Iraq’s Ruling Alliance Backs Down on PMF Legislation

A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)
A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)
TT

Iraq’s Ruling Alliance Backs Down on PMF Legislation

A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)
A widely circulated image shows a military parade by one of the Popular Mobilization Forces’ factions. (Social media/handout via X)

Iraq’s ruling Shi’ite alliance has suspended efforts to pass legislation granting sweeping institutional powers to the Iran-backed Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), in a move aimed at easing tensions with Washington and buying time until the outcome of the standoff over Hezbollah’s weapons in Lebanon becomes clearer, political sources said.

The draft law, opposed by the United States, would have formalized the PMF – a coalition of mostly Shi’ite armed groups with more than 200,000 fighters – as a parallel structure to the Defense Ministry.

It included independent funding and a military academy, as well as a proposed “doctrinal guidance directorate” that critics said risked embedding sectarian ideology.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and senior security officials have repeatedly defended the PMF since the last war with Israel, warning against any attempt to disband it. But within the Shi’ite “Coordination Framework” coalition that dominates the government, divisions have deepened over the law.

“The armed wing that was supposed to shield key actors has become a burning coal no one can hold for long,” a senior coalition figure told Asharq al-Awsat.

While some leaders, including Badr Organisation chief Hadi al-Amiri and Islamic Supreme Council head Humam Hammoudi, pushed to put the law to a vote, others warned it risked provoking US retaliation ranging from sanctions to threats of military action. Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani even hinted at the possibility of a US-led invasion if the law passed.

Washington’s position, conveyed to Iraqi officials in recent weeks, is that enshrining the PMF would strengthen Iran’s hand in Baghdad and destabilize Iraq’s fragile constitutional order, an Iraqi official briefed on the talks said.

Instead of passing the law, the coalition is now exploring a compromise that would fold PMF command positions more tightly into government structures without requiring a parliamentary vote – a formula insiders describe as largely cosmetic. Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani is reluctant to champion even that, fearing a backlash from Washington and political rivals ahead of elections in November.

“It is like standing on a buried landmine,” a veteran Shi’ite politician said. “Any movement risks an explosion.”

The debate has become a no-win scenario for Iraq’s rulers: pushing the law through risks of US punishment, while shelving it angers powerful armed factions who view legal recognition as essential to preserving their influence. Some lawmakers have floated theatrical solutions, such as convening a session with Shi’ite MPs in military uniform but without enough quorum to pass the law.

For now, the coalition has opted for delay, tying the PMF’s fate to Lebanon, where Hezbollah faces unprecedented pressure over its weapons.

“Everything depends on whether Hezbollah can reposition itself, with or without arms,” said a Shi’ite leader. “If they strike a deal, you will see the impact in Baghdad.”

 



Jordan's Army Says Shot Down 10 Iranian Missiles

This screen grab made on July 18, 2026 from handout video footage released by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on July 17, 2026 shows what the US military says is the latest wave of precision strikes on strategic Iranian military sites. (Photo by US Central Command (CENTCOM) / AFP)
This screen grab made on July 18, 2026 from handout video footage released by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on July 17, 2026 shows what the US military says is the latest wave of precision strikes on strategic Iranian military sites. (Photo by US Central Command (CENTCOM) / AFP)
TT

Jordan's Army Says Shot Down 10 Iranian Missiles

This screen grab made on July 18, 2026 from handout video footage released by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on July 17, 2026 shows what the US military says is the latest wave of precision strikes on strategic Iranian military sites. (Photo by US Central Command (CENTCOM) / AFP)
This screen grab made on July 18, 2026 from handout video footage released by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on July 17, 2026 shows what the US military says is the latest wave of precision strikes on strategic Iranian military sites. (Photo by US Central Command (CENTCOM) / AFP)

Jordan's army said on Saturday it had shot down 10 Iranian missiles with no casualties or damage, as Tehran retaliated against American strikes by pressing attacks on other countries.

"Air defense systems... intercepted 10 Iranian missiles that had entered Jordanian airspace and were targeting the Kingdom's territory (which) were intercepted and shot down," the army said in a statement, adding that there were no casualties or material damage.

The United States and Iran exchanged strikes aimed at infrastructure and military targets on Saturday as their battle over the Strait of Hormuz intensified.

The region has endured days of back-and-forth attacks in a conflict increasingly focused on control of the strait. The collapse of an interim ceasefire leaves no clear end in sight for the war that the US and Israel began more than four months ago.


Lebanon: Aoun Departs for Washington to Meet Trump

FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa
FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa
TT

Lebanon: Aoun Departs for Washington to Meet Trump

FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa
FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Saturday left Beirut for Washington, where he is expected to meet Donald Trump, the Lebanese presidency said, after talks between Lebanon and Israel wrapped up in Italy.

Aoun will hold discussions "with several American officials on the situation in Lebanon and ways to strengthen the ceasefire,” particularly in Lebanon's south, as well as on "the withdrawal of Israel from the Lebanese regions it occupies,” the presidency said.

Meanwhile, the United States has postponed a virtual meeting between Lebanese, Israeli and US military delegations that had been expected on Friday to discuss the first phase of the “pilot zones” plan.

The delay puts the practical rollout of the framework agreement between Lebanon and Israel on hold, particularly the pilot zone arrangements, and renews questions over an implementation process that still has no clear timetable.

The technical meeting was agreed during the latest round of negotiations in Rome. It was intended to finalize the first phase mechanism: Israeli forces would withdraw from several pilot zones, allowing the Lebanese army to deploy there under the supervision of the monitoring committee. The plan would then expand in later stages.

Sources familiar with the negotiations told Asharq Al-Awsat that Washington requested the postponement, saying more time was needed to complete technical files, operational plans and implementation procedures.


Transport Costs: A Daily Burden Weighing on Khartoum Residents

A general view of a public transport terminal in Khartoum (Asharq Al-Awsat)
A general view of a public transport terminal in Khartoum (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Transport Costs: A Daily Burden Weighing on Khartoum Residents

A general view of a public transport terminal in Khartoum (Asharq Al-Awsat)
A general view of a public transport terminal in Khartoum (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Getting to work, hospital or university in Sudan’s capital, Khartoum, has become a test of survival in a city battered by war.

As transport fares rise, incomes fall and unemployment spreads, thousands of families are being forced to choose between commuting and paying for food, medicine and education.

The crisis has deepened as displaced people return to Khartoum and its three cities while services remain limited and the number of operating vehicles falls far short of demand. Higher fuel, spare parts and operating costs have pushed fares up further.

Passengers face long waits, frequent fare changes and shortages of vehicles on several routes. Damaged infrastructure and road closures have altered routes, lengthened journeys and forced many commuters to use more than one vehicle, sharply increasing daily costs.

Official figures reflect the wider economic strain. Gold export revenues reached about $370 million in the first quarter of this year, while fuel imports exceeded $697 million over the same period, highlighting the gap between export earnings and the cost of essential imports as large parts of the economy remain shut by the war.

For bus driver Abdullah Ali, 50, the transport crisis mirrors his personal losses. His bus was stolen when fighting began, and he was wounded by shrapnel in his right hand before fleeing to Gezira state, then Atbara and Shendi.

After returning to Khartoum about six months ago, he began working as a hired driver on a bus he does not own.

Ali told Asharq Al-Awsat that his income barely covered his daily needs and was not enough to renew his driver’s license. Many drivers were also unable to pay licensing and maintenance fees as fuel, oil, tire and spare-parts prices continued to rise, he said.

Moussa al-Safi, a laborer supporting four children, said transport consumed much of his daily income.

“The war has not only raised prices, but also reduced job opportunities,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat. “A worker pays to travel there and back without any guarantee of finding work or earning money by the end of the day.”

Private-sector employee Sami Abdel Qayoum said he often used more than one vehicle to reach work, taking up a large part of his monthly salary. To save money, he gets off before his destination and walks long distances.

University student Shehab Othman said some students arrived late or missed lectures because they could not afford transport, while others walked long distances to cut daily expenses.

Ezzedine Jaber, a member of the bus union, said short-route fares were about 2,000 Sudanese pounds, while some longer routes cost up to 6,000 pounds. Lower fuel prices were the main way to reduce operating costs and ease the burden on passengers, he said.

The impact extends beyond passenger transport.

“The price of a gallon of diesel has exceeded 40,000 pounds, raising the cost of transporting goods from Port Sudan and production areas to markets and export ports,” economist Mohamed al-Nayer told Asharq Al-Awsat. “That is ultimately reflected in the prices of goods and services.”

In Khartoum, where displaced people and refugees continue to return, transport fares have become part of the cost of survival.

Each increase can mean one less meal for a family, delayed medicine for a patient, a missed lecture for a student or kilometers of walking for a worker trying to protect what remains of their income.