangs and a simultaneous Israeli withdrawal, in line with language agreed in May.

The two sources said mediators appeared satisfied with the progress and were now awaiting Israel’s response, as well as Mladenov’s position in his capacity as the Board of Peace’s representative.

The sources also emphasized that Hamas had informed mediators, on behalf of the Palestinian factions, that the proposed National Committee for the Administration of Gaza should govern the entire enclave rather than only areas vacated by Israeli forces.

They warned against what they described as Israeli attempts to restrict the committee’s authority in Israeli-controlled Rafah or confine it to designated humanitarian or “safe” zones.

The second Hamas source explained that negotiators had removed language stating that the committee would be responsible only for employees’ rights accruing after it assumed office.

Regarding weapons, he said some provisions had been dropped and replaced with alternative wording, and that a partial understanding had been reached on defining heavy weapons.

However, disagreement remains over the definition of military infrastructure, an issue Hamas plans to discuss during meetings in Türkiye and consultations with its leadership in Gaza before submitting revised proposals to the mediators.

Separately, Hamas official Basem Naim accused Mladenov on Wednesday of favoring Israel following remarks he made after a donors’ conference in Brussels.

Naim disputed Mladenov’s assertion that humanitarian aid flows into Gaza had improved compared with the period before the agreement and accused Israel of continuing military operations despite the ceasefire.

Citing figures from Gaza’s Hamas-run Government Media Office, he said more than 1,100 Palestinians had been killed and over 3,000 wounded, most of them women and children.

He also rejected claims that Hamas had dismissed the road map, saying the movement continues to discuss the proposal and, to its knowledge, it has not yet been presented to Israel. He added that blaming the Palestinian delegation for delays in reaching an agreement reflected a lack of neutrality in the mediation process.


Tunisian Journalist, a Critic of Saied, Sentenced to 1 Year in Prison

Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
TT

Tunisian Journalist, a Critic of Saied, Sentenced to 1 Year in Prison

Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki

Prominent Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki and critic of President Kais Saied said on Wednesday that he was sentenced to one year in prison over posts he made on social media.

El Mekki, known for his political commentary, was a regular host on Mosaique FM's flagship "Midi Show" before he left the station.

Authorities opened an investigation against him in 2024 under Decree 54 -- a law Saied enacted to combat "false news" -- after he decried poor conditions at a public hospital morgue in the coastal city of Sfax.

A lower court had dismissed the case, but an appeals court handed him the 12-month jail term, he said on Facebook.

The National Syndicate of Tunisian Journalists condemned the ruling in a statement, warning of a "worrying trend" and a "climate of intimidation and self-censorship.”

Mekki has been prosecuted three times since 2023, in each case over comments he had made online or in the media.

Although Mekki has recently distanced himself from the media, he remains active on social networks. He is also a member of the editorial board of Rachma, an independent Tunisian media platform.

Freedom of expression was celebrated as a main achievement of the 2011 uprising that toppled president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia. But since Saied's July 25, 2021 power grab, several NGOs and the opposition have lamented a decline in rights and freedoms.