Egypt Pushes Diplomacy to Clear Hurdles in US-Iran Talks

Meeting between Badr Abdelatty, Abbas Araghchi, and Rafael Grossi in Cairo in September (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
Meeting between Badr Abdelatty, Abbas Araghchi, and Rafael Grossi in Cairo in September (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
TT

Egypt Pushes Diplomacy to Clear Hurdles in US-Iran Talks

Meeting between Badr Abdelatty, Abbas Araghchi, and Rafael Grossi in Cairo in September (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
Meeting between Badr Abdelatty, Abbas Araghchi, and Rafael Grossi in Cairo in September (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)

Egypt has stepped up regional and international efforts to break the deadlock in negotiations between the United States and Iran, as Cairo welcomed a preliminary agreement to hold a joint meeting between the two sides.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty said on Thursday it was of paramount importance for Washington and Tehran to reach a “peaceful, consensual settlement” that addresses the concerns of all parties on the basis of mutual respect and shared interests, and helps spare the region the specter of war.

The Egyptian position was conveyed over the past two days through Abdelatty's talks with Qatar’s Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Omani Foreign Minister Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, and US Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff.

According to a statement by Egypt’s Foreign Ministry on Thursday, the discussions focused on efforts to de-escalate tensions and contain rising regional strain, as well as developments related to a planned meeting between the United States and Iran in Oman.

Abdelatty welcomed the preliminary agreement to hold the meeting, describing it as a development Egypt has long sought, achieved by creating conducive conditions through sustained diplomatic engagement and a series of intensive talks over recent weeks, in line with directives from President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

He stressed the importance of overcoming any differences at this critical stage in a way that preserves regional security and serves the aspirations of the region’s peoples for stability and development.

Risks of escalation

Ali El-Hefny, former assistant foreign minister and secretary general of the Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs, said Egypt continues its efforts between Iran and the United States because it fully recognizes the risks that could result from escalation between Washington, alongside Israel, and Tehran, noting that such a scenario would have serious repercussions for the region.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Egypt has, for decades, played a role in resolving regional and international disputes through peaceful means and away from military escalation, succeeding at times and falling short at others due to the involvement of multiple overlapping parties.

According to Hefny, the Egyptian efforts reflect Cairo’s determination to prevent escalation and promote regional stability.

He added that Egypt, along with other countries, is encouraging Washington and Tehran to resume negotiations, set aside procedural disputes, and engage with substantive differences to bridge gaps and prevent a war that could escalate into a wider regional conflict beyond what anyone might imagine.

Israeli affairs expert Ahmed Fouad Anwar said Egypt has long experience and communication channels with all parties, forming the basis for the Foreign Ministry’s role, as well as several direct contacts made by Sisi on the issue.

He said this provided solid ground for sustained Egyptian efforts to advance dialogue.

Anwar said the core dispute lies in Washington’s desire to conduct negotiations under military pressure rather than focusing solely on the nuclear file, warning that such an approach threatens regional stability given the capabilities and armaments of Iran’s allies.

Diplomatic solutions

US President Donald Trump warned Tehran late last month that it would face the harshest measures if it did not return to the negotiating table over its nuclear program.

On Thursday, Abdelatty expressed hope that the US-Iran meeting would help reduce tensions and escalation in the region and advance diplomatic and political solutions, in line with President Sisi’s view that there are no military solutions to the region’s crises and challenges, and that security and stability can only be achieved through political and diplomatic tracks and by avoiding a slide into insecurity.

He said Egypt would continue its intensive talks and sincere efforts with regional partners and both the American and Iranian sides to push for diplomatic and political solutions.

Cairo agreement

Last year, Egypt brokered mediation between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency, culminating in an agreement signed in Cairo on September 9 by Iran’s foreign minister and IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi.

The deal provided for the resumption of cooperation, including renewed inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities, before Tehran announced a freeze of the agreement in November.

Hefny said there is a preliminary understanding on a meeting between US and Iranian delegations, with references to possible involvement by other parties to help ease the current crisis.

He stressed the importance of maintaining dialogue, avoiding threats of force, and giving diplomacy a chance, without procrastination or using time pressure to weaken the other side’s resolve.

Anwar said both sides are engaging in trial balloons, alternating between threats and conciliatory signals.

He noted that Trump has said Washington does not want nuclear weapons in Iran. At the same time, Tehran insists it does not seek such weapons or pose a threat to others, adding that dialogue is essential given the airspace closures and losses suffered by countries during previous confrontations.

At the end of last month, Abdelatty held talks with his Iranian, Omani, Qatari, and Turkish counterparts, as well as with Witkoff, stressing the need to pursue peaceful solutions through diplomacy and dialogue.

A different Middle East

Former assistant foreign minister Hussein Haridy said that only Washington and Tehran can ultimately resolve their dispute, noting that analyses often focus on immediate developments while US-Iran relations are long-standing.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the region is entering a Middle East different from that of the past four decades in terms of power balances, and that both the United States and Iran are aware of this reality. He said current developments reflect discussions over Iran’s role in the future Middle East as understood between Washington and Tehran.

 



Israel, Hezbollah Dash Hopes for ‘Last-Chance’ Ceasefire Deal

The Lebanese and Israeli delegations, along with US State Department representatives, attend the latest round of negotiations in Washington.(AFP)
The Lebanese and Israeli delegations, along with US State Department representatives, attend the latest round of negotiations in Washington.(AFP)
TT

Israel, Hezbollah Dash Hopes for ‘Last-Chance’ Ceasefire Deal

The Lebanese and Israeli delegations, along with US State Department representatives, attend the latest round of negotiations in Washington.(AFP)
The Lebanese and Israeli delegations, along with US State Department representatives, attend the latest round of negotiations in Washington.(AFP)

Israel and Hezbollah have dashed hopes for a “last chance” ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, with Tel Aviv insisting it will continue military operations until a demilitarized zone is established, and Hezbollah vowing to fight on, calling the deal “a road map to exterminate part of the Lebanese people and enslave the rest.”

Lebanese contacts with domestic and international players are continuing in a bid to rescue the agreement.

The effort to salvage the deal, reached between the Lebanese state and Israel during direct talks in Washington on Wednesday, appeared to show that the crisis is tied to regional developments.

Lebanese ministerial sources said Lebanon had received Hezbollah’s rejection of the agreement from its secretary-general, Naim Qassem, “pending clarity on the Iranian position.” Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who supports a comprehensive ceasefire, remained silent.

Two obstacles appeared to be undercutting the agreement. The first was the failure to secure a comprehensive ceasefire across Lebanon. The second was Israel’s demand for “freedom of movement.”

A third hurdle, Hezbollah’s demand for a clause requiring Israel to withdraw from occupied territory, was eased after the Shiite duo accepted a timetable for withdrawal, starting after the ceasefire takes effect, with the next steps to proceed “step for step.”

A “last chance” agreement

Official Lebanon sees the deal as “the last chance” for a final and comprehensive ceasefire.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said in remarks to reporters that “each party must bear responsibility if it does not respond” to the statement and its provisions, which he described as highly important for Lebanon.

Aoun said that once replies are received from the concerned domestic parties, especially Hezbollah, Lebanon’s position will be relayed to the American side so the next steps can be determined.

Aoun praised the resolve of the Lebanese negotiating team, led by Ambassador Simon Karam, saying Wednesday’s talks were extremely difficult.

Karam, he said, suspended one round of negotiations and refused to move to any other issue before a comprehensive ceasefire was settled.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio then intervened to resume the talks, which ended with Lebanon’s demand for a comprehensive ceasefire being accepted.

Aoun said he remained in contact with international and domestic parties throughout Wednesday and into the early hours of Thursday to secure the comprehensive ceasefire.

He said brotherly and friendly states had helped put pressure on Lebanon’s side, and that US President Donald Trump would be the direct guarantor of the agreement’s implementation.

The deal could take effect 24 hours after Trump is notified of approval and the necessary guarantees are provided.

Israel and Hezbollah respond

The response came quickly. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said the army would not stop firing and would remain in the occupied areas “until Hezbollah elements are first removed from the entire area south of the Litani and a demilitarized zone is established.”

He also insisted on freedom of movement, including the right to strike targets in Beirut.

Qassem, for his part, called the agreement “a road map to exterminate part of the Lebanese people and enslave the rest.”

“We are concerned only with stopping the comprehensive aggression, with a ceasefire and Israel’s withdrawal,” he said.

“The ceasefire must be comprehensive. There can be no partition between the south and the rest of Lebanon, and no freedom for the Israeli enemy to kill in Lebanon. As long as the occupation exists, the resistance continues.”

Qassem said Hezbollah had given no one a pledge not to resist or respond to aggression.

“As long as the aggression continues, we will confront it with all the power we have, and we will reach it wherever we decide and are able,” he said.

“As long as our villages are not safe, are bombed and destroyed, and our people are killed, the settlements will not be safe, and they will see our force and severity.”

He said Hezbollah rejected any link between the presence of the resistance, stopping the aggression, and Israel’s withdrawal.

“No one has the right to interfere in Lebanon’s internal affairs among the Lebanese, in organizing their political, economic, and social life, and the decisions they agree on regarding the sovereignty and protection of their country within the national security strategy they agree on,” he said.

Prime minister

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam supports the official negotiating track. Opening a cabinet session, Salam said: “The negotiating path we chose is the fastest and least costly route for Lebanon and the Lebanese, and for the south and its people.”

He said negotiation “was not the only available option, but it was the best option.”

Referring to Aoun’s statement that “the negotiations were not easy, and our delegation faced Israeli intransigence,” Salam said Lebanon’s demands were unchanged.

“What we are demanding in these negotiations is not new,” he said.

“It is what we said from day one, a full Israeli withdrawal from our land, the return of our people to their homes and villages with dignity and safety, armed with our right to our land, the support of our Arab brothers, international support, and American understanding.”

On clearing the area south of the Litani of gunmen and weapons, Salam said, “This is not a condition imposed on us by anyone. This is what Lebanon pledged to the world when it agreed to Resolution 1701 in 2006.”

On the state’s exclusive control of arms across Lebanon, he said, “We have been very late in implementing what was stipulated in the Taif Agreement, which the Lebanese signed, and what was also included in our ministerial statement. We missed the opportunity in 2000 after the Israeli withdrawal, and then after the Syrian withdrawal in 2005. We must not miss this opportunity as well, because missing it this time will have grave consequences.”

Salam urged “all parties to place the interest of Lebanon and its people above any other interest, whether foreign or factional, and to bear their responsibilities.”

“Whoever rejects or stalls will alone bear the burden of what may result from that, before history, and more importantly before the Lebanese people, who have suffered greatly and made the greatest sacrifices,” he said.


Why Lebanon, Israel Chose Beaufort Castle as Pilot Zone

Smoke rises near the Beaufort Castle, as seen from Marjayoun, southern Lebanon, May 29, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
Smoke rises near the Beaufort Castle, as seen from Marjayoun, southern Lebanon, May 29, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
TT

Why Lebanon, Israel Chose Beaufort Castle as Pilot Zone

Smoke rises near the Beaufort Castle, as seen from Marjayoun, southern Lebanon, May 29, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
Smoke rises near the Beaufort Castle, as seen from Marjayoun, southern Lebanon, May 29, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer

The ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel provides for the creation of “pilot zones” in southern Lebanon, where the Lebanese army would assume exclusive control and ensure Hezbollah fighters are not present, in return for an Israeli military withdrawal from those areas.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said Beirut had proposed that the plan begin in the towns of Zawtar al-Sharqiya and Zawtar al-Gharbiya, along with Yohmor and Beaufort Castle, “given the symbolism of this area and its proximity to the city of Nabatieh.”

The zone carries strategic weight for both sides, security sources in southern Lebanon told Asharq Al-Awsat.

For Israel, it would be a test of security for northern towns and settlements. For Lebanon, it would push the Israeli army away from the surrounding areas of Nabatieh.

Israeli forces advanced last week in the area north of the Litani River, taking control of large parts of Zawtar al-Sharqiya and Yohmor.

By Sunday, they had reached the strategic historic site of Beaufort Castle before coming under Hezbollah fire from rockets and explosive drones, according to successive statements by the group. The security sources said Israeli forces carried out demolitions in parts of Yohmor and Zawtar, but did not establish a military position in the area.

The heights are among the most important military and geopolitical points in southern Lebanon. They overlook the Litani River, towns along its eastern bank, the Nabatieh to Marjayoun road to the east, Nabatieh and its suburbs to the west, and towns on both sides of Wadi al-Hujeir to the south.

For Israel, the elevated area forms a key security depth because it overlooks occupied areas in southern Lebanon and northern towns. It lies just 4 kilometers from the settlement of Metula.

Beaufort Castle has long been a focal point of fighting since the 1982 invasion. From the west, it overlooks the area between the Litani and Zahrani rivers and is the highest hill in that sector.

That position gives its holder a major military advantage. From Beaufort Castle and Yohmor, it is possible to overlook Taybeh, Deir Seryan, and Qantara, where the Israeli army is now deployed.

For that reason, “it cannot leave it outside its control, or without security arrangements, if it wants to remain in the area where it is stationed.”

For Lebanon, an Israeli withdrawal from the high ground is a priority for allowing residents to return to Nabatieh and its surroundings. The area overlooks territory to its west as far as the sea, meaning that an Israeli military presence there would leave nearby towns, as well as Nabatieh, exposed to strikes.

The city lies between 3 and 5 kilometers from Beaufort Castle, Yohmor, and Zawtar.

Sources in southern Lebanon say an agreement on the pilot zone would mean the area is demilitarized and falls under the control of the Lebanese army alone.

If the plan succeeds, it could gradually expand to other areas, including zones north of the yellow line in Majdal Zoun and Zebqine in the western sector, towns overlooking Wadi al-Slouqi in the central sector, or those overlooking Wadi al-Hujeir in the eastern sector.


Hezbollah Rejects Latest Ceasefire Agreement as Israeli Strikes Kill 4 in Lebanon

Destroyed buildings resulting from Israeli shelling on Beirut's Southern Suburb, where a Hezbollah flag is raised (EPA)
Destroyed buildings resulting from Israeli shelling on Beirut's Southern Suburb, where a Hezbollah flag is raised (EPA)
TT

Hezbollah Rejects Latest Ceasefire Agreement as Israeli Strikes Kill 4 in Lebanon

Destroyed buildings resulting from Israeli shelling on Beirut's Southern Suburb, where a Hezbollah flag is raised (EPA)
Destroyed buildings resulting from Israeli shelling on Beirut's Southern Suburb, where a Hezbollah flag is raised (EPA)

Hezbollah on Thursday rejected the latest ceasefire agreement reached between Israel and the Lebanese government, and the militant group demanded a complete Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon as continued fighting there hampered moves to end the Iran war.

The Hezbollah announcement came as Israeli strikes killed at least four people, according to local authorities, and a UN peacekeeper was killed in the crossfire.

Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem, in a written statement read on TV, called the negotiations “absurd, humiliating, and insulting.” He said the agreement’s demand that Hezbollah fighters leave southern Lebanon under fire would mean “surrender, defeat and achieving the enemy’s goals.”

“What we are concerned about is an end to the aggression, ceasefire and Israel’s withdrawal,” he said, underscoring that Hezbollah had not made any commitment to stop fighting. “So long as our villages are not safe and are being bombed and destroyed and our people are killed," he said, northern Israel “will not be safe.”

The fighting in Lebanon, where Israeli forces have seized large swaths of the south, threatens efforts to end the Iran war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key transit point for oil and gas. Its closure has jolted the world economy.

Iran has demanded that any lasting truce extend to Lebanon. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faces elections later this year, wants to press ahead with Israel’s offensive until Hezbollah no longer poses a threat.

US President Donald Trump, who faced a rare rebuke from Congress on Wednesday, has sought to downplay the diplomatic deadlock and the failure of declared ceasefires to end the fighting. He told reporters that in the Middle East, "a ceasefire is when you’re shooting in a more moderate manner.”

Peacekeeper killed in crossfire A Serbian peacekeeper was killed and two others were wounded when a mortar struck their location near Marjayoun, a Christian-majority town that has seen intense fighting, according to the UN mission, known as UNIFIL, and Serbia's Defense Ministry.

Israel later blamed Hezbollah for the firing that killed the UN peacekeeper, without offering evidence. Hezbollah and the UN did not immediately comment on who launched the shells, according to The AP news.

Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said a drone strike killed a motorcyclist and wounded four people in the village of Maaroub. It said airstrikes on the village of Sohmor in the Bekaa Valley, in eastern Lebanon, killed three people and wounded others. It also reported airstrikes elsewhere in the south.

There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military, which has warned people not to go into parts of southern Lebanon where it says it is striking Hezbollah facilities.

Fighting has raged despite declared ceasefires Hezbollah resumed rocket fire days after Israel and the United States launched their surprise Feb. 28 attack on Iran, which backs Hezbollah. Before then, Israel had regularly carried out strikes in Lebanon against what it said were militant targets, often killing civilians, despite an earlier truce reached in 2024.

Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, the Israeli military’s chief of staff, acknowledged Thursday that the ongoing war was straining northern Israeli towns living under the threat of Hezbollah fire. He said Israel's operations in Iran and Lebanon had “created a new security reality,” by weaking Iran and Hezbollah “to an unprecedented degree.”

After Hezbollah's rocket and drone attacks resumed, Israeli troops seized around a fifth of Lebanon, pushing further into the country's south than at any time since the end of Israel’s 1982-2000 occupation.

In the southern city of Sidon, residents reacted to Wednesday's ceasefire announcement with skepticism, saying previous agreements had failed to stop the violence.

“Every few days a ceasefire is announced, but people keep getting killed,” said Mayada Hijazi.

“It’s all talk and no action,” said Salah Nassab. “We keep going back to our homes, and then we get displaced again, back and forth. We’re very tired."

More than 3,500 people have been killed in Lebanon, and over 1.2 million have been displaced. The fighting has killed 27 Israeli soldiers and three civilians.

The ceasefire came from ongoing Israeli-Lebanese talks The latest declared ceasefire came about through US-brokered talks between Israel and Lebanon's government, which accuses Hezbollah of dragging the country into war and had made efforts to disarm it before the latest hostilities.

The ceasefire agreement calls for Lebanon's armed forces to take control of security zones in Lebanon from which the militants would be banned.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Thursday called the new agreement "the last chance to enter a final and comprehensive ceasefire.” He said Lebanon was ready to implement Wednesday's deal once he receives responses from relevant factions in Lebanon, including Hezbollah. The United States — and Trump himself — would determine how and when the deal is implemented, Aoun told journalists on Thursday.

The agreement terms Hezbollah “an enemy" of Israel, the US and Lebanon and calls for dismantling it. The government has promised to do so in the past but does not have the capabilities to disarm Hezbollah by force.

The latest agreement did not say when Israel would withdraw from southern Lebanon but said the US would support the Lebanese army as it works to assert control in areas where Hezbollah has long wielded power.