Iraq Pushes to Centralize War Powers Under State Control

Relatives of a soldier killed in an airstrike on Habbaniyah base carry the Iraqi flag during his funeral (AFP)
Relatives of a soldier killed in an airstrike on Habbaniyah base carry the Iraqi flag during his funeral (AFP)
TT

Iraq Pushes to Centralize War Powers Under State Control

Relatives of a soldier killed in an airstrike on Habbaniyah base carry the Iraqi flag during his funeral (AFP)
Relatives of a soldier killed in an airstrike on Habbaniyah base carry the Iraqi flag during his funeral (AFP)

Iraqi security sources reported a breakthrough in investigations into rocket and drone attacks on diplomatic and security sites, as political and legal pressure intensifies to confine decisions of war and peace to the state.

A security source familiar with the probe told Asharq Al-Awsat that authorities have begun identifying those behind the launches. The information was obtained after the arrest of three members of an armed faction, who were already subject to arrest warrants.

Security forces also detained another group suspected of involvement in attacks targeting the US embassy in Baghdad, the source said.

More arrest warrants are expected as investigators pursue others suspected of carrying out rocket and drone attacks in violation of the law.

Judicial warnings

The government has not named those responsible, but armed factions have repeatedly claimed similar operations through statements and online platforms, complicating the security landscape and weakening state control over weapons.

The developments follow a warning from Supreme Judicial Council President Faiq Zidan of “serious repercussions” from unilateral military decisions by factions and non-official entities. He said such actions violate the constitution and risk exposing Iraq to international isolation and sanctions.

Zidan said declaring a state of war requires a constitutional process, including approval by two-thirds of parliament based on a joint request from the president and prime minister.

The escalation underscores growing tension between the state and armed factions, as authorities seek to reassert institutional control amid rising domestic and international criticism over fragmented security decision-making and continued attacks on diplomatic missions.

Regional war dynamics

Officials describe the situation as indirect involvement in the region’s “geography of war,” with repeated attacks on sites linked to the US presence in Baghdad and Erbil, alongside airstrikes on military positions inside Iraq.

Since the start of the Middle East war, Iraqi factions have claimed attacks on US interests.

Iran has struck Iranian Kurdish opposition groups in northern Iraq, while sites linked to the Popular Mobilization Forces and Iran-aligned factions have been hit by airstrikes attributed to the United States and Israel.

War powers debate

Calls are growing within Iraq to reaffirm that decisions of war and peace rest solely with constitutional institutions.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said the government is “the sole authority” empowered to take such decisions, despite operating in a caretaker capacity following recent parliamentary changes.

The Foreign Ministry reiterated Baghdad’s firm rejection of any attacks targeting Gulf states, stressing solidarity with sister countries and commitment to their security and stability. It said Gulf security is inseparable from Iraq’s national security and that regional stability serves all.

Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and Jordan have condemned attacks by Iran-aligned Iraqi factions on regional countries and infrastructure, calling them violations of international law.

Energy risks

President Abdul Latif Rashid reiterated Iraq’s rejection of war, voicing deep concern over the widening conflict and calling for an immediate halt to military operations and a return to dialogue.

In a phone call with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Rashid said continued war serves no country in the region and threatens Middle East stability.

He added that Iraq, both its people and government, calls for peace and expresses solidarity with the Iranian people, praising their resilience in the face of “attacks.”

In Geneva, Iraq’s mission to the United Nations warned that expanding the conflict would deepen crises and undermine stability. Jaafar Mohammed, second secretary at Iraq’s mission, cautioned that disruptions to energy supply chains through the Strait of Hormuz could have global economic repercussions.



Palestinian Brothers Killed in Israeli Strike on Gaza

Mourners react during the funeral of Palestinians killed in an Israeli strike, according to medics, in Gaza City, March 28, 2026. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas
Mourners react during the funeral of Palestinians killed in an Israeli strike, according to medics, in Gaza City, March 28, 2026. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas
TT

Palestinian Brothers Killed in Israeli Strike on Gaza

Mourners react during the funeral of Palestinians killed in an Israeli strike, according to medics, in Gaza City, March 28, 2026. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas
Mourners react during the funeral of Palestinians killed in an Israeli strike, according to medics, in Gaza City, March 28, 2026. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas

An Israeli airstrike killed two Palestinian brothers Saturday morning in the Gaza Strip, hospital authorities said.

The strike hit the men close to the Showa roundabout in Gaza City’s Shijaiyah neighborhood, according to the Al-Ahly hospital.

The area is close to the so-called Yellow Line which separates Israeli-controlled areas across the Gaza Strip from the rest of the enclave.

Israel’s military did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Israel, Hezbollah Brace for Prolonged Fighting in South Lebanon

An Israeli soldier directs a tank near the Lebanese border (Reuters)
An Israeli soldier directs a tank near the Lebanese border (Reuters)
TT

Israel, Hezbollah Brace for Prolonged Fighting in South Lebanon

An Israeli soldier directs a tank near the Lebanese border (Reuters)
An Israeli soldier directs a tank near the Lebanese border (Reuters)

Hezbollah is preparing for a prolonged fight in south Lebanon and is insisting on an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory before any ceasefire takes effect, to avoid a repeat of the last war’s outcome, Lebanese sources following the group’s talks with officials said.

Continued Israeli troop build-ups suggest the Israeli army is also bracing for a long battle.

Information in Lebanon on fighters targeted in airstrikes, reinforced by Israeli footage of operations in combat zones, points to a shift in Hezbollah’s military approach.

The group has reduced combat units to two or three fighters to limit attrition and granted field units authority to act independently, based on battlefield conditions.

Sources said Hezbollah is preparing for a long war and will not accept any political deal that does not guarantee an Israeli withdrawal before a ceasefire begins, to prevent Israel from using any pause to destroy more homes or entrench military positions inside Lebanon.

The group is telling officials its fighters will continue to resist Israeli incursions until a full withdrawal, however long that takes. Any political agreement, the sources said, would also ensure the return of prisoners, whose numbers have risen since the war began, and allow displaced residents to return to their homes.

Talks suspended

The leaks indicate Hezbollah has raised its conditions ahead of any potential agreement, although there are currently no negotiations or exchanged messages with Israel through any international mediator, the sources said.

Israel has also raised its demands, seeking political negotiations with the Lebanese state while fighting continues and while it holds Lebanese territory.

These demands are coupled with steps by the Lebanese government to disarm Hezbollah, secure northern Israel fully and eliminate any threat, diplomatic sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The stance mirrors Israeli statements. The Israeli military said, “If the Lebanese government does not disarm Hezbollah, we will do it.”

A UN official warned of “increasingly alarming rhetoric” from Israeli authorities and the military regarding southern Lebanon, adding that what is needed is full respect for Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Advance of 10 kilometers

Israeli forces have made what is seen as a strategic advance along Lebanon’s coast, pushing nearly 10 kilometers from the border southwest of Naqoura toward Bayyada, about 12 kilometers from the coastal city of Tyre.

Local sources said progress on this axis has been relatively smooth, as Hezbollah’s defenses are positioned farther east, along the route the Israeli army would take to reach Shama and Tayr Harfa and seize the surrounding high ground.

That would allow it to overlook the valleys of Zibqin and Majdal Zoun, an area it failed to enter in the last war despite controlling Shama.

Elsewhere, Israeli forces have advanced further in Qantara, nearing the edges of Wadi al-Hujair, a strategic valley that marked Israel’s last point of control before its withdrawal from south Lebanon in 2000. Reaching it would cut Hezbollah's supply lines from the valley and the Litani River toward the interior.

In response, Hezbollah said it carried out a series of attacks targeting Israeli tanks and troop concentrations, and released images showing armored vehicles hit in Deir Siryan and Taybeh with guided missiles and drones. The group said its fighters were engaging Israeli forces at point-blank range in some areas of incursion and inside village neighborhoods.

The number of operations on Thursday reached nearly 90, announced in separate statements, the highest since the war began on Oct. 8, 2024, signaling a sharp escalation.

Israel now fully controls 11 villages across the first, second and third lines along the border.

At the same time, Israeli airstrikes hit the Zahrani area, causing casualties in Sarafand and Saksakiyeh.

Strikes also targeted Bazaliyah in the Bekaa in eastern Lebanon, as well as dozens of villages in the districts of Tyre, Nabatieh, Bint Jbeil, Marjayoun and Jezzine, in addition to attacks on Beirut’s southern suburbs.

Warnings over the humanitarian situation

On the humanitarian front, Karolina Lindholm Billing, UNHCR Representative in Lebanon, said about 150,000 people have been cut off after bridges over the Litani River were destroyed.

The situation remains deeply alarming, and there is a real risk of a humanitarian catastrophe, she said.

Marcoluigi Corsi, UNICEF Representative in Lebanon, said at a Friday press conference that displaced people in Lebanon are unable to find safe shelter even in the capital, Beirut, amid the Israeli offensive against Hezbollah.


Hamas to Seek Changes in Response to Disarmament Plan

Smoke rises from a site hit by an Israeli strike near a camp for displaced people in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza Strip last Wednesday (AP)
Smoke rises from a site hit by an Israeli strike near a camp for displaced people in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza Strip last Wednesday (AP)
TT

Hamas to Seek Changes in Response to Disarmament Plan

Smoke rises from a site hit by an Israeli strike near a camp for displaced people in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza Strip last Wednesday (AP)
Smoke rises from a site hit by an Israeli strike near a camp for displaced people in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza Strip last Wednesday (AP)

Sources in Hamas and other Palestinian factions say there’s growing pessimism over a plan presented by the high representative of the US-backed Board of Peace, Nikolay Mladenov, to the movement’s leadership, proposing the full and unconditional disarmament of the Gaza Strip.

Two Hamas sources, inside and outside Gaza, told Asharq Al-Awsat the group is leaning toward partially rejecting the plan and will push for amendments to make it more equitable for Palestinians.

They said it does not clearly bind Israel to carry out the second phase, or even complete the first.

A third Hamas source and a senior Palestinian faction figure in Gaza said internal discussions are ongoing within each faction and at a broader national level.

Despite major reservations, they said the proposal would be handled positively while safeguarding Palestinian rights.

A unified response is expected, they added, one that stops short of full approval and instead seeks clarifications, guarantees and clear changes to several provisions.

Although the plan, reported by some media outlets and confirmed by sources, refers to “step-by-step” implementation by both sides, Hamas and other factions believe it favors Israel and does not compel it to meet its obligations.

The sources said it aims to fully disarm Gaza, including light, heavy and even personal weapons that individuals wanted by Israel may retain for self-defense.

Another senior faction source said the plan seeks to reshape Gaza’s political and security landscape and dismantle the “resistance” structure, offering in return only humanitarian and administrative measures that do not preserve Palestinians’ political and national rights.

The “step-for-step” principle, the source said, is largely symbolic, requiring factions to take strategic steps including full disarmament, surrendering all powers, halting any military activity and potentially restricting political activity under various pretexts.

It would also require factions to dismantle their own tunnels in areas under their control in exchange for temporary humanitarian packages.

A Hamas source in Gaza said disarmament “in this way” is unacceptable, arguing that Israel is imposing its conditions without regard for Palestinian demands.

The source said individuals wanted by Israel and leading activists must retain at least personal weapons for self-defense, citing ongoing Israeli special forces operations and armed groups accused of carrying out assassinations.

Such a scenario, the source said, could allow Israel to carry out killings while attributing them to ordinary criminal acts.

The plan’s general principles call for completing outstanding commitments from the first phase without delay and allowing the entry of reconstruction materials, including dual-use items, into areas verified as disarmed and placed under a national committee.

Hamas sees this as linking reconstruction and access to areas in Gaza with the surrender of weapons.

Hamas sources said this contradicts a plan by US President Donald Trump presented to the group during ceasefire talks last September, noting the original proposal called for setting weapons aside under a negotiated framework, not imposing disarmament through what they described as threats.

They added that the Board of Peace plan does not require a full Israeli withdrawal; instead, it outlines a partial, phased pullback without clear benchmarks.

It also falls short of committing to genuine reconstruction, focusing mainly on temporary housing such as caravans, while allowing construction materials in unspecified quantities and without clarifying whether they would support the comprehensive rebuilding of homes and civilian infrastructure.

According to the sources, the plan allows Israel to take military action if the national committee fails to carry out its duties, to address what it describes as a “serious potential threat” in areas declared disarmed. Hamas views this as giving Israel room to justify operations similar to those it currently conducts against Palestinian factions.

Among Hamas’s objections is the Board of Peace’s insistence that no government employees affiliated with the movement serve on the committee that would administer Gaza. The issue was discussed during a recent meeting in Cairo between Hamas leaders and Mladenov and remains under further negotiation.

The plan stipulates that Hamas must cease exercising any civil or security authority in Gaza and refrain from governance, policing and administrative functions.

Hamas is seeking an arrangement under which its civil servants would be integrated after security vetting, while senior officers and others rejected by Israel would be excluded from any governing role in Gaza.

Since Hamas leaders expressed anger at Mladenov, particularly following his remarks before the UN Security Council, the movement’s media outlets have stepped up efforts to promote its position, featuring interviews with faction figures, tribal leaders, analysts and writers to rally support for its stance.