Hamas Bid to Join Gaza Administration Faces Rejection

People fill water tanks from a mobile tanker in the Maghazi refugee camp in central Gaza (AFP)
People fill water tanks from a mobile tanker in the Maghazi refugee camp in central Gaza (AFP)
TT

Hamas Bid to Join Gaza Administration Faces Rejection

People fill water tanks from a mobile tanker in the Maghazi refugee camp in central Gaza (AFP)
People fill water tanks from a mobile tanker in the Maghazi refugee camp in central Gaza (AFP)

Hamas has repeatedly declared its readiness to hand over authority to the Gaza Administration Committee immediately. However, the transfer has yet to materialize, with Israel still barring the body from entering the enclave.

A Palestinian source close to the committee told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hamas is trying to integrate its members, particularly police personnel, into the body, a move the committee has rejected.

The source said Hamas’s insistence on maintaining a presence in the “day after” the war was further underscored by an informed Egyptian source, who told Asharq Al-Awsat that the group’s public rhetoric does not reflect reality.

Hamas, the Egyptian source said, is seeking to ensure the integration of thousands of its members and secure their salaries, a step opposed not only by the committee but also clearly rejected by Israel and the US.

The Egyptian source added that Israel is adopting a similar approach, delaying the committee’s entry to assume its duties, while mediators, particularly Cairo, are working to ensure the committee operates independently as agreed.

Asharq Al-Awsat sought comment from Hamas but received no response. The group has repeatedly said in recent weeks in official statements that it is ready to hand over its responsibilities to the Gaza Administration Committee.

On Jan. 17, the High Representative of the Gaza Board of Peace, Nikolay Mladenov, said that the committee will work with mediators and all parties to create the conditions that enable the Palestinian technocratic committee to assume its responsibilities.

On Jan. 29, The Times of Israel reported that “Israel assesses that Hamas will formally transfer Gaza’s administration to a new Palestinian technocratic committee, but will effectively remain in control on the ground in the near term, with tens of thousands of gunmen, security apparatuses and key employees remaining.”

Tarek Fahmy, a professor of political science and specialist in Palestinian and Israeli affairs, said Hamas was seeking to buy time and execute a distraction plan by presenting public statements that differ from its actual objectives. This move threatens the “Gaza agreement,” which he said is also jeopardized by Israel’s refusal to allow the committee into the enclave.

Palestinian political analyst Abdel Mahdi Motawea said Hamas aims to control Gaza from within, applying what he described as the formula of “we left the government” while not relinquishing power in practice.

He pointed to the group’s cadres embedded in health, education, and police institutions, adding that the committee’s efforts to reach agreements with private security companies underscored that trajectory.

He warned of concerns that Hamas may seek to retain light weapons under any disarmament deal, in addition to integrating its members into the police, arguing that such a scenario could allow the group to repeat what it did during the 2005 takeover through its armed elements’ control of the enclave.

The potential rejection of integrating Hamas members coincides with US moves to deploy an international stabilization force and disarm Hamas, an announcement expected at the first meeting of the Board of Peace on Feb. 19, alongside support for reconstruction plans, two senior US officials told Reuters on Friday.

The meeting’s agenda includes detailed reports on the work of the newly formed National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, established to manage the enclave’s day-to-day civil affairs in place of Hamas. The committee held its first meeting in January and announced its formation.

Fahmy said Washington is likely to push for the deployment of stabilization forces to support the committee’s work and grant them authority to disarm Hamas if the group continues to stall. He added that Israel could also be given the right to conduct expanded operations in this regard.

The matter will become clearer after the Board of Peace meeting and its outcomes, he said, amid US President Donald Trump’s priorities this month related to the Iran file.

Motawea said Trump and Israel are likely to press ahead with plans to reshape Gaza’s identity through reconstruction initiatives, leaving no room for Hamas in any form. Any suggestion otherwise on the ground, he said, threatens the Gaza agreement and risks derailing it.

Hamas, he added, is playing for time, betting on Israeli elections that could bring change and allow it to remain, as well as on the duration of the US president’s term.

“This is pure illusion on their part,” he said. “It will not be accepted by the US or Israel, and we will return to war once again.”



Israel Steps up Pressure with Displacement, Strikes after Aoun Rejects Netanyahu Meeting

Rescue personnel clear rubble from buildings destroyed in the Lebanese town of Habboush, following Israeli strikes, Nabatieh Governorate, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
Rescue personnel clear rubble from buildings destroyed in the Lebanese town of Habboush, following Israeli strikes, Nabatieh Governorate, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
TT

Israel Steps up Pressure with Displacement, Strikes after Aoun Rejects Netanyahu Meeting

Rescue personnel clear rubble from buildings destroyed in the Lebanese town of Habboush, following Israeli strikes, Nabatieh Governorate, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
Rescue personnel clear rubble from buildings destroyed in the Lebanese town of Habboush, following Israeli strikes, Nabatieh Governorate, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer

Israel has intensified pressure on Lebanon by expanding evacuation warnings and resuming deep airstrikes, now covering most towns in the Nabatieh and Tyre districts and effectively isolating the city of Nabatieh from its surroundings. The escalation follows the failure of efforts to arrange a meeting in Washington between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu under US auspices.

Lebanese ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that “it is far too early” for such a meeting, stressing that the priority now is to end the war, secure an Israeli withdrawal from occupied Lebanese territory, allow displaced residents to return to their areas, and begin reconstruction.

In Beirut, the Israeli escalation is seen as additional pressure on the Lebanese state and Hezbollah amid a stalled political track. The Israeli army issued new evacuation warnings for nine towns in the Nabatieh district, adding to dozens of villages and towns previously warned starting last Sunday, prompting tens of thousands of residents to flee once again.

The new warning includes Qaquaiyat al-Jisr, Adshit al-Shaqif, Jibsheet, Aba, Kfarjouz, Harouf, Doueir, Deir al-Zahrani, and Habboush. This effectively restricts access to the city of Nabatieh, north of the Litani River, from all directions, leaving it isolated.

The Israeli army called on residents to immediately evacuate their homes and move at least 1,000 meters away to open areas, warning that “anyone near Hezbollah elements, facilities, or combat assets is putting their life at risk.”

Airstrikes

Within hours of the warning, airstrikes began targeting the affected villages. The state-run National News Agency reported that Israeli warplanes struck the old Husseiniya in the town of Doueir in Nabatieh district, completely destroying it.

Nearby, a condolence hall, additional halls and ground-level rooms, and a headquarters of the Islamic Risala Scout Association were also destroyed. Graves and a martyrs’ cemetery were heavily damaged, along with several parked vehicles.

Israeli warplanes also struck Qaquaiyat al-Jisr, Safad al-Battikh, the outskirts of Braachit, Shaqra, al-Shihabiya, Zawtar al-Sharqiya, Kounine, Adshit, Majdal Zoun, al-Shaitiya, al-Samaaiya, the area between Kafra and Yater, and the Shoukin–Nabatieh road, with reports of casualties. Meanwhile, Majdal Selm and Qabrikha came under artillery fire.

Strikes were also carried out near the vocational institute building in Nabatieh and near al-Quds roundabout in the city. A vehicle on the Kfar Dajjal–Nabatieh road was targeted, resulting in two deaths. Three residents from Shoukin, one from Meifdoun, and two Syrians were also killed in air raids on Shoukin in Nabatieh district.

Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted the southern Lebanese village of Mayfadoun in the Nabatieh district on May 2, 2026. (Photo by AFP)

Shelling and drone attacks

Yahmar al-Shaqif was subjected to Israeli phosphorus shelling accompanied by heavy machine-gun fire near the Litani River toward the town of Taybeh. Artillery shelling also targeted Zawtar al-Sharqiya, Zawtar al-Gharbiya, Meifdoun, al-Mansouri, Majdal Zoun, Touline, and Qabrikha. An airstrike on a house in the town of al-Luweizeh in the Iqlim al-Tuffah area killed three people.

In the western sector, Israeli forces fired heavy machine guns toward the outskirts of Ramieh and Qawzah. An Israeli loitering drone targeted a motorcycle at the Deir Qanoun Ras al-Ain junction south of Tyre, killing one person and wounding another who was taken to hospitals in Tyre.

Another drone strike targeted a motorcycle on the al-Shaitiya road in Tyre district, seriously injuring the rider. Drones were also reported flying over villages in al-Zahrani.

The cumulative death toll in Lebanon since March 2 has reached 2,659 killed and 8,183 wounded, according to the Emergency Operations Center at the Ministry of Public Health.

Hezbollah

Hezbollah, for its part, continued launching suicide drones targeting Israeli soldiers and armored vehicles inside occupied Lebanese territory. In a statement, the group said its fighters targeted a gathering of Israeli forces in the town of al-Bayada with a loitering munition.

The Israeli army said its air force intercepted a rocket fired toward its forces in southern Lebanon on Saturday afternoon.

It added that Hezbollah launched rockets and explosive drones in several other incidents on Saturday, which fell near areas where Israeli forces are operating in southern Lebanon, without causing casualties.


Oil Tanker Hijacked off Yemen, Diverted Towards Somalia

Oil tanker (file photo – Reuters)
Oil tanker (file photo – Reuters)
TT

Oil Tanker Hijacked off Yemen, Diverted Towards Somalia

Oil tanker (file photo – Reuters)
Oil tanker (file photo – Reuters)

An oil tanker was hijacked on Saturday off the coast of Yemen in the Gulf of Aden and taken toward Somalia, the Yemeni coast guard said.

According to the agency, the tanker EUREKA was seized off Shabwa province by unknown individuals who "boarded, took control of it, then steered it... in the direction of the Somali coast".

It also said that the tanker has been located, and efforts are under way to track it and take the necessary measures in an attempt to recover it and ensure the safety of its crew, whose number and nationalities were not specified.


Lebanese Divisions over Approach to US Pressure for Aoun–Netanyahu Meeting

A poster depicting the portrait of Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun that reads "The decision-maker, the protector of Lebanon, Lebanon first...The State always. We are with you" hangs at the entrance of a tunnel on a street in Beirut (Photo by Joseph EID / AFP)
A poster depicting the portrait of Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun that reads "The decision-maker, the protector of Lebanon, Lebanon first...The State always. We are with you" hangs at the entrance of a tunnel on a street in Beirut (Photo by Joseph EID / AFP)
TT

Lebanese Divisions over Approach to US Pressure for Aoun–Netanyahu Meeting

A poster depicting the portrait of Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun that reads "The decision-maker, the protector of Lebanon, Lebanon first...The State always. We are with you" hangs at the entrance of a tunnel on a street in Beirut (Photo by Joseph EID / AFP)
A poster depicting the portrait of Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun that reads "The decision-maker, the protector of Lebanon, Lebanon first...The State always. We are with you" hangs at the entrance of a tunnel on a street in Beirut (Photo by Joseph EID / AFP)

Lebanese political forces are split between those supporting direct negotiations with Israel to end the ongoing war in the south and those opposing them, placing the Lebanese president in a difficult position amid internal divisions that could affect the course of the state. There are warnings that pursuing any option without consensus could have repercussions for unity and internal stability.

In a statement notable for both its timing and content, the US Embassy in Beirut on Thursday called for direct engagement between Lebanon and Israel, saying a direct meeting between Aoun and Netanyahu, mediated by the US president, could give Lebanon an opportunity to obtain tangible guarantees regarding full sovereignty, territorial integrity, secure borders, humanitarian support and reconstruction, and the full restoration of the Lebanese state’s authority over every inch of its territory, guaranteed by the United States.

Hezbollah–Amal alliance

It was not surprising that the “Shiite duo” (Hezbollah and the Amal Movement) fully opposes such a meeting, viewing it as contrary to the path of direct negotiations underway between Lebanon and Israel.

Sources close to the two parties told Asharq Al-Awsat: “There is absolutely no support for this meeting, and a scene like this cannot be accepted. It is true that US pressure is very clear, but there is also Lebanon’s interest and the position of Arab states, which advised the president not to move toward such a meeting and instead to seek, through negotiations, a security arrangement similar to the 1949 armistice agreement, even if with some amendments.”

The sources added that “President Aoun is caught between US pressure on one hand and Arab pressure on the other, and must decide where Lebanon’s interest lies and define its position, role, and future in the region.”

A woman walks past a billboard supporting Lebanese President Joseph Aoun - EPA/WAEL HAMZEH

Progressive Socialist Party

The position of the Progressive Socialist Party, expressed by MP Dr. Bilal Abdallah, is not far from that of the “duo.” Abdallah considers that “the meeting is premature, and there are many stages that must be completed before it can take place, most notably consolidating the ceasefire, halting attacks, Israeli withdrawal, and reaching a security agreement based on international agreements (a revised armistice agreement), after which each step can be addressed in due course.”

He stressed the need to respect “the Arab and international ceiling and avoid preempting developments or skipping stages, as the repercussions would be negative for national interest and internal unity.”

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks with Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi on the day of a summit of the European Union and regional partners' leaders in Nicosia (Lefkosia), Cyprus, April 24, 2026. REUTERS/Yves Herman

Lebanese Forces and Kataeb position

By contrast, the Lebanese Forces and Kataeb parties take a different approach. MP Ghada Ayoub of the “Strong Republic” bloc (Lebanese Forces) said her party supports “the negotiating initiative undertaken by Aoun, which falls within the core powers of the president,” leaving it to him to assess its course, including the timing of any meeting or even a potential handshake with Benjamin Netanyahu, whether it should take place now or come as the culmination of negotiations.

She told Asharq Al-Awsat: “We support the president in what he sees as appropriate to save Lebanon and extricate it from this predicament, which has imposed a heavy cost as a result of Hezbollah’s decision to draw Israel into Lebanon. Today it realizes it is unable to remove it, and that the only party capable of doing so is the United States. We saw how President Donald Trump was able to impose a ceasefire on Benjamin Netanyahu despite his team’s insistence on continuing the war.”

Ayoub stressed that “any negotiating track will be tied to clear conditions where the US position intersects with that of the Lebanese government, foremost among them disarmament, preventing Lebanese territory from being used as a launchpad for military operations against Israel, and banning the party’s security and military activities.”

Sources in the Kataeb Party, while confirming significant US pressure to arrange an Aoun–Netanyahu meeting, said such a step requires “historic courage,” adding that “what matters in the end is the outcome, which should be a roadmap for peace.”