'Blood Emirate' Expands Across Sahel in Hunt for Gold, Power  

Al-Shabaab fighters display weapons as they conduct military exercises in northern Mogadishu, Somalia, October 21, 2010. (AP file photo)
Al-Shabaab fighters display weapons as they conduct military exercises in northern Mogadishu, Somalia, October 21, 2010. (AP file photo)
TT

'Blood Emirate' Expands Across Sahel in Hunt for Gold, Power  

Al-Shabaab fighters display weapons as they conduct military exercises in northern Mogadishu, Somalia, October 21, 2010. (AP file photo)
Al-Shabaab fighters display weapons as they conduct military exercises in northern Mogadishu, Somalia, October 21, 2010. (AP file photo)

In the Libyan city of Sabha, known as the “Bride of the South,” authorities dismantled three terrorist networks in August, revealing links stretching across and back to the African coast.

Five months earlier, in March 2025, security forces in western Libya had reported the arrest of another “terrorist organization” and aired “confessions” from several members who said they belonged to a jihadist group called “Nasr”. They spoke of “plans to recruit young men and manufacture drones.”

Across the vast belt of the Sahel, spanning countries separated by as much as 2,300 kilometers, militant attacks have intensified in recent months. Omar al-Mahdi Bashara, a veteran Chadian rebel, says these operations aim to “subject the region to the calculations of global powers and exploit its impoverished, underdeveloped populations.”

Bashara, who leads the Chadian National Salvation Movement, told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the former colonizer is overseeing from afar the drawing of a new map for the Sahel and the Sahara in blood, with his eyes fixed on the region’s resources.”

The Sahel stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea. Geographically and climatically, it encompasses northern Senegal, southern Mauritania, Mali, southern Algeria, Niger, Chad, South Sudan and Eritrea.

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) use a broader definition that includes Mauritania, Senegal, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon and Chad.

The term “Sahel” here does not refer to a sea coast, but to the “edge” — the long geographic strip lying south of the Sahara Desert, from the Atlantic coast in the west (Mauritania and Senegal) to the Red Sea in the east (Sudan and Eritrea).

As terrorist organizations have expanded across this belt, they have also deepened the bloodshed through armed attacks targeting soldiers and civilians over the past decade, leaving more than 150,000 people dead, according to the Africa Center for Strategic Studies.

Before tracing the map of these groups — which Bashara sums up as “a nightmare weighing on a region forgotten by development” — it is worth noting a significant shift: these organizations are increasingly turning to modern technologies, even artificial intelligence, while expanding beyond their traditional rural strongholds into urban centers.

Groups that once thrived on the ignorance of poor communities are now adopting artificial intelligence, outpacing some of their state adversaries still clinging to rifles, cannons and conventional warplanes.

Domestic proxies

Amid a bloody contest for influence, recruits and resources, ISIS has come to rely on its affiliates in West Africa, Central Africa and the Greater Sahara, while al-Qaeda moves more fluidly through local alliances with Jama’a Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) and Ansar al-Din.

Hamdy Abdulrahman Hassan, an African affairs expert who teaches at Zayed University and Cairo University, noted that “many of these globalized groups have taken on a local character, and the lines between them have blurred.” Local residents interviewed by Asharq Al-Awsat echoed the same view.

Both al-Qaeda and ISIS now have domestic proxies. As grievances against “new ruling regimes” have grown, these groups have managed to infiltrate social structures and exploit poverty — a key factor behind their resurgence, according to Fareh Wali from Somalia.

Wali explained that al-Shabaab members “win people over with money and by appealing to national sentiment, portraying themselves as defenders of the country against an infidel government.” In a written statement to Asharq Al-Awsat, he added: “They exploit people’s ignorance, poverty and hatred of those in power to recruit them. Those who refuse are kidnapped or killed.”

In Somalia, al-Shabaab killed around 30 people in two attacks, one on the Cairo Hotel in Beledweyne and another on a military recruitment center in Damanio, in March and May 2025.

Egyptian scholar Hassan identified several factors behind the surge in terrorist activity, including the region’s “porous” borders, which are “too loose to control,” and the “fragile state structures inherited from colonial rule.”

He also pointed to the wave of coups that have swept the region, saying: “These groups found an opportunity to expand, especially in the absence of regional coordination.”

In several parts of the Sahel, al-Qaeda has adopted local grievances and “localized its narratives to appeal to communities,” according to a July 2025 report by the UN Monitoring Team. This ideological pragmatism, the report said, helped expand the group’s territorial influence.

Dr. Ramadan Qarni, another African affairs expert, linked this deep societal penetration to the entry of international powers into the Sahel, which militant groups “used to stir local sentiment against them.”

Alongside the financial incentives mentioned by Wali, “perceived injustices” have served as another justification used by extremists to gain ground among Sahel and Sahara populations disillusioned with the “new authorities” that took power after eight successive military coups.

Hassan noted that the Macina Brigade, a JNIM affiliate active in central Mali and along the Burkina Faso border, draws its strength from the “historic grievances” of the Fulani, nomadic herders who accuse local authorities and Dogon militias of committing abuses against them, including “mass killings.”

Following this same pattern, al-Qaeda has expanded its operations through its local arm, JNIM, while ISIS and its affiliates have intensified their campaigns across the Sahara.

Blood and interests

The growing threat in the Sahel is not only measured by the frequency of attacks and rising death tolls, but also by the “pragmatism” of militant groups operating on volatile ground fraught with conflict, as they interact with civilians and seek to recruit new fighters for their brutal wars.

Contrary to expectation, the behavior of ISIS and al-Qaeda reveals contrasting ideologies. Mauritanian scholar and researcher on the Sahel, the Sahara and armed groups, Mohameden Ayeb, describes them as “a mix of global jihadist Salafism, local exploitation of ethnic and tribal disputes, and economic interests rooted in smuggling and extortion.”

While al-Qaeda and its branches tend to adapt to local environments in the Sahel and court the goodwill of tribes, ISIS rejects popular compromise and clings to the notion of a centralized caliphate, adhering to a stricter and more violent framework.

From his own experience in several Sahel countries, Sudanese national Abdelghani Ismail recounts witnessing the movements of extremist groups. “They try to impose themselves wherever they exist to achieve their goals of seizing power,” he said.

Ismail, who later traveled to Europe through Libya, told Asharq Al-Awsat that these groups “are locked in a battle for survival, driven by a misguided ideology, and they do not hesitate to blow up anyone who stands in their way.”

Map of groups and resources

In this fragmented security landscape, Ayeb maps militant groups across the Sahel and the Sahara, linking their movements in some areas to a push to control the region’s subterranean wealth.

Ayeb warns that the threat posed by these groups has changed from what it was before, as fighting has intensified in the border triangle of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, historically known as Liptako- ourma, a zone the 2024 Global Terrorism Index ranked among the ten most terror-affected areas in the world.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Jama’a Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin, the al-Qaeda affiliate, and ISIS, Sahel Province, “have tightened their grip on this area rich in gold and uranium deposits,” and that “local arms of the groups have become the strike force in their sophisticated operations,” pointing to ISIS activity in Nigeria, Mozambique, Cameroon, Togo and Benin.

Al-Qaeda, he added, has not only deepened its reach in Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, it is also present in the northwestern borderlands bordering Lake Chad, overlapping with other groups such as Boko Haram.

Ayeb said Jama’a Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin, announced by al-Qaeda in March 2017, is a coalition of four main components, namely Ansar al-Din, led by Tuareg commander Iyad ag Ghaly, the Katibat al-Murabitun faction that split from al-Murabitun and was formerly led by Mokhtar Belmokhtar, the Macina Liberation Front, a socially rooted movement in central Mali led by Amadou Koufa, and the Greater Sahara Emirate, formerly affiliated with al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

The group has reached a new level of operational capability, able to carry out complex attacks on well-fortified garrisons using drones, improvised explosive devices and large numbers of fighters, according to the UN report to the Security Council in June 2025.

Fighting has escalated in recent months between ISIS and al-Qaeda over the Liptako-Gourma triangle, Ayeb said, because the area is rich in raw gold and dense forest terrain that “is inaccessible to ground forces or airborne operations.”

Arms linked to ISIS, including units in West Africa Province and Greater Sahara Province, have expanded their footprint and their propaganda output to recruit fighters and raise funds, with signs of foreign fighters, mostly from West Africa, arriving during 2024.

The United Nations estimates that ISIS in West Africa comprises between 8,000 and 12,000 fighters. UN experts say Jama’a Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin has also broadened its operational reach, operating with relative freedom in northern Mali and across much of Burkina Faso. ISIS activity in the Greater Sahara has also seen a resurgence, particularly along the Niger, Nigeria border where the group seeks to consolidate its presence.

Banditry and cattle theft

Militant groups in the Sahel employ multiple methods, often justified in religious terms, to secure weapons and funding, including theft and armed robbery. Ayeb described this as “a form of pragmatism that permits and forbids according to their interests.”

A report submitted by the UN Monitoring Team to the Security Council said ISIS has increasingly turned to kidnappings, either directly or through criminal networks, to obtain ransom payments. It added that such operations serve as a source of financing and recruitment, which “could further intensify as the group seeks to break its isolation in the border area between Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.”

Bashara told Asharq Al-Awsat that “armed groups have widely resorted to kidnapping local residents.”

Member states informed the UN committee preparing the report that “cattle theft in the Lake Chad Basin has become a common source of revenue, with livestock sold in local markets.” The report also noted that Boko Haram collects zakat, or alms, at a rate of four to five cows for every 120.

Regarding weapons supplies, both al-Qaeda and ISIS depend on “small and light arms, either smuggled or stolen.” Member states observed that the transfer of these weapons “is coordinated among organized criminal networks.”

The report warned that both groups “are actively seeking to enhance their expertise in drone operations by recruiting specialists.”

‘Sea jihad’

As militant groups in the Sahel continue to build up their forces and arsenals, academic expert Hassan warned of what he calls a “dangerous development,” noting that these groups “are preparing to move westward from the Sahel toward the ocean, in an attempt to control maritime routes and revive what they call ‘sea jihad,’ targeting gas lines.”

He also pointed out that after ISIS declared its Mozambique Province in Central Africa, it is now seeking to expand its rule by establishing a Borno Province in West Africa.

This geographical belt, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean in the west to the Red Sea in the east, forms a semi-desert strip that separates the Sahara Desert to the north from the tropical regions to the south, extending roughly 5,400 kilometers.

The Mozambique Province, though smaller in size, is more brutal, posing a direct threat to major international economic interests linked to natural gas, making it a focal point of global attention.

Lake Chad

What is happening in the Sahel is closely linked to events in Chad, which on August 18 dealt a sharp blow to ISIS in West Africa by arresting six leaders of a local cell, including Muslim Yusuf, the youngest son of Boko Haram’s founder in Nigeria.

A report by the African Center for Strategic Studies (ACSS) said Boko Haram and its West Africa Province were responsible for about 66% of violent deaths in Nigeria in 2024.

Although Chad lies in Central Africa, its northern region, Borkou-Ennedi-Tibesti, is a direct extension of the Sahara, while its south is closer to tropical Africa, and the country is a member of the Group of Five Sahel States, G5.

Academic Hamdi Abdulrahman told Asharq Al-Awsat the Lake Chad area has become a “testing ground for ISIS’s new caliphate,” a development he describes as entrenching a grim picture of a bloody conflict that has quietly escalated into one of the most violent jihadist theaters in the world.

He said ISIS controls large swathes of rural land in the poorest and most densely populated parts of Nigeria, and it levies taxes said to generate about $190 million a year as it seeks to expand its influence.

He added that the group has built a parallel state infrastructure in West Africa, creating departments to oversee military operations, collect taxes and enforce sharia.

Conflict between Islamist insurgencies in the region’s northeast killed nearly 350,000 people and displaced more than two million by the end of 2020, the United Nations Development Program said.

Who controls the lake?

Four countries share responsibility for managing Lake Chad and its resources: Chad, which contains most of the lake, Nigeria to the west and southwest, Niger to the northwest, and Cameroon to the southwest.

Bashara, the former rebel, said that about 70% of the lake’s area, spanning northeastern Nigeria, southeastern Niger, northern Cameroon and western Chad, “is now beyond the control of these states.”

Bashara told Asharq Al-Awsat: “Unfortunately, these terrorist groups enjoy broad popular support among local populations, which explains their continued presence across most of the Lake Chad Basin.”

Local residents, including Somali analyst Wali, attributed this support to “financial inducements” used to advance the groups’ agendas, but he notes this does not prevent them from “oppressing the most vulnerable members of society, especially women.”

Women and girls bear the greatest burden, according to Sima Bahous, Executive Director of UN Women, who told the Security Council in August 2025, that this is a region where women are effectively erased from public life.

Bahous said that over one million girls are out of school, 60% of whom have never attended, amid widespread child marriage and sexual violence.

Strikes with cheap drones

The security vacuum in parts of the Sahel, combined with the overlap of local terrorist agendas and international interventions, is turning the region into a long-term conflict hotspot that threatens North Africa and Europe. Notable developments in terrorist tactics are a key factor.

Hassan warned that “current waves of violence are unlike previous ones, with significant advances in tactics and capabilities.”

Since April 2025, ISIS in West Africa launched a campaign called “Burning the Camps,” targeting fortified military bases long considered secure. Hassan said: “Observers might think these are ordinary raids, but the reality is far more complex.”

He added: “Terrorists in the Lake Chad region have learned to carry out night attacks using drones and night-vision devices,” cautioning that the area “has become a major battlefield for ISIS West Africa and its rival faction Boko Haram. ISIS today is different from before; it has acquired night-vision equipment that allows coordinated strikes during Nigeria’s low-visibility hours.”

The group now arms itself with commercially available, low-cost drones launched from safe distances to drop small explosives on army and security camps, which Hassan described as “a persistent aerial threat that complicates traditional defenses.”

The United Nations recorded more than 400 terrorist attacks in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger alone between April and July 2025, killing 2,870 people, according to Leonardo Simao, head of the UN regional office for West Africa and the Sahel, speaking before the Security Council on August 8.

International maritime security

Concerns over the expanding use of modern technologies by extremist groups dominated the session. Simao warned of “increasing use of drones, encrypted communication technologies, and cooperation between terrorist groups and transnational organized crime networks.”

He also expressed concern for maritime security, noting that shipping routes “are now at risk” and that “youth have become a prime target for recruitment.”

In response to this threat, the Africa Center for Strategic Studies highlighted “growing cooperation between al-Shabaab in Somalia and the Houthis in Yemen,” warning of “rising risks to navigation in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, and western Indian Ocean.”

The center cited a UN report from February 2025 indicating “evidence of contacts between the Houthis and al-Shabaab, including actual meetings in 2024 regarding the transfer of military equipment and training from the Houthis in exchange for increased piracy and arms smuggling activities.”

The report noted that the relationship between the two groups “is based on mutual benefit, not sectarian affiliation,” and detailed a flow of weapons from Yemen to areas controlled by al-Shabaab between June and September 2024, including ammunition and explosives delivered via the ports of Marka and Barawe in Lower Shabelle. Al-Shabaab was tasked with escalating piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden and off the Somali coast.

‘Companies of evil’

UN concerns have grown over terrorist groups’ use of advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence and social media, which were described as “a new challenge” during a Security Council session last August.

These worries were reinforced by Rami Shaheen, an international expert on AI technology, who said, “Imagine a geographical theater spanning 10 African countries, where burning sands meet the coolest technologies in the AI world.” Shaheen noted that these groups are no longer simply armed militias, “they have become startup companies of evil investing in cutting-edge technologies.”

Shaheen told Asharq Al-Awsat about what he called “liquid recruitment,” highlighting the use of “customized content,” where “each target receives promotional messages tailored specifically to their vulnerabilities and hopes.” He gave the example of “a young man in Niger receiving an AI-modified video showing a prosperous future with the group.”

He also discussed what he termed “digital camouflage,” involving “self-destructing communication networks,” which are applications that send encrypted messages disappearing after being read.

He described this as a shift “from the rifle to the algorithm,” particularly when combined with funding through complex cryptocurrencies that are difficult to trace.

Shaheen’s points were echoed by Vladimir Voronkov, head of the UN Counter-Terrorism Office, before the Security Council in August, as reported by the UN mission in Libya.

Voronkov warned of the use of emerging technologies by extremist groups, saying they continue to use encrypted messaging platforms to secure their communications, exploit crowdfunding systems to raise funds, and increasingly experiment with AI to enhance their propaganda.

From Africa to Al-Hol in Syria

Libyan authorities dismantled three terrorist cells, announcing the discovery of large and varied caches of weapons buried in storage beneath a house in Sabha, including shells, bombs, improvised explosive devices, medium and heavy ammunition, and anti-aircraft guns.

Investigations indicated the first cell was responsible for recruiting fighters, facilitating their movement from North Africa to Somalia and the Sahel, and supplying them with forged passports and safe housing.

The second cell laundered money through front companies to help fighters and their families escape the Al-Hol camp in Syria and relocate to Libya, where they were housed in accommodation funded by ISIS, the cell also sought to make investments in regional states.

The third cell handled transfers to ISIS using cryptocurrencies.

A source at the Libyan public prosecutor’s office told Asharq Al-Awsat that ongoing investigations showed the cells received logistical support from groups in the Sahel, and from some neighboring Arab states.

The source also described the July 2024 dismantling of a cell led by a Libyan who had ties to Jama’a Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin, saying that cell was involved in supplying satellite communications equipment.

In confessions aired by a security agency in western Libya, one suspect spoke of plans to target sensitive military and security sites, and of contacting Algerians to train members of the network in drone manufacture.

Expulsion of French forces

Explanations for developments in the African Sahel vary.

At the UN level, Senegalese diplomat Abdoulaye Mar Dieye, the UN Special Coordinator for the Sahel, believes that “the destruction of Libya has fueled counterterrorism challenges in the Sahel,” dismissing the idea that the crisis stems from events in northern Mali some 13 years ago.

In remarks reported by Senegalese media in early August, Dieye said: “The world owes a huge debt to the Sahel countries, and that debt has not yet been paid.”

At the same time, local residents in several Sahel states, speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, said the situation in their countries is a predictable outcome of weak governance. Bashara noted that ethnic tensions have “fueled conflicts and opened the way for cross-border jihadist growth.”

Some observers argued that the expulsion of French forces from several Sahel states has paved the way for the rise of extremist groups.

Qarni said that “targeting numerous local leaders and chiefs has weakened governance,” adding that “the absence of genuine development frameworks and the channeling of national resources toward military efforts have also exacerbated the terrorist phenomenon.”

Bashara considered Qarni’s assessment one of the main factors enabling terrorist expansion, attributing the failure of governments in the Lake Chad Basin to confront these groups to “the exclusion of local communities from development and security,” adding, “N’Djamena has made security the responsibility of the people themselves.”

Mali has faced a deepening security crisis since 2012, fueled by armed rebellion. Yet the UN peacekeeping mission requested to leave the country at the end of 2023, after a decade of support to the government.

France remained the main security and military actor in Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso and Chad, and to a lesser extent in Mauritania, providing military and intelligence support until its withdrawal. Russia has since emerged as a “new alternative” in an attempt to fill the resulting vacuum.

Gold before ideology

Dieye said the aim of warring groups is less about religion and more about economic gain. Speaking in early August, he said, all the terrorism we see is not ideological; it is purely economic.

Ayeb agreed, noting that “the material dimension of these groups is always the priority,” explaining that “Nigeria is a gas country, Niger is a uranium region, and Mali is a gold zone; therefore, the problems these countries face are linked to their resources.”

Bashara added that “gold mines in northern Mali are overseen by terrorist groups.”

The Malian transitional government’s Minister of Mines, Amadou Keita, previously revealed that proceeds from illegal gold mining “contribute significantly to financing terrorist and criminal networks.”

The South African Institute for Security Studies points out that jihadist groups such as ISIS’s Sahel Province impose taxes on miners and control smuggling routes.

Gaddafi’s weapons

Experts on African affairs say developments in the African Sahel cannot be separated from the interests and historical legacies of international powers in a region plagued by poverty and conflict, despite its abundant resources.

Bashara said that “the French colonizer will not leave its former colonies so easily, seeing the resource-rich Sahel countries as part of its strategic reserve for itself and future generations.”

He accused France, whose forces were previously expelled from Sahel states, of “mobilizing its proxies in extremist groups and affiliated organizations to destabilize countries from which its military bases were recently removed.”

Following military coups in Mali (2021), Burkina Faso (2022), and Niger (2023), French troops were gradually withdrawn from these countries, eroding Paris’s historical influence in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso.

Russia quickly entered through southern Libya into the Sahel, especially Mali, deploying forces it calls the “African Legion” to fill the security vacuum, alongside growing influence from China and Türkiye.

The magazine African Defense Forum, affiliated with AFRICOM, previously reported on Russian moves in the Sahel, citing military analyst Andrew McGregor from the Jamestown Foundation in July 2025.

McGregor said Russia has been using the Khadim airbase as an advanced platform for operations in the region.

Located about 100 kilometers east of Benghazi, the Khadim base is believed by McGregor to have become a hub for storing weapons and smuggling resources to and from the African Sahel.

He added that Russia is repeating the mistakes of Moammar al-Gaddafi in the 1980s when he attempted to use Soviet weapons to expand influence in the Sahel. The Kremlin is now reinvesting in the same base Gaddafi used to attack Chad.

Russia, seeking to build new alliances in Africa, signed a defense memorandum of understanding with Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso, announced on August 14.

However, the Conflict Armament Research Center, which tracks conventional weapons and military materials, said in April 2025 that weapons flowing from Libya to the Sahel accounted for only 7% of the total arms circulating there.

The situation in the African Sahel thus reveals a complex equation in which rising terrorist activity intertwines with international influence and interventions, while the struggle for resources remains a central objective pursued by armed groups.



Is Iran Pushing Houthis Toward Military Action Against Washington?

Houthis continue mobilization, fundraising, and declare combat readiness (AP) 
Houthis continue mobilization, fundraising, and declare combat readiness (AP) 
TT

Is Iran Pushing Houthis Toward Military Action Against Washington?

Houthis continue mobilization, fundraising, and declare combat readiness (AP) 
Houthis continue mobilization, fundraising, and declare combat readiness (AP) 

As US military movements intensify in the Middle East and the possibility of strikes on Iran looms, Yemen’s Houthi group has continued military preparations, mobilizing fighters and establishing new weapons sites.

The Houthi mobilization comes at a time when the group is widely viewed as one of Iran’s most important regional arms for retaliation.

Although the Iran-backed group has not issued any official statement declaring its position on a potential US attack on Iran, its leaders have warned Washington against any military action and against bearing full responsibility for any escalation and its consequences.

They have hinted that any response would be handled in accordance with the group’s senior leadership's assessment, after evaluating developments and potential repercussions.

Despite these signals, some interpret the Houthis’ stance as an attempt to avoid drawing the attention of the current US administration, led by President Donald Trump, to the need for preemptive action in anticipation of a potential Houthi response.

The Trump administration previously launched a military campaign against the group in the spring of last year, inflicting heavy losses.

Islam al-Mansi, an Egyptian researcher specializing in Iranian affairs, said Iran may avoid burning all its cards unless absolutely necessary, particularly given US threats to raise the level of escalation should any Iranian military proxies intervene or take part in a confrontation.

Iran did not resort to using its military proxies during its confrontation with Israel or during a limited US strike last summer because it did not perceive an existential threat, al-Mansi said.

That calculation could change in the anticipated confrontation, potentially prompting Houthi intervention, including targeting US allies, interests, and military forces, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Al-Mansi added that although Iran previously offered, within a negotiating framework, to abandon its regional proxies, including the Houthis, this makes it more likely that Tehran would use them in retaliation, noting that Iran created these groups to defend its territory from afar.

Many intelligence reports suggest that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has discussed with the Houthis the activation of alternative support arenas in a potential US-Iran confrontation, including the use of cells and weapons not previously deployed.

Visible readiness

In recent days, Chinese media outlets cited an unnamed Houthi military commander as saying the group had raised its alert level and carried out inspections of missile launch platforms in several areas across Yemen, including the strategically important Red Sea region.

In this context, Yemeni political researcher Salah Ali Salah said the Houthis would participate in defending Iran against any US attacks, citing the group’s media rhetoric accompanying mass rallies, which openly supports Iran’s right to defend itself.

While this rhetoric maintains some ambiguity regarding Iran, it repeatedly invokes the war in Gaza and renews Houthi pledges to resume military escalation in defense of the besieged enclave’s population, Salah told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He noted that Iran would not have shared advanced and sophisticated military technologies with the Houthis without a high degree of trust in their ability to use them in Iran’s interest.

In recent months, following Israeli strikes on the unrecognized Houthi government and several of its leaders, hardline Houthi figures demonstrating strong loyalty to Iran have become more prominent.

On the ground, the group has established new military sites and moved equipment and weapons to new locations along and near the coast, alongside the potential use of security cells beyond Yemen’s borders.

Salah said that if the threat of a military strike on Iran escalates, the Iranian response could take a more advanced form, potentially including efforts to close strategic waterways, placing the Bab al-Mandab Strait within the Houthis’ target range.

Many observers have expressed concern that the Houthis may have transferred fighters and intelligence cells outside Yemen over recent years to target US and Western interests in the region.

Open options

After a ceasefire was declared in Gaza, the Houthis lost one of their key justifications for mobilizing fighters and collecting funds. The group has since faced growing public anger over its practices and worsening humanitarian conditions, responding with media messaging aimed at convincing audiences that the battle is not over and that further rounds lie ahead.

Alongside weekly rallies in areas under their control in support of Gaza, the Houthis have carried out attacks on front lines with Yemen’s internationally recognized government, particularly in Taiz province.

Some military experts describe these incidents as probing attacks, while others see them as attempts to divert attention from other activities.

In this context, Walid al-Abara, head of the Yemen and Gulf Studies Center, said the Houthis entered a critical phase after the Gaza war ended, having lost one of the main justifications for their attacks on Red Sea shipping.

As a result, they may seek to manufacture new pretexts, including claims of sanctions imposed against them, to maintain media momentum and their regional role.

Al-Abara told Asharq Al-Awsat that the group has two other options. The first is redirecting its activity inward to strengthen its military and economic leverage, either to impose its conditions in any future settlement or to consolidate power.

The second is yielding to international and regional pressure and entering a negotiation track, particularly if sanctions intensify or its economic and military capacity declines.

According to an assessment by the Yemen and Gulf Studies Center, widespread protests in Iran are increasingly pressuring the regime’s ability to manage its regional influence at the same pace as before, without dismantling its network of proxies.

This reality is pushing Tehran toward a more cautious approach, governed by domestic priorities and cost-benefit calculations, while maintaining a minimum level of external influence without broad escalation.

Within this framework, al-Abara said Iran is likely to maintain a controlled continuity in its relationship with the Houthis through selective support that ensures the group remains effective.

However, an expansion of protests or a direct military strike on Iran could open the door to a deeper Houthi repositioning, including broader political and security concessions in exchange for regional guarantees.


The Gaza Ceasefire Began Months Ago. Here’s Why the Fighting Persists

Israeli soldiers and tanks stand in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the Israel-Gaza border, in Israel, February 4, 2026. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
Israeli soldiers and tanks stand in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the Israel-Gaza border, in Israel, February 4, 2026. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
TT

The Gaza Ceasefire Began Months Ago. Here’s Why the Fighting Persists

Israeli soldiers and tanks stand in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the Israel-Gaza border, in Israel, February 4, 2026. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
Israeli soldiers and tanks stand in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the Israel-Gaza border, in Israel, February 4, 2026. REUTERS/Amir Cohen

As the bodies of two dozen Palestinians killed in Israeli strikes arrived at hospitals in Gaza on Wednesday, the director of one asked a question that has echoed across the war-ravaged territory for months.

“Where is the ceasefire? Where are the mediators?” Shifa Hospital's Mohamed Abu Selmiya wrote on Facebook.

At least 556 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli strikes since a US-brokered truce came into effect in October, including 24 on Wednesday and 30 on Saturday, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Four Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza in the same period, with more injured, including a soldier whom the military said was severely wounded when militants opened fire near the ceasefire line in northern Gaza overnight.

Other aspects of the agreement have stalled, including the deployment of an international security force, Hamas' disarmament and the start of Gaza's reconstruction. The opening of the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt raised hope of further progress, but fewer than 50 people were allowed to cross on Monday, The Associated Press said.

Hostages freed as other issues languish In October, after months of stalled negotiations, Israel and Hamas accepted a 20-point plan proposed by US President Donald Trump aimed at ending the war unleashed by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack into Israel.

At the time, Trump said it would lead to a “Strong, Durable, and Everlasting Peace."

Hamas freed all the living hostages it still held at the outset of the deal in exchange for thousands of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel and the remains of others.

But the larger issues the agreement sought to address, including the future governance of the strip, were met with reservations, and the US offered no firm timeline.

The return of the remains of hostages meanwhile stretched far beyond the 72-hour timeline outlined in the agreement. Israel recovered the body of the last hostage only last week, after accusing Hamas and other militant groups of violating the ceasefire by failing to return all of the bodies. The militants said they were unable to immediately locate all the remains because of the massive destruction caused by the war — a claim Israel rejected.

The ceasefire also called for an immediate influx of humanitarian aid, including equipment to clear rubble and rehabilitate infrastructure. The United Nations and humanitarian groups say aid deliveries to Gaza's 2 million Palestinians have fallen short due to customs clearance problems and other delays. COGAT, the Israeli military body overseeing aid to Gaza, has called the UN's claims “simply a lie.”

Ceasefire holds despite accusations

Violence has sharply declined since the ceasefire paused a war in which more than 71,800 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The ministry is part of the Hamas-led government and maintains detailed records seen as generally reliable by UN agencies and independent experts.

Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people in the initial October 2023 attack and took around 250 hostage.

Both sides say the agreement is still in effect and use the word “ceasefire” in their communications. But Israel accuses Hamas fighters of operating beyond the truce line splitting Gaza in half, threatening its troops and occasionally opening fire, while Hamas accuses Israeli forces of gunfire and strikes on residential areas far from the line.

Palestinians have called on US and Arab mediators to get Israel to stop carrying out deadly strikes, which often kill civilians. Among those killed on Wednesday were five children, including two babies. Hamas, which accuses Israel of hundreds of violations, called it a “grave circumvention of the ceasefire agreement.”

In a joint statement on Sunday, eight Arab and Muslim countries condemned Israel’s actions since the agreement took effect and urged restraint from all sides “to preserve and sustain the ceasefire.”

Israel says it is responding to daily violations committed by Hamas and acting to protect its troops. “While Hamas’ actions undermine the ceasefire, Israel remains fully committed to upholding it,” the military said in a statement on Wednesday.

“One of the scenarios the (military) has to be ready for is Hamas is using a deception tactic like they did before October 7 and rearming and preparing for an attack when it’s comfortable for them,” said Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani, a military spokesperson.

Some signs of progress

The return of the remains of the last hostage, the limited opening of the Rafah crossing, and the naming of a Palestinian committee to govern Gaza and oversee its reconstruction showed a willingness to advance the agreement despite the violence.

Last month, US envoy Steve Witkoff, who played a key role in brokering the truce, said it was time for “transitioning from ceasefire to demilitarization, technocratic governance, and reconstruction.”

That will require Israel and Hamas to grapple with major issues on which they have been sharply divided, including whether Israel will fully withdraw from Gaza and Hamas will lay down its arms.

Though political leaders are holding onto the term “ceasefire” and have yet to withdraw from the process, there is growing despair in Gaza.

On Saturday, Atallah Abu Hadaiyed heard explosions in Gaza City during his morning prayers and ran outside to find his cousins lying on the ground as flames curled around them.

“We don’t know if we’re at war or at peace,” he said from a displacement camp, as tarpaulin strips blew off the tent behind him.


What to Know as Iran and US Set for Nuclear Talks in Oman

The flags of USA and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. EPA/ALI HAIDER
The flags of USA and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. EPA/ALI HAIDER
TT

What to Know as Iran and US Set for Nuclear Talks in Oman

The flags of USA and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. EPA/ALI HAIDER
The flags of USA and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. EPA/ALI HAIDER

Iran and the United States will hold talks Friday in Oman, their latest over Tehran's nuclear program after Israel launched a 12-day war on the country in June and Iran launched a bloody crackdown on nationwide protests.

US President Donald Trump has kept up pressure on Iran, suggesting America could attack Iran over the killing of peaceful demonstrators or if Tehran launches mass executions over the protests. Meanwhile, Trump has pushed Iran's nuclear program back into the frame as well after the June war disrupted five rounds of talks held in Rome and Muscat, Oman, last year.

Trump began the diplomacy initially by writing a letter last year to Iran’s 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to jump start these talks. Khamenei has warned Iran would respond to any attack with an attack of its own, particularly as the theocracy he commands reels following the protests.

Here’s what to know about Iran’s nuclear program and the tensions that have stalked relations between Tehran and Washington since the 1979 Iranian Revolution.

Trump writes letter to Khamenei Trump dispatched the letter to Khamenei on March 5, 2025, then gave a television interview the next day in which he acknowledged sending it. He said: “I’ve written them a letter saying, ‘I hope you’re going to negotiate because if we have to go in militarily, it’s going to be a terrible thing.’”

Since returning to the White House, the president has been pushing for talks while ratcheting up sanctions and suggesting a military strike by Israel or the US could target Iranian nuclear sites.

A previous letter from Trump during his first term drew an angry retort from the supreme leader.

But Trump’s letters to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in his first term led to face-to-face meetings, though no deals to limit Pyongyang’s atomic bombs and a missile program capable of reaching the continental US.

Oman mediated previous talks

Oman, a sultanate on the eastern edge of the Arabian Peninsula, has mediated talks between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff. The two men have met face to face after indirect talks, a rare occurrence due to the decades of tensions between the countries.

It hasn't been all smooth, however. Witkoff at one point made a television appearance in which he suggested 3.67% enrichment for Iran could be something the countries could agree on. But that’s exactly the terms set by the 2015 nuclear deal struck under former President Barack Obama, from which Trump unilaterally withdrew America. Witkoff, Trump and other American officials in the time since have maintained Iran can have no enrichment under any deal, something to which Tehran insists it won't agree.

Those negotiations ended, however, with Israel launching the war in June on Iran.

The 12-day war and nationwide protests Israel launched what became a 12-day war on Iran in June that included the US bombing Iranian nuclear sites. Iran later acknowledged in November that the attacks saw it halt all uranium enrichment in the country, though inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency have been unable to visit the bombed sites.

Iran soon experienced protests that began in late December over the collapse of the country's rial currency. Those demonstrations soon became nationwide, sparking Tehran to launch a bloody crackdown that killed thousands and saw tens of thousands detained by authorities.

Iran’s nuclear program worries the West Iran has insisted for decades that its nuclear program is peaceful. However, its officials increasingly threaten to pursue a nuclear weapon. Iran now enriches uranium to near weapons-grade levels of 60%, the only country in the world without a nuclear weapons program to do so.

Under the original 2015 nuclear deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium up to 3.67% purity and to maintain a uranium stockpile of 300 kilograms (661 pounds). The last report by the International Atomic Energy Agency on Iran’s program put its stockpile at some 9,870 kilograms (21,760 pounds), with a fraction of it enriched to 60%.

US intelligence agencies assess that Iran has yet to begin a weapons program, but has “undertaken activities that better position it to produce a nuclear device, if it chooses to do so.” Iranian officials have threatened to pursue the bomb.

Decades of tense relations between Iran and the US Iran was once one of the US’s top allies in the Mideast under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who purchased American military weapons and allowed CIA technicians to run secret listening posts monitoring the neighboring Soviet Union. The CIA had fomented a 1953 coup that cemented the shah’s rule.

But in January 1979, the shah, fatally ill with cancer, fled Iran as mass demonstrations swelled against his rule. The Iranian Revolution followed, led by Grand Khomeini, and created Iran’s theocratic government.

Later that year, university students overran the US Embassy in Tehran, seeking the shah’s extradition and sparking the 444-day hostage crisis that saw diplomatic relations between Iran and the US severed.

The Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s saw the US back Saddam Hussein. The “Tanker War” during that conflict saw the US launch a one-day assault that crippled Iran at sea, while the US later shot down an Iranian commercial airliner that the US military said it mistook for a warplane.

Iran and the US have seesawed between enmity and grudging diplomacy in the years since, with relations peaking when Tehran made the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. But Trump unilaterally withdrew America from the accord in 2018, sparking tensions in the Mideast that persist today.