General Assembly Adopts Resolution Asking Israel to Withdraw from Golan

Israeli soldiers operate in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights near the border with Syria, December 28, 2023. REUTERS/Gil Eliyahu/ File Photo
Israeli soldiers operate in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights near the border with Syria, December 28, 2023. REUTERS/Gil Eliyahu/ File Photo
TT

General Assembly Adopts Resolution Asking Israel to Withdraw from Golan

Israeli soldiers operate in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights near the border with Syria, December 28, 2023. REUTERS/Gil Eliyahu/ File Photo
Israeli soldiers operate in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights near the border with Syria, December 28, 2023. REUTERS/Gil Eliyahu/ File Photo

The UN General Assembly has adopted a resolution calling on Israel to withdraw from the Golan Heights.

The resolution, titled “The Syrian Golan,” was adopted on Tuesday by a recorded vote of 123 in favor to seven against (Federated States of Micronesia, Israel, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga, United States), with 41 abstentions.

By its terms, the Assembly declared that Israel’s December 14, 1981 decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan “is null and void and called for its rescission.”

The Assembly also called on Israel to resume talks on the Syrian and Lebanese tracks and to respect the commitments and undertakings reached previously.

It also demanded that Israel withdraw from the occupied Syrian Golan to the line of June 4, 1967.

General Assembly resolutions are not binding but carry political weight.

Israel's Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon said the “General Assembly once again proves how disconnected it is from reality.”

“Instead of addressing the crimes of the Iranian axis and the dangerous activities of militias in Syria, it demands that Israel withdraw from the Golan Heights - a vital defense line that protects our citizens. Israel will not return to the 1967 lines and will not abandon the Golan. Not now, not ever,” he added on X.



Sadr Gives Armed Wing One Week to Join Gov’t

A motorcycle passes a poster of Muqtada al-Sadr on a street in Baghdad, May 27, 2026 (AFP)
A motorcycle passes a poster of Muqtada al-Sadr on a street in Baghdad, May 27, 2026 (AFP)
TT

Sadr Gives Armed Wing One Week to Join Gov’t

A motorcycle passes a poster of Muqtada al-Sadr on a street in Baghdad, May 27, 2026 (AFP)
A motorcycle passes a poster of Muqtada al-Sadr on a street in Baghdad, May 27, 2026 (AFP)

Sadrist movement leader Muqtada al-Sadr has given his armed wing one week to complete its break from the movement and join state institutions, as a senior figure in Iraq’s ruling Coordination Framework described “armed resistance” as a “burden on society.”

Sadr said on Wednesday he was merging his armed wing, Saraya al-Salam, into the state and called on Popular Mobilization Forces factions to hand over their weapons.

A day later, he ordered Saraya al-Salam commanders to complete the separation and integration process within a week.

A document issued by Sadr’s office said he had “assigned a number of commanders in Saraya al-Salam to complete the procedures for separating the military side from the movement and move toward integration with state institutions.”

According to the document, Sadr tasked the director of his private office, Haider al-Jabri, the military adviser, Abu Doaa al-Issawi, the jihadist aide, Tahseen al-Hamidawi, and other officials with completing the separation within one week.

The full handover is to be completed by June 5, with the civilian side folded into Al-Bunyan al-Marsous in coordination with official authorities.

Members of the Sadrist movement say Al-Bunyan al-Marsous is a charitable institution that provides social assistance to different groups inside and outside Iraq.

Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi welcomed Sadr’s move, saying it marked “an important path toward strengthening internal stability and consolidating the principle of restricting weapons to the state.”

Zaidi called on all factions to work under the umbrella of the state and its official institutions, stressing that the state “is the sole authority authorized to carry weapons and enforce the law.”

Sadr had previously announced the dismantling of his armed wing in 2017 and 2019, but his latest position comes as a new government faces regional and international pressure to disarm factions.

Saraya al-Salam is part of the Popular Mobilization Forces through brigades 313, 314 and 315, and carries out security duties in several areas, most notably Samarra.

Rejection of uncontrolled weapons

Asaib Ahl al-Haq, led by Qais al-Khazali, said the movement and its parliamentary wing, the Sadiqoun bloc, believe in the authority of the state and in restricting weapons to its control, rejecting any uncontrolled arms or weapons outside official institutions.

Khaled al-Saadi, a member of Sadiqoun’s political bureau, told the press that “Asaib supports restricting weapons to the state, provided the state can protect Iraq’s security by land, air and sea from various threats.”

Asaib Ahl al-Haq leader Qais al-Khazali said earlier that “a resistance that does not have an integrated project for construction and development may, over time, become a burden on society.”

Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada spokesman Kazem al-Fartousi said his faction’s position on handing over weapons to the government was “firm and not subject to change,” but added that “resistance weapons” would remain as long as the reasons for their existence continued.

Fartousi told the press that “the brigades view their support for Prime Minister Zaidi in managing the state and achieving stability as positive, but at the same time reject the idea of handing over weapons at the current stage.”

He also criticized the idea of “directly integrating all armed formations into the security services,” saying “each side has its own specialization, and any discussion of full integration into state institutions is linked to specific security and political circumstances,” as he put it.

It is widely rumored that five armed factions have agreed to restrict their weapons to government institutions, though no clear details have emerged on how such a process would be carried out. Harakat al-Nujaba and Kataib Hezbollah, however, have refused to comply with disarmament requests.

Nazem al-Saidi, head of Harakat al-Nujaba’s executive council, said earlier this month that efforts to restrict weapons target “undisciplined” arms that cause “chaos,” not “resistance weapons.”

Disarmament plan

Asharq Al-Awsat revealed on May 9, 2026, that an Iraqi committee, including Prime Minister-designate Zaidi, outgoing Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, and Hadi al-Amiri, was working to complete an “executive project” to disarm armed factions, ahead of presenting it to Washington, amid mounting US pressure to keep militias away from the new government and state institutions.

The committee had presented militia leaders with “ideas on how to disarm,” but some meetings “did not proceed calmly,” according to people familiar with the matter.

The plan includes removing heavy and medium weapons and restructuring the Popular Mobilization Forces, alongside expected changes to sensitive security agencies, including the intelligence service.

But political sources questioned the government’s ability to implement the project, saying it may be aimed at “buying time.” Prominent factions, including Kataib Hezbollah and Harakat al-Nujaba, have declared they will not hand over weapons “whatever the cost.”


Israel PM Says Orders Army to Take Control of 70 Percent of Gaza Strip

Palestinians gather on a heavily damaged street to perform morning prayers marking the start of Eid al-Adha in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on May 27, 2026. (AFP)
Palestinians gather on a heavily damaged street to perform morning prayers marking the start of Eid al-Adha in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on May 27, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Israel PM Says Orders Army to Take Control of 70 Percent of Gaza Strip

Palestinians gather on a heavily damaged street to perform morning prayers marking the start of Eid al-Adha in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on May 27, 2026. (AFP)
Palestinians gather on a heavily damaged street to perform morning prayers marking the start of Eid al-Adha in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on May 27, 2026. (AFP)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday he had ordered the country's military to take control of 70 percent of the Gaza Strip, in defiance of the terms of a fragile ceasefire that took effect in October.

"We are currently squeezing Hamas. We now control 60 percent of the territory in the strip," he said at a conference in an occupied West Bank settlement, according to a video aired by Israel's Channel 12 network.

He said the military had controlled 50 percent of Gaza under the terms of the ceasefire, adding: "My directive is to move to... 70 percent".

"We're squeezing them from all (sides). We'll deal with what's left afterwards."

The first phase of the truce saw the last hostages seized in Hamas's October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel, which triggered the war in Gaza, released in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel.

The transition to the second phase, which was supposed to involve Hamas's disarmament and a gradual withdrawal of the Israeli army, has been stalled for months.

Under the terms of the ceasefire, Israeli forces were to pull back behind a so-called "yellow line", a demarcation between the area under Hamas control and that held by the Israeli army.

Netanyahu announced on May 15 that the Israeli army had expanded its grip on the Gaza Strip.

"There were those who said: get out, get out. We did not get out. Today we control... how much? 60 percent. Tomorrow we shall see," he said at the time.

Gaza remains gripped by daily violence, with both the Israeli military and Hamas accusing one another of violating the truce in effect since October 10.

Israel has killed more than 900 people since the ceasefire, according to Gaza's health ministry, which operates under Hamas authority and whose figures are considered reliable by the United Nations.

Israel said on Wednesday it had killed the new head of Hamas's armed wing in Gaza, Mohammed Odeh, after killing his predecessor earlier this month.

Since Hamas's October 2023 attack, Israel has systematically targeted the group's leaders, both in Gaza and across the region.

Odeh is the fourth head of the Ezzedine Al-Qassam Brigades that Israel says it has killed since the start of the Gaza war.

On Wednesday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz repeated Israel's goal of ending Hamas's rule over the Palestinian territory and alluded to a plan for the forced displacement of its residents.

"The plan for voluntary migration from Gaza will also be implemented -- everything will be done at the right time and in the right way," he said.


Between Bringing Down Governments and Losing Control: Hezbollah Faces a New Political Equation

The Lebanese government in session chaired by President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)
The Lebanese government in session chaired by President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)
TT

Between Bringing Down Governments and Losing Control: Hezbollah Faces a New Political Equation

The Lebanese government in session chaired by President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)
The Lebanese government in session chaired by President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)

Since becoming involved politics in 1992, Hezbollah gradually evolved from a parliamentary player with limited influence into a central force in Lebanon’s governing equation. The group first engaged in legislative work and did not directly join governments until 2005, following the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon.

Since then, Hezbollah has sought to impose its control and influence over successive governments, obstructing some and bringing down others after introducing the concepts of the “blocking third” and consensual decision-making, while it and its ally the Amal Movement monopolized the entire Shiite ministerial share to use as leverage to topple governments or prevent them from functioning.

In this context, remarks by Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem that “people have the right to take to the streets, bring down the government and bring down the US-Israeli project” did not come as a surprise to those who have closely followed Hezbollah’s conduct over the years in both the formation and collapse of governments. The same applies to comments by Hezbollah Political Council member and former minister Mahmoud Qamati, who said: “The president or anyone else, with a government majority, wants to target the resistance during this era. They should know that they are a passing side that comes and goes, while we are deeply rooted in this country.”

Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem

A Long Path of Pressuring Governments

Hezbollah’s first attempt to pressure the government in a bid to bring it down dates back to 2006, when it and the Amal Movement withdrew their ministers from the government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora in protest against the vote in favor of establishing the international tribunal to prosecute Hariri’s killers.

The “Shiite duo” and the Free Patriotic Movement then organized a lengthy sit-in in downtown Beirut on the grounds that the government lacked sectarian legitimacy. Nevertheless, the cabinet continued functioning until May 2008, when Hezbollah launched a military move in Beirut and parts of Mount Lebanon in response to government decisions concerning its telecommunications network.

That escalation led Lebanese factions to convene in Qatar, resulting in what became known as the Doha Agreement, through which Hezbollah secured the “blocking third,” meaning that it and its allies obtained one-third of cabinet seats, enabling them to bring down the government.

That scenario materialized in 2011, when Hezbollah and its allies withdrew their ministers from the government of Prime Minister Saad Hariri, leading to its collapse.

Former Lebanese finance minister, current member of parliament and a high ranking member of the Shiite Muslim Amal movement Ali Hasan Khalil (L), points as he stands next to Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam during his visit to the heavily-damaged southern village of Kfar Shouba, near the border with Israel on February 8, 2026.(Photo by Rabih DAHER / AFP)

Salam Government “Freed” From Hezbollah’s Grip

Subsequent governments were formed with Hezbollah and its allies holding the “blocking third,” allowing them to control the decisions and fate of successive cabinets. Six governments were formed from 2011 onward, culminating in the current government headed by Nawaf Salam, which is considered the first government since 2008 to break free from Hezbollah’s dominance through the “blocking third.”

As a result, Hezbollah failed to prevent the government from adopting decisions placing arms exclusively under state control, classifying its military wing as illegitimate, and passing other measures opposed and criticized by the group.

Ali al-Amin, political writer and editor-in-chief of the Janoubia website, said Hezbollah had, since the Doha Agreement, “sought to blackmail successive governments through the invention of concepts such as the ‘guaranteeing third,’ consensus, or legitimacy.”

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Amin said that “during the current phase, specifically under the present government, the equations have completely changed. The government was formed on different foundations reflecting the new political balance.”

He added that “even if Hezbollah believes bringing down the current government through street pressure is possible, it realizes that forming another government on its own terms is no longer feasible. Therefore, its current threats to topple the government amount to intimidation and rhetorical escalation, nothing more than an expression of the predicament the party is facing, reflected in Sheikh Naim Qassem’s contradictory rhetoric.”

He added that Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri is unlikely to support Hezbollah in such a move, meaning the group has virtually no chance of bringing down the government or changing the policies it is complaining about.