Death of Iraqi ‘Oil King’ Exposes ‘Jurf al-Sakhar Empire’

A photo released by the Popular Mobilization Forces showing its fighters in the town of Jurf al-Sakhar, south of Baghdad, in 2014
A photo released by the Popular Mobilization Forces showing its fighters in the town of Jurf al-Sakhar, south of Baghdad, in 2014
TT

Death of Iraqi ‘Oil King’ Exposes ‘Jurf al-Sakhar Empire’

A photo released by the Popular Mobilization Forces showing its fighters in the town of Jurf al-Sakhar, south of Baghdad, in 2014
A photo released by the Popular Mobilization Forces showing its fighters in the town of Jurf al-Sakhar, south of Baghdad, in 2014

A mysterious assassination of a faction leader in Iraq has exposed details of a lucrative oil trade run by what officials and local sources describe as the “Jurf al-Sakhar empire” south of Baghdad, according to information gathered from officials and local residents.

Sources said a “major incident” led to the killing of Abu Saif, believed to be the key figure overseeing the trade in smuggled crude oil, its refining and the sale of its derivatives.

Officials, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said Abu Saif was likely targeted by a drone strike, coinciding with a broader security escalation in Iraq linked to the war on Iran.

The strike is believed to have been carried out by the United States or Israel, as military aircraft of various types were seen flying intensively over several parts of Iraq throughout the previous week.

Sources said the flights were intended to track groups and individuals already involved in the conflict.

Since Feb. 28, 2026, Iraq’s skies have turned into a crowded theater of drones, attack helicopters and missiles launched by the opposing sides in the regional confrontation: the US and Israel on one side, and Iran and its Iraqi proxies on the other.

Backbone of militia finances

Abu Saif was a shadowy operator who largely worked behind the scenes. Sources said he began as a member of the Mahdi Army, the militia once loyal to Muqtada al-Sadr, before splitting with others and joining factions whose influence has since expanded.

Over the past decade, he has become a central coordinator of specialized operations tied to oil trading, building networks of intermediaries across northern and western Iraqi provinces.

These intermediaries helped obscure his factional ties within what sources describe as Iraq’s “large shadow oil market.”

A person familiar with the parallel oil market described Abu Saif as “one of the nerves of the parallel economy of Iran-aligned groups.”

As the business expanded and the network widened, Abu Saif oversaw refining oil, selling it on the local market, and supplying Iraqi Kurdistan, eventually emerging as one of what sources called Iraq’s “oil kings.”

His network controlled several mobile refineries, known locally as “furnaces,” which produce petroleum derivatives from crude oil siphoned through illegal punctures in major pipelines.

A former oil engineer said these units are small, mobile refining systems designed for quick installation and transport.

They rely on simple distillation equipment that includes heating tanks, small distillation towers, cooling systems and storage tanks that separate gasoline, kerosene, diesel and other products.

Despite their crude design, the operations generate huge profits. But they lack safety and environmental standards, making them vulnerable to explosions and causing severe pollution. The resulting fuel is often low quality and harmful to vehicle engines, the engineer said.

The furnaces also leave behind distinct black stains that damage soil and groundwater, revealing where they have operated.

“Jurf al-Sakhar furnaces”

Security sources said such furnaces spread in areas that experienced security turmoil after 2014, where armed groups and smugglers used them to refine oil extracted from small wells or siphoned from punctured pipelines.

The account is based on remote interviews with security and local sources. Field verification remains difficult because Jurf al-Sakhar has largely been closed to journalists and researchers for years.

The town south of Baghdad became a key hub for these operations because strategic pipelines linking southern oil fields with refineries and stations in central and northern Iraq pass through it.

Jurf al-Sakhar became a major stronghold for Iraqi factions in 2014, when military operations were launched to retake the agricultural town from ISIS fighters. While Shiite factions expelled the militants, around 120,000 civilians were forced to leave.

In the years that followed, the town — once dependent on agriculture — evolved into a complex hub for military and intelligence operations run by armed factions.

According to sources, surrounding farms offered safe cover for mobile refineries, tanker fleets and specialized equipment operated by workers with oil-sector expertise.

Clients of the “oil king”

Sources described a structured network behind Abu Saif’s operations. Products refined in the furnaces were loaded onto tankers that carried no official movement permits and transported to private refineries or facilities with government operating contracts that require petroleum derivatives, such as asphalt plants.

Normally, tanker drivers must carry documents — including official permits — allowing them to pass through checkpoints between Iraqi provinces. But sources said Abu Saif had enough influence to move shipments without interference from security or government authorities.

Dozens of contractors and intermediaries formed what sources described as an army of agents working for the oil king, handling every stage of the process — from operating and relocating furnaces to distributing products to factories and refineries. Many of these intermediaries operate in northern and western Iraqi cities.

The final deal

About a month before his assassination, Abu Saif completed what sources described as his final deal.

They said the network sold about 600,000 tons of oil products, worth roughly $120 million, with nearly half going to the local market.

It remains unclear how the network collects or stores the money. But sources said the deals represent pure profit, since the crude oil is siphoned illegally from pipelines at no cost.

Iraqi authorities periodically announce the dismantling of sites used to recycle and smuggle petroleum derivatives, seizing tankers and illegal refineries across the country.

In some cases, preliminary investigations reveal small networks led by oil traders, operators and complicit security or military officers.

Since 2018, oil smuggling by Iraqi militias has drawn increasing attention from US authorities, prompting Washington to sanction individuals and networks accused of involvement in the factions’ economic activities.

Among them is businessman Salim Ahmed Said, sanctioned by the US Treasury Department in 2025 for running a network of companies that sold Iranian oil as Iraqi oil using front companies and ship-to-ship transfers to conceal the shipments’ origins.

Washington also sanctioned businessman Walid Khaled Hamid al-Samarrai, accused of running a network of tankers and shipping companies used to smuggle Iranian oil and blend it with Iraqi crude before marketing it internationally.

Sources said the oil king exported large quantities of heavy derivatives, particularly black fuel oil, to regional networks that blend them with Iranian oil to facilitate exports using altered shipping documents.

The “Jurf empire”

Sources believe Abu Saif’s assassination during the war on Iran was likely linked to his involvement in military activities targeting US interests from within Jurf al-Sakhar.

Political sources said Shiite armed groups received orders from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards after the killing of Iran’s supreme leader to carry out operations aimed at damaging the US and its allies and targeting the most significant objectives.

Although Abu Saif’s main role involved oil trading and managing the furnaces hidden in Jurf al-Sakhar’s farms, his killing came after his commercial activities intersected with military assignments, which may have included launching explosive drones from the town.

The overlapping roles illustrate how Iraqi factions have built a semi-integrated empire inside Jurf al-Sakhar, combining economic and security functions.

According to sources, the enclave includes missile and drone depots, workshops to test and manufacture improvised explosives, farms, fish lakes, mobile refineries, command and intelligence centers and fortified prisons.

The area also serves as an alternative regional headquarters for units of Hezbollah and advisers from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, the sources said.

 



US Backing for Al-Zaidi Rattles Baghdad Calculations

Iraq’s prime minister-designate Ali Al-Zaidi attends a Coordination Framework meeting in Baghdad on April 27 (AP)
Iraq’s prime minister-designate Ali Al-Zaidi attends a Coordination Framework meeting in Baghdad on April 27 (AP)
TT

US Backing for Al-Zaidi Rattles Baghdad Calculations

Iraq’s prime minister-designate Ali Al-Zaidi attends a Coordination Framework meeting in Baghdad on April 27 (AP)
Iraq’s prime minister-designate Ali Al-Zaidi attends a Coordination Framework meeting in Baghdad on April 27 (AP)

The US administration went beyond its embassy’s congratulatory post in Baghdad for Iraq’s prime minister-designate, Ali Al-Zaidi, and a phone call by its envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack. It stepped up its engagement with a call from US President Donald Trump to Al-Zaidi.

Trump did not stop at the call, he then posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, congratulating Ali al-Zaidi and wishing him “success as he works to form a new Government free from terrorism that could deliver a brighter future for Iraq.”

The US president expanded on that vision, saying, “We look forward to a strong, vibrant, and highly productive new relationship between Iraq and the United States,” and calling it “the beginning of a tremendous new chapter between our Nations — Prosperity, Stability, and Success like never seen before.”

He also invited Al-Zaidi to visit Washington after his government wins a confidence vote.

The US stance appeared decisive and influential across several political forces, particularly within the Shi’ite camp.

Some leaders had been waiting for a signal from Trump rejecting Al-Zaidi’s nomination, which would have returned the process to the Coordination Framework, after it seemed to have temporarily slipped from its grasp with the nomination of an economic figure facing questions tied to previous US restrictions on his bank’s dollar transactions.

The US move unsettled armed factions, especially after three of their leaders were designated on terrorism lists, with financial rewards offered for information about them. Among those was a senior figure in the Coordination Framework who disappeared from view during recent meetings, along with leaders of other factions.

At the same time, additional complications emerged over the positions of political forces and figures previously considered for the premiership, amid talk of an undeclared US veto on some names, alongside clear support for Al-Zaidi.

This reshuffled dynamics within the Shi’ite political landscape.

“The last supper”

Alongside what appeared to be strong US backing, albeit conditional on forming a government “free of terrorism,” Al-Zaidi secured broad regional and international support, placing Iraqi political forces before a new equation.

Within the Shi’ite camp, this backing removed any suggestion that Al-Zaidi’s nomination was merely a political maneuver and weakened the chances of returning to the Coordination Framework's alternative names.

Some factions, despite recognizing his experience in economic files, had hoped to politically contain him, a prospect that has become more complicated under international backing.

Kurdish and Sunni forces had been counting on imposing their terms in forming the government, particularly regarding cabinet portfolios. However, US support for Al-Zaidi reshaped the negotiating balance and weakened his rivals’ ability to deal with him under traditional rules of engagement.

Concerns also surfaced within some political circles that Al-Zaidi could emerge as a strong, internationally backed prime minister, potentially reshaping internal balances and reducing the influence of regional actors, foremost among them Iran, which has yet to announce a clear position on his nomination. This silence has raised questions within Shi’ite circles about its implications.

Domestic moves

In a related development, Al-Zaidi received a phone call from Asif Ali Zardari, who congratulated him on being tasked with forming a government.

During the call on Friday, Al-Zaidi extended a formal invitation to Zardari to visit Iraq. The two sides discussed bilateral relations and ways to strengthen them in both countries’ interests. Al-Zaidi praised Pakistan’s role in easing regional tensions, while the Pakistani president expressed readiness to accept the invitation after the government is formed.

The Coordination Framework nominated Al-Zaidi on April 26 to form the new government, and he is preparing to present his cabinet to parliament within the constitutional deadline.

In parallel, the Coordination Framework plans to establish specialized advisory bodies to support the incoming government.

Aqil al-Rudaini, spokesman for the Victory Alliance, said these bodies would cover vital sectors such as energy, investment and anti-corruption, and aim to provide advice to the prime minister.

Al-Rudaini said the success or failure of the prime minister would be the responsibility of the alliance.

He added that the number of these bodies has yet to be finalized and will be determined after the government is formed, and that they will include experts and advisers across various fields to support government performance.


Israelis No Longer See Netanyahu as Best PM Choice

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends Holocaust Remembrance Day ceremony in Jerusalem, April 14, 2026 (AP)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends Holocaust Remembrance Day ceremony in Jerusalem, April 14, 2026 (AP)
TT

Israelis No Longer See Netanyahu as Best PM Choice

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends Holocaust Remembrance Day ceremony in Jerusalem, April 14, 2026 (AP)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends Holocaust Remembrance Day ceremony in Jerusalem, April 14, 2026 (AP)

A new opinion poll shows that Israelis, for the first time since he became their leader, no longer view Benjamin Netanyahu as the most suitable figure for prime minister, with Naftali Bennett overtaking him.

The results also show Bennett is no longer the only challenger, as former general Gadi Eisenkot now outpaces both.

The findings come from a weekly poll by Maariv, conducted with Lazar Research, headed by Menachem Lazar, and Pane4ll. Respondents were asked the standard question, “Who is the most suitable political figure for the post of prime minister?”

For nearly four years, Netanyahu consistently led his rivals, even when party polling suggested his government could fall.

But in the poll published on Friday, Bennett ranked first for the first time, with 46% saying he is more suitable than Netanyahu, who scored 41%. Eisenkot also surpassed Netanyahu, with 44% compared with 42%.

When Netanyahu was excluded from the comparison, Eisenkot edged ahead, winning 33% to Bennett’s 32%, signaling growing public confidence in him.

The poll also points to a shift in the Knesset balance if elections were held now. A joint list between Bennett and Yair Lapid, announced earlier this week, would emerge as the largest party with 28 seats, ahead of Likud with 26.

A previous poll had shown the two could win 31 seats combined if they ran separately, Bennett 24 and Lapid 7, but the joint list would still be positioned to receive the mandate to form a government.

Opposition figures see the alliance as generating fresh momentum and are pressing Eisenkot to join with his party, “Yashar,” to form a bloc strong enough to defeat Netanyahu.

Eisenkot, however, is not rushing to join a lineup that would place him second to Bennett. With his popularity rising, he is waiting for further polls, and if his support continues to climb, he is expected to seek the top spot on a unified list and run as its candidate for prime minister.

The survey also shows a sharp decline for Netanyahu’s coalition, dropping from 68 seats to 50. Likud accounts for the biggest fall, sliding from 36 to 26 seats. Religious parties drop from 18 to 15, while Bezalel Smotrich’s party, currently holding 8 seats, disappears.

The only right-wing party to gain is that of Itamar Ben-Gvir, rising from 6 to 9 seats.

Jewish opposition parties would secure 60 seats, alongside 10 for Arab parties, leaving them short of forming a stable government unless they abandon their refusal to partner with Arab factions or expand their support further.

Netanyahu, however, is far from finished. He is preparing multiple strategies to counter the opposition, including efforts to reunite Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, form a new right-wing party to recover lost votes, and advance legal and administrative measures that could reduce the influence of Arab parties.

Some accuse him of preparing steps that could manipulate elections or sway outcomes using artificial intelligence.

At the same time, the opposition is reassessing its position to strengthen cohesion and avoid internal rifts. Veteran political commentator Nahum Barnea says Eisenkot is best placed to advance steadily in an election battle in a way that would be difficult for Netanyahu to undermine.

Though a former army chief of staff, Eisenkot is seen as modest, and the deaths of his son and nephew in the recent war have brought him closer to the public. Barnea notes that Eisenkot displays a quote attributed to David Ben-Gurion on his wall: “It is good for our enemies to know that Israel’s security is led by an unbreakable man.”

He projects a positive approach to regional issues. Unlike Bennett, he backs a two-state solution and the Oslo Accords. He has openly criticized the war in Iran and Lebanon, describing both fronts as failures, and his stance toward Arab parties is not marked by racism.

Barnea also recounts that “legendary pilot” Iftach Spector asked Eisenkot why he rejects forming a government with an Arab party, noting Arabs make up 20% of Israel’s population.

Eisenkot replied: “Pay attention to what I said. I said I would form a Zionist and official government. ‘Official’ includes Arabs and ultra-Orthodox Jews. Anyone joining must meet three conditions: Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, the values of the Declaration of Independence, and commitment to service, military or civilian.”


Aoun Insists on Ceasefire Before Lebanon-Israel Talks

A billboard depicting Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and sentence reading in Arabic "The decision is up to Lebanon" is seen in the predominantly Christian Ashrafieh neighborhood in Beirut, Lebanon, 01 May 2026. (EPA)
A billboard depicting Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and sentence reading in Arabic "The decision is up to Lebanon" is seen in the predominantly Christian Ashrafieh neighborhood in Beirut, Lebanon, 01 May 2026. (EPA)
TT

Aoun Insists on Ceasefire Before Lebanon-Israel Talks

A billboard depicting Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and sentence reading in Arabic "The decision is up to Lebanon" is seen in the predominantly Christian Ashrafieh neighborhood in Beirut, Lebanon, 01 May 2026. (EPA)
A billboard depicting Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and sentence reading in Arabic "The decision is up to Lebanon" is seen in the predominantly Christian Ashrafieh neighborhood in Beirut, Lebanon, 01 May 2026. (EPA)

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun is pushing to lock in a ceasefire and halt Israeli strikes on civilians before Lebanese and Israeli representatives resume bilateral talks in Washington, as Hezbollah continues to vehemently reject the negotiations.

Aoun is under pressure from both sides. The United States is urging direct engagement between Lebanon and Israel, including a meeting between Aoun and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Hezbollah, meanwhile, rejects direct talks outright.

Aoun says diplomacy is the only option to secure a ceasefire, ensure an Israeli withdrawal, and extend state control across all Lebanese territory. But he refuses any meeting with Netanyahu, after rejecting even a phone call with him as part of a US-mediated three-way contact.

Consolidating the ceasefire

Aoun’s push to cement the ceasefire was discussed with US Ambassador to Beirut Michel Issa, hours after the US Embassy said a direct meeting between Aoun and Netanyahu, "facilitated by President Trump, would give Lebanon the chance to secure concrete guarantees on full sovereignty, territorial integrity, secure borders, humanitarian and reconstruction support, and the complete restoration of Lebanese state authority over every inch of its territory -- guaranteed by the United States."

The Lebanese presidency said Aoun met Issa after returning from Washington and reviewed developments, focusing on consolidating the ceasefire and stopping attacks on civilians and civilian facilities, ahead of further Washington talks aimed at securing peace and stability along the border.

Issa reaffirmed the US’s continued support for Lebanon and its institutions. Aoun thanked Washington for its backing.

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam also met Issa to discuss consolidating the ceasefire and negotiations with Israel, the prime minister’s office said.

Sources close to the presidency told Asharq Al-Awsat that a ceasefire and a halt to attacks on civilians and civilian facilities are “the basis for completing negotiations.”

Aoun’s position on a direct meeting “is known and declared,” the sources said. “Anyone who rejected a phone call with Netanyahu will certainly reject meeting him.”

Hezbollah pressure

Alongside US pressure, Aoun faces pressure from Hezbollah, which has vowed to keep fighting Israel in the south, and is holding the state responsible for the path it is taking.

Hezbollah’s Loyalty to the Resistance parliamentary bloc said the authorities’ move toward direct negotiations is “rejected and condemned,” calling it a deviation from national principles, a violation of sovereignty, and a contradiction of the Taif Accord and national consensus.

It said it is “not concerned at all” with their outcomes.

The bloc accused Israel of daily killings of civilians and systematic destruction of border villages, calling them war crimes that will not deter people from defending the country, but instead reinforce support for the resistance- Hezbollah.

It added that such actions should push the authorities to “stop their series of free concessions.”

Geagea

The move toward direct talks with Israel has drawn support from some political forces, led by the Lebanese Forces.

MP Sethrida Geagea said Lebanon’s current phase “cannot tolerate more one-upmanship or populist rhetoric,” which she said has only led to further collapse.

She voiced full support for Aoun’s efforts to end the war through a “clear and explicit negotiating path” aimed at protecting Lebanon and re-establishing the state as the sole authority.