Iraq’s Ruling Alliance Backs Down on PMF Legislation

A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)
A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)
TT

Iraq’s Ruling Alliance Backs Down on PMF Legislation

A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)
A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)

Iraq’s ruling Shi’ite alliance has suspended efforts to pass legislation granting sweeping institutional powers to the Iran-backed Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), in a move aimed at easing tensions with Washington and buying time until the outcome of the standoff over Hezbollah’s weapons in Lebanon becomes clearer, political sources said.

The draft law, opposed by the United States, would have formalized the PMF – a coalition of mostly Shi’ite armed groups with more than 200,000 fighters – as a parallel structure to the Defense Ministry.

It included independent funding and a military academy, as well as a proposed “doctrinal guidance directorate” that critics said risked embedding sectarian ideology.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and senior security officials have repeatedly defended the PMF since the last war with Israel, warning against any attempt to disband it. But within the Shi’ite “Coordination Framework” coalition that dominates the government, divisions have deepened over the law.

“The armed wing that was supposed to shield key actors has become a burning coal no one can hold for long,” a senior coalition figure told Asharq al-Awsat.

While some leaders, including Badr Organisation chief Hadi al-Amiri and Islamic Supreme Council head Humam Hammoudi, pushed to put the law to a vote, others warned it risked provoking US retaliation ranging from sanctions to threats of military action. Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani even hinted at the possibility of a US-led invasion if the law passed.

Washington’s position, conveyed to Iraqi officials in recent weeks, is that enshrining the PMF would strengthen Iran’s hand in Baghdad and destabilize Iraq’s fragile constitutional order, an Iraqi official briefed on the talks said.

Instead of passing the law, the coalition is now exploring a compromise that would fold PMF command positions more tightly into government structures without requiring a parliamentary vote – a formula insiders describe as largely cosmetic. Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani is reluctant to champion even that, fearing a backlash from Washington and political rivals ahead of elections in November.

“It is like standing on a buried landmine,” a veteran Shi’ite politician said. “Any movement risks an explosion.”

The debate has become a no-win scenario for Iraq’s rulers: pushing the law through risks of US punishment, while shelving it angers powerful armed factions who view legal recognition as essential to preserving their influence. Some lawmakers have floated theatrical solutions, such as convening a session with Shi’ite MPs in military uniform but without enough quorum to pass the law.

For now, the coalition has opted for delay, tying the PMF’s fate to Lebanon, where Hezbollah faces unprecedented pressure over its weapons.

“Everything depends on whether Hezbollah can reposition itself, with or without arms,” said a Shi’ite leader. “If they strike a deal, you will see the impact in Baghdad.”

 



Palestinians Say Israeli Army Killed Man in Occupied West Bank

 Israeli military vehicles roll during a raid in Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank on December 1, 2025. (AFP)
Israeli military vehicles roll during a raid in Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank on December 1, 2025. (AFP)
TT

Palestinians Say Israeli Army Killed Man in Occupied West Bank

 Israeli military vehicles roll during a raid in Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank on December 1, 2025. (AFP)
Israeli military vehicles roll during a raid in Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank on December 1, 2025. (AFP)

The Ramallah-based Palestinian health ministry said that Israeli forces killed a man in the northern occupied West Bank on Friday.

"Bahaa Abdel-Rahman Rashid (38 years old) was killed by Israeli fire in the town of Odala, south of Nablus," the health ministry said in a statement.

Shortly before, the Palestinian Red Crescent said its teams handled the case of a man "who suffered a critical head injury during clashes in the town of Odala near Nablus, and CPR is currently being performed on him".

The Israeli military told AFP it was looking into the incident.

Witness and Odala resident Muhammad al-Kharouf told AFP that Israeli troops were patrolling in Odala and threw tear gas canisters at men who were exiting the local mosque for Friday prayer.

Rashid was killed by live fire in the clashes that followed, added Kharouf, who had been inside the mosque with him.

The Israeli military said Friday it had completed a two-week counter-terrorism operation in the northern West Bank during which it killed six gunmen and questioned dozens of suspects.

It told AFP that Rashid was not among the six gunmen killed over the past two weeks.

Dozens of men including Rashid's father gathered at the nearby city of Nablus' Rafidia hospital to bid him goodbye on Friday, an AFP journalist reported.

Violence in the West Bank has soared since Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war.

It has not ceased despite the fragile truce between Israel and Hamas that came into effect in October.

Israeli troops or settlers have killed more than 1,000 Palestinians, many of them gunmen, but also scores of civilians, in the West Bank since the start of the Gaza war, according to an AFP tally based on Palestinian health ministry figures.

At least 44 Israelis, including both soldiers and civilians, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or Israeli military operations, according to official Israeli figures.


Lebanese President, Hezbollah Split Over Expanded Talks with Israel

A handout photo made available by the Lebanese Presidency press office shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (9-R) posing for a photo with a United Nations Security Council delegation following their meeting at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, 05 December 2025. (Lebanese Presidency)
A handout photo made available by the Lebanese Presidency press office shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (9-R) posing for a photo with a United Nations Security Council delegation following their meeting at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, 05 December 2025. (Lebanese Presidency)
TT

Lebanese President, Hezbollah Split Over Expanded Talks with Israel

A handout photo made available by the Lebanese Presidency press office shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (9-R) posing for a photo with a United Nations Security Council delegation following their meeting at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, 05 December 2025. (Lebanese Presidency)
A handout photo made available by the Lebanese Presidency press office shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (9-R) posing for a photo with a United Nations Security Council delegation following their meeting at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, 05 December 2025. (Lebanese Presidency)

Lebanon's president on Friday defended his decision to expand talks with Israel as a way to avoid further violence, but the head of armed group Hezbollah called it a blunder, lifting the lid on divisions at a watershed moment for the country.

Israel and Lebanon on Wednesday both sent civilian envoys to a military committee monitoring their ceasefire, a step towards a months-old US demand that the two countries broaden talks in line with President Donald Trump's Middle East peace agenda.

President Joseph Aoun told visiting representatives of the United Nations Security Council that his country "has adopted the option of negotiations with Israel" and that "there is no going back".

"These negotiations are mainly aimed at stopping the hostile actions carried out by Israel on Lebanese territory, securing the return of the captives, scheduling the withdrawal from the occupied areas, and resolving the disputed points along the Blue Line," Aoun said in a statement on Friday, referring to the UN-mapped line that separates Israel from Lebanon.

HEZBOLLAH CALLS MOVE 'FREE CONCESSION'

But the expanded talks were criticized by armed group Hezbollah.

Its head, Sheikh Naim Qassem, said on Friday afternoon that sending a civilian delegate to the truce monitoring committee was a "blunder," and urged the government to rethink its decision.

"You offered a free concession that will not change anything in the enemy's (Israel's) position or its attacks," Qassem said.

Lebanon and Israel have been officially enemy states for more than 70 years, and meetings between their civilian officials have been extraordinarily rare throughout their fraught history.

Over the last year, military officials have met as part of a committee, chaired by the United States, to monitor a 2024 truce that ended more than a year of fighting between Israel and Hezbollah which badly weakened the Lebanese Iran-backed armed group.

In that time, Israel has continued its air strikes on what it says are Hezbollah's attempts to re-arm in violation of the truce. Lebanon says those strikes and Israel's occupation of southern Lebanese territory are ceasefire breaches.

Fears are growing in Lebanon that Israel could expand its air campaign further to ratchet up pressure on the Lebanese government to disarm Hezbollah more swiftly across the country.

The group has refused to disarm in full and has raised the specter of internal strife if the state tries to confront it.


Hezbollah Unhappy with Political Negotiations with Israel but Unlikely to Confront the State

A joint patrol of UNIFIL forces and the Lebanese Army in the Marjayoun area near the border with Israel (AFP)
A joint patrol of UNIFIL forces and the Lebanese Army in the Marjayoun area near the border with Israel (AFP)
TT

Hezbollah Unhappy with Political Negotiations with Israel but Unlikely to Confront the State

A joint patrol of UNIFIL forces and the Lebanese Army in the Marjayoun area near the border with Israel (AFP)
A joint patrol of UNIFIL forces and the Lebanese Army in the Marjayoun area near the border with Israel (AFP)

Hezbollah officials have avoided commenting on the Lebanese government’s decision to appoint former ambassador Simon Karam as head of the Lebanese delegation to the “mechanism committee” overseeing the ceasefire with Israel, which effectively shifted the committee’s work from military-technical talks to political negotiations.

A formal party position is expected Friday, to be delivered by Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem in a previously scheduled appearance.

Yet media outlets aligned with Hezbollah, along with its supporters on social platforms, quickly denounced the presidential decision. They described it as “another act of surrender by Lebanon, taken despite the absence of any Israeli willingness to meet Lebanese demands, chief among them ending attacks and violations, withdrawing from occupied territory, and releasing detainees.”

Sources familiar with Hezbollah’s internal discussions told Asharq Al-Awsat that Qassem will reiterate the party’s refusal to enter “a new round of negotiations as long as Israel fails to meet its obligations.”

He is also expected to reference the open letter he sent on November 6 to Lebanon’s President, Parliament Speaker, Premier and the public, stressing rejection of any new talks and reaffirming “the right of resistance.”

The sources added that both Hezbollah and Speaker Nabih Berri are dissatisfied with Karam’s appointment because of his known political stance against “the resistance.”

Still, neither intends to provoke internal conflict. Instead, they will continue working with the state “within the framework of insisting that Lebanon assume responsibility for halting Israeli aggression, recovering land, securing prisoner releases, initiating reconstruction, and above all, preventing another Israeli war.”

On Wednesday evening, Hezbollah’s Al-Manar TV criticized the inclusion of a civilian in the mechanism committee, declaring that “the Lebanese state has taken its decisions and must bear their consequences.”

It added that the government “has stepped into the unknown without guaranteed returns,” insisting that “the people of the land will not concede rights or surrender.”

Political analyst Kassem Kassir, who closely follows Hezbollah, stressed that the priority for the party and its supporters remains achieving concrete outcomes: stopping Israeli assaults, withdrawing from occupied land, freeing prisoners, and rebuilding devastated areas.

Ali Al-Amin, editor of the Janoubia news site, recalled that Hezbollah had already informed Lebanon’s leaders of its rejection of negotiations with Israel.

Still, Karam’s appointment was “a Lebanese decision driven by internal considerations,” and the party cannot block it at a time when Israel has threatened a devastating war.

While Hezbollah signaled displeasure - prompting small street protests - it has not issued an outright rejection.

Asked about the party’s red lines, Al-Amin said Hezbollah will not relinquish its weapons, particularly north of the Litani River.

Should the government attempt to enforce disarmament, he warned, confrontation with the army could follow, an outcome still viewed by Hezbollah as less costly than a new Israeli war with unpredictable consequences.