From Retaliation to Displacement: How Gaza’s War Has Evolved

Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)
Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)
TT
20

From Retaliation to Displacement: How Gaza’s War Has Evolved

Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)
Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)

There is a stark difference between the war Israel launched on Gaza 16 months ago and the one it is waging today. In the first, Israel was driven by a deep wound to its prestige following Hamas’s surprise attack on October 7, 2023, making its military campaign in Gaza an act of retaliation.

Today, however, it is pursuing a war with a clear strategic goal: to eliminate the Palestinian cause and force the displacement of as many Palestinians as possible—not just from Gaza.

Israel now has a military led by a loyal, unchallenging command and the backing of a US administration hostile to Hamas.

While former President Joe Biden’s administration strongly supported Israel’s retaliatory war under the pretext of restoring its deterrence against the “Axis of Resistance,” providing extensive assistance in striking Hamas, Hezbollah, and even directly targeting Iran and the Houthis, the US at the time imposed some constraints on Tel Aviv.

Washington urged Israel to adhere to international law and voiced objections over the high civilian death toll, particularly among women and children.

The Biden administration managed the crisis while keeping political avenues open in response to Arab demands for an end to the war that would prevent future conflicts and destruction.

It was clear to Washington that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government was not suited for a comprehensive peace initiative. Expecting his swift downfall once the war ended, the administration engaged with political forces in Israel working to unseat him.

In the current war, Washington is led by a completely different administration under President Donald Trump, which is fully aligned with Netanyahu. This has allowed Netanyahu to act without restraint from the new US leadership, which harbors deep hostility toward Hamas—not only over the October 7 attack but also due to a fundamental misunderstanding of the group’s policies and objectives.

As a result, the key difference between the two wars is that Netanyahu now enjoys even stronger backing from Washington.

The Trump administration has opened a direct communication channel with Hamas despite Israeli objections, attempting to persuade the group to extend the initial phase of the ceasefire as a compromise that would keep Israel in the truce and allow the US to manage the crisis on its terms.

Moreover, the administration shares the same right-wing ideological base as Netanyahu’s government and wants it to remain in power.

It agrees with Netanyahu on the need to eliminate not only Hamas but also as many Palestinians as possible.

The administration has embraced the far-right proposal advocating for the “voluntary” displacement of Palestinians—an agenda that has come to be known as the Trump Plan.

Trump’s team recognizes that Netanyahu’s government cannot survive without appeasing the demands of the hardline right that controls its fate—not just figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, but also an ideologically rigid faction within Netanyahu’s own Likud party.

 

 



Netanyahu Believes Confrontation with Türkiye in Syria is 'Inevitable'

Israeli army tanks and a bulldozer drive through the Abu Diab military post on March 19, 2025, on the southern outskirts of the Syrian border town of Quneitra, which locals say had Russian forces' presence before the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024. (Photo by Bakr ALKASEM / AFP)
Israeli army tanks and a bulldozer drive through the Abu Diab military post on March 19, 2025, on the southern outskirts of the Syrian border town of Quneitra, which locals say had Russian forces' presence before the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024. (Photo by Bakr ALKASEM / AFP)
TT
20

Netanyahu Believes Confrontation with Türkiye in Syria is 'Inevitable'

Israeli army tanks and a bulldozer drive through the Abu Diab military post on March 19, 2025, on the southern outskirts of the Syrian border town of Quneitra, which locals say had Russian forces' presence before the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024. (Photo by Bakr ALKASEM / AFP)
Israeli army tanks and a bulldozer drive through the Abu Diab military post on March 19, 2025, on the southern outskirts of the Syrian border town of Quneitra, which locals say had Russian forces' presence before the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024. (Photo by Bakr ALKASEM / AFP)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is holding security consultations to discuss concerns over Turkish influence in Syria following the fall of Bashar Assad’s regime, and is trying to portray a confrontation with Ankara as inevitable, Israeli security sources said.
The Hebrew website Walla, citing security sources, said Syria is holding contacts with Türkiye regarding the transfer of areas near Palmyra (central Syria) to the Turkish army in exchange for economic and military support for Damascus. This development sparked significant Israeli concerns, the sources said.
They noted that the new Syrian regime is working to restore military bases and enhance missile and defense capabilities in the south, near Israel.
Also, Channel 12 reported that Netanyahu, through his advisors, is pushing Israeli media to portray that “a confrontation with Türkiye on Syrian territory is inevitable.”
In January, a confidential Israeli government study group delivered a warning about the Türkiye-Syria alliance. The committee’s report urged Netanyahu to prepare for a potential war with Ankara in Syria.
Also, the Jerusalem Post said Israel must prepare for a direct confrontation with Türkiye, according to the Nagel Committee’s latest report on the defense budget and security strategy.
It noted that the committee, established by the Israeli government, warns that Ankara’s ambitions to restore its Ottoman-era influence could lead to heightened tensions with Israel, possibly escalating into conflict.
The report highlights the risk of Syrian factions aligning with Türkiye, creating a new and potent threat to Israel’s security.
“The threat from Syria could evolve into something even more dangerous than the Iranian threat,” the report states, warning that Turkish-backed forces might act as proxies, fueling regional instability.
Meanwhile, Syria TV said two members of the Syrian defense ministry's 42nd Division were injured in the Israeli airstrike that targeted the Palmyra military airport last Friday night.
Later, the channel reported that US helicopters flew at low altitudes over Deir Ezzor.
Last week, Syrian state news agency, SANA, said Israeli strikes on the southern Syria province of Deraa killed and wounded several civilians.